SlayAdharm

@kingkapoor72 BTW What are “halal eggs”, Chicken face east while laying? They can’t be friends with any Pigs & Dogs on the farm either?

@KashifKhan2025 @MumukshuSavitri @seemay Of course Islam is oldest, Earth is flat, Mountains are there to balance it, Sun hides under muddy water lake every night and what else? 😂😅

@SlayAdharm @MumukshuSavitri @seemay Actually Islam is older than that if you understood the religion. Also Islam doesn't restrict use of natural resources to other minorities. Only Hindus have that mindset. Which is why they are considered backwards.

Who Owns the Ganga? A River of Many Faiths, Not One. thewire.in/culture/who-ow…

@Ayesha0Khaan @dhruv_rathee So Ateeq Ahmad was a saint now? Mazhar kab banega?

@dhruv_rathee गोबर भक्तों को बस मुसलमान को बदनाम करने में मजा आता है

I called Aditya Dhar a BJP propagandist 3 months ago. Now everyone will see it. It was subtle in the previous film, but he went so blatant this time in overconfidence. Remember how I said, well-made propaganda is more dangerous? Ab toh well-made bhi nahi raha. Lol

Dhruv Rathee is back to destroy Dhurandhar 2 😂😂😂

🚨As per the Video Thomas Alva Edison decided to Record 1st Sound as the 1st verse of Oldest Text in World - RIGVEDA But as per records “Mary has a Little Lamb” was the First recorded voice . What is the Truth !

@KashifKhan2025 @MumukshuSavitri @seemay Your freakin 1400 year old war lord created religion claims entire Universe & Hindus can’t claim what was their for few thousands of years documented history?

@MumukshuSavitri @seemay How can an entire shared river be claimed by one religion?

@twittominu @TVMohandasPai Don’t forget so it doesn’t repeat…he is not asking for any heads now! Know the difference…

@TVMohandasPai Man this guy, so called enterpreneur and activist digging colonial era activities and asking people not to forget. Basically spitting venom in daylight. Shame on you.

The Brutal Goa Inquisition led by the Catholic Church. Never forget

@mariawirth1 @S__Srikant @AtriNeeraj @rinkutai222361 @jsaideepak @prachyam7 @ShefVaidya @PankajSaxena84 @thebritishhindu @RajivMessage Even after conversion, you are still lesser to Arabs & few others…ofc you can basically take it over, like Turks & Persians did to some extent… Islam gives tools for oppression, one option to those in/with power is use it to exploit others…morality aside…loot & distribute…

@mariawirth1 @S__Srikant @AtriNeeraj @rinkutai222361 @jsaideepak @prachyam7 @ShefVaidya @PankajSaxena84 @thebritishhindu @RajivMessage They won’t engage, just try to dictate! It’s Arab imperialism pretending to be a religion. If they engage & debate 1. They ‘ll lose debate / lack of depth 2. Can’t pursue their imperialistic agenda Choices: Kick out Islam & save yourself OR Convert!

Anand, you always end "you can't do anything". I don't like it. Did we even try? Who threw out the petition to declare certain ayats as unacceptable? I think it was in 1985 in a Kolkata court. A few years ago we didn't support an ex Muslim who again petitioned the court regarding harmful verses in Quran. Did we explain that we are not idol worshippers in their sense (not "other" God's, but all are aspects of the One Brahman), etc...

“Dhurandhar is a propaganda movie," bolne wale ladke

@Acts17David @Muhammad_Owaiis OR - you can't make Pig out of Sausage!! 😂🤣

@Muhammad_Owaiis You lost your caliphate. Deal with it. You can't put Humpty Dumpty back together again.

One islamic state — spanning from Indonesia to Morocco, with combined armies exceeding 3 Million soldiers, Pakistan's nukes, Turkish drones, Iranian missiles, oil from the gulf. Who will dare challenge this state? #Khilafah_Is_The_Shield

History will remember a kashmiri pandit ended 70 years of brainwashing done by urduwood in just 6 months

Maturity is realising the Bollywood we grew up watching was just Urduwood.

