Shameless Popery

1.6K posts

Shameless Popery banner
Shameless Popery

Shameless Popery

@ShamelessPopery

Shameless Popery is a witty podcast that equips you to explain Catholicism, hosted by Catholic Answers apologist Joe Heschmeyer

Kansas City, MO, USA Katılım Nisan 2014
206 Takip Edilen9.8K Takipçiler
Shameless Popery
Shameless Popery@ShamelessPopery·
I am not working with any pro-Jewish groups to censor Catholic speech, no. I gave a talk explaining why I like Christ is King, and why it has Jewish roots and shouldn't be written off as a dog whistle. Is there some Jewish group out there making the same claim? If so, I'm unaware of it.
English
0
0
0
6
AZM
AZM@amzm599·
@ShamelessPopery @USAYep @grok @catholiccom So you just came up with, on your own, the same talking points the other pro-jewish groups are using and citing the same NCRI “report” to push anti-Christ is King messaging? So you’re not working with pro-jewish groups to produce content to censor Catholic speech?
English
0
0
0
12
John Yep 🇺🇲
What is going on at the White House? So questioning Charlie Kirk's death is now a national security threat? Can we get a clarification please on their relationship with VFT? Even @grok has concerns. BACKSTORY: Vine & Fig Tree Institute (vft.institute), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that combats antisemitism via research, polling, and tech. They analyze MAGA/America First splits, influencer trust (Fuentes, Carlson, Owens), and high Israel skepticism across groups, with notes on counter-messaging and political strategy. FULL STORY: 👇
Gabrielle Cuccia@gabbylovesusa

You may be wondering 2 things. 1) What happened to Trump? Who is he listening to? 2) Why does it feel like the internet isn’t real and engagement is fluctuating based on “particular topics” lately? I think I can help answer both questions. There is a company called Vine & Fig Tree (VFT). VFT is a pro-Israel organization with ties to the administration. Earlier this year, VFT was at the White House meeting with Sebastian Gorka. Shortly after that White House meeting, I was contacted through a third party and asked to script-write for VFT. The individual who contacted me is publicly very Christian and widely perceived as America First. I was told the script would be used to create an AI-generated video on behalf of the White House, specifically for NSC and Sebastian Gorka. They told me: “Yeah we have to do this on behalf of them [the administration] because they don’t want it to look like it’s actually coming from the WH.. you know what I mean? I mean, it worked out for them and Nick Shirley.” I was then given a Dropbox link containing research, polling data, internal comments, and strategy material compiled by VFT and the third party involved. Inside the Dropbox were 7 folders. Through those documents, I learned more about what this organization actually does. Their reports monitor major conservative and "dissident-right" accounts and frequently frame those accounts as vulnerable to, or participating in, foreign influence operations. The reports include information regarding @NickFuentes, @hodgetwins, @RealCandaceO, @TuckerCarlson, @jacksonhinklle, @IanCarrollShow, and @MarioNawfal just to name a few. They also collected polling and response data surrounding @joekent16jan19’s resignation from the administration. In another report, they argue that distrust surrounding Charlie Kirk’s assassination was mostly due to Americans falling for Russian, Iranian, and Pakistani propaganda networks. In that same Charlie Kirk report they state, "This represents an urgent national security threat... and demands a whole-of-government response on par with cyberattacks or terrorism." The internal comments attached to these reports are what stood out most. They talk about "going after" Fuentes, stating "undermining his Christian identity is probably a good Idea." They contemplate "getting" @MattWalshBlog or @michaeljknowles to publish on behalf of VFT. They suggest collaborating with NCRI, founded by Joel Finkelstein - a multi-million dollar organization that tracks "hate speech" on social media. Another internal comment weighs in on how they will advise politicians based on their data which also compiles info surrounding JD Vance's 2028 run: “There is definitely a way to use this in our favor: tell politicians that there are two wings of the party, they don’t overlap, the majority lies here, and this is where you should be if you want to get re-elected..." The documents also discuss: Burner profiles, burner ad accounts, AI-generated interview-style videos, audience personas, “troll content briefs”, engagement testing, and ideological audience segmentation. If you're wondering whether the White House is actually listening to VFT... It's worth reviewing the White House's latest 16-page Counterterrorism Strategy touted by Gorka. More to follow.

