ceranaught

@JaceAVinson @SofterK1tty @ChatgptLunatics Im sure you know more than them

@Sockppp1 @SofterK1tty @ChatgptLunatics They’re delusional

W

@SofterK1tty @JaceAVinson @ChatgptLunatics Ok. Good thing no one was doing it for money then, unlike non ai artists apparently

@Sockppp1 @JaceAVinson @ChatgptLunatics Also you cant copyright AI generated things. constitutioncenter.org/blog/supreme-c…

@SofterK1tty @JaceAVinson @ChatgptLunatics Didn’t stop them from liking it

@Sockppp1 @JaceAVinson @ChatgptLunatics Photography is supposed to be just that. Photography. Ai should have no part in it because thats not real photography. Its fake its not a real place and its not a real photo. Ontop of the fact ai shouldnt be used on the legacy of things like pink floyd the legacy is art.

@emollick done youtube.com/watch?v=5MO3sy…

This is true, but ARC-AGI-3 is also a test designed so that AI gets zero today, just as the earlier ARC-AGI tests were designed . Those tests were then mostly saturated with a year or two. The thing to watch with ARC-AGI-3 is whether we see the same progress.

@ednewtonrex @deanwball and most people used to be opposed to gay marraige in the 70s. whats right is different from whats popular

I think you're wrong about this. The vast majority of creatives object to the unlicensed exploitation of their work by AI companies. Every poll of creatives taken has reaffirmed this. There is no left-right divide here. The general public, too, believes that AI companies should pay for their training data. This is a majority view among both Democrats and Republicans. (AI Policy Institute, 2024) People across the political spectrum object to the unlicensed use of copyrighted work for AI training. I don't think there's any evidence that people's reasons for this are different on the right and left, or that it’s a more prevalent view on the left.

My theory about why so many on the left remain in denial about AI is that their worldview rests on a load-bearing notion of “the tech industry” as being composed of vapid morons whose accomplishments will always be superficial, never “real,” always based on some grand theft. With social media and search, the theft was manipulation of people’s minds. With Amazon it was worker exploitation. With Apple, it was a mix of these. In the left retelling of the story, no value whatsoever was created from these technologies. All a trick. With AI the “grand theft” in the telling of the left is the use of copyright-protected data in pre-training. This one is a particularly dangerous mindworm for them, since they identify with the “artists and writers” from whom they imagine this training data was “stolen.” This is why things like “mode collapse” from synthetic data, stochastic parrotry, “it can only mimic things it has seen on the web” and similar are so core to the argument for the left: it supports the notion of “tech bro” thieves—who lest we forget, and they never will let us, have no “liberal arts” training!—continuing their unbroken string of robberies. Of course the “grand theft” notion is an old motif on the left, relating as it does to a zero-sum mindset about economics, business, and growth that is. more traditionally associated with the left, though the lines have always been blurry, since the zero-sum mindset is above all else a *human* fallacy and thus a useful tactic in mass politics of all valences. The lines have become especially blurry lately, as has been widely observed. Anyway, the notion that AI *is* a genuinely world-changing technology, that it can “go beyond” its “stolen” training data, breaks this load-bearing conception of the tech industry as vapid and superficial and, more importantly, of the people within it as blood-sucking thieves.

@efterar2046389 @keane72068 @ItsMrsRabbitToU Probably. No unions means no leverage

@Sockppp1 @keane72068 @ItsMrsRabbitToU And what if I fuck you instead? What then? Am I fired as well?

Fuck you.

@keane72068 @ItsMrsRabbitToU Gl paying rent. All the other employers mandate it too

@Sockppp1 @ItsMrsRabbitToU Consider me fired. I’d sell finger painted rocks and lemonade before I’d agree to anything remotely similar to this.