@sonalishahy8 @Shakt1_ @rockykku @itsneilhere_ @sriramkg @UnSubtleDesi Brahman is that ultimate Creator for Hindus. There have been many analogies, but ONE Sun & many reflections from different lakes... Much mischief going on, Macauliffe & on, but here is an article goes in detail... hinduexistence.org/2023/02/13/all…

@Shakt1_ @SlayAdharm @rockykku @itsneilhere_ @sriramkg @UnSubtleDesi Shared words don't mean shared beliefs. If the SGGS defines Hari as the Formless Creator how does that make it a Hindu reference? Isn't the definition what matters?

The muted coverage by a large section of the Indian media on the NIA arrests is a bit baffling. This is arguably the biggest story right now. It’s not often that CIA operatives are arrested so publicly. What gives?

@Shakt1_ @rockykku @itsneilhere_ @sriramkg @UnSubtleDesi I hear you. Often a small minority of extremists make much noise. Let's hope majority remembers it's roots as Dharmic. That said, Dharmic unity is in everyone's interest, Hindus & Sikhs and all Dharmics!!

@SlayAdharm @rockykku @itsneilhere_ @sriramkg @UnSubtleDesi I’m from Punjab, plenty of conversations I’ve had & relatives have shared which confirmed to me that very less commonality exists now. Sikhs think they got upgraded version of Hinduism, without the rituals, murtis, etc & blended in mosque like practices of congregation, etc

@Shakt1_ @rockykku @itsneilhere_ @sriramkg @UnSubtleDesi Sadly, you may be correct and then rampant conversions.. That said, facts remain - must do whatever to keep it alive; Sikhs and Hindus are part of the same Dharmic system!!

@SlayAdharm @rockykku @itsneilhere_ @sriramkg @UnSubtleDesi Hardly 5% of Sikhs will agree with what you said, they have been taught for decades now that Ram, Hari, etc mentioned in SGGS are not Hindu Gods but the general name for God (like Bhagwan) at that time, no other vocabulary existed. This is every Sikh’s view (under 50 yrs old)

This is what Pakistan movies used to show, they're the real 🐷

@total_woke_ @ravish_journo These traitors don't even try to hide their treachery anymore!

@ravish_journo CIA agents caught in India Ravish Tweet : 0 Random Indian does financial fraud in USA Ravish Kumar : Haay haay shame on India!

cc to ministry of Home, India.

@balbirpunj @RahulGandhi @narendramodi @AmitShah @NitinNabin @DrMohanBhagwat @myogiadityanath @rajnathsingh @kharge @priyankagandhi @Jairam_Ramesh @INCOverseas Brilliant, but sadly - he'll neither read it, nor gets it! He is simply too rotten with his entitlement and arrogance & continues to trash anything he touches. Keep him away from power long enough, he 'll eventually end up in Phuket for rest of his life smoking whatever!!

