Sharayah Colter

10.5K posts

Sharayah Colter banner
Sharayah Colter

Sharayah Colter

@SharayahColter

Founder, Colter & Co. 🇺🇸

Dallas | DC Katılım Temmuz 2011
1.8K Takip Edilen1.7K Takipçiler
Sharayah Colter retweetledi
Z. Scott Colter 🇺🇸
Z. Scott Colter 🇺🇸@ScottColter·
I am truly grateful and excited to be able to share publicly what the Lord is doing at @nebcvt. This is an exciting new chapter in the story of this school that has been in the works for several months. Please join me in praying for @DrMarkAHowell and Carmen.
Z. Scott Colter 🇺🇸 tweet mediaZ. Scott Colter 🇺🇸 tweet mediaZ. Scott Colter 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
2
1
22
2.9K
Sharayah Colter retweetledi
The Danbury Institute
The Danbury Institute@DanburyInst·
The Danbury Institute continues to believe that churches and pastors hold the critically important responsibility in training Christians in biblical worldview. Pastors, pray that God will help you show people how to apply the clear truth of Scripture to their daily lives and perspectives. The Danbury Institute stands ready to support churches in doing exactly that. Thank you, @toddstarnes, for this timely report.
toddstarnes@toddstarnes

A shocking new survey from @George_Barna shows that most American churches are not equipping Christians with a biblical worldview. That explains the moral chaos and rot in our culture. Many American churches are more focused on American Idol worship bands and roasting coffee beans than they are studying God's Word. @ACU_AZ

English
0
2
11
821
Sharayah Colter retweetledi
brad jurkovich
brad jurkovich@bradjurkovich·
Grateful to see the Supreme Court make this decision. Important on so many levels.
The Danbury Institute@DanburyInst

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court, in an 8-1 vote, holds that Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy,” violates the First Amendment and counselors' free speech rights. This is a significant victory for truth and common sense and unties the hands of Christian counselors in speaking life and truth from Scripture. Quoting from the opinion, here are a few highlights: 🔸 "The First Amendment protects the inalienable right of every individual to decide for himself 'how best to speak.' 🔸“'Viewpoint discrimination' represents an even more 'egregious form' of content regulation from which governments must nearly always 'abstain.'" 🔸"As applied to Ms. Chiles, Colorado’s law regulates the content of her speech and goes further to prescribe what views she may and may not express, discriminating on the basis of viewpoint." 🔸"History is littered with examples of governments that have sought to manipulate professional speech 'to increase state power,' 'suppress minorities,' and censor ‘unpopular ideas.’” 🔸The First Amendment stands as a bulwark against any effort to prescribe an orthodoxy of views, reflecting a belief that each American enjoys an inalienable right to speak his mind and a faith in the free marketplace of ideas as the best means for finding truth. Laws like Colorado’s, which suppress speech based on viewpoint, represent an egregious assault on both commitments." Read the opinion of the Court here: supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf…

English
0
4
6
580
Sharayah Colter retweetledi
The Danbury Institute
The Danbury Institute@DanburyInst·
Standing for Christ and for truth often comes at a significant cost. As Christians, we stand in solidarity with those who confess Christ as Lord no matter the consequences. Stand with Jaden Ivey. "For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ." - Galatians 1:10
The Danbury Institute tweet media
English
0
3
14
325
Sharayah Colter retweetledi
Z. Scott Colter 🇺🇸
Z. Scott Colter 🇺🇸@ScottColter·
Grateful for this timely and correct decision by SCOTUS in protection of free speech and religious liberty. 🇺🇸
The Danbury Institute@DanburyInst

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court, in an 8-1 vote, holds that Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy,” violates the First Amendment and counselors' free speech rights. This is a significant victory for truth and common sense and unties the hands of Christian counselors in speaking life and truth from Scripture. Quoting from the opinion, here are a few highlights: 🔸 "The First Amendment protects the inalienable right of every individual to decide for himself 'how best to speak.' 🔸“'Viewpoint discrimination' represents an even more 'egregious form' of content regulation from which governments must nearly always 'abstain.'" 🔸"As applied to Ms. Chiles, Colorado’s law regulates the content of her speech and goes further to prescribe what views she may and may not express, discriminating on the basis of viewpoint." 🔸"History is littered with examples of governments that have sought to manipulate professional speech 'to increase state power,' 'suppress minorities,' and censor ‘unpopular ideas.’” 🔸The First Amendment stands as a bulwark against any effort to prescribe an orthodoxy of views, reflecting a belief that each American enjoys an inalienable right to speak his mind and a faith in the free marketplace of ideas as the best means for finding truth. Laws like Colorado’s, which suppress speech based on viewpoint, represent an egregious assault on both commitments." Read the opinion of the Court here: supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf…

