Long Zhang

@HKokbore 一百万在集中营的信息是中共疏导策略。集中营里的维吾尔人可能不是一百万，而是几百万，按比例筛选进监狱，也有中共军方情报机构直接失踪肉体灭绝活摘器官的，五年可能总共🈶五百万至八百万，大家要明白这是流水线，我估算日平均非正常死亡(包括活摘器官和秘密处决等)每天在2500至3000左右。

@NYCMayor @ZohranKMamdani I support your statement Mr. Mamdani, but please do not forget the genocide against Uyghurs and Kazakhs in China, as there are also Uyghur and Kazakh communities living in New York who have been affected.

@ElaineYuMuMu 操縱天氣屬於敵基督的特徵。上帝安拉降世的古蘭是final testaments. 耶穌基督再來人間與伊斯蘭教的禮拜方式幾乎完全一樣。

世人哪，耶和华已指示你何为善。他向你所要的是什么呢？只要你行公义，好怜悯，存谦卑的心，与你的神同行。（弥迦书6:8） 看见伊朗、伊拉克、土耳其境内气候突然转变，降雨量大增，许多地区由干涸变润泽、由沙漠变绿地，由衷地为他们高兴，希望他们生活富足，内心平和，更希望他们能够认识那位公义怜悯的独一真神，灵魂得到耶稣基督生命活水的滋养。

@wenjiebc 2017年我在休斯頓一座清真寺認識了一年輕阿富汗小伙，可能是為美軍做翻譯而後快速移民美國的。開齋節他邀請我去他那個年輕阿富汗翻譯小圈子社群去過節，我們好不快活。半年後他朋友遇到我對我說我這個剛認識不久的朋友得癌症去世了。如這小伙沒得癌症，過節後也許給我找個阿富汗老婆，似乎他必須得癌症

我不认为是中国或者伊朗杀了他，但我不知道是谁杀了他。中国和伊朗应该不怕他在美国国会作证。 即将成为UFO的举报人在同意向国会作证后死于意外药物过量

“甚至只是打了一次篮球——锻炼身体也有潜在的“暴恐分子”嫌疑——就被重点监控，然后经历审讯和酷刑，屈打成招，获刑入狱。” 何止。 我看过的新疆警察文件里有一个维吾尔父亲因为给自己的幼儿教翻跟头被判刑七年。罪名是培训恐怖分子。

New Gospel Gulnisa

新福音書 詩人古丽妮萨

古丽妮萨·伊敏的诗： 夜之花园 夜晚是一座寂静的花园， 每一朵花是我亲手种的 每一个花瓣是我亲手刺绣的 花园里的土地是从你处带来的 我返回花园 我找回自己 有时躺在花下 牙齿咬得咯吱响 我吸收的其它空气 使我进入化学反应 杀死我的脑细胞 终将我丢入回收箱。 在夜里，花园中的花是什么颜色？ 我轻轻触摸 为了感受最后的黑暗 为了体会它的孤独 我在哭， 夜之花园 带我往何处？ 不知之者，正是知之者。 #维吾尔援助 #uyghurhjelp

中国共产党建立其庞大的器官移植产业，是以法轮功学员的生命为代价的。 而当西方世界对此视而不见时，这些暴行便愈演愈烈。 如今，中共已对大量维吾尔人进行了血液检测——这一点已由泄露的“新疆文件”所证​​实。此外，伊森·古特曼（@Eastofethan）也记录了年轻维吾尔人从集中营中频繁失踪的现象。 我很荣幸受邀出席今天由 @OfficialNHRW 举办的活动，就中国“按需杀人、摘取器官”的产业，以及我的新书《按需杀戮》（Killed to Order）发表演讲。 让我们携手努力，终结美国在如此邪恶暴行中的共谋角色。

德黑兰缺水的时候我就在猜是美国和以色列用HARRP干的。 ------------------------- 🇮🇷 🇺🇸 伊朗指控美国从事“气象恐怖主义” 一位伊朗水利专家表示： “以色列和美国具备制造干旱的能力，四十年来，他们一直在实施‘气象战’。” 他披露的卫星数据显示，原本从地中海方向飘来、理应进入伊朗境内的云团，却突然偏离了既定航向。 “我不在乎有多少人声称这是正常现象。但我断言：这绝不正常。乌尔米耶湖（Lake Urmia）已经干涸了。”

@LoneTraveler111 DeDajjalization 去敵基督化的結果之一就是雨水🌧️回來了！

@EasternTurki Hoping WUC @UyghurCongress abandon all compromises and follow Nabi Isa me to contribute to the future independence of East Turkistan and freedom of ET people, Insha Allah! x.com/StevenLZhang/s…

