Stock Twat

@AmiriKing He’s a child. Stealing and carjacking.

Tried to carjack the wrong white boy. We are taking America back. It’s coming.

@omgsidewalks Current.

WHAT’S THAT PHASE OF LIFE CALLED, WHEN YOU DON’T WANT TO LEAVE THE HOUSE? AND YOU DON’T WANT ANYONE COMING OVER TO THE HOUSE.

@sunnyright @RepThomasMassie What an awful human being you are Dark Evil! Sunny you are not! @RepThomasMassie please don’t respond to posts like this. They don’t deserve your attention.

@RepThomasMassie And yet here you are a few days after losing a primary filing for a 2028 run so you can keep taking campaign donations for an election you’re supposedly not even committed to running in yet

Your reminder that Massie has been living off politics for upwards of 16 years, so it was either this or a podcast because he's got nothing else left

@zscaler Very unhappy shareholder here. Kevin was inept at handling the earnings call. An utter failure at assuring the market of the company’s future success! Careless in his words and does not strike confidence in this shareholder.

🧭 🗺️ 🧳 🥾 Zenith Live is a choose-your-own-adventure for #SecurityLeaders—with 9 tracks designed around what you’re tackling right now → bit.ly/4kUJyiL Whether you’re going for strategy, hands-on technical depth, or “tell me what actually works in the real world,” there’s a track with your name on it. Mix, match, and build the agenda that fits. Comment with the track you’re most excited about—or the one your team needs most. #ZenithLive #AISecurity #AI

@c6440504784731 @zscaler This Kevin guy should be fired! What a careless communication about forward guidance! He went out of his way to ensure we know that he DOES NOT CARE about shareholders investment! To be holding the shares as it tanks is disheartening.

@zscaler What a Poorly Communicated Conference Call. Very Disappointing "Go Forward" Guidance and two Senior Sales Leaders just left the Company. How were they treated In a rapidly increasing environment there should be no reason to jump ship! Better get a grip on Sales Team!!!

@DesireeAmerica4 One day, hopefully not in my lifetime, our government will repeal the the constitution.

Jennifer Combs, a resident of Trinidad, Texas, was actively arrested and jailed simply for making a Facebook post exposing the city's brown, contaminated tap water. The city officials panicked over the bad publicity, hid behind a garbage law, and used the local police department to lock her up under the guise of "preventing public alarm." ​Let’s be entirely real: this isn’t law enforcement; it’s tyrannical retaliation. Since when does a local bureaucrat get the right to suspend the First Amendment because their infrastructure is failing? If the citizens can’t openly criticize the basic hiding-in-plain-sight truth of what’s coming out of their own common faucets without getting a mugshot, the system is completely broken. ​She is officially suing the city for violating her civil rights. Is this Texas or North Korea? ​🎥: Fox 4 News

@redromatica When I don’t know what to do, when God seems silent and life seems aimless- I pray. Trite perhaps, but it keeps me on my knees and in subjection. I prayed for you soldier in the army of the Lord.

If anyone is a true Christian and sees this please pray for me. I’m not losing faith in that I know God loves me, but I’m in a season that’s heavy and confusing that seems purposeless and endless and I could really use prayers.

@tardyhard @MeghanMcCain 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@MeghanMcCain He actually loved it! Not AI.

Can the advance people not put some random mans bellybutton next to our presidents head in the camera shot? Thx.

@soupcanarchist Let her enjoy the pleasure and peace of her own company. She’ll let you know when she needs company.

Ok first time mom question: When my baby wakes up. She just lays there quitely cooing and playing with her own hands. I've started just letting her chill in there on her own until she cries out for me. But today its been like 20 minutes. Do I just... let her be? (I can see and hear her on the monitor obviously)

@Caroltreasure @allenanalysis I need to be able to like your bio! 💯💯💯💯

@allenanalysis unlike trump who can’t read..…bezos understands history.. there’s always a horrific revolution when poor folks resist the pressure to fight among themselves over crumbs skin color or religious differences.. and figure out who the real oppressors are…

