OG SouClip

Dear @MetPoliceUK, Below is a video of Zarah Sultana MP, inciting violence against British citizens at a rally in London. “We are the majority. We will defeat them… we will fight them in the streets.” Zarah must be investigated for the following criminal acts: >S.4 Public Order Act 1986 (provocation of violence) >SS.44-46 Serious Crime Act 2007 (encouraging or assisting crime) >S.1 Terrorism Act 2006 (publishing (or causing publication of) a statement, either intending encouragement or inducement or being reckless as to whether it will have that effect — for political or ideological purposes) I look forward to your investigation of Ms Sultana any criminal charges that may arise from her despicable conduct. This is a clear incitement of violence, for political and ideological purposes, against an immeasurable number of innocent British citizens. She is unfit for Parliament, and unfit for public office. Her hateful, dangerous, and wilfully divisive language as demonstrated below proves just that. Sincerely, The British Public

Dear @UN, Oldest slave trades: 1. Africans enslaving Africans: Thousands of years to today 2. Arab slave trade: 1000+ years to today British Empire slave trade? 1555 - 1807 Should Europe claim reparations for the Barbary Slave Trade in 1M+ WHITE SLAVES? North Africans enslaved at least 1 Million white Europeans in the Barbary Slave Trade, which lasted longer than the British Empire's trans-Atlantic slave trade. If the Caribbean and Africa want reparations, why is Europe also not entitled to reparations? Where does this end? Should Italy pay reparations for slavery in the Roman Empire? Me on @GBNews with Jacob Rees-Mogg:

Labour just voted to block North Sea drilling during an energy crisis. Turning down more domestic supply and £25 BILLION in extra tax revenue. That means more taxes on ordinary people instead. Economically illiterate doesn't even begin to cover it.

Sorry to have to say this... The British do not like the kind of diversity that intends to take over Britain and kill any infidel that does not convert to Islam Is that hard to understand, silly little man ?

Radical idea but how about we give the best person the job, no matter what colour they are? Stuff like this is condescending, divisive and breeds resentment. It’s also damaging the game. We should call DEI what it is: anti-white racism.

In a country that has always allowed criticism of religious behaviour, we are now told that criticism of Islam is a phobia, like the irrational fear of spiders, or dogs What about criticism of Islam which is not phobic ? Or is all criticism of Islam irrational ?

This is a blatant lie. In July 2024, the energy cap was £1,568. It's now £1,641. Bills have gone up under this Prime Minister. The £117 he talks about has just been moved from your energy bill to your tax bill. And yet he claims he’s saving us money. It’s outrageous.

Finally, They've Admitted It The battle over the upcoming by-election in Gorton and Denton has, so far, been largely uneventful. The Labour Party which holds the seat looks set to lose it as you would expect: their leader has, after all, the worst personal satisfaction ratings of any British leader since records began. Reform look set to do well which, with immigration dominating the political conversation, is also unsurprising. The Greens are also performing strongly, and, like Reform, may even win the seat, for reasons I explained last week. So far, so predictable. But then, a video by Green candidate Hannah Spencer began doing the rounds. The clip itself is unremarkable. It wouldn’t even be worth discussing if it weren’t for one minor detail - it’s delivered entirely in Urdu. Now, you might be thinking: look how “right wing” Konstantin has become. Why does anyone care whether a few unrepresentative areas have a lot of people from a particular community living there? After all, this tends to happen when groups of people move from country to country. People are not atomised individuals, especially in more traditional societies. British settlers who moved to the New World didn’t move in groups of 3 either. A lot of immigration happens in clusters. It’s why so many big cities have a Chinatown. I’m not against Chinatowns, but then again, I’ve never seen a British politician campaigning in Chinese, and the food is incredible. I am aware, as I write this, that to some American readers this might seem a strange thing to take issue with. After all, there are many parts of the US where you’ll get by just as easily with Spanish as you will with English. But there is a big difference between Britain and America as a British-born-Pakistani Uber driver once explained to me in Los Angeles. “British people aren’t racist,” he said. “It’s just space: Britain is a small country, America is a big country. When you move to America you’re not taking someone else’s space.” This reflects in the linguistic differences too: when you become an American citizen, you’re called a “first-generation American”. When you become a British citizen, you’re a “first generation immigrant”. I’m not complaining - that’s what I call myself because that’s a cultural difference between Britain and America. This difference is partly caused by something else too - America displaced its native population and replaced it with waves of colonists from different parts of Europe and later immigrants from all over the world. With the exception of the people brought there against their will, they all effectively took the land from someone else. Whether your ancestors did the initial taking or moved more recently, you still benefit from that land being taken by living on it. The native population of North America is dwarfed by the more recent arrivals. I say “more recent” and not “recent” because when it comes to land, someone always took it from someone else. With the exception of Australian aboriginals, there are no people in the world who can claim they were the first modern humans to settle on land they currently occupy outside a handful of tiny, isolated island communities. Everyone else took the land they currently live on from someone else. And because Americans have a collective sense of being historically recent arrivals, it’s just that much harder for them to deny other people the American Dream their great-grandparents sought, provided they do it legally. As I’ve written before, until very, very recently, Britain was a highly ethnically and culturally homogenous society. Your opinion of whether that’s good or bad is unimportant for the purposes of what I’m saying here. The fact is, in the lifetime of almost everyone alive today, London and other British cities have gone from being overwhelmingly populated by native Brits to being majority minority. In 1991, 35 years ago, London was estimated to be 80% White British. By 2021, thirty years later, it was 36.8%. Over 75% of the country’s population is over the age of 35. This dramatic change happened in the lifetimes of three out of four people in Britain today. That’s not a political statement - it’s a fact. Forget about the skin colours and races of the people involved. When European settlers came to North America and within a couple of generations became the more populous people on the Eastern seaboard of today’s United States, on a scale from 1 (dissatisfied) to 10 (delighted), how happy do you think the natives were? “Konstantin, you can’t possibly compare the horrors inflicted on the native population of North America by a combination of brutal warfare, deadly European disease and forced displacement and ethnic cleansing,” I hear you say. You’re right; no reasonable person would make that comparison. But say the colonists had moved to America because a handful of Native American leaders had welcomed them in despite the repeatedly expressed wishes of their citizens? Britain voted against mass immigration in 2010, 2015, 2016 with Brexit, 2019 and 2024, when they punished the Tories for letting immigration spin out of control. So, in our example, say there was no war, no violence and the displacement happened entirely peacefully and without coercion. Would you concede that in that situation quite a lot of Native Americans might have a few questions about whether their leaders made a better decision than the one they voted them in to make? This is why I didn’t agree with Sir Jim Radcliffe using the word “colonisation” to describe what’s happened in Britain. But it’s also why I refuse to criticise him for it. Like all of us, he is trying to feel his way towards the right word to describe what’s happened in much of Europe in the last few decades. It’s hard because what’s happened is completely unprecedented. Never in the history of our countries have our rulers decided that opening the borders to so many people from the rest of the world was a good idea. Indeed, at any other point in human history, the suggestion that we should pursue this course of action would have been met with bemusement to put it very, very mildly. It’s happened. In a very short period of time. Not only without the consent of the British people, but in direct contravention of their wishes. Words like “invasion” and “colonisation”, which the edgelordy wing of the internet is so fond of using, sound like the people your anger is directed at are the immigrants themselves. This is why the #bekind brigade keep claiming that people with concerns about immigration are “demonising immigrants”. But 95% of the anger I see is directed at the people who did this: British politicians of all 3 major parties. I don’t hate other people for wanting to come here. Britain is wonderful. Why wouldn’t they? I don’t even hate the politicians who have done this. Some of them, at least, have the excuse of being incompetent and naive. The people I am starting to hate, however, are the liars and the hypocrites who want to have it both ways:

