Smartick

4.8K posts

Smartick banner
Smartick

Smartick

@Smartick

Adaptive online math program for children ages 4-14. Powered by cutting-edge AI to help you avoid costly tutoring and learning centers.

Boston, MA Katılım Haziran 2016
1.8K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Smartick
Smartick@Smartick·
Life is great when you reach out to a family in California to ask how they knew about us and they tell us about Barbara Oackley´s book. #Mathematics youtube.com/watch?v=Bbc4A6…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
0
663
Daniel Willingham
Daniel Willingham@DTWillingham·
Do Students Today Have Reduced Attention Spans? In this American Educator article, I argue they don't. (This piece is mostly a reprint of the one I published last year in Education Next.) aft.org/ae/spring2026/…
English
8
51
142
17.6K
Anna Stokke
Anna Stokke@rastokke·
1/3 🇫🇮Finland is often held up as an education success story, but the narrative doesn’t hold up. They topped PISA reading once (2000) & declined ever since. What explains that early one-time success, and why have they been declining? My guest breaks down the Finland myth 👇
English
6
29
128
51.5K
Smartick
Smartick@Smartick·
This, in @nytimes, sounds so Smartick. Extra math problems online.
Smartick tweet media
English
0
0
0
31
Smartick
Smartick@Smartick·
Entropy🌻Chase@EntropyChase

@Ed_of_O @Oliver_S_Curry I wonder if we'll find that the impact depends on the person & what their focus is. Some people might find social media empowering if they focus on connecting w communities or getting info. For others focused on status or achievement, it could fuel envy & depression.

QAM
0
0
0
12
Rod
Rod@rodjnaquin·
6th grade teacher Jon Midget dramatically improved math scores by changing his approach. He now starts each class with timed multiplication drills, teaches procedures before concepts, and has students practice 30-40 problems daily instead of just 6. Every assignment mixes new and old topics throughout the year. Result: over 80% of students now score in the 97th percentile. hollykorbey.substack.com/p/how-to-weave…
Rod tweet media
English
8
52
325
14.3K
Smartick
Smartick@Smartick·
@rastokke Early screening, in a way, is what we do almost daily.
English
0
0
0
25
Anna Stokke
Anna Stokke@rastokke·
👏Excellent article in the Globe & Mail about math screening. Kudos to the reporter. Here's one of my quotes. Emphasize: we don't have to have this math crisis. We really don't. But we keep using ineffective approaches. theglobeandmail.com/gift/d574e61ad…
Anna Stokke tweet media
English
8
17
72
2.6K
Jonathan Haidt
Jonathan Haidt@JonHaidt·
More evidence that the global decline in test scores that began after 2012 is linked to the proliferation of smartphones and computers in class: The slide was bigger in countries where students began spending more time on devices (for leisure) generationtechblog.com/p/phones-at-sc…
Jonathan Haidt tweet media
English
114
1K
3.1K
648.4K
Karen Vaites
Karen Vaites@karenvaites·
It’s important to note that Boaler’s philosophies have a common wellspring with other bad ideas in education (Whole Language): misguided but seductive-at-face-value ideas about how kids learn. There’s a Cult of Engagement behind it all: the idea that kids will all achieve better if we just make more engaging. And once we make it more engaging, we’ll close gaps and *poof* equity will magically be achieved. (I’m oversimplifying a little, but not by much.) The SFUSD debacle, the California math framework, the YouCubed coursework, the popularity of Balanced Literacy… they all draw from this wellspring. It’s wildly prevalent among educators, and parents and the public fall for it, too! This Mr. Beast video, which is being widely critiqued in learning science circles, is just the latest example of it. “We can reinvent education and making it more engaging will make learning easier and access more students” is the underlying assumption. Figures like Jo Boaler and Lucy Calkins and Irene Fountas and Gay Su Pinnell provide an academic fig leaf for these philosophies, but they didn’t originate them, and they aren’t the only people carrying them forward. The majority of US educators (though thankfully not all) believe these things. I say this because canceling Jo Boaler, if we can achieve it, won’t solve the problem. Someone else will rise up to become the new Boaler. We need much more public and parent education about What Good Looks Like, so parents show up at schools as educated consumers.
Jack@Jackkk

MrBeast explains why the education system is completely broken “Why are students today being taught the same way their parents were? Look at how much everything else has advanced. When I was in school the teacher would just stand there, read out of a book and write on a whiteboard” "Now look at Mark Rober’s videos. You can learn complex topics in 20 minutes in a way that’s engaging, fun and you retain it. Just because our parents were taught one way doesn’t mean we need to keep teaching that same way. It makes no sense to me, I think education should be reformed dramatically” “Students spend so much time in school. If we had real courses made through videos, made learning more hands on and optimised everything with modern technology, kids could probably learn more in 5 hours than they currently do in 8 hours"

English
12
15
82
7.9K
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
The damage that Jo Boaler and other "Equity-Based Mathematics Education Researchers" cannot be understated Watering down the curriculum and refusing advanced students move ahead has stagnated test scores and only increased behavior-related problems in the classroom.
Garry Tan tweet media
English
29
63
681
69.7K
Smartick
Smartick@Smartick·
@MrDanielBuck Deliberate practice, always fine 😄Our case with mathematics.
English
0
0
0
103
Anna Stokke
Anna Stokke@rastokke·
🩺 Math education today is where medicine was 200 years ago: light on evidence & ed gurus selling programs that don't work. Like surgeons who refused to wash their hands because they didn't want to admit they were wrong. Check out this clip ⬇️
English
10
26
139
17.7K
Anna Stokke
Anna Stokke@rastokke·
So many positive messages streaming in about my latest episode w/ @sarahpowellphd 🎧Have you listened yet? We respond to the NCSM statement criticizing the Science of Math and confront the real issue: resistance to evidence is alive and well in math education. Links below 👇
English
6
4
31
2.5K