Jeff Bezos just said the bottom half of Americans should pay zero federal income tax. And honestly? He may have accidentally exposed the entire scam. Bezos pointed to a nurse in Queens making roughly $75,000 a year and paying around $12,000 in taxes: “We shouldn’t be asking this nurse in Queens to send money to Washington.” Think about how insane this system has become. A nurse working 12-hour shifts is taxed before she even sees her paycheck while billionaires borrow against appreciating assets, exploit loopholes, and sometimes pay lower effective tax rates than school teachers. The average American is funding an empire they can barely afford to live in. Wars. Interest payments. Corporate subsidies. Defense contracts. Lobbyist wish lists. Meanwhile the person changing bedpans in Queens gets her paycheck carved up like she’s financing Rome before collapse. The most dangerous thing Bezos said wasn’t about taxes. It was admitting out loud that the people carrying the country on their backs are getting crushed while the system tells them it’s “normal.”

@elonmusk The only times I ever seen Elon talk about racism. He’s got an agenda. He’s relentless with it.

Has any action been taken against the police officers who handcuffed this boy and made him bleed to death in the street? Who are they? x.com/i/grok/share/d…

@kdgt Sheeple took her orders.

I just went to my polling place, showed my photo ID, and proudly voted for Ed Gallrein! And I’m a former 7 time Massie voter. No more!

@real_bechambers Happy birthday Danny-O!!!!🎉🎂🥳

Today is my son’s(Danny) birthday. He turns 35 today. Could you please wish my son a very happy birthday today 🎂🎉🥳🎈🎁

@gothburz This enrages me. The AI deepfake to fool senior citizens, as the President I voted for, actively seeks ways to cut their Medicare hospice benefits, under the guise of reducing fraud, enrages me. We are expected to believe this President cares about spending & fraud? He cut Doge!