Starmer says Gorton and Denton would “descend into hostility” if Reform win the by-election. Er… so democracy is only acceptable when Labour wins? Suggesting unrest will follow a legitimate result is a dangerous message for any Prime Minister to spread.

@Keir_Starmer A lower rate of inflation means prices are rising, just not as quickly as before. How are people who don't understand basic economics in charge of our economy???

This wasn't allowed in public incase it offended anyone. So please don't retweet it. Thanks 🙏dutchbarn.com

It almost feels like this government is deliberately trying to destroy our country. Not prosecuting under 17s for knife crime? Insane. Allowing young kids to change their gender? SICK. Giving away our territory? Treasonous. And so it goes on.

@AdamJoseph Yeah but he's better than Vidic 👀😁🤣

This is your regular & rightful reminder that Virgil Van Dijk is one of the most overrated footballers in recent memory & the most overrated central defender in Premier League history. Reputation holding up over reality. The mask always slips.

I can scarcely believe I am writing this, but Labour is moving towards a ban on 𝕏. No one believes that it is because of bikinis. Gemini and ChatGPT will imagine people in swimwear. Facebook, Instagram and TikTok are awash with deepfakes. What we are seeing is a panicky PM shoring up his position with Labour MPs who hate @ElonMusk. They hate him because he allows stories to circulate that they would rather repress, and because they used to feel proprietorial about the old Twitter. Me in the @DailyMail. dailymail.co.uk/debate/article…

We used to be a proper country, FFS. God forbid people could go to a park on a hill and watch some sodding fireworks on New Year's Eve without the fun auditors banning it. 🙄

Today, James O’Brien compared me to Lord Haw-Haw, a Nazi sympathiser who was hanged for treason. Why? For agreeing with people I met in NYC that London is dangerous. Just that. Two hours on air. LBC chose that moment to clip and post. Clear agenda. Here’s my response 👇

Never mind crisis talks - he should be sacked. Sharia Law is an abomination that discriminates against and harms women.

A mosque has banned women and girls over 12 from running in a charity run. Why is this run allowed to go ahead and where are all the liberals protesting about inequality? Silent against sharia.

@lancstelegraph You bunch of absolute clowns.... It's a man... You idiots... Journalists my ass

Woman jailed after exposing herself to group of children in park ift.tt/HcfFlO0

🚨 Graham Lineham has been arrested for online posts, after arriving at Heathrow. I cannot explain to you how important it is to understand what is happening in Britain. understand this … ANYTHING you say may be held against you. You don’t need to lie, threaten, or even be rude. All it takes is for a person, police officer, or authority to claim your words made them feel “alarmed” or “distressed.” Truth won’t protect you. You can post something accurate, sourced, and backed by official reports and still be accused of online harassment, If someone claims you’ve created a “hostile atmosphere,” that can be enough. And you don’t even need to break the law. Civil injunctions, Community Protection Notices, and “Respect Orders” can be used pre-emptively (in case you say something offensive in the future) to silence people. No jury. No trial. Just a judge ruling that your speech causes “discomfort.” This isn’t about protecting people, it’s about protecting narratives. And the rules aren’t applied fairly. Because this is the front line now. It’s not about kindness. It’s about control 🚨