Snow2diamond🏴☠️
31 posts



building on the SOFA financial disclosure listing RC as a co-debtor for $BBBYQ, I want to remind everyone of some other anomalies surrounding him throughout the Chapter 11. Bratya became the lead plaintiff of his class action over the moon emoji. often forgotten is that on the same day that the voting had ended the Plan, they attempted to enter the case and made a legal request to be apprised of any and all information that could include a transaction between any party in interest. from docket 2114: to the attentive reader, that should seem very odd. they are in a lawsuit against one individual—who sold his shares!—and yet they want a ton of information about the inner workings of the old $BBBY involving anyone. why? what possible reasoning could they have to justify any and all details about any transaction, if their only interest is litigating RC? isn't that a great question! it makes no sense unless through the discovery process of their case against RC, they uncovered information that would have suggested he is involved with the Reorganization through an affiliate or proxy. then it would make perfect sense. after some negotiations, we see that there was a compromise reached. the details of any transactions were not shared, but to prevent impairing Bratya from their class action, Ryan Cohen was explicitly identified in the Plan as not being a Released or Exculpated Party. this would allow Bratya to continue their class action litigation and so they had no reasonable explanation for why they would need any other details, especially involving any party in interest. — if you have been following, this is an important distinction. as the Holder of Interests within the third-party release, he is a Releasing Party. very important difference! — I will say it again because it is very important to understand: Ryan Cohen was explicitly identified in the Plan as not being a Released or Exculpated Party. here is where things get really interesting. let's establish a timeline: • on September 1, Bratya wants information involving any party in interest; but then.. • on September 7, the Kirkland attorneys admit that the Bratya request had escalated to a potential objection to Confirmation of the Plan and as we just explained; • this was publicly by stating that RC is not a Released or Exculpated Party. but look what else happened before the Confirmation hearing for the Plan: within a few days of the attorneys stating that they resolved the Bratya issue, the Plan is refiled with the court as amended and includes a plethora of edits to the definitions section, the releases, as well as the injunction and exculpation provisions. none of these modifications existed during the voting period. all of these changes came only after satisyfing Bratya to not object to Confirmation by stating that RC will not be a Released or Exculpated Party. the significance of the timing of these changes cannot be understated. what other reason could there be to have to amend definitions, releases and exculpations at the last minute, that had just excluded only ONE specific individual? Bratya found through discovery exactly what $BBBYQ holders have always believed. "in hindsight, it will all be so obvious." if you are curious for more reading, here are a few posts I made in 2024 and early 2025 going over all of the changes in detail: x.com/jake2b/status/… x.com/jake2b/status/… x.com/jake2b/status/…







WE ARE A GO FOR PRESS CONFERENCE JAN 12th 10AM To the #mmtlp #GME #AMC #BBB and #TMTG communites that have been harmed by government agency collusion with Wall Street, we are a GO for our press conference. SHARE FAR AND WIDE Location: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission - Headquarters 100 F St NE, Washington, DC 20549 cc: @busybrands @zing_leo12693 @Xenon61098 @Stokum @BasileEsq @bleedblue18 @Notarighty12 @JunkSavvy @giftsonglass

