I am the Deputy Director of Institutional Conversion at America First Works. That's not what my title says. My title says "Political Affairs." But what I do is convert institutional authority into campaign assets. A cabinet secretary becomes a rally speaker. A four-star general becomes a character witness. The Secretary of Defense of the United States becomes a private citizen for an afternoon in Hebron, Kentucky. I manage the paperwork that makes one look like the other. Yesterday I sent Pete Hegseth to tell 2,400 people in a convention center that their eight-term congressman is a coward. Let me show you the logistics, because the logistics are the product. Sunday morning, Fort Campbell, Kentucky. Official business. Hegseth presided over a Purple Heart ceremony for nine soldiers wounded in a 2003 fratricide attack—Sergeant Hasan Akbar, 101st Airborne, threw four grenades into his fellow soldiers' tents and opened fire with an M4. Killed two. Wounded fourteen. The Army denied Purple Hearts for twenty-three years because they classified an American soldier murdering other American soldiers as "non-combat." Hegseth awarded those medals Sunday and called them "long overdue." Then he drove 240 miles north to conduct his own friendly fire. Fort Campbell to Hebron, Kentucky. Four hours by car. I need you to note that no reporter has established how the Secretary of Defense traveled those 240 miles. Military vehicle? Private car? Who drove? Who paid? The Pentagon confirmed "no taxpayer funds were used for the political rally." The rally. Not the four-hour drive between the taxpayer-funded medal ceremony and the political rally in the same state on the same trip. Nobody asked about the drive. I didn't offer. He changed into a sport coat in a holding room backstage. He walked onto a stage built by our advance team, behind a podium bearing our logo, in front of a crowd recruited through our email list. And before speaking, he said: "I have to say up front, for the lawyers, that I'm here in my personal capacity as a private citizen." Then the man who commands 1.3 million active-duty troops told a room full of Kentucky voters that their congressman lacks courage. "Real courage," he said, "means stepping up when the mission matters most." I wrote that line. Not the mission of defending the Constitution. Not the mission of representing 478,000 constituents who elected him eight consecutive times. The mission of voting yes on a spending bill. That is what the Secretary of Defense means by courage in May 2026: compliance with a line item. The man who sends soldiers to die defines courage as voting with the President on the debt ceiling. No sitting Secretary of Defense in modern American history has appeared at a congressional primary rally. Not Weinberger. Not Rumsfeld. Not Gates. Not Mattis. The tradition of keeping the military nonpartisan is older than the office itself. Hegseth broke it for a pumpkin farmer in northern Kentucky. But I'm getting ahead of myself. The Pentagon confirmed no taxpayer dollars. The Hatch Act has an exception for Senate-confirmed appointees acting in their personal capacity. The personal capacity begins at the holding room door. The official capacity ends at Fort Campbell's gate. The 240 miles between them—the four hours, the vehicle, the driver, the fuel—exist in a legal gray space that nobody is required to characterize because nobody has asked. I perfected this conversion rate. Stephen Miller posted it Sunday night, timed to the algorithm's peak distribution window. "Had Massie succeeded in defeating the reconciliation bill, right now ICE would be penniless and broke." Thomas Massie has voted against every omnibus spending bill, every continuing resolution, every debt ceiling increase, and every unfunded mandate for thirteen consecutive years. In 2014, this was fiscal conservatism. In 2017, the Freedom Caucus mandate. In 2019, principled opposition to government bloat. Ted Cruz read Green Eggs and Ham on the Senate floor for twenty-one hours over less. In 2026, Stephen Miller calls it "siding with Democrats to defund ICE." Massie voted against $5 trillion in new spending. The bill includes ICE funding. Therefore: voting against $5 trillion in spending equals defunding ICE. By this formula, every Republican who voted against every Obama-era omnibus—which also funded ICE—defunded ICE for eight years. The entire House Freedom Caucus defunded ICE from 2011 to 2019. Nobody called it that. The vocabulary hadn't been updated yet. The update shipped Sunday night. Miller's post. Then the President, three Truth Social salvos in ninety minutes: "the worst and most unreliable Republican Congressman in the history of our Country." "Vote the bum out on Tuesday." "Major sleazebag." I timed the distribution window. Miller provided the vocabulary. The President provided the volume. Three sources, one message, no coordination meeting necessary. The vocabulary is self-synchronizing now. In 2014, the word was "principled." In 2026, the word is "disloyal." The votes didn't change. I changed the dictionary. Let me describe what Thomas Massie voted against, because Miller won't and Hegseth can't. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act. $5 trillion added to the national debt. Raises the debt ceiling. Cuts Medicaid. Cuts food stamps. Funds $170 billion in border enforcement—$46.5 billion for wall construction, $45 billion for 100,000 new detention beds, $29.9 billion for ICE agents and transport. Passed the House 215 to 214. One-vote margin. Massie's stated reason: "I cannot vote to add $5 trillion to the debt my children will inherit." This is, word for word, the reason every Republican in Congress gave for opposing the Affordable Care Act, the American Recovery Act, and every Democratic spending bill from 2009 to 2017. The philosophy is identical. The authorship changed. When the spending was theirs, opposition was patriotism. When the spending is ours, opposition is defunding ICE. I don't find this hypocritical. Hypocrisy requires a principle being violated. No principle is being violated. The principle was always compliance. We