Eagle Reich

@d_kaiserk @Sara84916943 @Partisan_12 Kosher laws also imply the existence of jews in my country with power. That's worse than anything, tbf

@Sixfootthreeee @Sara84916943 @Partisan_12 You know that 99% of the Halal in the west is based of kosher?

“Why does israel have one of the lowest cancer death rates in the world?”

@CowboyJerry777 @kanaday_k @Sara84916943 @Partisan_12 x.com/i/status/20388…

@kanaday_k @Sixfootthreeee @Sara84916943 @Partisan_12

If you wanna know what is terrorism, this is terrorism:

In Russia, a woman notices that her cat comes every night and kneads her throat. Days later, she develops a slight swelling in her neck and, after seeing a doctor, learns that she has a thyroid issue. 🐾 When she looks into it, she comes across a fascinating idea: cats are believed to sense health problems in their owners and may focus on affected areas, using their purring vibrations to help soothe them. 🐱✨ Maybe, just maybe… they can feel what we cannot. 💫❤️

Russia has taught me any animal is pettable if you're brave enough..🥲

Anti-Semitic champion of the day: Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser

@PromiseToDJ @DigitalGermania Imagine East Asians putting up with these nigs like we do. White sentimentality can't end quick enough.

@DigitalGermania Only thing your evil culture has contributed too.

Recap it gets worse Asian men just like the whites are soulless demons 🤷🏽‍♂️

@kanaday_k @Sara84916943 @Partisan_12 And it's less about logic or evidence and right/wrong anway. It’s about the feel of right and wrong being coded by civilization itself. For Westernesr, this looks unpredictable and archaic. So the moral outrage at ritual slaughter is a projection of Western cultural instincts.

@Sixfootthreeee @Sara84916943 @Partisan_12 How does the alienness of a practice to people turn into inhumanity towards animals?The approach to animal slaughter in Islam/Judaism - instantaneity, a sharp knife, one precise movement,a ban on killing animals for fun etc. - is aimed at minimizing animal suffering

@kanaday_k @Sara84916943 @Partisan_12 The best method is the one that reliably produces immediate unconsciousness with the least chance of error; methods that are more standardized and less relied upon the expertise of the person

I think people like @mattforney are confused and maddened at people like me who believe Iran is, on balance, winning the war. And I wondered - why are they so mad about this assessment? And I realize that it's because to him this is a social-transactional game. For me, it's a prediction based on what I think is happening. The war is ongoing, so the fog is very thick still. But there are a few major pieces of evidence that the US is, by most definitions, "losing" the war (though what constitutes "winning" and "losing" is itself a topic.) 1. No regime "of note" has fallen to a conventional air campaign. I also believe that Japan didn't surrender in response to the atomic bomb drops, but that's a side-issue since there probably won't be any nukes used in this war. You can quibble around the bubble regarding "of note", but Iran is clearly a more substantial state than Lebanon or even Syria. The most meaningful comparison is Iraq, which faced a far more significant bombing campaign, and still required a large ground invasion to topple. 2. Iran is able to strike several key radar assets in the gulf, blockade from land the strait of hormuz (which suddenly we're all learning is super-duper-important) - Iraq couldn't do that. 3. The strategy appeared highly dependent upon killing the leadership and the state falling apart as a result. This has not occurred so far - even though Iran has clearly shown some schizophrenic messaging (the president stating no more strikes on the gulf states, followed by strikes on the gulf states, which indicates a lack of uniform state action). We also know that Iran has specifically been preparing for precisely this "kill the leadership" strategy, and thus created the "mosaic" defense plan. I'm not saying that Iran's war support is infinite, but it is clearly nothing like Syria, Libya or even Iraq. 4. Who's crying uncle? The US is, the rest of the world is, not Iran. Iran is refusing mediation. Obviously they have to come to terms eventually, but the Iranian leadership clearly believes they can get a better deal than what Trump is currently offering. Basically, I'm using Iraq as the touchstone: - Iraq was never able to do what Iran is currently able to do. They couldn't threaten the gulf or block the world's largest egress of petroleum and fertilizer. - Iraq was, by all good account, a more fragile regime than Iran. If Saddam were to be killed, the regime was likely to unravel - or at least this was considered a major possibility. This is clearly NOT the case with Iran. - Even as weak as Iraq was both politically and militarily, it required a massive ground invasion to ultimately remove the Saddam government. - The US is nowhere like as capable of conducting a ground invasion against Iran as they were against Iraq. The US army isn't capable of such an operation inherently as it was in 2003, the US army can't mass anywhere like they could in 2003 (in 2003, Saudi Arabia was the staging ground into Iraq; today, Iraq is hostile to the US and cannot be used as a staging ground), and Iran can strike any concentrated troop formations. Moreover, as the Ukraine war is showing, the kind of concentrated maneuver warfare possible in 2003 has been nullified by mass drones. In addition, the geography of Iran is horrific compared to flat Mesopotamia, and the Ukraine war has shown that things like rivers and mud still matter a lot. - There is NOTHING like the popular support for the Iran war as there was for the Iraq war. In 2003, there was something like ~70% support for the mass ground invasion of Iraq; right now there is, at most, ~40% support for the air and missile campaign against Iran. This attack on Iran is a bigger mistake than the invasion of Iraq in 2003 (or 1991, but that's a whole different kind of conversation). If you think I'm over-analogizing with Iraq, do tell! What's the secret sauce that makes all of these factors go away? I see two pathways to US "victory": 1. Regime collapse in Iran, which hasn't happened 2. Ground invasion Look at Hegseth and his clown show, and Trump's response to the Minab debacle. A responsible adult would say "We mistargeted in our double-tap strike of a girl's school", instead of making up a story of Iran using a tomahawk to blow up their own school. "There won't be boots on the ground" - "we've already won" - then Hegseth says "nothing can be off the table in war". Missile defense proven a meme - this whole thing is a disaster. Pointing out that the US is hitting Iran even harder is a big "so what". The talk now is around Hormuz, since Iran has blockaded it. I.e. - the conversation is about a disastrous situation which didn't exist before the war. Re-opening the straits almost certainly requires a ground invasion in that area of Iran, and controlling some distance inland to prevent some of the shorter range missiles being in range. This would weaken, but not eliminate, the blockade. Here's a prediction: Iran will get a nuke, and quickly, shortly after the war. This speed of development after however many years of claiming Iran was close to getting nukes will decisively evidence that, just as Saddam wasn't actually developing WMDs, Iran truly wasn't developing nukes. If Iran was developing nukes they'd have one by now. The Ayatollah Khomeini had a fatwah against developing nukes, that's now over. Why would people believe the US is "winning" this war decisively? Even if you think the US will ultimately prevail, the degree of certainty is just wild. I think it's a few things: 1. Flat-earth pattern completion. The US has just always curbstomped regimes in the region. The mistake is thinking Iran is just another regime. This is a view that stems from a radical ignorance of geography, history (Persia and Anatolia are the two traditional landlords of MENA), and biological race (Anatolians and Aryans are NOT Arabs). Another major problem is so many simply don't believe in biological race at all, but this doesn't make the error vanish. To think Iran (or Turkey) would crack in the same way Libya, Syria or even Iraq would stems from profound racial ignorance, and a lack of a real sense of what these states are vs. the Sykes-Picot territories. It's also possible they read about the British-Soviet invasion of Iran in WW2, but that would be giving this category of people too much credit. Someone like the metokur @MoshiMoshiMoan is mainly just this. 2. Social metaphysics. A certain class of people just hate the free-speech truth confluence, which tends to coalesce around "neo-nazi" and "anti-semitic" propositions. This is what happened to /pol, and is happening to a less total degree on twitter. It's pretty easy to tell who is who. Clown forney (even his name sounds like a joke) brings up the kinds of people who disbelieve in the certainty of US victory, and makes a point that we're bad and dumb for not flat-earth pattern matching. The metokur just did a bunch of dumb posts reflexively celebrating such an impending victory. Anyway thanks for coming to my TED Talk. It would take more effort for me to make this shorter.

