Taha

I won't tolerate racists on my account!

Islam is incompatible with Japan.

When Marandi says that the Taliban in 1990s slaughtered people and murder people, he is specifically talking about the killing of Iranian diplomats in Mazar e Sharif, but he doesn’t mention that the militias who were aligned with Iran, slaughtered thousands of Taliban prisoners before the incident in question took place. Here is the context for those who are interested; The Taliban briefly captured Mazar-e-Sharif in May 1997 through a peaceful entry, achieved by striking a deal with an Uzbek commander (Abdul Malik Pahlawan). The Taliban entered the city at his invitation. To show the people they were not there to fight, Taliban fighters came in lightly armed, with many of their weapons tied or secured as a gesture of trust. But there was a great betrayal. Hazara militias (Hezb-e-Wahdat) resisted Taliban’s rule, sparking spontaneous fighting in the streets. Abdul Malik Pahlawan then turned against the Taliban and joined the opposition forces. In the chaos, nearly 3,000 Taliban fighters were captured. They were then brutally executed, every last one of them. Their bodies were dumped in wells, left in open fields, or buried in mass graves in remote desert areas. Many Taliban fighters carried the memory of this bloody, merciless betrayal for revenge. So when the Taliban recaptured Mazar-e-Sharif in August 1998, that fresh trauma fueled the fire, which led to the storming of the Iranian consulate and the killing of the diplomats and journalist. Even then, Mullah Umar sent a letter to the United Nations expressing sadness over the killings. He stated that the soldiers responsible acted on their own, without orders, and that the bodies had been found buried outside the city. Mullah Umar also expressed readiness to cooperate in returning the bodies to Iran and asked the United Nations to mediate between Iran and the Taliban to de-escalate tensions and prevent further conflict. Given this full context; the betrayal and massacre of thousands of Taliban prisoners in 1997, the revenge-driven chaos of 1998, and Mullah Umar’s official response denying responsibility while seeking UN mediation, Marandi’s depiction is complete false and biased.

Onlyusemeblade tries copying ChudTheBuilder content by saying the N-word gets pepper sprayed 🤣

Ya Allah please protect our Imaan.

Since people seem to be confused about this, here is a more complete explanation: I thought the point of the OP was that it is important (for any reason) whether or not something can be determined reliably to be a Monet painting or an AI derivative of a Monet painting - as in, if given an A/B test, can an average (or even well-trained) human tell the difference between something painted by AI and something painted by Monet? Will they misidentify a Monet as AI? Will they misidentify an AI as Monet? Etc. My point in saying Monet is a bad example (or any famous painter, I might say) is because that criteria has not historically been important even before AI, as far as I can tell. Humans seem to care whether a painting was painted by Monet, not whether anyone can tell by looking at it that it was painted by Monet (including themselves). They will happily invest in a painting if they are assured it is Monet, whether or not they themselves could ever tell the difference between that painting and a forgery, and they will be very upset if it later turns out it was not painted by Monet - even though they clearly could not tell the difference in the interim, etc. So to me, they were trying to prove one point, but accidentally proved the other point. Can most humans figure out if something is a genuine Monet or not? No. Do most humans care if something is a genuine Monet or not anyway? Absolutely. And I would argue this is a very important thing to understand about "AI art". Humans care about the origins or things - they don't just care about the things, even if they cannot themselves determine that origin definitively.

Japanese politician says that Muslims shouldn’t be buried in Japan. ”Japan is a cremation country. Allocating land for Muslim burials is not appropriate. If they want burial, it should be done in their home countries at their own expense.”