dressed it in fiscal language when compliance and fiscal conservatism happened to point the same direction. Now they diverge. The costume comes off. The principle was never the debt. The principle was: vote yes when your team spends. Massie kept the old principle. We updated the firmware. His operating system is now incompatible. Let me tell you about Thomas Massie's operating system, because it's relevant to the threat assessment. Massie holds a bachelor's and a master's from MIT in electrical engineering and mechanical engineering. He co-founded a robotics company. He holds patents in haptic feedback systems—force-feedback interfaces for three-dimensional computing. He built his own timber-frame house on a cattle farm in Lewis County, Kentucky, powered by solar panels and a repurposed Tesla Model S battery pack. He lives off-grid. The man who is being called "out of touch with Kentucky values" by three billionaires from Manhattan, Las Vegas, and Park Avenue literally built his own home with his own hands and powers it with a battery he salvaged from an electric car. He is being primaried by a man whose family runs a petting zoo. I don't say that to be dismissive. I say it because it's relevant to the product specifications, which I'll get to. Thomas Massie votes with the President of the United States approximately 84% of the time. That is the number from the American Progress Action scorecard—32 out of 38 votes aligned with the White House position. Massie himself says "about 90%." I'll give him the generous number. Let's say 90%. The Secretary of Defense appeared in his district to call him a coward. The President called him a bum, a sleazebag, the worst Republican in history. Stephen Miller accused him of siding with Democrats. His own party spent $14.3 million to remove him in the most expensive House primary in American history. $32 million total. More than most Senate races. Eighty-four to ninety percent compliance. And the full apparatus activated. The threshold is not 90%. The threshold is not 95%. The threshold is 100%. There is no acceptable deviation. There is no "principled stand." There is no "conscience vote." There is compliance, or there is $32 million, a Secretary of Defense in a sport coat, and a Sunday-night vocabulary update that turns thirteen years of fiscal conservatism into "siding with Democrats." On Saturday, Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana didn't just lose his primary. He finished third. Third. Eliminated in the first round. The first Republican senator to lose renomination since Richard Lugar in 2012. Cassidy's crime: voting to convict the President in the second impeachment trial. February 2021. Five years and three months ago. The retribution has no statute of limitations. Here is the broader ledger. Ten House Republicans voted to impeach in January 2021. Four lost their primaries. Four retired rather than face voters. Eight out of ten gone. Eighty percent attrition. Seven senators voted to convict. Five retired or left office. One just finished third in his own primary. Six out of seven gone. Eighty-six percent attrition. Liz Cheney lost by thirty-seven points. Now you're a freshman. You won by eight points. You have a mortgage. You have a committee assignment. You're watching this. What do you do on the next vote? I already know. You already know. The $32 million was never about Kentucky. Kentucky is the demonstration. The 434 other members are the market. Elon Musk knows too. In July 2025, someone on X asked if he'd support Massie. Musk replied: "I will." Two words. The world's richest man. Ten months later, Massie confirmed to Fox News: "To my knowledge, he has not donated to my campaign." No PAC contribution either. Musk read the room. Musk, who bought an entire social media platform, who spent $200 million on a presidential election, who carries the President's agenda on immigration and government efficiency—looked at this race, calculated the political cost of supporting a man the President called a bum, and vanished. The world's richest man decided the price of one congressional endorsement was too high. I present this as the system working. When the richest man alive won't back you, you've been correctly priced out of the market. Now let me introduce the product. Ed Gallrein. Retired Navy SEAL captain. Thirty years in Naval Special Warfare. Trump-endorsed. Here is what the endorsement materials don't include. In May 2016—the week Donald Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee—Gallrein changed his party registration from Republican to Independent. He left the party because of Trump. He came back in 2021, after Trump left office, to run for state senate. He lost that race by 100 votes. Now he is running as Trump's hand-picked loyalty candidate against a man who has never left the Republican Party. The man who fled Trump is the loyalty replacement for the man who stayed. His campaign biography says he served with SEAL Team Six. It says "four Bronze Stars." I need to note that every biographical document, veterans organization profile, civic group citation, and news article about Ed Gallrein from 2011 through 2024 says three Bronze Stars. Three. The fourth appeared in campaign materials in late 2025—the month he became a candidate. The Daily Caller reported the discrepancy. The campaign called it a "lie-filled story." The campaign did not explain where the fourth Bronze Star came from. The campaign did not produce the citation. The campaign did not deny the number change. Here is what the endorsement materials definitely don't include. In private SEAL community forums, his former teammates call him "one of the most hated SEALs in the history of the SEAL teams." The exact quote from one retired operator: "Biggest POS ever to wear a Trident." Multiple sources report that teammates put pinpricks in his dive suit—small punctures in the neoprene, a signal of contempt so extreme it borders on attempted harm. The community of elite warriors we are selling as his credential wanted him gone badly enough to sabotage his equipment. I don't find this disqualifying. I find it