Sir Guuu!!

@major_minister @MlamboBrandonp Chikomba chinorovera kuwodza kunge mhungu🐍,my guy😭😭😂😂

@MlamboBrandonp Achizhakwa means bro witnessed her girl being destroyed 😂😂😂😂🙌🏽

Help our brother ,mupeiwo zano

@AMK_Mapping_ Did it succeed?

A Russian Su-35 just tried to shoot down a Ukrainian tactical aircraft launching glide-bombs at the Kupyansk area with an R-37/77 air-to-air missile.

@BMutebuka @NewsHawksLive I agree with most of what you wrote besides that Chamisa is rationing his strength for the long haul. I dont think there will be a long haul for him after that Bill passes. Your guy is simply not built for the kind of fight needed in this ring

@NewsHawksLive 1. I guarantee you that all the anti-2030 iterations you have mentioned will achieve nothing in terms of stopping Agenda 2030. 2. As everyone knows, Zimbabwe is a competitive authoritarian regime scaffolded by the military. They will be the final arbiters. The side the securocracy chooses is the one that will emerge victorious. 3. By implication, without meaning to be offensive, the reality is that the CDF & other platforms are effectively "bridesmaids" indulging in understandable but desperate political theatre based on a fundamental misdiagnosis of the Zimbabwean political crisis. 4. By default, regardless of how things might look from the outside, their role is to effectively sanitise the position taken by the securocracy. 5. If ED has succeeded in fracturing that securocracy, as is now appears, it follows that he has clinched Agenda 2030, at the very least in the short term. 6. As I have always argued, Agenda 2030 creates a false urgency. As long ago as 2021, and even before then, yourselves & yours truly extensively covered ED's smoke & mirrors strategy pursuant to Agenda 2030. 7. We have been in the throes of a vicious ZANU PF factional battle all this time. This is what it truly is. Both factions, ED's & Chiwenga's, have tried to infuse a sense of nobility to that naked power struggle through masterfully seeking to characterise it as one steeped in nationalistic, liberation struggle & constitutionalism fervour. That is a convenient, strategic & manufactured conflation. 8. The narrative cannot shift. We will not let it shift conveniently. The belated intervention cannot mask the irresponsibility, rank opportunism, short sightedness & in some instances, complicity shown in not challenging the sham election in August 2023 which affected all voters, not just pro-Chamisa ones & also witnessed constitutional vandalism on an industrial scale. 9. Zimbabwe is effectively a one-party state where virtually all opposition political activity is criminalised. Even the Generals who are coming into the open to oppose ED know this undeniable fact. That is the real crisis. 10. As certain as the Sun rises from the East & sets in the West, even if ED's 2030 madness is somehow sensationally defeated, Chiwenga & the military will quickly close ranks & ZANU PF will follow suit, without any attempt at shifting core values to embrace constitutionalism. 11. Those are the fundamentals that @nelsonchamisa has mastered. He is playing the long game. He can have weaknesses just like any mortal being, but not on diagnosing & prognosing this crisis - where his fingers are clearly on the political pulse of the nation. He refuses to be stampeded / commandeered into waging the wrong battle. 12. For some who refuse to learn the lessons from our recent upheavals, the battle / destination starts & ends with fighting & defeating Agenda 2030. 13. It is that fog which has culminated in a misleading dash to paint Chamisa as a fading & isolated political figure on the wrong side of history who is being left behind by events orbiting a parallel universe at breakneck speed. By appearing to slow his political spaceship, Chamisa is actually accelerating it, as explained further below. 14. Chamisa will eventually be vindicated. It is clear that to some on X, he appears to have lost his lustre, because they have swallowed the drivel peddled by his opponents - many of whom have never supported him anyway. 15. Many are oblivious to the fact that, he is quietly transacting his business away from the social media bubble, moored on grassroots avenue, canvassing support, reconnecting & reconstituting his ship because he knows that it's a marathon & not a sprint. 16. The vindication will come in two ways. If 2030 is defeated, the immediate aftermath will be dominated by a triumphant Chiwenga & securocracy and will be immediately followed by a deepening & uncompromising military brand of authoritarianism which will render the current manufactured & misplaced consensus a farce. Many will be rueful, just like they are about ED now, with euphoria displaced by doom & gloom. 17. If ED prevails, that would mean that Chiwenga would have been dramatically & spectacularly felled, which would also see ED consolidating his hold on ZANU PF & the state, with a dynasty or life presidency on the way. 18. Such an outcome would mean that all those that would have invested everything they have into fighting Agenda 2030 would suffer a devastating sense of deflation & immediately start running on fumes. That is where the investment that Chamisa is putting now into the grassroots will pay dividends! It will generate stamina / resilience for the long haul! Conclusion It is a strategic mistake to conclude that the fate of Zimbabwe's decades old political crisis will be decided by the current battles over Agenda 2030. I respectfully argue that, either way, the outcome will result in a temporary pause, which will then be followed by an immediate resumption of hostilities after the deceit is unearthed - in pursuit of the genuine struggle - the one that is temporarily being side lined - incorporating the pursuit of bona fide constitutionalism, not the current mirage steeped in waging ZANU PF factional battles under the misplaced guise of fighting to preserve the constitution! By the way, notwithstanding the fact that the level of danger does not diminish, is petitioning a determined & ruthless regime armed to the teeth an effective way of stopping Agenda 2030 any different from what we have seen before? I would say no, as admirable as it might seem. It's effectively the position Chamisa was in - in August 2023 - albeit worsened by the marauding hordes of infiltrators who were surrounding him. The only effective strategy to stop Agenda 2030 has to involve roping in the deep state - with no guarantee of success. Even then, if success is somehow achieved, immediate challenges would arise pertaining to whether or not they would be open to introducing genuinely transformative constitutional reforms where the right to vote would be genuinely upheld, not the ruse we are witnessing at the moment. They are unlikely to be open to such simply because they are aware that in that conflagration, the risk of losing power would increase exponentially, which is the primary reason why hitherto ED, ably supported by Chiwenga, has been violently suppressing the opposition - although Chiwenga, now a victim, conveniently & belatedly now claims to be fighting to preserve that sacred right!

