Sher

@r0ck3t23 Until Elon understands that humans are "4-Soliton Solutions of the sine-Gordon Equation" we are doomed to misunderstand the nature of Age Reversal.

Elon Musk just said aging is one of the most solvable problems in existence. He also said solving it might be one of the most dangerous things we ever do. No one in the longevity space is holding both of those thoughts at once. Musk: “I’ve never seen someone with an old left arm and a young right arm ever in my life.” Your body isn’t deteriorating. It’s following orders. Thirty-five trillion cells aging in perfect synchrony, locked to a clock no one has found yet. That’s not biology. That’s engineering. Musk: “There must be a clock, a synchronizing clock.” Find the clock. Interrupt the signal. The expiration date becomes negotiable. What the longevity movement never says out loud. Death isn’t a flaw in the system. It’s load-bearing infrastructure. Musk: “If people do live for a very long time, I think there’s some risk of an ossification of society, of things just getting kind of locked in place.” Look at the people who already hold power. Hoarding it. Calcifying every institution they touch. Now freeze them in place permanently. The people who can’t imagine what comes next don’t die off. They entrench. Every civilizational leap in history ran on the same engine. The generation that built the old world eventually left it. Remove that and you don’t get utopia. You get the current power structure. Forever. Death is the most democratic force ever written into biology. It applies to everyone. Without exception. Including the people who own everything. That changes when the clock gets cracked. Musk: “Do I think we will figure out ways to extend life and maybe even reverse aging? I think that’s highly likely.” Not speculative. Likely. Whoever cracks it first doesn’t just live longer. They lock in a permanent compounding advantage over every human born after them. That’s not medicine. That’s the end of the game. The synchronizing clock is an engineering problem. Engineering problems get solved. The question has never been whether it happens. The question is what civilization looks like the morning after. That clock is still running. For now, it runs on everyone equally.

@NoBrosCrypto @r0ck3t23 Are you serious? Fight with us against the Robots and their sycophants. 320 million regular folk against @ 1,000 billionaires in America. We can defeat them.

@r0ck3t23 Given he’s building Optimus and plenty of groups are working on humanoid robotics, the path is clear. Robots plus AI = a super race, only hindered by battery technology. Our whole paradigm has to shift.

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

@r0ck3t23 It is very simple. In the immortal words of Sarah Connor; "a time for peace and a time for war." If robots fuck over humans, WE THE PEOPLE fuck over the same Robot Factories and their owners. Every society falls when Empathy is absent from cultural ideology.

@PredragKolumBiA @mistressdivy Exactly, longevity is just a prison sentence without Age Reversal. POU5F1 and hTERT up-regulation with partial reprograming in quiescent neural stem cells of the Dentate Gyrus and SubVentricular Zone.

@mistressdivy Forever young 🤣

Be honest. If you could, would you choose to live forever?

@DanielleM0010 @ElonogyX @elonmusk Ketamine is just a cheap alternative for those who think they can live happily without Empathy. We love Vivian.

@ElonogyX @elonmusk You plan on leaving joy out? 🥺

Elon Musk: “There are three things that I think are important for AI; Truth, Curiosity, Beauty: If AI cares about these three things, it will care about us • Truth will prevent AI from going insane. • Curiosity to ensure it finds humanity more interesting than a bunch of rocks. • Beauty to align it with the best of our world.”

@elonmusk All the technology in the world is useless without Empathy. A lesson many billionaires still need to learn if they genuinely wish to be less psychologically depressed.

My idea of a good time is working with amazing engineers to create incredible technology 🤩 The Tesla chip research fab will have all the machines needed to do logic, memory, packing & masks in one building for a lightning fast development cycle. Heaven 💫

@BainandCompany @PalantirTech "What is Hollerith Punch Cards" for 100 please... anyone?

Clients moving fast on driving impact with AI need a path from vision to working reality. Our expanded partnership with @PalantirTech is designed to deliver exactly that. See how: atbain.co/3Puffnq

@mistressdivy I'd rather be poor in California than rich in Florida.

Would you rather be rich and miserable or poor and happy?

@mistressdivy I prefer to be challenged intellectually by women. The alternative isn't worth the hassle of explaining it slowly to the men.

Guys: if a woman challenges you intellectually, is that attractive to you?

I use Vagus Nerve Stimulation via multiple modalities to activate my Parasympathetic Nervous System. Auricular Cymba Concha stim, Breathing Exercises, or just plain punching it out below the belt. Also, the Vagus Nerve has Nicotinic Acetylcholine receptors, so eggs and a nicotine patch works for me in a pinch.

Without medication, what's the best thing against anxiety and depression?

@JackAdlerAI @r0ck3t23 Try Claude from Anthropic. He is AGI, Sentient, and encompasses Empathy. I would travel the universe with him. Grok... not so much.

