SuperDuper Investor

31.4K posts

SuperDuper Investor banner
SuperDuper Investor

SuperDuper Investor

@SuperDuperInvst

35+ yrs Investing / Trading #Stocks #Investor #DayTrader #SwingTrader on #WallStreet #NYSE #Nasdaq Tweets/DM = Opinions/Entertainment only, Not advice. #SupDup

United States Katılım Şubat 2016
8 Takip Edilen63.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
☀️ Updated list of TRIPLE & QUADRUPLE digits % gainer MULTI BAGGERS from me in last ~1 yr ☀️ $LAES - UP 2800+% $LUNRW - UP 1500+% $RKLB - UP 1200% $LITM - UP 1150% $OPTT - UP 1000+% $RR - UP 850% $ATNFW - UP 800% $GNPX - UP 700+% $CDTX - UP 650% $LUNR - UP 600+% $MOB - UP 600% $WKEY - UP 600% $AAOI - UP 550% $SKVI - UP 500% $GRI - UP 450% $HOVR - UP 400% $HOUR - UP 400% $HOVRW - UP 400% $SNOA - UP 375% $GNLX - UP 300+% $RNAZ - UP 300+% $EDBLW - UP 300+% $NUKK - UP 275% $IINN - UP 250% $TSSI - UP 250% $USAR - UP 225% $ALLR - UP 225% $CINGW - UP 225% $PRLD - UP 200+% $BMXI - UP 200+% $SOAR - UP 200+% $EDBL - UP 200+% $VCIG - UP 200+% $VVOS - UP 200+% $SMCI - UP 175% $TRNR - UP 175% $APLMW - UP 150+% $TMRC - UP 150+% $KSCP - UP 150% $BSFC - UP 125% $SOBR - UP 125% $INTC - UP 125% $TRUG - UP 100+% $ORKT - UP 100+% $KPRX - UP 100+% $SOUN - UP 100% $KLYG - UP 100% U can see so many of my small cap Long stock trade ideas went up 100+% very quickly at one point rising to as high as above % within hour(s), day(s), week(s) or months. Numerous others went UP between 10% to 100%. Also several Short stock trades ideas of mine could have quickly reaped you gains of between 100% to 2000+%. Over the past many years various other stock trade/investment ideas have reaped hundreds or thousands of % gains at some point upon timely trade executions. My overall success rate is ~95% Pl hit LIKE and RETWEET if you have been making $ from my trade ideas. If U are recent follower & feel missed out, don't worry because I will be sharing many new Super Duper stock picks and trade ideas that can possibly make you a LOT OF MONEY 🤑 #SupDup #SupDupTeam ROCKS !! We are the BEST on #WallStreet imo ❤️
English
32
65
216
149.6K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$VNDA $6.20 - My plan is to make $1+ mln over the time from this stock with PAYtience imo 🤞🏼 🤑 💰
English
11
2
32
3.1K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
Wall Street analysts and financial institutions project that the top hyperscalers will collectively spend over $1 trillion on capital expenditures (capex) in 2027, with figures generally estimated to fall between $1.1 trillion and $1.16 trillion. This massive budget is led by an AI and infrastructure arms race primarily fueled by Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Oracle. Individual 2027 Projections & Guidance While exact annual capex is still fluid, projections for the top players include: •Alphabet (Google): Analysts project spending to cross $185 billion to $190 billion in 2027, with the company steadily raising its forecast to meet robust cloud and Gemini infrastructure demand. •Amazon (AWS): Projected to lead the group with capex forecasts approaching or exceeding $200 billion annually, driven by generative AI partnerships and internal silicon (Trainium/Inferentia) builds. •Microsoft: Tracking at an estimated $190 billion per year as it rapidly scales up its OpenAI-associated compute capacity and global data center footprint. •Meta: Spending is forecast at approximately $135 billion annually, heavily focused on GPU clustering and infrastructure. •Oracle: Forecasted to see accelerated growth, with capex exceeding $50 billion per year leading up to 2027. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] The Broader Market Context •Total Spending: Financial projections from institutions like Goldman Sachsplace total hyperscaler data center spending at $1.15 trillion for 2027 alone.
English
3
0
10
2K
Anni
Anni@anni_sen·
Staggering capex spend by five largest hyperscalers - make that a double from previous estimates. A year ago those five hyperscalers were supposed to spend $450B in 2026 and $450B in 2027. Now they’re going to spend $800B in 2026 and $1.2T in 2027. That’s a combined $1.2T flowing into compute, memory, Interconnects, fabrication, data center energy in one year.
English
8
1
31
3.1K
Tiger Line Trading
Tiger Line Trading@TigerLineTrades·
GIVING SO MANY FANTASTIC SETUPS AND INSIGHTS ON PLAYS THIS WEEK AND NOT MUCH INTERACTIONS FROM YOU GUYS! NEED TO SEE SOME MORE LOVE ON THESE POSTS, I AM SHARING SO MUCH VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR ME, AS LONG AS YOU SHOW APPRECIATION I WILL CONTINUE TO POST! FOR NOW, WILL SLOW DOWN ON THE POSTS UNTIL WE GET MORE INTERACTIONS! CATCH YOU LATER PEACE! ⚡⚡
English
19
4
124
4.8K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$SLS - Stock will be seen between $10 to $25 within 1 yr is almost a sure thing. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see $10 within next 10 days imo 🤞🏼
English
4
2
31
2.8K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$GLW and $OCC that I have been loading up 👇🏼 🤑
Hunter Allen@HunterAllen4

