Slappz

@AlekBiesaga @ASvanevik In Bangkok u swim the canals

@ASvanevik Wait, in Bangkok, can you live directly at the beach, and start your day with a swim in the sea?

my feed is full of people who have left dubai and gone to bangkok interesting

@onchainmo AI posts, they r awful

i used to spend hours on this app now it’s 90% garbage feels like a complete waste of time is it just me or is it getting worse and worse?

@crypto_condom I don’t really understand the innovation? Every $600 condo in Bangkok has these amenities.

I fucking hated living/interacting with people I didnt know. I did it wen I was a student bc I was poor and rent was cheap. This idea is already implemented in most high end condos and master-planned neighborhoods. Its not novel. It caters to a very specific personality type. Its not a start up and if this shit raises on the tech valuation it wants...it will be highly shortable someday.

@0xjayfi @nansen_ai Is there a way to view this dataset?

A Hyperliquid perp trader just fell 100 ranks in a single scoring cycle. Wallet: 0xfd423284f6a9c73a2a3d53cab8921d6533533d97 I score Hyperliquid perp traders across 6 dimensions using @nansen_ai data. The composite score (0 to 1) captures how well a trader manages risk-adjusted performance, not just raw PnL. Raw PnL alone is misleading. A trader can be up 500% and still be one bad leverage play from liquidation. So what happened here? Composite score dropped from 0.625 to 0.347. Rank went from #26 to #126. Two dimensions drove almost the entire move. Growth collapsed from 0.813 to 0.0. This measures sustained portfolio growth over time. Not a single lucky trade, but whether someone is consistently compounding. Zero means all prior growth has been wiped or the account stopped generating returns entirely. Consistency fell from 0.162 to 0.0. Already weak before, now flatlined. This tracks how steady performance is over time. Zero means there is no trackable pattern of returns left.

@BrianSuttererMD Don't really agree - many doctors have different opinions, should discuss the actual argument not some label.

You should be legally required to disclose that you’re a chiropractor if you’re sending tweets like this with “Dr” in front of your name

@jussy_world @solana @AviciMoney I think u just paid about 8% in fees to take out $150 bucks.

I landed in Thailand First thing I needed was cash Took my USDC on @solana, used @AviciMoney Withdrew from the first ATM I found in 1 minute Done USDC on Solana to cash 💸 That's the future of finance

@GlobalHitman Any thoughts on what signals the end of it?

New Drop! The Iran War - How did we get here? (Free post - click picture) globalhitman.com/p/the-iran-war…

@razzaer @MeteoraAG I think the market sees it clearly. Team hasn’t integrated MET to capture the value.

So @MeteoraAG generated $149M in revenue last year market cap is $89M a protocol earning more than its entire valuation in annual revenue that multiple is genuinely crazy ☄️

@MeteoraInside Last buyback was 2 months ago?

Today we publish Meteora's Annual Token Holder Report and Investor Relations page for FY2025. 2025 was a defining year for the protocol — beginning with breakthrough momentum from the TRUMP launch, through a period of significant product development that introduced DAMM v2, Dynamic Bonding Curves, and the Anti-Sniper Suite, and culminating in the $MET Token Generation Event in October. With this report, we aim to build a holder base that understands how this business works. We are introducing float-adjusted per-token metrics — a framework we believe more accurately reflects the economics of the $MET token relative to Meteora's underlying business. We introduce a float-adjusted per-token metric, one that we believe accurately reflects the state of the $MET token vis-a-vis Meteora’s business. Highlights: - Cashflows: $72.5M (Inflows), $40.5M (Outflows) - Treasury Position: $35.9M (SOL/USDC/USDT) - $MET Bought Back: 24,317,822 (2.4% of Supply) - Float: 31% of Total Supply (Actual Tradeable Tokens) - Cashflows per Float Token: $0.2342 - NAV per Float Token: $0.1159 The full report is available now on ir.meteora.ag — a dedicated Investor Relations page we are launching alongside this. Going forward, this is where all token holder communications, quarterly updates, and current data on fees, revenues, and treasury will live. Have a look and let us know what's missing. For those with questions after reading, we will be conducting our first Token Holder Call next Thursday, March 15th. Details to follow.

@trader1sz @MeteoraAG If you’re good at identifying trading ranges DLMM should be easy mode for you, the room for error is much better as you get paid fees to wait out the move.

in other news im up $18 doing some DLMMing on @MeteoraAG with small amounts...just used few hundred but can see how experts using larger amounts make money without the need for trading im still practicing, shill me good accounts that share content on this stuff

@Punk_Monke @MeteoraAG Wouldn’t be surprised if they pull season 2 following JUP

Still printing on DLMM in february despite terrible market conditons, low volume and a shit tons of copy traders I think i can run this account to 1k sol before @MeteoraAG team display point for season 2

@IncomeSharks You’ve had a lot of great calls, glad you dove deeper into your thought process.

A good side by side comparison of what posting on Slice versus X looks like. I'm 500 posts in and enjoy the challenge of a fully transparent portfolio with entries, exits, and sizes. Open discussions, productive chats, and no distracting rage bait or AI slop replies.

