The Gaming Curmudgeon

12.2K posts

The Gaming Curmudgeon banner
The Gaming Curmudgeon

The Gaming Curmudgeon

@SurlyGamer

52 year old gamer, amateur cynic, skeptic, life long 49ers fan, RPG fan, Rock And Roll musician, graduate of GCU.

California, USA Katılım Haziran 2016
209 Takip Edilen214 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
The Gaming Curmudgeon
The Gaming Curmudgeon@SurlyGamer·
Prime 4 is a solid game that fails in its storytelling & its 𝐚𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 end game item hunt. Familiarity can be a good thing, but here it feels uninspired. Feels like a by the numbers, play it safe game. It also feels/looks like a game that was in develop for a long time.
The Gaming Curmudgeon tweet media
English
0
0
1
247
Metroid Mike 64
Metroid Mike 64@MetroidMike64·
I open Twitter to see a StarFox Direct available, just like that, no announcement. Kinda felt like “yeah this was leaked so here ya go.” I miss actual Nintendo Directs. Excited for a new StarFox, devastated that it’s another remake of StarFox 64. Regardless I will devour this.
Metroid Mike 64 tweet media
English
2
0
17
589
The Gaming Curmudgeon
The Gaming Curmudgeon@SurlyGamer·
I've played Rainbow Skies 2 times but found myself frustrated and angry at the game's difficulty system. 3rd time's a charm I guess & at the advice of my son, Im approaching the game differently this time. I'm really enjoying it & will beat it this time. youtu.be/dagptENljE8
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
0
3
The Gaming Curmudgeon
The Gaming Curmudgeon@SurlyGamer·
@LizzieMarbach Objectively? If you're speaking objectively please tell us what methodology you utilized in determining this as fact. Surely you have a large peer reviewed data set...or are you just giving us your subjective opinion on something you're clearly know very little about?
English
0
0
0
4
Lizzie Marbach
Lizzie Marbach@LizzieMarbach·
I know this is unpopular, but it will always be unattractive for a grown man to play video games. Some women might be understanding or pretend like they don’t care that you spend hours playing, but they do. It is extremely unattractive to women and will never not be. 🤷🏼‍♀️
English
18.4K
304
6.3K
13.7M
The Gaming Curmudgeon
The Gaming Curmudgeon@SurlyGamer·
@Chase_Senior Perfectly sstated Chase! The standards of excellence and what counts as "success" has dipped considerably over the years.
English
0
0
0
3
Chase Senior
Chase Senior@Chase_Senior·
People are really out here defending the 49ers recent draft record with every fiber of their being. Isn’t San Francisco supposed to be a championship city with championship expectations? 49ers in the 1980’s and 90’s, Bruce Bochy’s dynastic run with the Giants, Steph Curry’s run with the Warriors. Shouldn’t titles be the standard? Especially for a football team that hasn’t won a ring since 1994? It’s a soft, loser mentality. #49ers
English
78
9
92
20.9K
The Gaming Curmudgeon
The Gaming Curmudgeon@SurlyGamer·
@LombardiHimself Ad Hominem...come on Dave, do better. Counter the arguments instead of trying to invalidate data by erroneously labeling people with whom you disagree. Its the mark of both dishonesty and a low intellect.
English
0
0
0
83
Obsolete Sony
Obsolete Sony@ObsoleteSony·
Which game defined the PlayStation in your opinion?
Obsolete Sony tweet media
English
170
73
1.2K
39.9K
TD Nash
TD Nash@td_nash·
Who was the Quarterback of your favorite team when you were a teenager?🧐
TD Nash tweet media
English
562
68
620
176.5K
TheNinersWolf
TheNinersWolf@TheNinersWolf·
Time for some of you Cohn retards to grow up, stop whining about a GM and coach and grow a pair. They have 5 Playoff appearances in 7 years including 4 NFCG and 2 SBs. 0% of you are qualified to criticize and 0% of your baiting content creators actually know anything about football…your just feeding some idiot realtors bank account with engagement…100% of you are pathetic… #49ers
English
53
22