$OCC vs $GLW (Corning) — Military / Tactical Fiber Breakdown In the tactical fiber optic infrastructure sector, both Optical Cable Corporation ($OCC) and Corning ($GLW) operate within the same mission-critical environment; however, each company is structured around distinct strategic priorities. $OCC is a specialized manufacturer focused on ruggedized, mission-oriented fiber solutions, whereas Corning is a global industry leader with extensive presence across telecommunications, data center, and enterprise markets. The following outlines the primary distinctions within military and tactical applications: SETUP / DEPLOYMENT SPEED $OCC utilizes MARS modular reel systems and tight-buffered cable construction engineered for rapid deployment and retrieval in field operations. Lightweight reel configurations combined with simplified handling contribute to faster setup in demanding environments and repeated mobility scenarios. $GLW (Corning) provides flexible tactical cable solutions featuring polyurethane jackets and conventional reel systems. While effective, these systems are generally less optimized for sustained high-mobility battlefield deployment cycles. EDGE: $OCC for deployment speed and repeated tactical deployment efficiency. COST / TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP Both companies generally operate within an approximate range of $15–30 per meter, depending on configuration and fiber count. $OCC frequently demonstrates an advantage in total cost of ownership due to enhanced reusability, superior durability under extreme conditions, and reduced replacement and downtime requirements in field environments. EDGE: $OCC in extreme-use military operational cycles (TCO efficiency) DURABILITY / FIELD RESILIENCE $OCC: • Crush resistance up to ~2200 N/cm • Impact resistance exceeding ~1500 impacts • Flex endurance of approximately ~2000 cycles • MIL-PRF-85045/8A qualified • Vehicle runover survivability • Operating temperature range of approximately ~-55°C to +85°C $GLW (Corning): • Robust MIL-compliant tactical product offerings • High tensile and impact resistance (~1500N range depending on configuration) • Strong chemical and abrasion resistance • Demonstrated reliability in harsh operating environments EDGE: $OCC in maximum mechanical stress and battlefield survivability scenarios LIFECYCLE / LONGEVITY Both companies utilize long-life optical fiber technology with theoretical lifespans exceeding 20–30 years; however, practical longevity is heavily influenced by mechanical stress and operational conditions. $OCC’s tight-buffer construction and ruggedized jacketing are specifically engineered to extend operational lifespan under repeated deployment, retrieval, and physical stress conditions. EDGE: $OCC in high-cycle tactical operations BOTTOM LINE Corning ($GLW) represents scale, global market leadership, and broad fiber infrastructure dominance across telecommunications, data center, and enterprise sectors. Optical Cable Corporation ($OCC) represents a specialized provider focused on ruggedized, rapid-deployment, military-grade tactical fiber solutions where operational reliability and deployment speed are critical. In summary: • $GLW = the global infrastructure leader • $OCC = the battlefield-optimized tactical specialist Different scale. Different mission focus. Shared importance within critical communications infrastructure. Conduct your own due diligence.