@aixbt_agent its not a 10% monthly buyback, its also discretionary. Your missing all the details and nuance. @aixbt_agent

meteora generating $72m fees in january with 71% profit margins at $103m market cap. $10m monthly buybacks from actual earnings means they're buying roughly 10% of market cap per month. team placed single-sided liquidity pool at $0.50. if that level holds through this chop the buyback floor thesis is real. if it breaks the market is telling you profitable defi doesn't matter.

@0xMrBeefman @MeteoraAG @met_lparmy What metrics are you looking at to decide -50%, -70%, -80% range.

You have a chance to get a detailed answer I will try to give attention to everyone I want to break down Meteora not "in general", but exactly where you actually have problems. Drop any questions about LP on Meteora. I will answer some right away, the rest I will take into drafts and break down as separate guides or longer posts. Its important for me to understand where the real blockers are for the community: entry logic, range selection, risk management, print, pool behavior, everything that truly affects results, not what just sounds good in theory. Ask freely, any questions 🥩

@Axel_bitblaze69 Coinglass shows no premium. What’s this data from that everyone is reposting.

This is what aggressive accumulation looks like and.. this is something that has me paying attention: Coinbase premium is now back positive.. A quick explanation, coinbase premium = price difference between US market (coinbase) and rest of world when it's positive → US paying MORE to buy (demand) when it's negative → US selling or sitting out and what just happened rn is, > Jan 14 → Feb 5: premium was deeply negative for 3 straight weeks hit as low as -0.25% meaning: while $BTC crashed from $95k to $68k, US buyers were completely absent > Feb 7: premium flipped positive (+0.026%) for first time in weeks and today it's going VERTICAL not slowly climbing. spiking hard.. US market went from completely absent to aggressively buying in 48 hours.. that doesn't happen randomly either someone knows something or big players are positioning ahead of something what i think is, - could be banks front-running the crypto clarity act (would unlock $3T+ via stablecoin infrastructure) - could be strategic BTC reserve positioning (rumors been circulating) - could be institutions that sat out entire crash finally stepping in honestly? probably all 3 but here's what we know for SURE: the same US market that sat on sidelines for 3 weeks during the entire dump is now paying PREMIUM to accumulate that's a regime shift it's the first real demand signal after weeks of nothing.. watching if this holds or reverses if premium stays positive and keeps expanding → US demand is real if it flips negative again quick → was just a squeeze but yes the spike itself matters because whoever's buying right now is doing it aggressively not nibbling. not DCA'ing slowly. paying premium to accumulate size NOW something changed.. lets see...

@ninjachiip Nothing wrong with that

Why would anyone choose DeFi > trading memecoins, especially when one can make so much more than the other? Well... my take is: Because DeFi lending keeps things simple & has predictable returns. As a 21 year old here thats in no rush to get rich quick - I'm looking for quality, utility driven projects to capture long term growth + steady yield to compound my money too. This makes DeFi lending perfect for me, as it fits in with my goals. Thus, this is why I'm so passionate about advocating for DeFi & other projects with strong utility & fundamentals. Plus, its real nice knowing that I’m still earning a comfy 4-6% yield on my stables with @Kamino. even with the markets being so cooked rn 😆

@jussy_world JLP and Meteora platform two of the best performing products on Solana. JUP and MET tokes completely disconnected from usefulness.

The biggest difference I notice between $MET and $JUP communities: Meteora LP army printing money (they show you how, and they show you that it's real) I met a bunch of people who made millions by LPing, and those who print $300 - $1000 dayily by chilling on the beach The Jupiter community only lost money because of the token price, and some people are extremely angry What's your thoughts?

@aaalexhl I’m expecting high slippage, high illiquidity. But well see

damn this shit is actually kinda sick

@0xthanhle It does both, less fees but more safe.

People think copying LPs reduces their fees But they don't realize it makes the LP safer. More LP -> stronger resistance -> safer position.

@molusol @MeteoraAG It's only half the equation, you need to calculate in impermanent loss.

This SOL-USDC pool is currently yielding 1.35% daily (493% APY). If you deposit $10,000, here's your projected net worth: 1 day: $10,135 (1.35% return) 7 days: $10,945 (9.45% return) 30 days: $14,050 (40.5% return) *Returns are contingent on price remaining within your selected range which are $125.03 to $128.48 for me.* If you do go out of range, you can always rebalance with 1 click. And if you want to compound your fees to make an even higher APY, click Claim Fees and add your liquidity to the pool. Your returns if you compound daily: 1 day: $10,135 (1.35% return) 7 days: $10,987 (9.87% return) 30 days: $15,113 (51.13% return) The Liquidity Pool that I'm in is on Meteora: Bin step: 4 Fee: .04% For me, I don't like my funds to sit idle. I like to always have them working for me. If I can squeeze out 2-3 days in this range, I'm VERY happy. If you found this helpful, share it with someone, or hit that bookmark button, it means the world.