StrobFX

An old success about to be recognized!

@mxvdxn @yapper_so wow how is that even possible to create video so realticly! Can't wait to try seedance 2

Made with Seedance 2.0 via @yapper_so Beside action, Seedance 2.0 is also very good with candid realism style. And i'm a huge fan of this style.

@DudeWhoInvests Gold is now just another meme word.

Makes LITERALLY ZERO sense. GOLD the hedge for geopolitical instability is crashing in the face of geopolitical instability. Can’t make this up.

@Dheepanratnam I meant Seedance 2.0?

@Dheepanratnam wow! the camera move is so realistic and all the details created along the way are so real too! is seedance now available outside china?

Seedance 2.0 / continuous one-take / hyperreal water physics. It takes lot of time to make VFX rendering for a shot like this. Seedance just generated it in minutes First frame image prompt 🔽 A lone emergency technician in an orange survival jacket stands on the shattered roof of a flooded museum in a drowned European capital, storm clouds overhead, broken statues and floating debris below, cold blue-grey palette, cinematic disaster realism, wet surfaces, strong scale, 35mm film look Created with nano banana pro @ImagineArt_X Video Prompt: 👇 "Disaster film realism, one-take. The camera starts high above a drowned capital city in violent storm weather, then dives toward a lone emergency technician standing on the shattered roof of a flooded museum. He sees a rescue flare in the distance and runs. The camera follows tightly behind him as he sprints across collapsing rooftops, leaps over broken skylights, slides down a tilted glass dome, and grabs a dangling cable. Below, dark floodwater surges through streets filled with drifting cars and statues. He lands on a partially submerged tram roof, keeps moving, and reaches a rescue beacon platform just as a giant wave crashes past behind him. Cold grey-blue apocalyptic palette, hyperreal water physics, wind, spray, handheld urgency, one continuous shot, no cuts."

@greg16676935420 @Kalshi 🍆

@Kalshi Does anyone else see what I see?

BREAKING: Democrats and Republicans are now tied at 50% to win the Senate.

@quipnetwork Here is my submission! x.com/StrobFX/status…

Just kicked off a week-long Quantum Art Contest on Discord. Submissions are already coming in and we're impressed with the creativity so far. Prizes for the top 10. Eternal glory for everyone. Join in → discord.gg/quipnetwork

WHat???? As a former 3D/VFX artist with 30+ years of experience, I am speechless everyday by what AI can do.

Entering the Quantum Era ⚛️ @quipnetwork

@quipnetwork x.com/StrobFX/status…

New quest live: Make quantum history and inscribe your message on the Quip Network genesis block. > Leave Your Mark quest.quip.network

I just inscribed my message on the Quip Network Genesis Block! Join the quantum revolution: account.quip.network/inscribe/0xdf2… x.com/quipnetwork/st…

What ever happened to the Strategic Bitcoin reserve?

@Davincij15 Or maybe it's the mid term years fractal?

Bears were waiting for the June 2022 fractal. Instead, they got the Q4 2022 bottom fractal. Just like in the past, many people will miss buying #Bitcoin because they're trying to time the bottom.

@elonmusk Thank you @elonmusk here is my dogecoin address for my charity: DDrcfo1MeiMFqLikKqND6DQrywyEqNv46n 🫂

Btw, the proceeds of any legal victory in the OpenAI case will be donated to charity. I will in no way enrich myself.

@saylor @chamath Nope, all centralised entity can closed down in seconds and upgrade. Bitcoin can't close for upgrade.

@chamath Your AI thesis assumes the digital world is quantum-resistant. If quantum breaks cryptography, it breaks AI, cloud infrastructure, banks, and the internet—not just Bitcoin. The entire stack upgrades together.

@GordonGekko You mean why Bitcoin is crashing and Oil going parabolic right? Zoom out a tiny bit...

Someone explain why oil is CRASHING and Bitcoin is going PARABOLIC?

Vitalik Buterin explains why proof-of-stake is more secure than proof-of-work “I think proof of stake is very secure because to attack the system, you need to have basically as much stake as the rest of the network. Right now, for example, we have 5 million ETH staking, which means you have to come up with 5 million ETH and then join the network.” At the time of this writing, more than 37 million ETH are being staked, with 3 million ETH waiting to join via the validator queue. At today’s prices, that’s more than $80 billion of ETH someone would have to acquire to attack the network and revert finalized blocks, which is more than the cost of attacking even the Bitcoin network by some estimates. The other defense mechanism that proof-of-stake has that proof-of-work doesn’t is slashing, which makes Ethereum antifragile. Vitalik explains: “Recovering from attacks is much easier in proof-of-stake than proof-of-work. For many kinds of attacks you do against [the Ethereum] network, we have this concept of automatic slashing. In order to revert a finalized block, you basically have to have a big portion of your validators sign two conflicting messages. This is something where once these messages are on the network, you can go and prove ‘these people did it.’ So we have this feature in the protocol where you basically take all these people who provably misbehaved and you burn their coins.” Vitalik also acknowledges the possibility of censoring attacks, where if 1/3rd of validators refuse to attest, the chain can’t finalize. But, as he explains, Ethereum has a contingency plan for this as well: “Everyone who got censored would create a minority chain, and the community would have to do a soft fork. The would have to say, ‘this chain is clearly attacking us and this one is not attacking us, so we’re going to join this chain.’ Then what happens is, on that new chain, the attackers also lose a lot of coins. The difference between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work is that in a proof-of-stake system, you can identify specific participants — and this isn’t a human going in and saying ‘I don’t like you’. It’s all automated.” One last benefit of proof-of-stake is that security scales with the value of the network. As Vitalik put it five years ago, it is really relative security, and not absolute security, that matters: “The security needs of a thing have to be proportional to the size of that thing, because as a thing gets bigger, its enemies become bigger and more well-motivated. If BTC were 100x as big as it is today, the value from destroying it would be 100x higher, and the kinds of actors that would want to care about destroying it would be much bigger and scarier. This is also why countries of all sizes have roughly similarly sized militaries as a percentage of GDP. Hence, cost of attack divided by market cap really is the correct statistic to measure, and in the long run issuance-free PoW really does look not that good." Source: @lexfridman (Jun 2021)

@IvanOnTech Depend... Maybe Powell only knows it.

GOOOD MORNING CRYPTO!!! ☀️☕️ BITCOIN REJECTED BY $74,000 (2025 year low again) Will it now go into the buy zone?

One-third of Bitcoin supply is quantum-vulnerable according to a new white paper from ARK Invest and Unchained. In related news, our first quantum-resistant Bitcoin wallets are right around the corner. x.com/ARKInvest/stat…

@elonmusk You should team up with @xx_network for privacy and quantum resistance!

𝕏 Money early public access will launch next month