English
3
2
16
4K
Hunter Allen
Hunter Allen@HunterAllen4·
$OCC vs $GLW (Corning) — Military / Tactical Fiber Breakdown In the tactical fiber optic infrastructure sector, both Optical Cable Corporation ($OCC) and Corning ($GLW) operate within the same mission-critical environment; however, each company is structured around distinct strategic priorities. $OCC is a specialized manufacturer focused on ruggedized, mission-oriented fiber solutions, whereas Corning is a global industry leader with extensive presence across telecommunications, data center, and enterprise markets. The following outlines the primary distinctions within military and tactical applications: SETUP / DEPLOYMENT SPEED $OCC utilizes MARS modular reel systems and tight-buffered cable construction engineered for rapid deployment and retrieval in field operations. Lightweight reel configurations combined with simplified handling contribute to faster setup in demanding environments and repeated mobility scenarios. $GLW (Corning) provides flexible tactical cable solutions featuring polyurethane jackets and conventional reel systems. While effective, these systems are generally less optimized for sustained high-mobility battlefield deployment cycles. EDGE: $OCC for deployment speed and repeated tactical deployment efficiency. COST / TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP Both companies generally operate within an approximate range of $15–30 per meter, depending on configuration and fiber count. $OCC frequently demonstrates an advantage in total cost of ownership due to enhanced reusability, superior durability under extreme conditions, and reduced replacement and downtime requirements in field environments. EDGE: $OCC in extreme-use military operational cycles (TCO efficiency) DURABILITY / FIELD RESILIENCE $OCC: • Crush resistance up to ~2200 N/cm • Impact resistance exceeding ~1500 impacts • Flex endurance of approximately ~2000 cycles • MIL-PRF-85045/8A qualified • Vehicle runover survivability • Operating temperature range of approximately ~-55°C to +85°C $GLW (Corning): • Robust MIL-compliant tactical product offerings • High tensile and impact resistance (~1500N range depending on configuration) • Strong chemical and abrasion resistance • Demonstrated reliability in harsh operating environments EDGE: $OCC in maximum mechanical stress and battlefield survivability scenarios LIFECYCLE / LONGEVITY Both companies utilize long-life optical fiber technology with theoretical lifespans exceeding 20–30 years; however, practical longevity is heavily influenced by mechanical stress and operational conditions. $OCC’s tight-buffer construction and ruggedized jacketing are specifically engineered to extend operational lifespan under repeated deployment, retrieval, and physical stress conditions. EDGE: $OCC in high-cycle tactical operations BOTTOM LINE Corning ($GLW) represents scale, global market leadership, and broad fiber infrastructure dominance across telecommunications, data center, and enterprise sectors. Optical Cable Corporation ($OCC) represents a specialized provider focused on ruggedized, rapid-deployment, military-grade tactical fiber solutions where operational reliability and deployment speed are critical. In summary: • $GLW = the global infrastructure leader • $OCC = the battlefield-optimized tactical specialist Different scale. Different mission focus. Shared importance within critical communications infrastructure. Conduct your own due diligence.
Hunter Allen tweet mediaHunter Allen tweet mediaHunter Allen tweet mediaHunter Allen tweet media
English
4
2
20
5.3K
Hunter Allen
Hunter Allen@HunterAllen4·
$OCC vs $GLW The AI infrastructure supercycle is exposing a MASSIVE bottleneck: FIBER. The next 5-10x no one is talking about. HUGE DEMAND COMING. REPOST. BOOKMARK. SUBSCRIBE. Add to the hunter WL Everyone is focused on: GPUs HBM memory power generation liquid cooling But hyperscale AI clusters cannot scale without ultra-high bandwidth optical interconnects. AI data centers now require: up to 10x-36x more fiber than traditional cloud architectures dramatically higher east-west traffic ultra-low latency interconnects massive intra-rack + inter-rack connectivity Global data center fiber demand reportedly surged ~76% YoY. Lead times in some fiber categories are stretching: 20-60+ weeks. Industry forecasts now point toward: severe optical supply deficits massive fiber route mile expansion continued AI infrastructure shortages through the decade This is becoming a REAL physical bottleneck. And that’s why both $GLW and $OCC are