200
5.3K
The Gaming Curmudgeon
The Gaming Curmudgeon@SurlyGamer·
@LombardiHimself Fallacy Of False Equivalencey... It takes a lot of energy to be as intellectually dishonest and disingenuous as Dave.
English
0
0
0
21
David Lombardi
David Lombardi@LombardiHimself·
Bill Walsh: "It never matters where we pick them, it only matters how they play."
David Lombardi tweet media
English
75
44
343
99K
The Gaming Curmudgeon
The Gaming Curmudgeon@SurlyGamer·
@DestinyisDesire @tomjimsula49 Making and winning playoff games, exceeding expectations, finishing 3rd, missing the plays nearly half the time, going to the NFCCG and the Bowl aren't success unless they are early steps on the way to winning a Bowl. These guys have had 9 sessons. Time to go...
The Gaming Curmudgeon tweet media
English
0
0
3
34
EternalCreator
EternalCreator@DestinyisDesire·
2nd most playoff wins in the last 7 seasons behind the Chiefs, sustained success and in the playoffs every year they don't lose too many of their best players. While you're getting into your emotions, they'll likely make anothet deep playoff run again this year, who's stopping all these weapons on offense?
English
4
0
14
1.3K
Jim Tomsula's Ghost
Jim Tomsula's Ghost@tomjimsula49·
Something is rotten in Santa Clara. The 49ers draft process isn’t just off, it’s systematically broken. The 2026 class is just the latest entry in a 5+ year pattern of pissing down their own leg. Here's a summary of the 2026 class: - A 60-pick reach in Round 2. - A flawed “need” player over higher-upside talent. - And, of course, the "Shanahan classic:" a RB taken 40-70 spots earlier than expected while premium positions sit untouched. This isn’t misfortunate. It’s a pronounced, fundamental failure to understand value and evaluate talent. One reach is defensible. Doing it every year, while consistently flaunting the board, is malpractice. Take Stribling: the Niners passed on higher-graded players at positions of need - Bisontis, T.J. Parker, Kayden McDonald, Cashius Howell, C.J. Allen, Colton Hood (all who went within the next 8-9 picks) - to draft a traits-based WR projected for the middle of Round 3, if not later. Best case, he develops into a good player but contributes nothing this year while immediate impact options at guard or edge go elsewhere. Then they trade back from 58, passing on players like Anthony Hill and Keyron Crawford, only to land Romello Height, a 25-year-old with a capped ceiling. Even if he produces, the opportunity cost is glaring. You don’t pass on young, ascending talent for marginal contributors unless you’ve got a broken framework for evaluating talent. And then the signature move: reaching ~60 picks for Kaelon Black. A fine player, sure, but with no distinguishing traits (call him Jordan James redux...but taken 60 picks earlier). A Day 3 back taken on Day 2 while OL (Trey Zuhn, Gennings Dunker), WR (Chris Bell), EDGE (Barham), and S (Jalon Kilgore) talent remained on the board. It’s not just suboptimal, it’s flat-out incoherent. At some point, this stops being debatable. Under @JohnLynch49ers, this regime has gone 6 drafts without producing a single Pro Bowl player. The results aren’t unlucky; they’re consistent. And consistently mediocre at best (see 2024/2025) and disastrous (2021, 2022 and 2023) at worst. @JedYork, tolerating this is a choice. And that choice is settling for permanent underachievement. Enough is enough. cc: @grantcohn @sportslarryk @Chase_Senior @SharpFootball @dieter @hutchdiesel
English
163
237
2K
320.2K
絶望ボイ
絶望ボイ@mrtgrnt37·
@tomjimsula49 People coming in here crying about W/L records are hilarious. Yeah, Kyle is one of the best coaches in football, and they've had some good free agent moves. Imagine how good they could be if they hadn't wasted draft after draft every year? We'd probably have multiple SBs by now.
English
3
3
58
2.9K
The Gaming Curmudgeon
The Gaming Curmudgeon@SurlyGamer·
Expertly said..... #49ers
Jim Tomsula's Ghost@tomjimsula49