English
1
2
14
563
Sharayah Colter retweetledi
The Danbury Institute
The Danbury Institute@DanburyInst·
🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court, in an 8-1 vote, holds that Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy,” violates the First Amendment and counselors' free speech rights. This is a significant victory for truth and common sense and unties the hands of Christian counselors in speaking life and truth from Scripture. Quoting from the opinion, here are a few highlights: 🔸 "The First Amendment protects the inalienable right of every individual to decide for himself 'how best to speak.' 🔸“'Viewpoint discrimination' represents an even more 'egregious form' of content regulation from which governments must nearly always 'abstain.'" 🔸"As applied to Ms. Chiles, Colorado’s law regulates the content of her speech and goes further to prescribe what views she may and may not express, discriminating on the basis of viewpoint." 🔸"History is littered with examples of governments that have sought to manipulate professional speech 'to increase state power,' 'suppress minorities,' and censor ‘unpopular ideas.’” 🔸The First Amendment stands as a bulwark against any effort to prescribe an orthodoxy of views, reflecting a belief that each American enjoys an inalienable right to speak his mind and a faith in the free marketplace of ideas as the best means for finding truth. Laws like Colorado’s, which suppress speech based on viewpoint, represent an egregious assault on both commitments." Read the opinion of the Court here: supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf…
The Danbury Institute tweet media
English
1
6
17
1.8K
Sharayah Colter retweetledi
Seth Gruber
Seth Gruber@sgruber91·
When pro-lifers say they want to end abortion, what does that mean? Naturally, that has always meant we want to make abortion illegal. We want unborn baby humans to be given legal protection, for their right to life to be restored. Thus far, every anti-abortion advocate agrees with my 3 sentences. But what does it mean for someone to have a right to life? What does it mean to have legal protection against being murdered? I learned that answer as an elementary homeschooler. Our government was instituted to recognize and protect the RIGHT to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. So you don’t have a right to life in the legal sense, unless that government that was instituted to protect the right to life actually protects it. And how does our government protect our right to life? By prosecuting those who seek to abuse it or who actually destroy it. It’s no different than parenting really. We can declare what is right and wrong to our children. But if your 6-year old doesn’t experience consequences for punching his sister, he will learn that punching his sister is something he can continue doing and getting away with. Today in 2026, over 60% of the murdered babies are killed almost exclusively by their mother through abortion pills delivered to her mailbox. And this number is rising quickly! She takes the poison to end the life of her baby, and she delivers the corpse on the toilet and flushes that small child down our sewage system. And this is happening in very large numbers in red states with Republican supermajorities because Rhinos often acting at the behest of pro-life organizations have insisted that murdering babies in “pro-life” states should be a crime for everyone except the aborting mother. And that idea has been codified in red states who celebrate their “pro-life” bonafides. As long as we continue to pass laws in red states that declare it’s a crime to kill unborn babies but the aborting mother can kill her unborn baby by herself with legal immunity and impunity - we will never end abortion. You cannot dismantle a culture of death by legitimizing the very laws that created it. And my position - that it should be illegal for everyone to murder anyone - is not new. By the time of ratification, nearly every state had criminal legislation proscribing abortion. Twenty-three states and six territories referred to the fetus as a "child" in their anti-abortion statutes. Twenty-eight jurisdictions classified abortion as an "offense against the person." Nine ratifying states provided the same range of punishment for killing the preborn child as for killing the mother. Ten states classified abortion as manslaughter, assault with intent to murder, or murder. The Ohio legislature that ratified the Fourteenth Amendment in January 1867 passed legislation criminalizing abortion at all stages just months later — its committee declaring abortion "at any stage of existence" to be "child-murder." Senator Jacob Howard, who sponsored the Amendment, declared its purpose to "disable a state from depriving not merely a citizen of the United States, but any person, whoever he