@PaiatPeace @BlackTantos @freakin_snow she already knew his intentions frm the word go. Women play dump wen it suits their purposes

@BlackTantos @freakin_snow How did you come to that conclusion? Yes, she could have rejected those gifts knowing where it is heading. However, he could have left subtle hints like being intimate now and then, kissing and fondling her, maybe she would know his intentions better..

I met this guy in a flight, we connected so well. He really has money- he spent on me for almost 3 months even bought me iPhone 16, gave my kid bro a PS5 too. One day he invited to his place and he tried to touch me but I refused. This guy booked my ride around 1am and told me to leave his house . The next day he came to my house with his army brother, took the iPhone 16, some of the designer clothes and the PS5. I asked him so you were doing all these for sex and he boldly said yes.😭

@slicksli @shumbakadzi_zim 😂💪🏾akabatirira pamhasuru

@shumbakadzi_zim Zvainaka ka pamaibatirira pamhasuru, muchimushedza nezita

Lets help our sister 😭💔

@tazmus982 @JumaMwakalobo @matinyarare @TateChangambika my point too.The purpose of a limit is to limit. If the duration can be amended willy nilly,wat stops an incumbent from adding 50years to his term,as long as he has 2/3 majority in Parly

There is no way you can logically separate the number of terms and the duration of the term. Those are two sides of the same coin. If the duration of a term is undefined, then what would be the purpose of limiting the number of terms? An incumbent might as well have one term of unlimited duration. So you cannot split duration and number of terms and still make sense. It can't. Hazviite!

𝗪𝗛𝗬 𝗠𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗔 𝗟𝗔𝗪 𝗧𝗢 𝗘𝗫𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗗 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗟𝗜𝗠𝗜𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗕𝗬 𝗟𝗔𝗪? Why are you even trying to make a law to EXTEND something that is not LIMITED by law? Why require a law to extend a term from five years to seven years, if five years was not a term limit at law? If five years is not a limit, then you shouldn’t be needing a law to extend what is not limited. Just simply automatically continue for an extra two years without requiring a law to make it happen. The fact that you are making a law to extend the five years to seven, means there was a limit (in law and the constitution to be exact) that you are now trying to break with a new law to extend it. That new law and desired extension of an existing limited term emanating from the constitution, axiomatically requires the formality of a referendum.

