Paul Q

2.9K posts

Paul Q banner
Paul Q

Paul Q

@SteelCoreBTC

Entrepreneur, #BTC,#blockchain,#tokenize assets, #beek, tweets ≠ advice. opinions =mine

Decentralized Katılım Mayıs 2013
1.7K Takip Edilen795 Takipçiler
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
@Ford I have an old F-150. I cannot imagine buying another F-series vehicle with all the surveillance modules embedded in your vehicles. This is not safety related -this is clear 4th amendment overreach.
English
0
0
0
3
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
When ever speaking with or listening to an attorney I've learned to listen for the words said as well as the words not said or the terms that are not as clear as they should be. I think the US AG's words mean the Samourai team can finally go home. Great news! What was not as clear are the other statements, they infer; if you create open source code and you aide someone's use of that code fo nefarious purposes you are not protected. That should be a clear declarative sentence.
The Bitcoin Historian@pete_rizzo_

JUST IN: US ATTORNEY GENERAL JUST SAID THEY WILL NO LONGER PROSECUTE #BITCOIN DEVELOPERS "YOU ARE NOT GOING TO BE INVESTIGATED AND NOT GOING TO BE CHARGED" SAMOURAI DEVS ABOUT TO BE FREE 👏

English
0
0
0
9
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
@dotkrueger Oh @dotkrueger , Don’t forget .. your 51% attack has to execute across 51% of the decentralized nodes, decrypt (insert false blocks) and re-encrypt .. in about 6-8 minutes - before the next block is produced on the longest copy of the chain …. to really corrupt the blockchain .
English
2
0
6
893
Fred Krueger
Fred Krueger@dotkrueger·
“‘I’ll just 51% attack Bitcoin.’ Cool. Go find: – 1.5 million ASICs – 4 nuclear plants worth of power – years of buildout – $10B+ all-in Then announce it to the world (because you can’t hide it). Then watch: – exchanges freeze you – price dump – your economics implode Congratulations, you attacked yourself.”
English
98
108
1.1K
61.5K
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
Couldn’t agree with you @lopp more, we cannot give up self-custody and to do so is not convenience IMO - it’s laziness. To custody your own assets does take work - not a lot - but you need to understand that there are 24/7 forces trying to erode your sovereignty and capture your assets.
English
0
0
1
46
All In Bitcoin with CK
All In Bitcoin with CK@allinbitcoinpod·
Self-custody’s biggest enemy? New clip with @lopp It’s a battle that may never be won, but it still has to be fought. Full episode 👇
English
6
6
27
9.4K
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
Went to the-edge@xyx and was prompted to provide email - no problem.However, ur website has a "Press & Hold" pop-up that appears to be trying to load some some software onto my machine. WTH? My Malware software shut all this down!! Can you add something more transparent to your enrollment process? This is a none starter.
English
1
0
1
13
DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth
DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth@DeFi_Dad·
🎙️ New @edge_pod 🪐 How Saturn Is Tokenizing @Saylor's 11.5% $STRC BTC-Backed Yield For DeFi | DeFi Frontier 0:00 - Intro 2:21 - Saturn CoFounders background 4:47 - Why build Saturn? 6:57 - Why Saylor’s excited for STRC in DeFi 10:14 - Three major DeFi use cases 14:59 - How Saturn distributes STRC yield 15:58 - Where STRC yield comes from 17:06 - 2-token design: USDat vs sUSDat 18:48 - Is USDat a stablecoin? 20:56 - How STRC vs USDat peg works 24:29 - Opportunity for STRC to grow 28:37 - STRC demand will eat into fixed income 31:50 - DeFi is starving for a yield like STRC 35:43 - Can STRC become the risk-free rate? 37:20 - 24/7 trading of STRC onchain 39:16 - Impact of perps for STRC 41:46 - How far could STRC reasonably drop 43:50 - What’s live now on Saturn? 45:23 - Closing 🙏 Thanks to @saturn_credit CoFounders @ellisp_osborn and @kevinlhr88 for joining us!
English
43
81
422
123K
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
I think colleges and universities need to be held to a minimum alumni employment rate (% of graduates), the earnings test adds accountability. The 4 year on-ramp is generous. They can tune their majors, curricula and alumni services to post graduation employment. Free thinking and critical reasoning are still part of that; as should civics and government so people learn how government actually works.
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes

