Sabitlenmiş Tweet
火柴棍
14.3K posts


@wangzhian8848 Air Force One usually flies a "Great Circle" route, heading north over Canada and the Arctic before descending through Russian or Mongolian airspace into China.
English

罕见奇葩的操作,全球最大石油进口国的中国,同时又在大量出口石油,难道中国要重塑全球石油市场?而且这样的动作越来越狠:今年4月份,中国原油进口量环比暴跌20%,降至每天820万桶,创至少两年以来最低水平。对比伊朗战争前,每天减少了350万桶(降幅约30%),这个量几乎相当于整个日本的日均石油总消费量,比绕过霍尔木兹海峡的阿联酋管道供应量还要大2倍。
更狠的是,中国国有石油公司还在把部分进口原油转售给欧洲和亚洲买家,这说明即便全球供应紧张,中国自己的库存依然相当宽裕。
中国即使在自己短缺的情况下,仍在默默支撑着全球石油市场。
在经济三战(贸易战、科技战、能源战)全面打响、霍尔木兹海峡风险爆表的背景下,中国正在用实际行动重塑全球石油版图。
一方面大幅减少从中东进口(战略储备 + 去依赖),另一方面通过转售稳定全球供给。这既是自我保护,也是对美国能源霸权的一次隐形反制。
中国正在把石油从“被动买家”变成“战略工具”,未来油价和全球能源格局的走向,将越来越受北京的节奏影响,而不是单纯由OPEC或美国页岩油说了算。
KUNLUN昆侖@Kunluntalk
美国期权市场,现在已经彻底疯了,双向投机达到历史级疯狂:当前1个月的总看涨期权日均交易量,已经飙到约4100万份合约,创下历史第二高水平,比2006-2019年的长期平均值高出4倍多。与此同时,看跌期权日均交易量也达到2900万份合约,同样接近历史最高。两边都在疯狂下注,从未见过交易者如此歇斯底里地赌方向。 这种极端双向投机的水平,历史上几乎每次都伴随着市场波动率的急剧飙升。 资金一边害怕错过,一边又害怕暴跌,才导致杠杆被玩到极致。 之所以如此疯狂,是经济三战(贸易战、科技战、资本战) 背景下,流动性+政策不确定性共同催生的投机狂潮。风险已经堆到天花板。一旦某一边被打爆,踩踏式回调会来得非常凶狠。 所以,我们正处在一个“有趣”的时代,有趣到可能要付出惨痛代价。
中文


Oh I see. Unfortunately you are wrong.
You can check these:
- U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 3
- Federal Rule of Evidence 603
- Legal Precedent: Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961)
The "oath or affirmation" does not mean it has to be the Bible.
"...no religious Test shall ever be required..."
English

@SparksBark @mikesignorelli_ The problem is it's required. I've never heard of anyone. Going through court without swearing on the Bible.
English
火柴棍 retweetledi

‼️ READ THIS CAREFULLY.
Worship broke out in the White House.
Not a concert.
Not a campaign.
Not religion for optics.
The name above ALL names was lifted in one of the most powerful buildings on earth.
Do you understand the prophetic weight of this moment?
For years people have prophesied about revival in America.
Many mocked it.
Many said darkness had won.
But while culture spiraled into confusion…
God was still moving behind the scenes.
From college campuses…
To prisons…
To churches packed with hungry people…
To the streets of New York City…
And now even the White House…
Jesus is revealing Himself.
This is not about a denomination.
This is not about politics.
This is about the Spirit of God moving through a nation that desperately needs Him.
And hear me clearly:
REVIVAL IS NOT COMING.
Revival is HERE.
🙏 Pray for America.
Pray for a great awakening.
And comment where you’re watching from so we can pray for you too.
- Mike Signorelli
English

@jreturntoeden @mikesignorelli_ No. If Congress forbids people from swearing on their Bible, that would be unconstitutional.
English

@SparksBark @mikesignorelli_ Yes and that should be breaking the separation of church and state, which is a crime.
English

@jreturntoeden @mikesignorelli_ Exactly! They practice their belief with no restriction.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."
English

@SparksBark @mikesignorelli_ Yet the government and courts have people swear on the Bible.
English

Of course, history is also a testament that religious practice is always allowed and encouraged in government. The first amendment only recognized this value and observed this tradition.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."
It is absurd and unconstitutional for a congress to forbid religious practice and establish an atheism belief as "national belief system."
Atheists are free to practice their belief and refuse to worship in the government, just as Christians are free to worship, fast, and pray.
English

Yet the American government states. That our laws are based on the 10 Commandments.
ARTICLE
THE USE OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS IN
AMERICAN COURTS
John A. Eidsmoe:
I. INTRODUCTION
From the beginning of our republic through the present, American courts
have commonly quoted or cited the Ten Commandments and other portions
of Biblical law in their official published decisions. But how frequently, in
what form, and for what purpose are they cited?
Seeking an answer to these questions, I conducted a Lexis computer search
in March 2002 to discover how often courts have cited the Decalogue. My
research is far from complete, but when I inputted the words "Ten
Commandments," the Lexis search reported 515 cases in which that term was
used. This included only published decisions of courts of record: the United
States Supreme Court, federal courts of appeals, federal district courts, state
supreme courts, and occasionally state courts of appeals.
A further search using the term "Decalogue" revealed 331 cases in which
that term is quoted or cited. Searches for individual Commandments, which
I conducted in October 2002, revealed many more: "First Commandment,"
twenty-six cases; "Second Commandment," twenty-four cases; "Third
Commandment," nine cases; "Fourth Commandment," forty-four cases;
"Fifth Commandment," forty-five cases; "Sixth Commandment," twenty-
seven cases; "Seventh Commandment," twenty-nine cases; "Eighth
Commandment," thirty-four cases; "Ninth Commandment," nine cases; and
"Tenth Commandment," thirteen cases.
English

@jreturntoeden @mikesignorelli_ No. That is the testament that the state has no say in our faith.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."
No restriction. Welcome to the free world.
English

@mikesignorelli_ Yes a direct breach of the separation of church and state. 🧐
English
火柴棍 retweetledi

I wrote this piece to promote thoughtful, respectful, and rational engagement with controversial science topics. I hope it fosters constructive dialogue in the scientific community—thank you for reading and sharing 🙏🏼 @NatRevImmunol
nature.com/articles/s4157…
English
















