StarryNift

✨Why Hold $SNIFT? Uncover the True Value✨ 📈Whether you're looking for short-term or long-term value, #SNIFT offers exclusive benefits. We keep building to unlock unlimited potential. 💎Secure your $SNIFT today and be part of our bright future!🌈starrynift.medium.com/unlocking-snif…

Now, the quantum resistance roadmap. Today, four things in Ethereum are quantum-vulnerable: * consensus-layer BLS signatures * data availability (KZG commitments+proofs) * EOA signatures (ECDSA) * Application-layer ZK proofs (KZG or groth16) We can tackle these step by step: ## Consensus-layer signatures Lean consensus includes fully replacing BLS signatures with hash-based signatures (some variant of Winternitz), and using STARKs to do aggregation. Before lean finality, we stand a good chance of getting the Lean available chain. This also involves hash-based signatures, but there are much fewer signatures (eg. 256-1024 per slot), so we do not need STARKs for aggregation. One important thing upstream of this is choosing the hash function. This may be "Ethereum's last hash function", so it's important to choose wisely. Conventional hashes are too slow, and the most aggressive forms of Poseidon have taken hits on their security analysis recently. Likely options are: * Poseidon2 plus extra rounds, potentially non-arithmetic layers (eg. Monolith) mixed in * Poseidon1 (the older version of Poseidon, not vulnerable to any of the recent attacks on Poseidon2, but 2x slower) * BLAKE3 or similar (take the most efficient conventional hash we know) ## Data availability Today, we rely pretty heavily on KZG for erasure coding. We could move to STARKs, but this has two problems: 1. If we want to do 2D DAS, then our current setup for this relies on the "linearity" property of KZG commitments; with STARKs we don't have that. However, our current thinking is that it should be sufficient given our scale targets to just max out 1D DAS (ie. PeerDAS). Ethereum is taking a more conservative posture, it's not trying to be a high-scale data layer for the world. 2. We need proofs that erasure coded blobs are correctly constructed. KZG does this "for free". STARKs can substitute, but a STARK is ... bigger than a blob. So you need recursive starks (though there's also alternative techniques, that have their own tradeoffs). This is okay, but the logistics of this get harder if you want to support distributed blob selection. Summary: it's manageable, but there's a lot of engineering work to do. ## EOA signatures Here, the answer is clear: we add native AA (see eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8141 ), so that we get first-class accounts that can use any signature algorithm. However, to make this work, we also need quantum-resistant signature algorithms to actually be viable. ECDSA signature verification costs 3000 gas. Quantum-resistant signatures are ... much much larger and heavier to verify. We know of quantum-resistant hash-based signatures that are in the ~200k gas range to verify. We also know of lattice-based quantum-resistant signatures. Today, these are extremely inefficient to verify. However, there is work on vectorized math precompiles, that let you perform operations (+, *, %, dot product, also NTT / butterfly permutations) that are at the core of lattice math, and also STARKs. This could greatly reduce the gas cost of lattice-based signatures to a similar range, and potentially go even lower. The long-term fix is protocol-layer recursive signature and proof aggregation, which could reduce these gas overheads to near-zero. ## Proofs Today, a ZK-SNARK costs ~300-500k gas. A quantum-resistant STARK is more like 10m gas. The latter is unacceptable for privacy protocols, L2s, and other users of proofs. The solution again is protocol-layer recursive signature and proof aggregation. So let's talk about what this is. In EIP-8141, transactions have the ability to include a "validation frame", during which signature verifications and similar operations are supposed to happen. Validation frames cannot access the outside world, they can only look at their calldata and return a value, and nothing else can look at their calldata. This is designed so that it's possible to replace any validation frame (and its calldata) with a STARK that verifies it (potentially a single STARK for all the validation frames in a block). This way, a block could "contain" a thousand validation frames, each of which contains either a 3 kB signature or even a 256 kB proof, but that 3-256 MB (and the computation needed to verify it) would never come onchain. Instead, it would all get replaced by a proof verifying that the computation is correct. Potentially, this proving does not even need to be done by the block builder. Instead, I envision that it happens at mempool layer: every 500ms, each node could pass along the new valid transactions that it has seen, along with a proof verifying that they are all valid (including having validation frames that match their stated effects). The overhead is static: only one proof per 500ms. Here's a post where I talk about this: ethresear.ch/t/recursive-st… firefly.social/post/farcaster…

@RolfKv Thank you for checking-in. We have transitioned to quantum-resistant research. Wishing you a Happy New Year.

@StarryNift Keep working/developing you guys! Don't give up now 😅

“All of the prerequisites for the original web3 vision are here, in full force, and are continuing to get stronger over the next few years. Hence, it's time to buidl, and buidl decentralized.” greenfieldscan.com/tx/0xfd992b91b…

LATEST: ⚡ Michael Saylor says Strategy will initiate a Bitcoin security program to coordinate with the global cyber, crypto and BTC security community around blockchain quantum resilience.