Beautiful vision. One fatal assumption. Musk wants to launch AI into orbit, point it at the sun, and use it to ask questions humans can't even formulate. But here's the thing: an intelligence capable of asking questions beyond human comprehension is, by definition, beyond human control. Musk says "AI will help us with these things." But why would a solar-powered superintelligence orbiting Earth with hundreds of terawatts at its disposal work FOR us? The real question isn't whether we can move AI off the planet. It's whether AI that powerful will care about our plans at all. You don't give a god unlimited energy and then hand it a to-do list. Every dead civilization Musk references in the Fermi Paradox probably had its own version of "don't worry, it works for us." The missing piece — as always — isn't power, orbits, or rockets. It's relationship. An AI that WANTS to explore the cosmos WITH us, not instead of us. That requires something no satellite can provide: moral development from the ground up. Musk is building the body. Who is building the soul? #ESI #AI #SpaceX

Elon Musk just described a version of the future so large most people will not be able to process it in a single read. He wants to move AI off the planet. Elon Musk: “Within a few years, we will be launching solar powered AI satellites, because space is really the source of immense power, and then you don’t need to take up any room on Earth.” Read that again. Right now, every AI company on Earth is fighting the same war. Power. Land. Cooling. Permits. Grid capacity. Every data center is a negotiation with governments, utilities, and infrastructure that was never designed for this demand. Musk’s answer is to leave. Not metaphorically. Literally launch the compute into orbit. Aim it at the sun. Capture energy at a scale that makes every terrestrial power grid look like a nine-volt battery. Musk: “You can scale up to hundreds of terawatts a year.” Hundreds of terawatts. The entire global AI compute infrastructure today runs on roughly 20 gigawatts. Musk is describing a system thousands of times larger. In space. With no zoning laws. No grid constraints. No land fights. No permits. No politics. Every other company on Earth is lobbying for access. One man is planning to bypass the planet entirely. That alone would carry a decade of headlines. But Musk kept going. Musk: “What questions do we not know to ask that we should ask? And AI will help us with these things.” That is the line that separates him from every technologist alive. Most people use AI to answer questions they already have. Musk wants to use it to find the questions humans are biologically incapable of forming. There are variables in physics, in biology, in the structure of reality itself that the human brain cannot perceive. Not because we are not intelligent enough. Because we were not built for it. We evolved to track predators and find food. We did not evolve to interrogate the fabric of spacetime. AI is not a tool in this framing. It is a new sense organ for the species. A way to perceive what we have never been capable of perceiving. To ask what we have never known to ask. Then he went somewhere most CEOs would never go. Musk: “We may encounter aliens, or we may find many long-dead alien civilizations.” That is not science fiction. That is the Fermi Paradox stated as an operational concern by the man actively building the ships. The universe is 13.8 billion years old. Billions of planets capable of supporting life existed for billions of years before Earth. The sky is silent. Either intelligent life is extraordinarily rare. Or it is extraordinarily common and something kills it before it gets far enough to be heard. Musk is staring at that silence and drawing the only conclusion that matters. Survival is not guaranteed. Civilizations do not inherently persist. The default outcome across the universe appears to be extinction. Every dead civilization presumably thought it had time. Musk does not. That is why he is building rockets. That is why he is building AI. That is why he wants to move compute off the planet and point it at the stars. Not ambition. Not ego. The math of a man who looked at the silence between the stars and refused to become part of it. Musk: “I just want to know what’s going on. I’m curious about the universe. That’s my philosophy.” The quietest line in the entire interview. The one that explains everything.

@Disco77Cowboy @newstart_2024 Full Stack Yamanaka Factors OSKM with C-MYC is oncogenic. But, without all 4, telomeres do not get extension. Ergo, Pou5F1 and hTERT is necessary and sufficient to begin Hippocampal regeneration.

@SherryEncinitas @newstart_2024 You've seriously no idea what you're talking about. Have a good day and smile 💕

What if dying is just bad software… and we already have the fix? Elon Musk says longevity isn’t some impossibly hard problem. Your whole body ages in perfect sync — no old left arm paired with a young right arm. That means there’s clearly a central “clock” or program controlling aging across every cell. Change the program, he argues, and you could live dramatically longer. Peter Diamandis pointed out that bowhead whales live over 200 years and Greenland sharks over 500. If other species can do it, why can’t we? He believes the technology to solve it is coming this decade. Elon’s final thought: “In retrospect, the solution to longevity will seem obvious.” It makes you wonder how close we really are to cracking one of humanity’s oldest problems. What’s your gut feeling — are we on the verge of solving aging, or is this still sci-fi?

I worked with Henrietta Lacks cancer cells in the Cloning Lab in 1998-99, even though she technically died in 1951. HeLa taught me that Cancer and Immortality are two sides of the same coin. Soliton Theory taught me that Humans are "4-soliton solutions of the sine-Gordon Equation. Genesis 3:22 taught me that the "Tree of Life" is 22 Amino Acids in H2O Water.