@JumaMwakalobo @matinyarare @TateChangambika Yet the purpose of the term limit was to "limit" the duration an individual could hold in office.If the duration can be wantonly ammended,what safeguards against a dictator extending the duration to 50years or a century?🤷🏾‍♀️🤷🏾‍♀️🤷🏾‍♀️

This argument sounds logical at first glance, but it’s actually mixing up two different concepts: a limit and a defined duration. The Constitution sets five years as the length of a term not as a term-limit provision. A term-limit provision speaks to how many times someone can hold office (e.g. two terms), not how long each term lasts. So why make a law to change 5 years to 7 years? Because the 5-year period is fixed in the Constitution, and anything written in the Constitution can only be changed through a formal amendment process you can’t just “continue automatically” beyond it. That doesn’t mean it’s a protected term-limit requiring a referendum. It simply means it’s a constitutional provision that needs to be amended through Parliament, as allowed under Section 328 for non-entrenched clauses. In short: 5 years = term length (amendable through Parliament) 2 terms = term limit (protected, requires referendum if changed) Changing one is not the same as changing the other.

@Ta_wanda_M @mputailic @zimlive What is the purpose of the ZTA license?

@mputailic @zimlive Which too many boards and authorities are you talking about? ..mention them .. As far as I know, a restaurant requires a ZTA license, local authority, insurance to cover your business, and Zimra tax What else .. which one do you think is not important among these?

📸 The Mazowe Dam Restaurant came within a whisker of being shut down by Zimbabwe Tourism Authority inspectors for failing to pay the $170 annual ZTA registration fee before a customer in a Land Rover Defender parked out front saved the day by paying the amount. The ZTA continues its nationwide blitz targeting hotels, Airbnb and restaurants

@taspace_ @TinShav1 @porkterror @loiceMututuvar1 variko vasingadyike newe in particular but vachitodyika nevamwe.You can hv all the tym in the world,all the patience and determination but still fall short.As for budget,very few actually have tht kind of budget

@SirGuuu @TinShav1 @porkterror @loiceMututuvar1 You gents underestimate the power of patience and determination. Hapana asingadyike baba. Just have time, a budget and determination unorova.

ngl.link/loicemututuvar1 But Inga munoti varume muri united wani ko munodyirana vanhu sei?

@BillyBlankes @loiceMututuvar1 unenge wakutoita resort to rape nejeri kuti ubudirire

@loiceMututuvar1 Size only works kana mukadzi wake ari hure sezvazviri bbie rako. Its high unlikely though cause mafes mahure know how to pick loyal wives

@DamnGame @TrollZwitter @loiceMututuvar1 unless if u rape,chances are high you wont succeed.Life rarely has a novel storyline😅

@TrollZwitter @loiceMututuvar1 Ndinenge ndine plan yekuroora iwe wodya babe rangu best believe ill be retaliating 🤞🏾😹

@TinShav1 @porkterror @loiceMututuvar1 taura hako😂 munhu akakudyira babe rako hazvikupe a qualification yekuti wife yake yakutokudawo ende wakukwanisa kuidya