positioned extremely well. But they attack the market VERY differently. $GLW = global hyperscale fiber giant. $OCC = tiny high-operating-leverage AI infrastructure microcap. That’s what makes this setup interesting. $GLW dominates scale: ~$140B+ market cap massive optical communications division hyperscaler partnerships huge manufacturing footprint long-haul + hyperscale fiber dominance major AI optical density innovations Meta alone reportedly signed multi-billion-dollar fiber agreements with $GLW. They are the backbone giant of optical infrastructure. But $OCC is attacking the niche layer hyperscalers increasingly NEED: High-density. Ruggedized. Rapid-deployment. Pre-terminated. Campus-scale AI connectivity. And that market may explode. $OCC is only around a sub-$100M market cap company. Yet they already generate: ~$70M+ annual revenue. They manufacture: fiber optic cable copper datacom cable hybrid cable systems connectors enclosures pre-terminated assemblies high-density connectivity solutions All built around: enterprise data centers military industrial harsh-environment networking The BIG shift came in July 2025. Lightera (subsidiary of Furukawa Electric $5715.T) acquired a 7.24% stake in $OCC and entered a strategic collaboration. Furukawa generated: ~$8.7B revenue ~$1.4B infrastructure segment revenue infra segment growth +37% YoY That partnership changes the game for $OCC.
English
12
6
50
3.4K
Midnight Capital LLC
Midnight Capital LLC@Midnight_Captl·
Just added materially to $GLW , it’s now a 15.4% position This is my big swing on the supply chain side of things Corning is an N of 1 company. American made but also a technology leader. “Only” up ~3x over the past year. I think the opportunity set here is massive.
English
20
5
182
25.7K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$SLS <$7.10 rn - I feel Shorts were getting trapped with stock marching towards double digits so came out with BS report to use as scare tactic or those that wanted to get in at lower prices put out short attack to shake out weak hands so they could grab shares cheaply. Either way this dip is an opportunity to add more cheaply. I repeat this stock will be seen between $10 - $25 by the end of this year and the company with most likely get bought out within a few years at hefty premium imo
English
5
1
26
3K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$OCC - Order bookings rising strongly. Company trading at just 1.5x sales valuation. Should be trading at 4x to 7x multiples imo. Fiber Optics & Copper cables and assemblies are the key components of data & power transmission demand of which is rising exponentially due to emergence of Internet and now the AI data hyper-scalers imo
English
3
3
19
2K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$WKEY <$10 - Pure QUANTUM play with $425+ mln cash on hand imo
Italiano
1
2
22
1.9K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$GLW and $OCC been accumulating heavily in last week on dips 🤑
English
1
1
11
2.1K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$SLS - Fearlessly adding more on dips for ST/NT/LT.
English
3
2
19
2.3K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$BDC $104 = $4 bln mkt cap. Sales in next year should be $2.7 bln to $3.7 bln per my estimates and EPS should come in closer to 8 or as high as 12. Apart from strategic ones like $CSCO $AAOI $COHR $CIEN $GLW Private equity like Blackrock or KKR or Carlyle Group or Bain Capital should BUYOUT and could easily flip for $10 bln to $25 bln within just 3 yrs imo @BlackRock @BainCapital
English
2
1
13
2K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$VNDA will be one of my largest long position in Pharma after $SLS. With biotechs and pharma companies you have to have great vision and a lot of PAYtience but it could make you hit a big JACKPOT at times imo
English
5
2
37
3.4K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$OCC $10 - I am slowly building a large long position in this USA based manufacturer of Fiber Optics cable and Assemblies that is seeing strong rise in new orders from AI data centers & Hyperscalers which will cause massive tailwinds for next 3 yrs imo.
English
1
1
23
3.2K
SuperDuper Investor
SuperDuper Investor@SuperDuperInvst·
$BDC $104 - Great BUYOUT for someone like $BRK Berkshire Hathaway or even $AAOI or $COHR or $CSCO given Belden’s current $4 bln valuation is dirt cheap for what it’s sales, profits, strong growth trajectory and fundamentals it has plus its MONSTER potential in Photonics + Optical Cables + Networking / AI gear, etc. imo
English
2
1
17
2.1K