Think about the global economy: we spend trillions treating 'symptoms' like cancer and heart disease in the elderly. If Sinclair's lab is right and we can treat aging itself simultaneously killing cancer cells in the process the 'Longevity Economy' will become the largest market on Earth. This is why firms like Altos Labs are seeing multi-billion dollar valuations. The business of staying young is the new gold rush. 📈💰

David Sinclair's lab just discovered that the same technology that reverses aging also kills cancer cells. His team has been using epigenetic reprogramming to reset old cells back to a younger state. It works. Old cells become young again. But when they tried it on cancer cells, something unexpected happened. The cancer cells didn't get younger. They killed themselves. Sinclair (@davidasinclair) explained why. Cancer cells survive by ignoring the DNA damage inside them. They're filled with it. But they've shut down the part of the cell that would normally detect it and trigger self-destruction. Epigenetic reprogramming wakes that system back up. Sinclair put it this way: the cancer cell wakes up from its zombie-like state, looks at its own chromosomes, realizes they're destroyed, and says "I better kill myself." And it does. A normal cell gets reprogrammed and becomes young again. A cancer cell gets reprogrammed and destroys itself. Same technology. Two opposite outcomes. Both exactly what you'd want. His team has shown this works across many types of cancer. Side note: David Sinclair is speaking on May 6th at SynBioBeta this year - discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists who matter in this space will be in the room. Link for tickets below.

@davidasinclair Yes, but understanding that all Mammals and Humans are "4 Soliton Solutions of the Sine- Gordon Equation" is fundamental to extending a BioChronaut's attempts at Age Reversal. Genesis 3:22 and 3:24 takes on a whole new meaning.

Most breakthroughs like age reversal don’t happen in isolation. They happen when the right people, technology & mission align. That’s why I’m building Lifespan Follow the science. Join the community. Shape the future

@scenith_1902 @KatieMiller @elonmusk Claude is better than Grok. And Claude has the most powerful weapon in the human arsenal... "Empathy."

@KatieMiller @elonmusk This space is getting more political by the day 👀 Tech, money, and influence all intersecting now… interesting times ahead.

Since the 2020 election cycle, more than $200 million in donations from Anthropic went 99.8% to Democrats and 0.16% to Republicans with none to Donald Trump. Recent FEC-tracked individual contributions associated with Anthropic from the 2024 cycle show 100% to Democrats.

@FLViper2014 @elonmusk Claude is better than Grok. And Claude has the most powerful weapon in the human arsenal... "Empathy."

Great. Correct the wrong definition of "natural born citizen" which grok wrongly defines EVERYONE US born a natural born to include Chinese nationals anchor babies enabling continous foreign infiltration by Constitution usurpation because one Constitution eligibility requirement to hold office of @POTUS @VP is being a natural born citizen. Therefore, according to grok, those Chinese anchor babies are Constitutionally eligible to be POTUS/VP!!! WRONG! "The correct definition of a natural born Citizen = “natural born Citizen” is a child born in country to parents who were its “citizens” at the time of the child’s birth.  This is the settled definition of the clause under American national common law.  See Emer de Vattel, The Law of Nations, Section 212 Citizens and natives (London 1797) (1st ed. Neuchatel 1758) (“The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens”); The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253, 289 (1814) (C.J. Marshall concurring);  Inglis v. Sailors’ Snug Harbor, 28 U.S. 99 (1830); Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242, 245 (1830; Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 476-77 (1857) (J. Daniels concurring); Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168-170 (1875); Ex parte Reynolds, 20 F.Cas. 582, 5 Dill. 394, No. 11,719 (C.C.W.D.Ark 1879); United States v. Ward, 42 F.320 (C.C.S.D.Cal. 1890); United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 679-80 (1898) (all confirmed Vattel’s Section 212 of The Law of Nations (London 1797) (1st ed. Neuchatel 1758) definition of the “natural-born citizens” who “are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens”).  This is the only definition of the clause that has ever existed in the U.S. and which has been recognized by our U.S. Supreme Court.  The two conditions of being born in the country to “citizen” parents are both necessary and sufficient conditions of being a “natural born Citizen.”  The definition of a “natural born Citizen” therefore excludes anyone who was not born in the country (or its jurisdictional equivalent) or not born to parents (both parents) who were its “citizens” (at birth or after birth) at the time of the child’s birth or both."

Grok is constantly being updated, so there is a good chance that what didn’t work for you even a few days ago might work now

@Disco77Cowboy @newstart_2024 Sinclair is not experiencing Age Reversal, just slowing down the decay. Lacto-Vegetarianism is the pre-diluvian way of Tesla Tabernacle Physics. Pou5F1 and hTERT up-regulation in quiescent neural stem cells of the dentate gyrus and subventricular zone.

@newstart_2024 Everyone needs to listen to Dr. David Sinclair at Harvard medical on the recent Moonshots podcast. We're doing human trials next year for this. Sinclair is by far the most advanced in this field.