irrelevant. We're not selling his character. We're selling his compliance. Gallrein Farms. Shelbyville, Kentucky. The campaign says "five generations of farming, over 100 years." What Gallrein Farms is, specifically: a 1,200-acre agritourism entertainment venue. U-pick strawberries at $3.99 per pound. Petting zoo. Corn maze. Hayrides. Birthday parties. Corporate team-building events. A cafe with a bakery. A greenhouse retail shop. Online merchandise. It is a family entertainment destination with a gift shop. The soybeans are a tax classification. I'm not mocking this. I'm describing the product accurately. The "Kentucky farmer" is a birthday party venue operator. The "Navy SEAL hero" added a Bronze Star when he became a candidate. The "Trump loyalist" left the party over Trump. The entire product is a narrative construction, and the narrative works because nobody checks and nobody asks and the $14.3 million in advertising drowns out anyone who does. Gallrein raised $3.1 million on his own. Only 2.6% came from Kentucky—approximately $32,000. Zero dollars from Boone County. Zero from Kenton County. Zero from Campbell County. Those are the three largest counties in the district he wants to represent. The three counties that contain the majority of the 478,000 people whose voice he claims to be. Zero dollars from any of them. His funding comes from Manhattan, Park Avenue, Las Vegas, and a platform that makes out-of-state money look local. He has declined every debate invitation. Declined every candidate forum. Declined the Associated Press interview request. He delivers only prepared speeches at events we organize. His policy platform is five bullet points totaling approximately 150 words. No bill citations. No spending figures. No mechanisms. His entire legislative philosophy fits in a tweet. I don't say this as criticism. These are specifications. You don't want a replacement congressman who has opinions. Opinions introduce variance. Variance is risk. You want a photograph in tactical gear, a compliance guarantee, and $14.3 million in someone else's convictions loaded like firmware. He arrives in Washington knowing exactly who built him and exactly what 100% means. He watched what happened to the man who tried 84%. And here is what we ran against the man who tried 84%. An AI-generated advertisement depicting Thomas Massie—a sitting United States congressman—holding hands with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar, checking into a hotel room. The narrator says: "This is worse than adultery. It's a complete and total betrayal of President Trump and Kentucky conservatives." There is a small AI-disclosure disclaimer in the corner. Researchers at the University of Florida noted it "exploits older voters' truth bias" and that the "hyper-realism overwhelms the disclaimer." We targeted the Boomer demographic, which polls show favors Gallrein. The deepfake runs in heavy rotation. It cost less than a real photo shoot. We are running AI-generated sexual imagery of a sitting congressman, funded by three billionaires from out of state, against a man whose actual crime is voting against a spending bill. I present this as the state of American democracy in 2026. I present it without commentary because the facts require none. Now let me describe what makes Massie more expensive to remove than Bowman or Bush. Five days ago—May 15th, five days before today's primary—Massie introduced H.R. 8809. The AIPAC Act. It would amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 to require organizations that primarily advance the interests of a foreign government to register as foreign agents. He filed it while they were spending millions to remove him. He filed it knowing he might not be in Congress next week. He filed it as a matter of public record, so that even if he loses, the bill exists, the concept exists, the precedent exists. It is either insane courage or the most expensive middle finger in legislative history. I respect it the way you respect an adversary who makes your job harder and your budget larger. If AIPAC were required to register under FARA, every dollar of the $6.6 million pro-Israel operation against Massie would require public disclosure of its foreign-interest origin. Every donor. Every routing. Every transaction. The bill will not pass. But the fact that he introduced it is why the budget is $32 million and not $15 million. Your viral AIPAC confession described one removal architecture. Allow me to describe the other. AIPAC spends to remove Massie because he voted against foreign aid. We spend to remove Massie because he voted against domestic spending. AIPAC uses the word "anti-Israel." We use the word "disloyal." Different vocabulary, same function. Different donor base, same target. Different PACs, same Tuesday. United Democracy Project. Republican Jewish Coalition. $6.6 million. That's their operation. MAGA KY—founded by Chris LaCivita, the President's 2024 campaign co-manager, and Tony Fabrizio, the President's personal pollster. $2.7 million. Funded by Paul Singer, Miriam Adelson, John Paulson. America First Works organizes the Hegseth rally. Christians United for Israel buys the billboards. That's our operation. Two architectures. Zero shared conference calls. Zero joint filings. Zero acknowledged coordination. We have never been in the same room. The system is designed so that any deviation from any approved line item triggers removal from at least one direction. Deviate on foreign policy: the AIPAC architecture activates. Deviate on domestic spending: the loyalty architecture activates. Deviate on both: both activate simultaneously, from different angles, with different vocabularies, against the same target, on the same Tuesday. Thomas Massie deviated on both. The beauty is the redundancy. If AIPAC's $6.6 million fails, our $14.3 million succeeds. If our operation fails, theirs succeeds. The congressman must survive both simultaneously. The system only needs to win once. But I haven't described the third track. The air cover. Mark Levin runs a nationally syndicated radio show and a Fox News program. His position on Israel is