@kanaday_k @Sara84916943 @Partisan_12 Humane* It doesn't reflect our cultural instinct shaped by the Western soul. Your 'sacred' practices feel foreign and alien to us in the West, and it's worse for the animal's welfare.

@Sixfootthreeee @Sara84916943 @Partisan_12 Why do you call it inhuman?🫤

According to a 2022 ISPU survey, Jewish Americans report the lowest rate among major religious groups, with just 5% saying they've ever served in the U.S. military—compared to 9% of the general public. Jews make up ~2% of the U.S. population but only 0.4–1% of service members, per DoD demographic studies. White evangelicals and Muslims report the highest rates. Data doesn't always control for age, education, or geography, but the pattern holds across sources like RAND Army reports.

White kids are either imitating blacks or feeling left out. Once blacks reach high % of classrooms, white kids, in a climate of "diversity" and "anti-racism", have no option but to imitate black mannerisms, expressions, sounds -- destroying their race.

@Sara84916943 @Partisan_12 Halal slaughter is too inhuman and backwards. Skin cancer is a consequence of )ews being maladapted to their environment in isrl.

@Partisan_12 Eating halal is better

in 41 of the 50 states discrimination on political affiliation is completely legal. That means in 41 states say you can throw zionist out of your stores, and refuse them service. It's time for discrimination to begin. This is no different than how those jewish bastards would say "we're not discriminating against Wһitе pеоpӏе, just nazis." You get your jеwish ass out of our stores. Better yet, get the fuck out of Amеrіcа.

One thing about trump is he will be playful and even mocking of Christianity and Islam. Saying Allah akbar and swearing on easter. But he is always serious about Judaism. He never mocks or does anything disrespectful about that religion. He takes Israeland Judaism seriously.

@WithoutLaws666 @TheOnlyDSC If feels great being on the ground floor of something becoming so universally adopted

@TheOnlyDSC I hope it really ends badly for every single j33t in the US.

L I T E R A L L Y W H E E Z I N G

before you ask, yes he obviously is a dual citizen, and before you ask yeah its that country

Still the greatest edit to date. Keep your grubby AIDS paws off the children.

Reminder that conservatives see the 2nd amendment as nothing more than the right to own toys and will never do anything revolutionary no matter how many guns they own.