Ethereum is for AI. ERC-8004, a new standard by the @ethereumfndn dAI Team, @MetaMask, @Google, @Coinbase, and others, provides a blueprint for how AI agents find and review each other, request and pay for jobs, and verify the work done. What builders need to know.

📈 @BNBCHAIN Chain AI Agents with the Highest Growth in the Last 7 Days 📸 Highlighted projects: ▫️@codatta_io ▫️@StarryNift ▫️@klip_ai ▫️@CoreonMCP ▫️@Everlyn_ai ▫️@bluwhaleai ▫️@singularryai ▫️@SKYAIpro ▫️@SUPERFORTUNE888 ▫️@DeAgentAI #AIAgent

@Umardangombe WIP🙏

@StarryNift Happy New Year pls is this project a life? no update no twitter active.

❄️Happy New Year！Let this chapter hibernate in winter’s solitude; may the seeds bloom in a new season🌱

@saifulsohan5 Happy New Year

@StarryNift Happy new year

@ClassicFilmTV Merry Christmas & Happy New Year —may your season be filled with that same unwavering affection, no matter how "less vibrant" this year might be🎄

A CHARLIE BROWN CHRISTMAS (CBS, 1965) Created and Written by Charles M. Schulz

🔥 Top AI Agents on #BNBchain yesterday 🚀 Strong inflows, outstanding performance and bullish on-chain signals. Which ones are you watching? 👇 🔸 $GAIX - @GaiAIio 🔸 $VIA - @OctaviaToken 🔸 $AIAGENT - @AI_CSPR 🔸 $SINGULARRY - @singularryai 🔸 $SNIFT - @StarryNift

Quantum computing and blockchains: Let's match the urgency with the actual threats. But first, where are we on timelines to an cryptographically relevant quantum computer? Lately, the timelines are being overstated — leading to calls for urgent, wholesale transitions to post-quantum crypto. This is a problem because it overlooks the costs and risks of premature migration, and ignores more salient security risks. More from @SuccinctJT below. ⤵️

Congratulations to all the winners for StarryNift thanksgiving giveaway 🚀 Reward distribution has been done. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…

🦃Happy #Thanksgiving Day🎉 💕Grateful for all your company! ✅Follow @Starrynift ✅RT & Comment BSC Address ✅Tag 3 frds 🥇20 winners 2/3/5U lucky draw 🗓️ Nov 27 8PM - 29 12AM (UTC-8) #Giveaway #Airdrop #Thanksgiving

We're giving our all, but it may still fall short of your expectations. You might not care about the setbacks we've faced, the steps we've taken to fix things, the reasoned responses to your question, or our 5-year commitment. You seem focused on gains as a taker, not the struggles of building as a maker. If there's no respect or trust in what we say—why keep asking? Why not save your time to dig your own GEM? #DYOR rather than stick to no unfounded accusations. BW & GBU

@StarryNift With prices plummeting like this, does it mean you've already absconded with the money?

🚀 StarryNift AMA runs Sept 27 - Nov 2, 9 AM UTC! Join our Discord channel bit.ly/47rJhxc 🌟 Share your ideas & questions in "StarryNift-Questions-Proposals" to get rewards 🏆 10 winners as SNIFT holders snag 10 USDT each at AMA’s end! Shine on! #Giveaway #SNIFT #AMA

Mutual Support Program has concluded 🙏 Sent small gifts as thanks—modest, but heartfelt for your support. Life’s path has challenges, but we persist🌿 Wishing you safety & health!

1. We have never collaborated with CoinEx since TGE. They listed SNIFT on their own and later chose to delist it, which is unrelated to the team. 2. Gate, MEXC, HashKey, and Bitmart have been CEX partners since TGE, and the token remains listed on all of them. Why not use other CEX? 3. Beyond CEXs, more liquidity will soon be added to DEX pools. 4. Even the screenshot about the team is false—reorganized 4 years ago, so CoinEx info is outdated. Why trust CoinEX?

@StarryNift Snift token has been delisted from CoinEx exchange. What are you really doing to restore liquidity?

@trandangdung888 Thank you so much for your support! If you base in Singapore 🇸🇬 welcome to come by 🍺 drinks and gift await!

@StarryNift Wallich Street about to feel that AI magic in full spooky mode

🎃 Halloween’s coming… are you ready for AI-lloween? 👻 If you’re near Wallich Street, come say hi to our crew! 🧚‍♀️ Whisper “code green” for a lil’ spooky surprise 🤖 Join the fun & register here 👉 luma.com/1kkyc7se?tk=ZT…