An Open Letter To @RahulGandhi Dear Rahul ji, I write with candour, yet with due regard for the office you occupy as Leader of the Opposition in the #LokSabha. In any parliamentary democracy, this office is not meant merely to oppose, but to scrutinise rigorously, question the government of the day, fearlessly, and do so while safeguarding national interest. A mature democracy requires both - a strong government and a credible opposition. When either falters, democratic balance weakens. Unfortunately, I must say that the dignity of the office has declined since your takeover, due to your conduct and statements that appear impulsive, theatrical, and lacking a solid grounding in facts or historical knowledge. My concern is not limited to a single incident. The pattern predates 2014 and indicates a deeper intellectual attitude—one that is sometimes disconnected from historical realities and national sensitivities. In 2010, diplomatic cables released by #WikiLeaks recorded that you told the US Ambassador that radicalised “Hindu groups” posed a “bigger threat” to India than the Pakistani terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba— responsible for the horrific 2008 Mumbai 26/11. This disclosure came when India was still scarred by the Godhra train burning, where fifty-nine pilgrims were burnt alive by jihadist. Yet, instead of confronting Islamist extremism with clarity, a fake counter-narrative of “saffron terror” was constructed, even casting suspicion on organisations such as the @RSSorg. The 2007 affidavit questioning the historicity of Lord #Ram further reflected a disturbing intellectual drift. In a continuity of this disposition, you and your family chose to absent yourselves from the historic 2024 #RamTemple Pran-Pratishtha ceremony at Ram Mandir Ayodhya. In 2013, the country witnessed an extraordinary spectacle. During PM #ManmohanSingh’s tenure, you publicly dismissed your party-led Cabinet-approved ordinance as “complete nonsense” that should be “torn up and thrown away.” The ordinance had already been cleared by the Cabinet and the Congress leadership. Democracy welcomes dissent; it also demands institutional respect. Where do you get such arrogance? From a sense of entitlement owing to your dynastic roots? More recently, on 13 March last in Lucknow, while commemorating #KanshiRam’s birth anniversary, you suggested that had #JawaharlalNehru been alive, Kanshi Ram might have become Chief Minister through the @INCIndia. The claim surprised many observers — not just because it was speculative, but because it overlooked Kanshi Ram’s political journey and the historic disdain of Congress for dissenting Dalit voices outside its organisational structure. In 1994, I had the opportunity to meet Kanshi Ram several times. Each interaction lasted hours. These meetings were facilitated by a Dalit leader from South India who then served as a minister in the government of P. V. Narasimha Rao and remains associated with your party even today. Kanshi Ram impressed me as a man uniquely dedicated to Dalit empowerment. Unlike many politicians who see power as an end in itself, he viewed political office solely as a tool for social change. Personal ambition did not motivate him. He politely declined an offer to move to Rashtrapati Bhavan, made by Atal Behari Vajpayee. Ultimately, he trusted his movement to Mayawati, whom he believed could continue the struggle. The analogy you used in your speech—holding a pen vertically to symbolise hierarchy and horizontally to represent equality—was actually Kanshi Ram’s favourite metaphor. I remember him demonstrating it vividly during our conversations. Invoking Nehru in this context, however, appeared historically misplaced. Kanshi Ram built his politics precisely because he believed the Congress system had failed Dalits. The historical relationship between Congress leadership and Dr B. R. Ambedkar also deserves reflection. Kanshi Ram regarded #Ambedkar as his greatest inspiration. Yet Ambedkar’s political experience with #Congress leaders—particularly Nehru—was marked by sharp tensions. Nehru had no hesitation in awarding himself the Bharat Ratna in 1955. Ambedkar, the chief architect of India’s Constitution, received the same honour only in 1990—thirty-five years later—under the government of V. P. Singh, which was supported from outside, by the Bhartiya Janta Party and the left. Ambedkar’s entry into the first Cabinet of independent India occurred largely because Mahatma Gandhi insisted that the new government must include distinguished non-Congress figures. Thus, Ambedkar served alongside leaders such as Syama Prasad Mukherjee and Sardar Baldev Singh. The 1952 general election further highlights the relationship. After resigning from the Cabinet, Ambedkar contested from North Bombay. The Congress fielded Narayan Sadoba Kajrolkar against him. Ambedkar lost by around fourteen thousand votes, while over 75000 ballots were declared invalid. It was probably the first case of vote chori (theft), scandalising independent India in its very first election to Lok Sabha. Compounding the hostility, Congress and Communist leaders called Ambedkar a “traitor.” Yet such accusations were not entirely novel. Writing to Rajkumari Amrit Kaur on January 26, 1946, Nehru himself remarked that Ambedkar had “allied himself with the British Government against the Congress.” Savita Ambedkar records in her autobiography that Nehru was “keeping a sharp eye on the constituency” during the 1952 election. According to her account, Nehru, S.K. Patil and Dange were determined to ensure Ambedkar’s defeat. Nehru himself appeared jubilant with the outcome. In a letter to Lady #Edwina #Mountbatten dated January 16, 