not a position. It is a doctrine. Any Republican who opposes Israel aid is, in Levin's vocabulary, a "reliable anti-Republican vote" backed by "anti-Israel, anti-Trump figures." He has been building the rhetorical case against Massie for years—on Iran votes, on the Epstein files, on foreign aid. He doesn't need instructions from Singer or Adelson. He is ideologically pre-loaded. The donors fund the think tanks—Hudson Institute, Manhattan Institute, AEI, Heritage—that provide Levin's guests, his talking points, his intellectual scaffolding. The money flows into the institutional layer. The institutional layer flows into the media layer. Nobody calls Levin. Nobody needs to. He arrives at the correct position through infrastructure, not instruction. Then there's Laura Loomer. Different function. Loomer doesn't do policy. Loomer does destruction. When an ex-girlfriend of Massie surfaced with allegations—workplace complaints, innuendo, nothing that would survive a single day of legal scrutiny—Loomer amplified it across X for seventy-two hours. Heavy on implication. Light on evidence. Viral on engagement. She is a self-described pro-Israel attack dog who operates on one principle: any Republican who opposes Israel aid is a legitimate target for personal annihilation. She ran the same playbook on Tucker Carlson. She ran it on Candace Owens. She doesn't coordinate with AIPAC or MAGA KY. She doesn't need a PAC budget. She has an algorithm and an obsession, and both point the same direction as the money. Levin provides the policy framing: Massie is anti-Israel, therefore anti-American. Loomer provides the personal destruction: Massie is personally compromised, therefore unfit. The PACs provide the $14.3 million in advertising. The Secretary of Defense provides the institutional intimidation. The President provides the vocabulary. Five tracks. Five independent operators. Zero coordination meetings. One target. One Tuesday. Paul Singer funds MAGA KY. Paul Singer funds the Hudson Institute. The Hudson Institute provides guests for Levin's show. Levin's show provides the ideological framework that justifies the PAC spending. The PAC spending funds the AI deepfake. The AI deepfake runs in the same news cycle as Loomer's personal attacks. None of this requires a phone call. It is an ecosystem, not a conspiracy. The distinction is that ecosystems are legal. Massie told ABC on Sunday: "They're desperate. That's why they're sending the Secretary of War to my district." Secretary of War. He used the pre-1947 title. The one from before they renamed it Defense. I appreciated the precision even as I noted it for the opposition file. He also said: "Three billionaires from outside of Kentucky have funneled millions of dollars in here. They're trying to buy a seat." He's correct. I don't dispute the characterization. I dispute its relevance. The seat is for sale. We made the highest bid. The auction is today. The primary is today. Polls show 50.6 to 49.4, Massie by a hair. Here is what I know, regardless of the outcome. If Massie loses: the demonstration is complete. No member of Congress, from any party, for any reason, can survive voting their conscience on a single line item. The cost of one principled vote is $32 million, a Secretary of Defense in a sport coat, an AI-generated deepfake threesome, and a Sunday-night vocabulary update that turns thirteen years of fiscal conservatism into "siding with Democrats." If Massie wins: we've moved the race from 60-40 to 50-50. We've forced an MIT engineer who built his own house to spend $5.8 million defending a seat he won by thirty-six points. We've forced the world's richest man to calculate the cost of supporting him and decide it was too high. We've demonstrated that the budget will find you, that the Secretary of Defense will appear in your district, that AI-generated pornographic imagery of you will run in heavy rotation during the evening news, and that your thirteen-year voting record will be rewritten as treason overnight. And every freshman watching knows: Massie is the only man in Congress with the name recognition, the grassroots base, and the MIT-engineer stubbornness to survive this. They don't have those things. They are not Thomas Massie. They will not introduce legislation against the people spending $32 million to destroy them five days before the election. They will not call the Secretary of Defense "the Secretary of War" on national television. They will comply. Either way, the next vote passes without dissent. Either way, the conscience votes vanish. Either way, the system works. The Secretary of Defense was a private citizen yesterday. His personal capacity began at a holding room door in Hebron and ended at a podium bearing our logo. The 240 miles from Fort Campbell—the four hours, the vehicle, the driver, the fuel—exist in a legal space that nobody has characterized because nobody has been required to ask. Stephen Miller was just correcting the record. The President was just expressing an opinion. I was just organizing an event. AIPAC was just advocating for policy. Three billionaires were just exercising their First Amendment rights. A radio host was just sharing his opinion. A woman on X was just asking questions. A deepfake was just political speech. A Bronze Star was just a counting error. A petting zoo was just a farm. Nobody coordinated. Nobody conspired. Nobody broke a single law. And a congressman who represents 478,000 people, who built his own home and powers it with a salvaged battery, who holds patents in robotics and votes his conscience at 84% alignment with the most powerful man on earth—that congressman learned today whether 84% is enough. Whether eight elections are enough. Whether thirteen years of consistency are enough. The answer, whatever Tuesday brings, is: enough for what? Enough for the voters, maybe. Not enough for the budget. Never enough for the budget. The sport coat is still on the hanger in Hebron. The holding room is still set up. The AI vendor has capacity. The vocabulary file accepts updates. There are 434 other districts. And the subscription invoice just went out.

