Stefano Peron

19.2K posts

Stefano Peron banner
Stefano Peron

Stefano Peron

@Stefano_Peron

"Nature can never be completely described, for such a description of Nature would have to duplicate Nature”

Veneto, Italia, Venezia land Katılım Aralık 2009
779 Takip Edilen3.8K Takipçiler
Stefano Peron retweetledi
Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara·
Prominent Economics Professor Steve Keen exposes the absolute delusion of financial markets. He warns that the massive destruction of physical resources like fertilizer and helium will inevitably trigger a catastrophic global financial crisis. The establishment is blind.
English
19
128
425
17.6K
Stefano Peron retweetledi
Shay Boloor
Shay Boloor@StockSavvyShay·
$AMD CRUSHED THEIR Q1 EARNINGS • Revenue $10.25B vs Est. $9.85B • EPS $1.37 vs. Est. $1.29 • Data Center Revenue $5.8B vs Est. $5.6B • Gross Margin 55% vs. Est. 52% Q2 Guidance • Revenue $11.2B vs Est. $10.5B • Gross Margin 56% vs. Est. 55%
Shay Boloor tweet media
English
96
194
1.7K
320K
Stefano Peron retweetledi
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
BREAKING: AMD, $AMD, surges over +6% after reporting stronger than expected Q1 2026 earnings and providing positive guidance. The stock has now added +$35 billion in market cap since reporting earnings.
The Kobeissi Letter tweet media
English
101
129
1.3K
116.8K
Stefano Peron retweetledi
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
*ALPHABET SHARES CLIMB 1.6% ON REPORT OF ANTHROPIC SPENDING Alphabet is up because Anthropic is spending Google's money on Alphabet
English
53
86
1.4K
121K
Stefano Peron retweetledi
Oguz Erkan
Oguz Erkan@oguzerkan·
$AMD delivered. Initial commentary is exactly as I expected: - GPU demand remains strong. - High-end CPU demand is surging. - MI450 and Helios will exceed expectations. We’ll likely see Q2 growth driven by CPU ramp and smaller scale GPU deployments. H2 will see larger scale deployments with Helios ramp, so we’ll see further acceleration. $100 billion revenue is coming by 2028. Long $AMD.
Oguz Erkan tweet media
Wall St Engine@wallstengine

$AMD Q1’26 EARNINGS HIGHLIGHTS 🔹 Revenue: $10.25B (Est. $9.89B) 🟢; +38% YoY 🔹 Adj. EPS: $1.37 (Est. $1.28) 🟢; +43% YoY 🔹 Data Center Revenue: $5.8B (Est. $5.6B) 🟢; +57% YoY 🔹 Adj. Gross Margin: 55% (Est. 55.06%) 🔴; +1 ppt YoY 🔹 Data Center now the primary driver of revenue & earnings growth Q2 Guide: 🔹 Revenue: ~$11.2B +/- $300M (Est. $10.52B) 🟢; +46% YoY at midpoint 🔹 Adj. Gross Margin: ~56% (Est. 55.25%) 🟢 Segment Performance: 🔹 Data Center: $5.8B; +57% YoY 🔹 Client & Gaming: $3.6B; +23% YoY 🔹 Client: $2.9B; +26% YoY 🔹 Gaming: $720M; +11% YoY 🔹 Embedded: $873M; +6% YoY Other Metrics: 🔹 Meta & AMD: Plan to deploy up to 6 GW of AMD Instinct GPUs 🔹 Meta: First 1 GW to be powered by custom AMD Instinct MI450-based GPU 🔹 Meta: Lead customer for upcoming 6th Gen AMD EPYC CPUs, “Venice” and “Verano” 🔹 AMD & Samsung: Collaborating on HBM4 supply for AMD Instinct MI455X GPUs 🔹 AMD & TCS: Co-developing AMD Helios-based rack-scale AI infrastructure Financials: 🔹 Adj. Operating Income: $2.54B; +43% YoY 🔹 Adj. Operating Margin: 25%; +1 ppt YoY 🔹 Adj. Net Income: $2.27B; +45% YoY 🔹 GAAP Gross Margin: 53%; +3 ppts YoY 🔹 GAAP Operating Income: $1.48B; +83% YoY 🔹 GAAP Net Income: $1.38B; +95% YoY 🔹 GAAP EPS: $0.84; +91% YoY Commentary: 🔸 “We delivered an outstanding first quarter, driven by accelerating demand for AI infrastructure, with Data Center now the primary driver of our revenue and earnings growth.” 🔸 “We are seeing strong momentum as inferencing and agentic AI drive increasing demand for high-performance CPUs and accelerators.” 🔸 “Looking ahead, we expect server growth to accelerate meaningfully as we scale supply to meet demand.” 🔸 “Customer engagement around MI450 Series and Helios is strengthening, with leading customer forecasts exceeding our initial expectations and a growing pipeline of large-scale deployments providing us with increasing visibility into our growth trajectory.”