1952, he wrote: “In Bombay city and to a larger extent in Bombay province, our success has been far greater than expected. Ambedkar has been dropped out.” #RahulGandhi ji, please ask yourself: Why was Nehru celebrating Ambedkar’s electoral defeat? I am not implying anything, but I wonder why he was happily sharing the news of Ambedkar’s loss with a woman, who was the consort of a colonial ruler responsible for planning and executing India’s partition, and had then left Indian shores for her country. Hopefully, you know the answer. Ambedkar’s anguish is recorded by his biographer Dhananjay Keer in ‘Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar: Life and Mission’. Ambedkar lamented that Congress leaders routinely branded him a “traitor”. In contrast, Mahatma Gandhi once told him: “I know you are a patriot of sterling worth.” In this context, your recent demand for the Bharat Ratna for Kanshi Ram raises questions about consistency. When Mayawati made the same request in 2008, the Congress-led UPA government rejected it, arguing that such honours should not be subject to lobbying. Why were you silent then? Today, the same demand, raised by you on the eve of Uttar Pradesh elections, seemingly appears insincere and driven by political opportunism. Kanshi Ram himself had little faith in the Congress. In his 1982 book ‘Chamcha Yug’, he accused the party of cultivating “stooge” Dalit leaders who served its interests rather than empowering the community. Your rhetorical framework often echoes familiar ideological clichés about India’s civilisation. This has repeatedly led to judicial corrections. Your remarks linking the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh to Gandhi’s assassination required clarification in court. The “Chowkidar Chor Hai” episode led to an apology to the Supreme Court. Your statements on Vinayak Damodar Savarkar invited judicial caution. Criticism is legitimate, and indeed a vibrant democracy’s lifeline. However, undermining the nation while trying to criticise the government, echoing external prejudices, and making baseless accusations against political rivals and ideological opponents fall into a different category. It's an irresponsible behaviour unworthy of a credible leader. Your endorsement of foreign criticism describing India as a “dead economy” raised concerns about national disparagement. Your remarks abroad suggesting that “Sikhs may not freely practise their faith in India” were swiftly appropriated by hostile elements. Most alarming was your assertion that your party is fighting not merely the @BJP4India or #RSS, but the “Indian State”—a formulation historically invoked by insurgent movements. In 2018, you made an unsubstantiated claim in the Rafale matter, invoking the French President—swiftly contradicted by the French government. In 2017, during the Doklam standoff, you met the Chinese Ambassador, with your party first denying and then admitting the meeting. During foreign visits, Rahulji, you have expressed concern that Western powers no longer comment on India’s internal affairs and have repeatedly described India as merely a “union of states” — not as a nation. This is less a constitutional observation and more an intellectual stance that diminishes India’s civilisational continuity — a doctrine Gandhiji often emphasised and strived for. Even recent episodes— such as the conduct of Youth Congress activists at an international forum, followed by your approving remark—suggest a troubling preference for spectacle over seriousness. You have warned that India would “burn” if BJP return to power and questioned constitutional stability. After electoral defeats, you and your party have cast doubts on institutions such as the Election Commission. Opposition is legitimate; delegitimising institutions is not. Your parliamentary conduct has occasionally reinforced perceptions of theatricality—the 2018 embrace of the Prime Minister followed by a wink, or recent public gestures that prioritised superficial optics over substantive politics. Your renewed emphasis on redistribution slogans such as “jitni abaadi, utna haq” raises further concern. History offers a cautionary lesson. Under Indira Gandhi, excessive nationalisation weakened production, fuelled shortages, and culminated in the Indian Emergency. Redistribution without wealth creation destroys the very foundation it seeks to distribute. The test of leadership lies not in applause, but in arguments that withstand scrutiny—historical, judicial, and intellectual. India deserves an opposition that challenges the government with seriousness—not slogans; with evidence—not conjecture; with statesmanship—not theatrics. As Leader of the Opposition, you have a rare opportunity to elevate national discourse. That responsibility demands intellectual discipline, historical awareness, and an unwavering commitment to the dignity of the Republic. I hope you will reflect—not as a matter of partisan disagreement, but as an appeal to restore seriousness to India’s political conversation. Yours sincerely, @DattaHosabale @sgurumurthy @mediasurya @ARanganathan72 @jsaideepak @RajeevKSachan @yv_post @AMISHDEVGAN @sardesairajdeep @rajkamaljha @republic @anjanaomkashyap @sudhirchaudhary @Mayawati @bspindia @amitmalviya @KanchanGupta @nishikant_dubey @SudhanshuTrived @RatanSharda55 @ShashiTharoor @SupriyaShrinate @Pawankhera @himantabiswa @annamalai_k @CTRavi_BJP @Tejasvi_Surya @OpIndia_com @SwarajyaMag

@khanumarfa Didn't see even Pakistani citizen this upset! Why would they, since the film depicting the worst sections of Pakistan society, not common people! Why is this Jihadin upset so much?

DHURANDHAR 2- Full Review coming soon on my Youtube channel.