Something is rotten in Santa Clara. The 49ers draft process isn’t just off, it’s systematically broken. The 2026 class is just the latest entry in a 5+ year pattern of pissing down their own leg. Here's a summary of the 2026 class: - A 60-pick reach in Round 2. - A flawed “need” player over higher-upside talent. - And, of course, the "Shanahan classic:" a RB taken 40-70 spots earlier than expected while premium positions sit untouched. This isn’t misfortunate. It’s a pronounced, fundamental failure to understand value and evaluate talent. One reach is defensible. Doing it every year, while consistently flaunting the board, is malpractice. Take Stribling: the Niners passed on higher-graded players at positions of need - Bisontis, T.J. Parker, Kayden McDonald, Cashius Howell, C.J. Allen, Colton Hood (all who went within the next 8-9 picks) - to draft a traits-based WR projected for the middle of Round 3, if not later. Best case, he develops into a good player but contributes nothing this year while immediate impact options at guard or edge go elsewhere. Then they trade back from 58, passing on players like Anthony Hill and Keyron Crawford, only to land Romello Height, a 25-year-old with a capped ceiling. Even if he produces, the opportunity cost is glaring. You don’t pass on young, ascending talent for marginal contributors unless you’ve got a broken framework for evaluating talent. And then the signature move: reaching ~60 picks for Kaelon Black. A fine player, sure, but with no distinguishing traits (call him Jordan James redux...but taken 60 picks earlier). A Day 3 back taken on Day 2 while OL (Trey Zuhn, Gennings Dunker), WR (Chris Bell), EDGE (Barham), and S (Jalon Kilgore) talent remained on the board. It’s not just suboptimal, it’s flat-out incoherent. At some point, this stops being debatable. Under @JohnLynch49ers, this regime has gone 6 drafts without producing a single Pro Bowl player. The results aren’t unlucky; they’re consistent. And consistently mediocre at best (see 2024/2025) and disastrous (2021, 2022 and 2023) at worst. @JedYork, tolerating this is a choice. And that choice is settling for permanent underachievement. Enough is enough. cc: @grantcohn @sportslarryk @Chase_Senior @SharpFootball @dieter @hutchdiesel

English
0
0
0
286
Chris
Chris@red_flag_raised·
@LombardiHimself How many division titles? Playoff appearances? NFCG? SBs?
Chris tweet media
English
5
0
3
298
David Lombardi
David Lombardi@LombardiHimself·
I know it's a wild concept and that many just want to use the draft as an outlet for their anger, but maybe we can actually wait to see how these 49ers' draftees perform in the NFL before grading them. The truth is that you don't know how things will break for these players
English
325
25
490
55.6K
Maurice Kilbride
Maurice Kilbride@MauriceK1421·
@LombardiHimself David - you are such a butt kissing apologist for our franchise. Why not be honest, give your actual thoughts. We as fans have eyes, watch the team and see the issues and positional deficiencies on the roster - none of which were addressed. Thats what is making fans angry!
English
1
0
2
86
Razor’s Sports Shift
Razor’s Sports Shift@TheSports_Shift·
Where is Joe Montana on your list of All time Great Quarterbacks?
Razor’s Sports Shift tweet media
English
741
39
430
42K
The Gaming Curmudgeon
The Gaming Curmudgeon@SurlyGamer·
@Supernerd471 25 hours? The original always takes me 80+ hours every time I play. The remakes look and sound great but are shallow games with a de-emphasis on combat and not much challenge. They also ruined Aerith's death and story.
English
1
0
1
161
SupernerdFFVII
SupernerdFFVII@Supernerd471·
The original FF7 is about 25 hours long People out here are implying Square is charging $70 for three 8 hour parts No. The 7R games are each full size AAA games Remake is 40 hours Rebirth is 80 hours 7R3 will likely be 60-100 hrs You're definitely getting your moneys worth.
SupernerdFFVII tweet media
English
467
188
2.6K
241.4K
Bob Nash
Bob Nash@bob_robertnash·
The classic KISS lineup, often regarded by fans as the only lineup that truly mattered. #70sKISS
Bob Nash tweet media
English
23
27
372
3.2K