
TheChainsawDisciple
6.6K posts

TheChainsawDisciple
@TCSDisciple
Faith. Religion. Politics. Life. From a mind on the spectrum. Formerly @4KADHD. Husband | Father | Lumberjack My Substack: https://t.co/ab9orT4oWe
Katılım Temmuz 2023
394 Takip Edilen251 Takipçiler

@EvangelicalDW I like how you reposted something from "All day Astronomy", an account based in SE Asia.
English

This was obvious at the time.
MRNA is bad technology.
All day Astronomy@forallcurious
🚨: U.S. cancels mRNA vaccine development, stating it has 'more risks than benefits'.
English

@Joseph_Spurgeon Same thing is being done now with Protestant hierarchy and the PWC/Racism/Christian Nationalism/Joooos and every other controversy people claim they have the infallible answer to.
English

Roman Catholics claim an infallible church, but in practice what they defend is a selective and shifting infallibility. The problem is not hard to see. There are councils the Roman Church now rejects or downplays, such as the iconoclast council of Hieria in 754, which opposed the use of images, and then later councils that reversed course. Both cannot be protected from error. At some point, the church was wrong, and Rome decides after the fact which moments count and which do not. That is not a consistent doctrine of infallibility. That is a retrospective sorting of history.
The same tension appears in the Western Schism from 1378 to 1417, when there were two and then three rival popes, each with supporters, each claiming legitimacy, and each excommunicating the others. The church did not speak with one clear, indefectible voice. It fractured, and it took decades and a council to sort out the mess. During that time, who exactly was the infallible head of the church. The system offers no clean answer. It simply moves past the problem once a winner is declared.
There are also moments when popes themselves resisted ideas later defined as dogma. In the fourteenth century, during disputes over poverty, the Franciscans pushed arguments that would bind a pope to prior papal statements. Pope John XXII rejected those claims and opposed the line of reasoning that would later be used to support papal infallibility.
Take another example. Pope Honorius I was condemned by the Third Council of Constantinople for supporting the Monothelite heresy. A pope was formally rebuked as a heretic by a council later recognized as authoritative.
Or consider the Council of Constance in the fifteenth century, which asserted that a general council held authority over the pope. Rome later rejected that principle. So was the church speaking infallibly when it elevated the council over the pope, or when it later denied it. Both positions have been held. Both cannot be infallible.
Then there is the case of Pope Sixtus V and his official edition of the Latin Vulgate in 1590. He proudly proclaimed to have produced an infallible translation. Yet within his own lifetime, it was found to contain numerous errors. Within a short time, it was withdrawn and replaced under Pope Clement VIII with a corrected version. Oops.
And this raises a deeper problem. Can the church produce an infallible list of all the infallible things it has ever said. It cannot. What Rome actually has is a selective catalog, identified after the fact, under highly technical conditions that seem to change with the wind. That is not how an inherent property works of infallibility works.
Even beyond that, popes have contradicted one another in teaching and policy. Councils have been called, corrected, and sometimes effectively reversed. Rome maintains the appearance of consistency by narrowing the definition of infallibility to rare, highly technical conditions, then declaring that only those moments count. Everything else is allowed to be mistaken, revised, or abandoned. That approach protects the claim while conceding the reality that the church, in its actual history, has erred.
Once that is admitted, then we aren't dealing with infallibility any more. An authority that can be wrong in many of its official acts, reversed by later decisions, and divided against itself in times of crisis does not carry the marks of something that is incapable of error by nature. The historical record shows a church that can speak truly at times and err at others. That is exactly what one would expect from a fallible institution, not an infallible one.
Holy Scripture is infallible because it is the word of God. It is the only infallible authority on earth.
English

@WassonWatch Eric Conn, Joel Webbon, and Brian Sauve all love this guy, and think you are victimizing them and Pharisees if you make the correlation and point out the lack of spiritual fruit, discernment, and the deception they’re under because of it.
They’re all clowns.