may be, of life, liberty and property without due process." Representative Thaddeus Stevens called it "a superstructure of perfect equality of every human being before the law." Justice Blackmun acknowledged in Roe v. Wade that if "personhood is established," the case for abortion "collapses, for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the [Fourteenth] Amendment." Just as the First Amendment protects speech technologies that did not exist in 1791, and the Second Amendment protects arms that did not exist in the 18th century, "person" protects every member of the human species — including those whose membership in the human family is now confirmed by modern science beyond any doubt the framers could have imagined. This isn’t about “criminalizing women” or whatever other phrases are used to dishonestly describe my position. This is about restoring full legal protection to little babies, whose metaphysical right to life currently has no political application in any state in America. The tragedy in all of this is that many pro-life organizations in various red states are actively working against people and organizations attempting to restore full legal protections to little unborn humans. These pro-life organizations fundraise on “ending abortion” and then join the ACLU and Planned Parenthood in fighting against those who are trying to codify the little baby’s right to life; by ensuring that our government that was instituted to protect the right to life will actually do so once again with the most vulnerable members of the human family! To declare that precious unborn babies have a right to life but actively oppose and work against the political realization of that right to life is either deceptive, hypocritical, cowardly, or horrifically ignorant. This is neither complicated nor controversial. It’s worth adding that my position is in line with roughly 1,900 years of Christendom going all the way back to the patristics. If their cultural milieu of child-abandonment and infanticide was not a good excuse to give parents wholesale legal immunity to kill their babies, then neither is our cultural milieu. To quote Aristotle, “statecraft is soulcraft.”
English
35
74
262
46.8K
Sharayah Colter retweetledi
Mr Pool 3.0
Mr Pool 3.0@real_EBS_·
🚨 #BREAKING: The Supreme Court just ruled parents ARE allowed to opt their children out of being indoctrinated with LGBTQ+ propaganda HUGE WIN for religious liberty! Government Schools were attempting to EXPEL CHILDREN for this.
English
542
10.4K
54.8K
851.1K
Sharayah Colter retweetledi
The Danbury Institute
The Danbury Institute@DanburyInst·
Churches full of people on fire for Christ can change America. Imagine a country where people filled with the joy and truth of the Lord and the power of the Holy Spirit lead us toward policies that respect the value of every life, the sanctity of marriage, the innocence of children, and the God-given nature of our liberties. There is no limit to what God can do in America when Christians get serious about following Him with their whole hearts. Join us in praying for a mighty move of God and revival to sweep the nation!
The Danbury Institute tweet media
English
0
4
7
127
Sharayah Colter retweetledi
The Danbury Institute
The Danbury Institute@DanburyInst·
America is an exceptional nation. Understanding the true history of her founding is critically important for helping the next generation to appreciate and steward the unique blessings of a free America and a nation built on trust in God. How are you handing down this legacy to your children and training the next generation? Share your stories and resources below and encourage other parents and grandparents who wish to do the same!
The Danbury Institute tweet media
English
0
1
3
82
Sharayah Colter retweetledi
The Danbury Institute
The Danbury Institute@DanburyInst·
🎬 In theaters this Easter! Don’t miss Sight & Sound’s second feature film, “A Great Awakening.” Catch our podcast interview with Sight & Sound President and Chief Story Officer Joshua Enck on our YouTube channel and all major podcast platforms. youtu.be/x5xSuYXnlP4
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
1
2
142
Sharayah Colter
Sharayah Colter@SharayahColter·
Enjoyed this conversation! Especially liked finding out the President of Sight & Sound began by mucking horse stalls and serving as a stage hand before working his way to President and Chief Story Officer. Great film company and great movie coming out Easter weekend! 👇
The Danbury Institute@DanburyInst

NEW Podcast Episode - ‘A Great Awakening’ on the Big Screen: An Interview with Sight & Sound President Joshua Enck Watch here: youtu.be/x5xSuYXnlP4

English
0
0
1
101
Sharayah Colter
Sharayah Colter@SharayahColter·
Any Republican that does not work wholeheartedly to pass the SAVE America Act should be ousted by voters.
English
0
0
0
32