@porkterror @loiceMututuvar1 Iyi nyaya ndeye kunyeba iyi

@shanaka86 Larijani will be up in smoke alongside his leader

Khamenei is planning for his own assassination. The New York Times reports that Iran’s Supreme Leader has delegated sweeping authority to Ali Larijani, his longtime loyalist and current Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, with explicit directives for regime continuity in the event of a decapitation strike. Larijani is now reportedly overseeing key security and military affairs, running what amounts to a shadow government designed to survive the death of the man who built it. This is not succession planning. Succession planning happens over years in stable systems. This is elimination planning, and it happened in January, weeks after Trump’s inauguration and days before the military buildup began. Read what this tells you about what Tehran actually believes. Iran’s foreign minister goes on MSNBC and says a deal is forming. Iran’s state media claims Washington accepted continued enrichment. Iran’s diplomats signal flexibility through Omani mediators. And simultaneously, behind every public-facing gesture of negotiation, the Supreme Leader is quietly transferring operational authority to ensure the regime survives his killing. Governments that believe diplomacy will work do not build shadow governments. They build negotiating frameworks. The shadow government is the tell. Now understand why this matters for the strike calculus in both directions. The hawkish read: Khamenei is terrified. The preparations confirm that Iranian intelligence assesses a decapitation strike as a live probability within the current window. This validates every indicator from the C-17 surges to the personnel evacuations to Graham’s lobbying tour. The target believes it is about to be hit. The dovish read: Khamenei is insulating. By ensuring continuity, he is sending a message to Washington that killing him will not collapse the regime. Larijani is a system man, connected to every power center, capable of holding the IRGC, the clerics, and the security apparatus together through a transition. This is deterrence through resilience. Hit us and we survive. The regime persists. Your strike buys you nothing. Both reads are correct. And that is precisely the problem. The preparations simultaneously confirm that Iran believes strikes are imminent and that Iran has built a mechanism to survive them. For markets, this creates a paradox. The elimination planning validates the strike probability. But the continuity architecture reduces the strategic payoff of striking, which in turn should reduce the probability of a rational actor ordering one. But “rational actor” is doing a lot of work in that sentence. And the man making the decision just told the world he is “considering” it while his senior senator ally calls it a “historic shot” and his own advisers are publicly described as “pleading” with him not to act. Here is the detail no one is discussing. Larijani is not Mojtaba Khamenei, the Supreme Leader’s son widely expected to be the dynastic successor. The delegation bypassed the bloodline entirely and went to a political operator with institutional relationships across every faction. That choice tells you Khamenei is not planning for a graceful transition. He is planning for chaos. Mojtaba cannot hold the IRGC together under fire. Larijani might. When a dictator stops planning for legacy and starts planning for survival, the window between the present moment and the event he is preparing for is shorter than anyone outside his inner circle understands. The C-17s are flying. The P-8A is circling. The personnel are evacuated. The hawks are lobbying. The deadline is days away. And the Supreme Leader just told you, through his actions, that he believes all of it.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