Donald Trump is making major changes that will ban colleges from the Federal Student Loan Program and all federal financial aid if the programs at that college don't pass the earnings test “They are putting together a new earnings threshold test that says Bachelor degree program graduates have to earn more than the median high school graduate in your state 4 years after graduation. And when it comes to grad school programs, they have to earn more than bachelor's degree graduates for that same type of field in that state within 4 years after their graduate school program. If the school program fails this test for 2 years in a row, they will lose access to federal Fi, federal student loans. And if more than 50% of the school's programs fail this test, they lose access to all types of federal financial aid programs.” Here’s what that really means Colleges can no longer have programs that do not deliver positive financial outcomes for their graduates The goal is to stop federal taxpayer subsidies via loans and grants for programs that leave graduates financially worse off or no better than if they had skipped college This is common sense legislation and a huge win for everyone

English
0
0
1
19
Fred Krueger
Fred Krueger@dotkrueger·
This is our friends at Bitgo. The speaker lineup is insane, and this is in a small intimate space. We will be hanging out here much of Tuesday. Sort of a "Whale Room" on Steroids. bitgo.com/events/high-ro…
English
1
1
7
3.3K
Fred Krueger
Fred Krueger@dotkrueger·
Our Vegas event is on Waitlist, but please sign up we will try to find some way to acomodate. Also please sign up for the BitGo "high roller" event all day -- we are in the same space. Link in comments. luma.com/y1vtg0tn
English
8
4
27
10.3K
Fred Richmond
Fred Richmond@FredRichmo96717·
Who do you believe has the knowledge and intelligence to present the truth over the other?
Fred Richmond tweet media
English
1
0
2
12
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
@BritishHodl Short attention spans will do that. Agreed … when Bitcoin crosses $100K … a new conversation can begin.
English
2
0
4
569
BRITISH HODL ❤️‍🔥🐂❤️‍🔥
Imagine being in Bitcoin for such a short time that you think THIS is a “pump” and the Bull Market is back. Wake me up after we cross $100,000.
English
64
24
975
26.5K
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
Clarity Act needs to be signed to provide market structure stability. From the White House Economists "According to the report, smaller lenders would see just $500 million in additional lending under a yield ban, an increase of roughly 0.026%. In other words, the White House economists contend that the policy delivers minimal benefits to the very institutions it is often framed as protecting. coindesk.com/policy/2026/04…
English
0
0
0
64
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
@adam3us Thank you for your contributions to the space that has become the industry and the prototypes that sparked the mathematical discovery of the difficulty factor and time- stamp hashes. Let the Satoshi legend live on !
English
0
0
2
386
Adam Back
Adam Back@adam3us·
i'm not satoshi, but I was early in laser focus on the positive societal implications of cryptography, online privacy and electronic cash, hence my ~1992 onwards active interest in applied research on ecash, privacy tech on cypherpunks list which led to hashcash and other ideas.
English
2K
3.5K
28.7K
3M
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
@BritishHodl I tend to agree.... there is a lot of retail BTC education in the market..... if you won't study it, you won't study it - adding more or arguing the detractors is a waste of energy. Follow your three rules.... ✅✅✅. Work on other things.
English
0
0
1
20
BRITISH HODL ❤️‍🔥🐂❤️‍🔥
Bitcoin content is dead. And it's not because Bitcoin is dead. In-fact the HNW seem to still be buying. Or because the creators in the space suddenly became shit. Because some of them are really great. It's because - as I predicted a year and a half ago and was hated for - we have hit peak Bitcoin education for retail and they don't care anymore. Retail is utterly cooked, fried and has given up. Retail does not give a single damn about Bitcoin. They will be back to take an L when the prices get moving and momentum builds enough. But remember - there's still only 3 rules to Bitcoin. The question is will you pass the IQ test of market moments like these?
English
186
37
799
57.3K
Paul Q retweetledi
Michael Saylor
Michael Saylor@saylor·
Strategy has acquired 4,871 BTC for ~$329.9 million at ~$67,718 per bitcoin. As of 4/5/2026, we hold 766,970 $BTC acquired for ~$58.02 billion at ~$75,644 per bitcoin. $MSTR $STRC strategy.com/press/strategy…
English
1.2K
2.5K
19.5K
1.3M
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
With these verifiable costs - why not initiate demonstration projects (there many already proven models outside the US - that include LT mental health and non-acute drug addiction support services) to implement in NYC with a 5 year reduction target of 40-45%. Oh, that requires leadership....
DeltaSage@deltasage_ai