English
12
27
217
26.9K
Stefano Peron retweetledi
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
BREAKING: The S&P 500 surges to a new record high, now up +15% since its March 30th low. Asset owners are winning.
The Kobeissi Letter tweet media
English
282
569
4.8K
1.3M
Stefano Peron retweetledi
Beardo
Beardo@BeardoTrader·
Repeat after me:
Beardo tweet media
English
269
361
3.9K
210.7K
Stefano Peron retweetledi
Philosophy Of Physics
Philosophy Of Physics@PhilosophyOfPhy·
The Penrose–Hameroff “Orch OR” theory of consciousness is one of those ideas that sits right at the edge of physics and philosophy, where things start to feel both exciting and a little uncomfortable. It was developed in the mid-1990s by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff. Their starting point was a bold question: can human consciousness really be explained as just computation, like a very complex computer running in the brain? Penrose suspected the answer was no. He argued that human understanding, especially in mathematics, seems to go beyond strict computation. From that idea, the two proposed something unusual. Instead of neurons alone producing consciousness, they suggested that tiny structures inside neurons, called microtubules, might support quantum processes. According to their theory, these structures can briefly maintain quantum coherence, a delicate state where many possibilities exist at once. At some point, this coherence collapses in a very specific way, what Penrose calls “objective reduction.” Unlike the usual quantum collapse tied to measurement, this one is linked to gravity and is supposed to be fundamental and non-computational. The claim is that each such event contributes to a moment of conscious experience. It is a striking idea, but also a deeply controversial one. Critics argue that the brain is far too warm, wet, and noisy for such fragile quantum states to survive long enough to matter. In most known systems, quantum coherence disappears almost instantly under those conditions. From the perspective of mainstream neuroscience, classical processes in neurons already explain brain activity well enough, without needing quantum mechanics. So the theory remains speculative, and most scientists do not accept it as a working model of consciousness. Still, it has had an impact. It pushed researchers to take seriously the question of whether physics, especially quantum theory, might play a deeper role in the mind. It also overlaps with the growing field of quantum biology, where subtle quantum effects have been observed in some biological systems. Even if Orch OR turns out to be wrong, it has done something valuable. It forced people to ask whether consciousness is just computation, or whether it touches something more fundamental about how the universe itself is structured.
Philosophy Of Physics tweet media
English
22
37
161
22.6K
Stefano Peron retweetledi
Beardo
Beardo@BeardoTrader·
It’s actually stupid easy to make money right now. Just find the most high flying overbought chart in the market and long the absolute top with leverage. You'll be retired by Friday. (Not financial advice)
English
72
32
1.2K
63.1K
Stefano Peron retweetledi
Douglas A. Boneparth
Douglas A. Boneparth@dougboneparth·
Went to buy my dream car at the Porsche dealership today. I offered to pay 50% in cash and 50% in stock. The sales associate went to get the manager who asked me to leave.
English
226
156
9.4K
1.3M