English

This is absolutely disgusting. Michael Spangler calls The Hiding Place, by Corrie Ten Boom, "One of the most subversive books around."
If you cannot see how this statement is positively*dripping* with evil, then you have lost your moral compass, your sense of reason, or both.
I have blocked @spanglermt and suggest you do the same.

English

@not_our_guy @WassonWatch And Eric Conn reposts him, and teaches his family in Bible study that only Pharisees call this stuff out and think it’s a problem.
English

@WassonWatch Spangler is a clown who believes every meme he sees on the internet and thinks if you believe the holocaust occurred that you need to repent
x.com/i/status/20216…
Hitler Hated Christ@not_our_guy
Excommunicant Michael Spangler has decided to start "preaching" all of the Stone Choir tier disinfo holocaust denial memes from his "pulpit". He insists his congregation must "repent" for believing that the holocaust occurred.
English

@HilaireNereus I think it’s hilarious how Mahler, Woe, and all their cronies know Webbon and his bros just stole all their material, repackaged it with shiny words and branding, and think that most people can’t smell and see the leakage coming from the pile of feces inside.
English

@Eric_Conn @lastbulwark @LonghausBurning @Brian_Sauve Please spare us the sanctimonious bullcrap.
You like and repost Spangler, one of the worst snakes in a pastoral position today.
x.com/eric_conn/stat…
English

@lastbulwark @TCSDisciple @LonghausBurning @Brian_Sauve People are crazy.
That’s the mild stuff, too.
We read in family worship the other night, the Pharisees said Christ cast out demons by the Prince of demons. How much more will we be maligned.
English

@lastbulwark @LonghausBurning @Eric_Conn @Brian_Sauve 0 discernment. These dudes are all the same. You think a “jovial” demeanor means they are saints? You must think Joel O’ Steen is amazing too!
English

@TCSDisciple @LonghausBurning @Eric_Conn My bros, is this what you deal with on the regular?! It makes me think @Brian_Sauve , @Eric_Conn , & crew are closer to sainthood than I did before if there still so jovial dealing w/ such uncharitable men regularly. Keep up the good work making these women hysterical. God bless!

English

@lastbulwark It doesn’t matter. They are all the same. Same group. Same goal.
English

@TCSDisciple Dude we weren't even talking about Webbon! You were responding to Eric ya goof. I do not like him so why make it an issue? Unlike you I don't offer an opinion beyond that b/c I know very little about him. I let him rise or fall to His own master & it ain't me.
English

Something is seriously wrong w/some Christian men on here. If you don't affirm them they hurl weird accusations & act like hysterical women. A lot of projection going on here but u gotta love the zeal. If only they properly & graciously applied it
TheChainsawDisciple@TCSDisciple
@lastbulwark @Eric_Conn Under the master’s spell, like a good boy!
English

@Strangeland_Elf You are such a threat to his existence!
English

@JoelWebbon You are a clown.
x.com/tcsdisciple/st…
TheChainsawDisciple@TCSDisciple
1: Corey Mahler 2: Corey Mahler w/ DLSS5
English


@LonghausBurning @lastbulwark @Eric_Conn Well, yeah, because that would involve God breaking you from the deception they have you under 🙄
English

@TCSDisciple @lastbulwark @Eric_Conn You're not going to trick us into believing that you have any idea what you're talking about.
English

@LonghausBurning @lastbulwark @Eric_Conn You’re not going to trick me into believing Joel and his cronies have any fruits of righteousness.
English

@lastbulwark @TCSDisciple @Eric_Conn Nice try, Derrek, but I don't think you realize that "TheChainsawDisciple" is the omnipotent one who can look into men's hearts, judge them and condemn them. Stand in awe at him.
English

@lastbulwark @Eric_Conn Nah, I’ll continue calling out the wolves until He returns.
English

@TCSDisciple @Eric_Conn Not really a single one. Some make good points here & there but I don't feel the need to care about them at all. You though, strong SWF vibes. Take a chill 💊, pray, repent, & go about your day. Enjoy life & learn to discuss things like a man. I can help you if u want
English



@thesopawsome Dune on the brain. Thought this was a dog on Arrakis for a sec 😂
English












