Tom Wilson

2.3K posts

Tom Wilson

Tom Wilson

@TWilsonMD

Interventional Cardiologist, CTO-PCI, CHIP, Peripheral vascular disease, acute PE. Views & opinions are my own.

Rapid City, SD Katılım Şubat 2021
368 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Elad Asher
Elad Asher@AsherElad·
Curious to hear opinions: 99F s/p TAVI (Allegra 23) developed CAVB ~2h post-procedure that resolved within ~1 hour. Would you proceed with PPM implantation or watchful waiting?
English
3
1
4
1.3K
Tom Wilson
Tom Wilson@TWilsonMD·
@ColletCarlos @rotamonster PCCTA will be ready for us to use in 2-3m. Is high iodine contrast a must have or does 350 do the job? What do you use?
English
0
0
0
308
Tom Wilson
Tom Wilson@TWilsonMD·
@Hragy My Answer: call the referring doc. Have a discussion. Maybe the patient has been symptomatic. If not, discuss option for Rx therapy, close follow up.
English
1
1
2
313
Hany Ragy
Hany Ragy@Hragy·
Question 3: An asymptomatic patient with CACS above 1000 is referred for cath, they have a focal proximal calcific LAD 70% angiographic stensois , needing one focal 4/18 DES , authorization is for adhoc PCI
English
3
0
2
2.4K
Hany Ragy
Hany Ragy@Hragy·
Ok, IC’s discussing CACS please reply; Do you believe CACS is the new Stress Test used mostly inappropriately to perform angio and PCI for asymptomatic patients with very occasional trues saves? This is question 1 in our poll
English
6
4
10
6.5K
Tom Wilson
Tom Wilson@TWilsonMD·
@djc795 @Hragy Yes of course. The only caveat is occasionally, less than 10x per year, someone is referred for an elevated CAC and by taking a good history they do have angina or dyspnea. But those are few and far between. Usually the stress test is done on ASx patients.
English
0
1
4
429
David J. Cohen, MD, MSc
@TWilsonMD @Hragy I think that’s the same phenomenon. It leads to an unnecessary stress test, which then leads to an unnecessary cath, etc, etc,
English
3
1
8
870
Tom Wilson
Tom Wilson@TWilsonMD·
I didn’t advocate for 1 size fits all and never would. I referenced DCBs and BVS, to severely limit permanent implants in coronary arteries, especially younger patients or HBR. DES will be around for decades-just want to decrease use if able. Being skilled w multiple tools is vital.
English
2
0
3
109
Matt Daniels MD PhD
Matt Daniels MD PhD@cardiacpolymath·
@Hragy @TWilsonMD What do you think is the motivator for "one approach fits all"? Is it corporate greed, or physician need to have a preferred tool that they can use in 95% of cases? Aiming for particular niche with unmet need doesn't seem like a bad idea, build out from that bridgehead later??
English
1
1
1
224
Hany Ragy
Hany Ragy@Hragy·
Anyone who worked as an interventional cardiologist before the introduction of Stents , knows that the current direction to promote DCB as stent free PCI world will fail. What we really need to know is if we can use DCB when and where we do not want to put DES,like distal LAD.
English
5
3
79
8.1K
Tom Wilson retweetledi
Eric Topol
Eric Topol@EricTopol·
@drjohnm I have been outspoken on the massive misuse of CAC testing for a long time (excerpt from my book in 2011) and have never ordered one.
Eric Topol tweet media
English
32
30
123
162.6K
vjyden sam
vjyden sam@rational_doc·
@georgetolisjr Oh u need to see interventional meetings. It’s even worse there
English
1
1
21
2.7K
George Tolis
George Tolis@georgetolisjr·
Cardiac surgical societies should require all “experts” to turn in a case list before they can sit on a national meeting panel and lecture the audience about “how I do it” or “how I teach it”.
English
23
26
298
71.6K