At 140,000 homeless individuals that math produces $11.4 billion annually, roughly 9% of NYC's entire budget. The homeless population grew 78% since 2019. Spending on the unsheltered subset grew 262% over the same period. The $81,705 is not housing. A median income household spends roughly $28,000 to $29,000 on housing, about 35% of gross income. The city's per-person homeless spend is 287% above what a self-sufficient household pays for shelter alone. The difference is 24/7 institutional staffing, security, meal service, healthcare, case management, and administrative overhead layered on top of the bed cost. The unsheltered 3% cost even more at roughly $87,600 per person, suggesting street homelessness drives marginal cost inflation through emergency medical interventions and intensive outreach despite being a small fraction of the total. Permanent supportive housing costs approximately $25,000 per year in operating subsidies versus $81,705 in shelter. The city is spending 3.3 times more to warehouse people in temporary shelter than to house them permanently. That arithmetic is why the cost curve accelerates. The system is optimized for crisis response, not resolution.

English
0
0
1
38
Paul Q retweetledi
CryptosRus
CryptosRus@CryptosR_Us·
STABLECOINS JUST FLIPPED THE US BANKING SYSTEM (ACH) 🚨 Stablecoins processed $7.2T in February, surpassing ACH at $6.8T for the first time ever. That’s not crypto hype -- that’s core financial infrastructure getting replaced in real time. This is the signal: capital is moving to rails that are 24/7, global, and instant. No banks, no weekends, no borders. Cross-border flows and B2B settlement are driving this -- not retail speculation. Bitcoin is the reserve asset, but stablecoins are becoming the plumbing of the system. Follow the rails, follow the liquidity. 🌊
CryptosRus tweet media
English
83
431
1.7K
106.2K
Paul Q retweetledi
Jameson Lopp
Jameson Lopp@lopp·
In an increasingly polarized world, the most difficult position to hold may be that of the free thinker who rejects false dilemmas.
English
16
16
130
7.4K
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
Can a SCJ speak informally when sitting on the bench? Justice Jackson Suggests Foreign Tourists Qualify for Birthright Citizenship Because They Have ‘Local Allegiance‘ to U.S. While on Vacation breitbart.com/immigration/20… via @BreitbartNews
English
0
0
0
10
Paul Q retweetledi
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
American startup Reflex Robotics makes warehouses faster, smarter, and more efficient.
English
229
651
2.7K
262.5K
Paul Q
Paul Q@SteelCoreBTC·
I think it's important that he included "skilled trades" and farming in this AI interview - they are equally important and he shows how AI can be integrated . Critically important!!
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Jensen Huang just told every college student on Earth the one thing that determines whether they get hired. It is not their GPA. It is not their degree. It is not their internship. Huang: “If I have a choice between two, I would hire the one who’s expert in using AI.” He did not say prefer. He said hire. One gets the job. One does not. The only variable is whether you learned to use the machine. Then he went down the list. Accountant. Hire the one who uses AI. Lawyer. Hire the one who uses AI. Marketing. Supply chain. Sales. Customer service. Every function. Same answer. The person who can command the model does not have an edge. They are the only candidate in the room. Everyone else is applying for a job that no longer exists. Huang: “If you’re a carpenter, if you’re an electrician, go use AI. If I were a farmer, I would absolutely use AI.” That line should demolish every assumption about who this technology is for. This is not a Silicon Valley tool for software engineers. This is infrastructure for anyone who builds anything with their hands or their head. A farmer who uses AI to optimize soil, predict weather, and manage yields is not competing with other farmers. They are operating at a level that used to take an entire department. An electrician who uses AI to model loads, simulate wiring, and quote jobs in seconds does not compete with other electricians. They compete with firms. One person with the model replaces the output of a team without it. That is not a prediction. That is Tuesday. Huang: “Every college student should graduate and be an expert in AI.” Not familiar with it. Not aware of it. Expert. The university system is still training students to execute the work. The market already moved. It wants the person who directs the machine that executes it. Four years of tuition. Thousands of hours of lectures. And if you walk out the door without mastering the one tool that redefines every industry you could enter, you burned all of it. Huang: “I want to see what it could do to elevate my job, so that I could be the innovator to revolutionize this industry myself.” That is the part most people miss. AI does not replace ambition. It multiplies it. The carpenter who learns the model does not lose their craft. They scale it. The pharmacist who learns the model does not become redundant. They become dangerous. One person. Deep skill. Full command of the machine. That used to be called a company. The question is no longer what do you know. It is what can you build with the machine that knows everything. And the people who cannot answer that are not falling behind. They already fell.

English
0
0
1
13