@EasternTurki 中共必須從所有被佔領土撤軍並撤銷中國人民解放軍所有番號而且解散共產黨！x.com/stevenlzhang/s…

A Critique of the World Uyghur Congress (WUC) and Dolkun Isa: The Perspective of True East Turkistan Independence Advocates From the perspective of true East Turkistan independence advocates—the vast majority of the diaspora who reject any compromise with Chinese colonialism—here is a clear, unapologetic critique of the World Uyghur Congress (WUC) @UyghurCongress and @Dolkun_Isa Dolkun Isa’s actions. @HKokbore @RushanAbbas @MehmetTohti @AHakimIdris 1⃣. Betrayal and damaging act by attending “The Indigenous Peoples” event The most shameful part is WUC’s repeated participation in the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII). Dolkun Isa has spoken there multiple times (2017, 2018, and later sessions), often appearing under the electronic banner “Indigenous Peoples’ Organizations.” This creates ambiguity. Audiences (especially those sympathetic to China or simply skimming reports) can and do interpret it as that Uyghurs are presenting themselves as an indigenous people. China and China friendly nations, including majority of Muslim nations, can weaponize this to say “even their own leaders accept they are just a minority/indigenous group inside China.” This is especially true for those who are not deeply familiar with the nuances of Uyghur politics or UN accreditation rules. Furthermore, we do not recognize Dolkun Isa as our leader, nor do we view the WUC as representing the collective interests of East Turkistan. From the real patriotic perspective, this is political treason: 🔹Rejection of the Label: The East Turkistani people overwhelmingly rejected the “indigenous peoples” label in a 2021 diaspora poll (over 90% opposition). 🔹Framework Failure: The entire UNDRIP framework is about internal rights within an existing state—cultural preservation, limited autonomy, minority protections—not decolonization or restoring national independence. 🔹Legitimizing China: By allowing themselves to be listed and to speak under that banner, WUC actively helps China frame East Turkistan as merely an “internal ethnic/minority issue” inside China instead of a colonized and occupied sovereign nation. Palestinian advocates do not water down their language in UN forums. They call it occupied Palestine and settler-colonialism without fear. WUC’s refusal to do the same for East Turkistan proves they have chosen a Beijing-friendly path: human-rights talk that leaves Chinese sovereignty unchallenged. 2⃣. The UN has NO rule banning “East Turkistan” The United Nations has no official prohibition, no rule in its Rules of Procedure, and no standing policy that forbids the use of the historical and correct name East Turkistan in any meeting, including formal plenaries of the UNPFII or the Human Rights Council. Speakers are allowed to use their preferred terminology as long as it stays within basic rules of decorum. China may scream “separatist” and raise points of order, but that is political bullying, not UN law. WUC and Dolkun Isa know this perfectly well. 3⃣. WUC’s deliberate, calculated self-censorship WUC occasionally and symbolically uses the English term “East Turkistan,” in low-impact venues: their own website, social media, press releases, and interviews. But in high-impact formal UN speeches—the exact places where the international diplomatic record is created—they almost never use the term. Instead, they speak of “Uyghurs in China,” “China’s Uyghur region,” or “human rights in Xinjiang.” This is a deliberate strategy. Even when China interrupts and calls Uyghurs terrorists anyway, WUC chooses the softer language. They know full well that China will harass them regardless; yet, they continue to self-censor where it matters most. 4⃣. The Moral Disgrace of Leadership Furthermore, it is a profound disgrace for the Uyghur/East Turkistan cause to be represented by individuals facing credible, long-standing allegations of sexual harassment. Elevating someone associated with such misconduct to speak on human rights or represent the dignity of the East Turkistani people undermines our moral authority. The movement for national liberation requires leaders whose integrity is beyond reproach; keeping such figures still in positions of influence is an insult to the victims of Uyghur genocide in China occupied East Turkistan. 5⃣. The final take Even their cautious, “safe” human-rights advocacy did nothing to stop the genocide. The concentration camps, forced sterilizations, cultural erasure, and demographic replacement have continued and evolved despite years of WUC’s moderate approach. China was never going to be shamed into stopping by polite language. By softening the core demand—full independence and decolonization—WUC has helped keep the East Turkistan issue trapped in the “China’s internal affair” box that Beijing loves. They have traded the national liberation struggle for photo-ops, grants, and temporary Western applause, while the homeland continues to be destroyed. Conclusion From the genuine East Turkistan patriotic perspective, WUC and Dolkun Isa are not simply “pragmatic.” Their consistent, calculated choice to self-censor “East Turkistan,” to embrace the Indigenous Peoples’ framework, to avoid direct challenges to Chinese sovereignty, and to maintain leaders implicated in sexual harassment constitutes a betrayal of the East Turkistani people. It is not neutral. It is not harmless. It actively damages the national cause by legitimizing the very colonial framework the occupier demands. True patriots will never accept this dilution of our struggle. East Turkistan is not a human-rights problem inside China; it is an occupied nation demanding freedom. Anything less is surrender dressed up as advocacy.

