TFA 🚀

@Erdayastronaut @thejackbeyer Two goats

Found a random @thejackbeyer in London! Shared the best steak of our lives!

@Evereverii Watch this @Erdayastronaut talks about it in his new video.youtu.be/T-jf6tTKt3Y?si…

I might have a good idea for making a Starship landing on the moon easier/more plausible: I recently thought about how Starship can land on the moon and came to the conclusion, that landing upright comes with too many problems compared to landing horizontal, but landing horizontal has pretty much one big problem, which is the ship's shape is not built for the sideways loads. With the idea, that seems to be considered currently, which is using landing legs, this would mean, that you need structural reinforcements on the inside of the ship (outside it disturbs aerodynamics), to take the force from each landing leg and distribute it throughout the (near) hull, so that the hull experiences no extreme loads in one area. (Keep in mind the legs not only have to hold the ship up on the moon under little gravity, which might be quite easy, but also it has to carry enough load, to be keept from buckling when later covering it with regolith, if Starship should become a shelter.) So, this idea of landing horizontal with legs means more weight compared to using legs for landing vertical, because of aditional structures and then you also have the problem of somehow making them aerodinamical, or making them foldable. (which adds even more weight) So the idea that I got to possibly solve this problem and make a horizontal landing possible, is basically a big airbag like structure, that is not filled with gas, but with an expandable foam. (Well to be exact, this would also need gas to expand, but then the foam hardens and the gases escape slowly into space.) The landingbag could be stored close to the tip of the ship on the inside, behind a flap (This comes with no aerodynamic penalty compared to a naked ship, contrary to any landing leg design I have seen so far.) When the ship is in space on its way towards the moon, the flap opens, the landingbag gets pulled out by strings or some other kind of mechanism, then secured on the outside of the ship and then inflated with a chemical reaction. The foam should have enough time to harden on the way to the moon. When the Starship lands on the moon, my thinking is, that the foam will be relatively hard, but it has such properties, that it gets crushed slightly upon impact, to absorb some energy and this way also even out the forces from the rough terrain and thus keep the ships belley from being punctured, or bent, by high points, or a rock or something like that. The foam should also act as an external structural reinforcement, so the Starship has a lower chance of buckling and thus no internal structural reinforcements are needed, since the foam touches the whole belly of the ship and it should be like a quite even preassure on the hull. (The load distribution should be similar to the one experienced during reentry - wich the ship is already built for.) Here is an AI made picture, that is relatively close, to what I imagine (The foam filled bag should "hug" the shape of the ship more and there is some other minor issues with the picture, but the AI did not quite get everything I said.):

@KennethSchindig @GoldBellClips How old you think earth is?

@GoldBellClips Haha who said it was 2 billion years to form? That's hilarious. People believe really far out stuff. There is tons of evidence of the earths age. Just study the moon for starters.

2.5 billion years to form, ruined in seconds for a dumb social media clip.

@UpdateVultures @DramaAlert

@DramaAlert that girl in the back looks like mantis from guardians of the galaxy and mizkif is a women beater than went to kick because nobody likes him after everything he did terrible person.

Mizkif defends FaZe Banks after ex-FaZe members launched their own group.

@PaulTeamAlberta @AntiTrumpCanada Maybe you should do more research cause Canada did not pay the US to be part of Artemis 2.

@AntiTrumpCanada I'll bet you didn't know that Canada paid the US to be part of the Mission hahaha! 😂

There’s a CANADIAN HERO in the picture, motherfuckers.

Canada is heading back to the @Space_Station! 🚀 CSA astronaut Joshua Kutryk is assigned to NASA’s SpaceX Crew-13. Launching no earlier than September 2026, he’ll be the first Canadian to fly under NASA’s Commercial Crew Program. Details: asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/news/artic…

@TjeefAI @Truthful_ast @SpaceX OK, stop lying to yourself, that’s not even close to being true.

SpaceX this is why you stream on YouTube, inspiring the youth is extremely important and YouTube is the greatest way to do so. Please bring back the streams!

@DerplandAdam @StingyandProud @NASASolarSystem @Manuel_LiFe67 Do some research on focal length.

@StingyandProud @NASASolarSystem @Manuel_LiFe67

POV: You're flying by the Moon. This visualization is designed to show you what exactly the Artemis II astronauts will see outside their window during their lunar flyby. Here, the seven-hour visualization is compressed into 28 seconds. ⬇ (1/4)

@anicecolddrankk @NASASolarSystem @NASAArtemis Was taken couple days ago buy the Artemis 2 crew. This shows the dark side of the earth (the sun is behind the earth)

@NASASolarSystem @NASAArtemis Hey, can we get some photos/videos with the exposure adjusted to see stars?? Pretty please?

"...copy, Moon joy."

@sstsoft @RealGPatgar @BGatesIsaPyscho 1 picture? apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery…

@RealGPatgar @BGatesIsaPyscho Just like in 1974 they took one photo of Earth, Only one for all 6x flights not counting Apollo 8 or something. And one it's on the video - proven to be faked inside the cabin while on low Earth orbit. Bart Sibrel discovered that, used to make a documentary about.

Simple question:- Why don’t NASA install the very best cameras to Artemis II & live stream it?

@AlekUFC @DramaAlert

@DramaAlert Watched the live stream… talk about CGI

HISTORICAL: Artemis II has lifted off and his heading towards the Moon.

@tonyhitz @DramaAlert

@DramaAlert Awesome that we’re going to the Moon for the first time 🚀

@eanball420 @DramaAlert

@DramaAlert I feel like this fake and they are using AI to fake people out

@BucketHunterX @yoxics Its does go sideways but not that much.

@yoxics NASAAA‼️😭 Bro a rocket doesn’t go sideways Sometimes Lacy just sometimes…🤦‍♂️

Lacy thought he saw the official NASA Artemis rocket ship that took off from Florida but it was just a regular plane 😭

@SkippyLongFish Real

Is this actually real? Or is it for a movie I’m confused

@ShIndustries @_Testflight_ He’s undoubtedly the most aura-filled person alive, if not ever.

@_Testflight_ Yeah lets just ignore the aura jarred has in this pic

Bro why is the Australian Prime Minister on the wall at NASA?😭

@Itz_7xcritical @vantamaga @MrBeast @grok educate this guy

@vantamaga @MrBeast Woo love that our taxes are propping up all of elons businesses and likely making him the first trillionair

I see so much negativity about the future so I thought it’d be fun to showcase the positive things that could fundamentally change humanity for the better in our new video :D youtu.be/pAnGwRiQ4-4?si…

@Kin79057726 @vantamaga @MrBeast @grok educate this person

@vantamaga @MrBeast Go expensive instagram shots going nowhere funded by tax money.

@MorganWKhan @yatharthmaan @rookisaacman @NASAAdmin finding conspiracies where there aren’t any.

@yatharthmaan There is more than a coincidence here. Why that specific jet and who was responsible for the maintenance? @rookisaacman @NASAAdmin Seems super sus when flight 12 is right around the corner and we need that jet.

The WB-57 involved in today's incident shot this footage two years ago:

@LacyHimself I have school