@sarahmarie1581 @henrydaubrez You do realize runway ml trains its ai models on copyrighted content without permission right

@Sockppp1 @henrydaubrez I never said I wasn’t? I’m pro-ai in many cases but anti extraction/exploitation

This is one of the bleakest AI art accounts on here. They are constantly switching styles, and it is often painfully obvious how much of the aesthetic is resting on the backs of artists whose labor, originality, and years of craft are being flattened into a product demo. What infuriates me is that AI could actually be used to support artists: to speed up process, explore ideas, and expand creative development. Instead, slopportunists rushed in at the exact moment tech companies needed people to showcase the tools, and are now being labeled “visionary” or “creative director” while real artists, many of whom are genuinely visionary, have spent years building original style through discipline and sacrifice. The talent of my friends is extraordinary. It is exhausting to watch people on this platform celebrate “art” that is so often built on top of an already exploited creative class. Hollywood has exploited artists for years, and now tech companies seem eager to Uber them too.

@sarahmarie1581 @henrydaubrez Wait, your pinned tweet is pro ai! x.com/sarahmarie1581…

@sarahmarie1581 @henrydaubrez And kurosawa was not a minority. He was japanese in japan.

@sarahmarie1581 @henrydaubrez Kurosawa never consented to have star wars copy his films yet it happened anyway, lucasfilms made billions, and zero people complained about it

@Sockppp1 @henrydaubrez “Everything is a remix” is not a serious defense of systems built on mass unconsented ingestion of artists soul and labor.

@sarahmarie1581 @henrydaubrez star wars stole from kurosawa. tarantino stole from other movies. led zeppelin stole from other musicians. everything is a remix. there is no such thing as a truly original work. youtube.com/watch?v=nJPERZ…

I’m not arguing that AI invented exploitation or that every visual similarity is theft. But it is still very different from, say, me using my own abilities to make fan art. Even then, it would still come through my style rather than as an exact replica. These tools can be useful for things like quick edits, enhancing existing work, or generating rough reference to communicate mood. But they arrived inside an already exploitative creative economy and are accelerating pressures around authorship, labor value, and aesthetic flattening. That concern isn’t “frozen in time” just because people have been raising it for years.

@yacineMTB this u? x.com/yacineMTB/stat…

If you are doing anything serious you very quickly see the limits of these new AI models

@vikhyatk "without dire consequences"

if you decide not to start a family because of the bullshit ai companies and doomers are peddling about AI, this will be you in 50 years

@ZaraNoraZ @kozzz_y i think you gotta reread part 1

@kozzz_y Power is the only one since the beginning who has had no intention of deceiving Denji. Glad that they are reunited

@JaceAVinson @ChatgptLunatics And yet AI won in Sony World Photography Awards scientificamerican.com/article/how-my… AI wins photography competition petapixel.com/2023/02/10/ai-… AI won Colorado State Fair cnn.com/2022/09/03/tec… AI wins Pink Floyd video competition ew.com/ai-wins-pink-f…

@Sockppp1 @ChatgptLunatics Contestant 1: “Hey CrapGPT, generate crappy looking art” Contestant 2: “Hey Grok, generate slightly less crappy art that’s still crap”

@WxControlTruth @Dr_Singularity do they like getting new cancer treatments blog.google/innovation-and…

@Dr_Singularity Maybe people don't like idea tens of millions losing jobs so billionaires become trillionaires? Or AI may one day kill all humans? We don't believe propaganda evil billionaires like Satanic Elon Musk saying how wonderful, he saying that to stop opposition his Satanic plans?

I’m tired of these anti-AI people. They’re arguing against intelligence itself. Think about how absurd that is.

@BitcoinJed1 @Dr_Singularity MIT seems to think it is news.mit.edu/2024/llms-deve…

@Dr_Singularity I'm tired of you AI simps thinking it's actually intelligence.

@Joker_Ollie @ChatgptLunatics a real photo won third place in an ai art competition lol cnn.com/flamingo-photo…

@ChatgptLunatics Proof that that human art conquers over AI.