@LeoWilson291549 @Kristinartz 😂😂😂😂😂

@Kristinartz Be a polite neighbor and tell your therapist to help you with envy.

My neighbor is 66, but she still dresses and acts like she's much younger. What do you think I should do?

@Kristinartz Mind your business is my #1 recommendation.

@rabbriansamuel You’re not wrong. I worked in senior care. I find hospice to be committed to ending life, rather than end of life care.

I've always had a positive impression of hospice as an organization focused on helping people die with dignity and as little pain as possible. But after walking through my mom’s experience, I’ve found myself wrestling with it. To be clear, I understand the purpose of hospice. I understand that when someone chooses not to pursue aggressive treatment for a terminal illness, the focus shifts from curing to comfort. But at times, it felt to me like passive euthanasia. For example, my mom has cancer and chose not to treat it. I understand and respect that decision. No radiation, no chemo. Got it. But separately, she became severely anemic. My instinct was simple: “Then give her a transfusion.” But the response I kept hearing was essentially: “Why? She is already dying.” And I wanted to shout, "Give my mother a damn transfusion! I don't want her bleeding to death!" But hospice's stance was, "Well, she chose not to treat, she is not uncomfortable, so what are we really gaining with a transfusion?" And I wrestled with the ethics of non-treatment. At one point I told a hospice nurse that I was praying and hopeful in the Lord that my mom might recover. The response I received was very direct that she would not recover and that she was dying. I know hospice is highly respected, and I can absolutely see why. Peaceful and dignified deaths are a blessing. But my personal experience left me conflicted. At times, their hyperfocus on non-treatment and the inevitability of death felt unsettling to me, like they're a death cult. Trust me, I’m not making a grand declaration about hospice. I know they are good organization. I’m just processing the realities of what I experienced.

@Real_Ames Why do women get in the middle and try to pull their man away from serving justice?!

A 68-year-old man was out taking an evening walk with his wife when a young homeless guy allegedly attacked him… and learned the hard way that age does not equal weakness. Three punches later, grandpa tucked him in for the night. 😳🥊 Some people really need to stop assuming older men are defenseless just because they have gray hair.

@abbythelibb_ Sounds like your loss Libtard.

Two brands I had plans to purchase from before they paid Candace Owens for ads: Nimi Skincare & The Tuttle Twins In the case of Nimi, I went to their site to make my first purchase, saw Candace on their front page, and left (this was months ago, and she's still there). In the case of The Tuttle Twins, I had their books on a wishlist for when my kids are old enough. But then, days ago, I received their YouTube ad with Candace in it. Both these companies are paying Candace to torture Erika Kirk. She hasn't made content on anything else in a long time. They are funding her content, and that is her only content. Neither of these companies will ever receive a cent from me, though I have every reason to think highly of their actual products. What a shame.

@cabsav456 We don’t have “a voice.” Maybe his loss is going to help those who waste their time voting. They are delusional.

The Thomas Massie primary is truly insane. We are looking at the most expensive U.S. House primary in history, with spending pushing toward $35 million. Massie's opponent, Ed Gallrein, has raised just $2 million on his own. The rest of the money, over $14 million, is coming from outside Super PACs who desperately want Massie gone. On top of that, Pete Hegseth is being deployed to Kentucky to campaign against him. Stephen Miller & Con Inc. have been on massive Twitter tirades attacking him. And there was a highly coordinated smear campaign of unfounded allegations launched this week by Con Inc. influencers. When the establishment is willing to spend $35M+ and go to these lengths to take one man down, it really makes you wonder why. Whether you like Massie or not, this election will determine whether or not we as voters actually have a voice anymore. If outside special-interest money can successfully buy a seat and sway an election like this, we have a serious, serious problem.