@ishemukati @nicksaulop @kerinamujati u just wish they were afraid of him

@nicksaulop @kerinamujati So you mean zanu pf is not scared of Chamisa 😂😂😂

Nelson Chamisa does not exist in a vacuum. He is not a tragic hero fighting alone against tyranny. He is part of a long and ugly Zimbabwean tradition in which deception is sanitised with scripture and betrayal is baptised as peace. To understand Chamisa honestly, one must place him where he belongs, in the lineage of Abel Muzorewa, not of liberation politics. Abel Muzorewa’s role under Rhodesia was not to defeat the Smith regime, but to preserve it while pretending to oppose it. Armed with a Bible and clothed in moral language, Muzorewa redirected African anger away from armed liberation and into negotiation, prayer, and patience. He did not dismantle settler power,he stabilised it. Faith was not incidental to this project. It was the weapon. Into this morally bankrupt landscape steps Nelson Chamisa, not as a challenger, but as a protector of the same system. Chamisa’s role mirrors Muzorewa’s with disturbing precision. Where Muzorewa used the Bible to preserve the Smith regime, Chamisa uses the Bible to preserve Mnangagwa’s. The language has changed. The function has not. Chamisa has perfected the art of turning opposition into performance. He does not organise power; he performs suffering. Losses become prophecies. Defeats are reframed as divine delay. In this religious theatre, accountability dies. To question Chamisa is to lack faith. To demand results is to be impatient with God. This is not leadership. It is manipulation dressed as humility. Chamisa’s politics does not threaten Mnangagwa. It comforts him. A dangerous opposition escalates pressure, builds structures, and forces rupture. Chamisa absorbs anger, disperses it through prayer and slogans, and sends people home to wait for the next ritualised election. He transforms legitimate rage into emotional release without consequence. That is why Mnangagwa survives so easily. Chamisa guarantees that dissent remains loud but harmless. This is why Chamisa should be shamed, not pitied. He inherited a mass based, worker rooted movement forged by Morgan Tsvangirai under far harsher repression. Instead of deepening it, Chamisa hollowed it out. He replaced organisation with personality, policy with scripture, and strategy with theatrics. Repression did not destroy the opposition. Chamisa domesticated it. The most obscene aspect of Chamisa’s politics is his abuse of faith in a country bleeding from poverty. To preach “God is in it” while refusing to build material power is not hope,it is cruelty. It tells the hungry to wait, the unemployed to pray, and the dispossessed to believe harder. It sanctifies suffering while elites, both ruling and opposition, remain comfortable. Chamisa’s defenders insist he is restrained by the system. This is dishonest. He is not restrained. He is useful. Like Muzorewa, he provides moral cover. Like Muzorewa, he creates the illusion of choice. Like Muzorewa, he ensures that domination survives without needing to appear nakedly brutal. Mnangagwa’s government rehabilitates Rhodesian collaborators. Chamisa neutralises resistance. One restores the past. The other manages the present. Together, they complete the circle of betrayal. The war veterans who fought genuinely for liberation are sidelined and forgotten. Their struggle is reduced to slogans, while their enemies are rehabilitated and honoured. Meanwhile, Chamisa stands at rallies quoting scripture, pretending to oppose a system he structurally preserves. This is not opposition. It is collaboration by incompetence and deception. History will be unforgiving. Abel Muzorewa is remembered not as a liberator, but as a guardian angel of settler power. Nelson Chamisa is walking the same path.If he continues,he will not be remembered as a victim of dictatorship,but as the man who transformed resistance into religion and handed Mnangagwa the greatest gift of all,an opposition that never threatens to win. Zimbabwe does not need prophets in politics. It needs organised leaders not a charlatan in suit.

@Mudapakatip @steveyP07 @PhiriTofara mayb not worthless,but very very cheap

@steveyP07 @PhiriTofara It's not a problem that she is not a virgin anymore He can just look for another virgin and leave her alone . There's no need to make her feel worthless

nyaya dzeku roora zvadzava kutonetsa aah🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭

@maxwell_tembo @DD_Geopolitics both😅

@DD_Geopolitics Yet the Iranian leadership and military personnel will sit ducks and even go home in the evening to sleep. One begins to wonder whether they are just incompetent or outright stupid 🤔

🇮🇱✈️ The Israeli government aircraft used by Netanyahu has just left Israeli airspace. In past escalations, this step has been taken to secure political and military leadership ahead of, or during, major operations, with the PM’s aircraft doubling as a mobile command post. This is not a routine movement.

@JayDi1984 @Brian___Jethro buyer's remorse will always catch up with the guys vakaroora nzenza

@Brian___Jethro Hapana nyaya apa we've told you time and again your past matters and virginity is important to man.Just a side note to all women most men feel this way if he marries u usiri virgin and he's never had a virginity that urge will come during the marriage when he comes to his senses

🙇🏽‍♀️??

@Hosoro1 @DenzelMbara @Brian___Jethro carpet bombing😅😅

@DenzelMbara @Brian___Jethro You might be good at that time but nowadays with Shadhaya carpet bombing that issue am sure even madhara edu achembera are also starting to have bitterness if they married our grandmas vasiri mhandara. 😄

@kendrickkachepa @runya_gee for the gal marriage is just a poverty alleviation program.she wants to walk in and immediately starting reaping dividends.Avoid these type of ticks at all costs

@runya_gee You don’t need to have it all to marry. You just need someone willing to build with you. Marriage is stronger when both of you plan and hustle together. That's why some women move in with a guy ane one plate stove ne mattress isina base. Those women know vakachi master chi game

This is someone being realistic, zvekuti unotenga hupfu negas kumba kwavo doesn't make you financially stable. Her being in a worse situation than you is also another reason why ya'll getting married right now is a terrible idea.

@Elladeyforyou i am looking for a virgin,would she fit the criteria?

Tell us🤌