English
15
81
274
9.2K
Lizzie Marbach
Lizzie Marbach@LizzieMarbach·
Watching the stream with @JPuncut, @Acts17David, & @truthcartel816, and of course the EO guy is making the typical "the saints are alive in heaven" strawman. 🤦‍♀️ When protestants respond to praying to the saints with, "saints cannot hear you in heaven, they are dead," this is not a denial of them being alive in Christ in heaven. We ALL recognize that Christians are alive in heaven. I'll say it again: Protestants do not deny that we are alive in the afterlife. So, to respond to this rebuttal with "bUt GoD iS tHe GoD oF tHe LiViNg, NoT tHe DeAd" is a dishonest framing of the argument. It is a complete strawman. No one is arguing against this. When we say, "they are dead," we simply are speaking of their status here on earth. They are dead and gone from this earth, which is something that we all understand. Which is why Francis is no longer the pope, or why we have funerals for loved ones, or why we cry when someone dies. Death is real for christians and non-christians alike. We ALL understand the concept of death and understand that even Christians die from this earth. So please, PLEASE, stop making this strawman argument when defending the intercession of the saints. PLEASE engage with our actual positions and stop pretending that we deny eternal life in heaven.
English
105
10
86
11.9K
Shameless Popery
Shameless Popery@ShamelessPopery·
You've got non-Christians like Jake Shields and Andrew Tate using the phrase. Is it your contention that they're doing this for some other reason? Or can we acknowledge that a phrase that's neutral or good (of itself) might nevertheless be used in a derogatory and insulting way? This doesn't seem hard. People can use terms like "woman" pejoratively, but womanhood is obviously a good thing, instituted by God. We can be pro-woman and against the use of "woman" as an insult. We can likewise be pro-Christ the King and against the use of "Christ is King" as an insult, right?
English
1
0
3
118
Illinois Native🇻🇦
Illinois Native🇻🇦@Illinois_Native·
@ByzCat @ShamelessPopery @VoiceJacobCath That's the problem, Jake Shields isn't Christian and people are straw manning his actions to discourage the truth of Jesus from being spoken. We can't worry about Jewish feelings when it comes to proclaiming to truth of Jesus Christ, especially in an age of mass censorship.
English
2
0
1
146
Shameless Popery
Shameless Popery@ShamelessPopery·
@CovenantReform2 I'll try a third time. Is it your contention that the Gospel was or was not being revealed orally (and not in writing) at the time of Jesus?
English
1
0
4
67
John B. Carpenter
John B. Carpenter@CovenantReform2·
@ShamelessPopery The Lord Jesus taught Sola Scriptura in Matthew 15:6 where He judged a sacred tradition by scripture alone. That is the definition of Sola Scriptura.
English
1
0
0
68
Shameless Popery
Shameless Popery@ShamelessPopery·
@CovenantReform2 @SeanNea71990714 Judging something by Scripture doesn't prove "Scripture ALONE." Jesus judged it false by comparing it to the Torah, that doesn't mean He taught the Torah ALONE. You're begging the question.
English
1
0
4
76
John B. Carpenter
John B. Carpenter@CovenantReform2·
@ShamelessPopery @SeanNea71990714 The tradition the Lord Jesus judged by scripture alone, thus teaching Sola Scriptura, was far more sacred than the idolatrous traditions of your self-serving sect.
John B. Carpenter tweet media
English
1
0
0
65
Sean Neal
Sean Neal@SeanNea71990714·
@CovenantReform2 @ShamelessPopery "where He judged a sacred tradition"---That is a lie. The tradition that Christ condemned was not "sacred tradition" but vain human tradition. And Christ did not follow sola scriptura at all. He quoted scripture but He also used His own authority: Matt 5:22, Matt 5:28 etc.
English
2
0
0
61
Shameless Popery
Shameless Popery@ShamelessPopery·
Man, I literally asked you a question, you answered "absolutely," and then acted like I was straw manning you for taking you at your word. It's easy to claim "that's now what sola scriptura means," but show me HOW any version of sola scriptura is true while divine revelation is still being given orally.
English
1
0
1
60
John B. Carpenter
John B. Carpenter@CovenantReform2·
@ShamelessPopery That's not what Sola Scriptura means. You'd know that if you ever bothered to actually learn it. But because you're an idolater, you're not interested in the truth but in saying whatever it takes to say to cover for your idolatry. You're suppressing the truth (Romans 1:18ff).
English
1
0
0
54
Shameless Popery
Shameless Popery@ShamelessPopery·
@CovenantReform2 Again, just so I'm 100% clear that you “absolutely” believe this, it's your view that Jesus's listeners should have rejected Him for teaching new doctrine that was not in the Old Testament? You're showing perfectly how your view is incompatible with Christianity.
English
1
0
2
64
John B. Carpenter
John B. Carpenter@CovenantReform2·
@ShamelessPopery Absolutely. Jesus exemplified it. He judged a sacred tradition by scripture alone, thus proving that your self-serving sect is false. You don't understand Sola Scriptura. You idolaters always lie.
English
1
0
0
53
Shameless Popery
Shameless Popery@ShamelessPopery·
Man, did you read the replies to my earlier post? It was chock full with people making hateful comments about the Jews, and suggesting that I must secretly be a Jew for recognizing the Jewish origins of the phrase. Obviously, “Christ is King” is not an anti-Semitic phrase of itself. But you’re blind if you don’t see that a lot of people use it to mean something like “shut up, Jew” online.
English
0
0
6
152
Shameless Popery
Shameless Popery@ShamelessPopery·
There's been some confusion over my argument in this week's episode, so I'll spell it out: despite its modern reputation as being an anti-Semitic dog whistle, the phrase “Christ is King” is one that makes perfect sense within both Christian and Jewish theology. God is King, and the Messianic Son of David shares in this divine kingship. Rather than a point of disunity, this theology gives us a framework in which to make sense of Jesus's claim to Messiahship and Kingship. youtube.com/watch?v=7so8w0…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
27
12
110
10K
Shameless Popery
Shameless Popery@ShamelessPopery·
@CovenantReform2 To be clear, is your argument that during the time of Jesus, sola scriptura was true? So while Jesus is orally preaching the Gospel (“A new teaching!” as Mark 1:27 says), the people should have rejected Him in favor of the Old Testament Scriptures alone?
English
1
0
2
68
John B. Carpenter
John B. Carpenter@CovenantReform2·
@ShamelessPopery The Lord Jesus taught Sola Scriptura in Matthew 15:6 where He judged a sacred tradition by scripture alone. That is the definition of Sola Scriptura.
John B. Carpenter tweet media
English
2
0
0
107
Timothy Gordon (Rules for Retrogrades Show)
I challenge @ShamelessPopery to a 2-part debate on ✅Christian feminism (specifically his audaciously blue-pill claim that wives need not obey ordinary prudential judgments) ✅"Christ is King" (specifically his audaciously blue-pill claim that it is more Jewish than Christian) Sick of the bullshit, and the CA crew cherry-picking opponents to match favorably with
English
21
17
232
20.5K