福林将军 General Mike Flynn 突发：关于退出中东这场战争的思考 现在已经非常清楚，大多数美国人对与伊朗的战争感到不满，同时也很明显，@POTUS 正在寻求退出战略，以便让我们从这场战争中脱身。 我们应该如何退出？ 美国可以轻松退出在这场冲突中的直接军事参与，只需将任何兵力缩减视为基于条件的、深思熟虑的成功，而不是撤退。 这并非一厢情愿的想法。 这一理念与历史上大国在核心目标已达成或成本超过收益时处理有限战争的方式完全一致。 关键在于时机、顺序，以及在缩减过程中保持威慑力，让对手（即伊朗及其代理人）将其视为力量的展示，而不是弱点。 @realDonaldTrump 已经明确表示，我们并非陷入一场无休止的战争。 美以对伊朗的打击针对的是核设施、导弹基础设施和领导层目标，包括击毙伊朗最高领袖哈梅内伊。我们已完成既定目标。 伊朗能力的快速（战术性）削弱造成了严重破坏，但也引发了伊朗立即（且有些出乎意料）的报复。尽管伊朗在基础设施破坏、国际孤立和经济中断方面付出了沉重代价，但该政权仍维持了对国家的控制。而且与阿富汗和伊拉克不同，政权更迭从来不是我们的既定目标。 这不是越南（直升机撤离西贡）或阿富汗（阿比门爆炸案）那样的场景。美国没有陷入无休止占领的大型作战部队。 我们的退出在后勤上是直截了当的。 1. 逐步解除封锁。 2. 减少航母存在。 3. 将顾问/支持角色移交给那些对地区安全和通道有更大需求的伙伴。 4. 评估伊朗境内剩余派系是否需要援助，以及如何提供这些援助。 那么，这意味着什么？ 对手会考验我们的决心，而盟友则会观察我们是否会抛弃他们。这些动态必须被理解。 下一步该怎么做？有哪些可行的路径？ 1. 宣布核心目标已达成使命，并谈判达成有利的停战协议。继续当前的会谈，并根据需要引入其他参与方。 2. 在该地区保持轻足迹，将“和平红利”和重建工作移交给多边论坛（例如加沙和平委员会）。 3. 声明美国正在进行战略重置，并重新优先考虑全球需求（这本身就是必要的，并不意味着失败，只需宣布一次转向即可）。美国不再需要中东这个泥潭。真正的政治输家是那些当初把我们拖入阿富汗和伊拉克的人。美国正在做出战略计算，继续和平努力，同时为未来的机遇和挑战进行重置。 存在风险吗？ 1. 伊朗会试图将其宣传为他们的胜利、我们的失败。为了威慑这一点，美国必须证明未来的威慑在于能力和意志（如果涉及我们的核心利益，美国人拥有充足的这些资源），而非永久驻军。 2. 盟友的感知会引发不确定性。以色列政府和海湾国家会担心被抛弃。只需通过持续的安全保障和武器供应（与他们自身的克制挂钩）来安抚他们。 3. 在国内战线，新保守主义鹰派会痛哭流涕，而“美国优先”声音则会为川普的交易成功欢呼。 这些只是初步的一些想法。纵观历史，参与过以往战役的大国都在收益开始递减时退出了有限战争。 一条清晰的路径已经存在。 现在的执行取决于川普政府明确传达：是实力让美国得以退出。 上帝保佑我们的部队，上帝保佑美国🙏🏼🇺🇸 🌸 关注 t.me/wenjiech

@RayhanAsat UN experts should show the CCP’s MasterBlueprint of Uyghur Genocide I tried to reconstruct and recover, to China officials

See the full communication here. spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/…

Breaking! Eight independent @UN experts have sent a communication to China on the severe restrictions of China’s so-called “ethnic unity law” on the #Uyghurs’ cultural way of life, religious freedom, freedom of expression & practice of language etc. They also raised transnational repression and other international law issues that may arise from the “authoritarian law.”