Sabitlenmiş Tweet
小白
12.6K posts
小白
@Taiwanfounding
藍白甲、柯粉退散。台灣要保有主權就不能再被親共分子拖累 發表的言論只代表自己所吸收的資訊，不代表一定正確 発言は自分が吸収した情報を代表するだけであり、必ずしも正確を意味しません。
新北市、桃園市 Katılım Temmuz 2023
165 Takip Edilen111 Takipçiler
小白 retweetledi
『11.4 公克牛肉。這就是（丹麥）哥本哈根市政府規定，當地安養院住民每天能吃的牛肉份量，才能不超過每週 80 公克的上限。
根據 替代黨 一名政治人物的說法，原因是我們的老人一輩子以來都是「最大的氣候罪人」。因此他們必須受到懲罰。結果就是——每天只能分到半顆肉丸等級的牛肉。
我真的覺得這荒謬到難以形容。這些自以為高人一等的氣候狂熱份子，到底把自己當成什麼？
我們的老人辛苦勞累了一輩子，打造出今天這個讓所有人受益的社會。結果現在，卻要以「氣候正義」的神聖名義，用近乎嚴苛配給制度的方式懲罰他們。
我認為這毫無尊嚴。令人羞愧。完全無法接受。
因為，讓老人一天只吃 11.4 公克牛肉，根本不可能拯救世界。丹麥的人為碳排放量只占全球的 0.1%。
而最糟糕的是什麼？許多推動這類嚴苛氣候政策的氣候狂熱人士，自己卻完全不介意搭飛機到處參加那些毫無意義的氣候會議。這些氣候救世主身上的偽善，簡直滿到從牆壁上流下來。
現在是時候終結這種狂熱的氣候政策了。這種政策只是在讓普通人的生活變得更痛苦，包括我們的老人。
氣候政策應該建立在理性與比例原則之上。因為世界上根本沒有任何國家會把丹麥視為榜樣——當我們只是讓自己變得更窮、降低生活品質，換來一點微小到根本無法測量的假設性氣候差異。
與其如此，不如投資核能與未來科技，透過真正合理的方式推動綠色轉型。
同時，也請讓我們的年長公民擁有有尊嚴的晚年。讓他們如果想吃一塊好吃的牛排，或午餐來份生牛肉塔塔，就能安心享用——而不是因此受到懲罰。』
Malte Larsen@MalteLarsen_
11,4 gram oksekød. Så meget må plejehjemsbeboere i Københavns Kommune spise om dagen, for ikke at overskride den ugentlige grænse på 80 gram. Ifølge en politiker fra Alternativet skyldes det, at vores ældre har været de største klimasyndere igennem deres liv. Og derfor skal de straffes. Så der kun er oksekød til en halv frikadelle om dagen. Jeg synes at det er så grotesk, at det er svært at sætte ord på. Hvad fanden bilder de sig egentlig ind, disse bedrevidende klimafanatikere? Vores ældre har slidt og slæbt et helt liv. Skabt et fantastisk samfund for os alle sammen. Og nu bliver de straffet med drakoniske oksekøds-rationer i klimaets hellige navn. Jeg synes, at det er uværdigt. Beskæmmende. Og totalt uacceptabelt. For nej, vi redder ikke hele verden ved, at vores ældre kun spiser 11,4 gram oksekød om dagen. Danmark udleder 0,1% af verdens menneskeskabte CO2. Og det værste ved det hele? Mange af disse klimafanatikere, som gennemfører denne form for drakoniske klimaforanstaltninger, har intet problem ved at flyve frem og tilbage for at deltage i ligegyldige klimakonferencer. Hykleriet driver simpelthen ned ad væggene hos de klima-frelste aktivister. Det er på tide, at vi gør op med denne fanatiske klimapolitik, som gør livet sur for almindelige mennesker, herunder vores ældre. Klimapolitikken skal være fornuftig, og der skal være styr på proportionerne. For der er ingen lande, der ser Danmark som et foregangsland, når vi gør os selv fattigere og sænker levestandarden, alene for at skabe en så mikroskopisk og hypotetisk klimaforskel, at den aldrig vil kunne måles. Lad os i stedet satse på kernekraft og fremtidens teknologier, som kan bane vejen for en fornuftig grøn omstilling. Og lad os samtidig give vores ældre medborgere en værdig alderdom. Hvor de har lov til at spise en lækker hakket oksebøf eller tartar til frokost, hvis de har lyst - uden at de skal straffes.
中文
小白 retweetledi
『罕見的舊影片：
倫敦市長薩迪克・汗與英國內政大臣夏巴娜・馬哈茂德，多年前在巴基斯坦同框，當時他們還遠未掌握權力。
看起來他們像是從年輕時就被精心挑選並培養，好在未來把英國帶往某個特定方向。這一切帶有長期規劃、資金充足運作的特徵，就像穆斯林兄弟會式的、從內部悄然進行的滲透。如今兩人都身居要職，英國正在為此付出代價。
猶太公民生活在恐懼之中。一般英國人不敢表達自己的想法。家長害怕讓女兒在夜晚獨自行走。
這不是偶然。你覺得，這是被計畫好的嗎？』
Yossi BenYakar@YossiBenYakar
Rare old clip: London Mayor Sadiq Khan and UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, together in Pakistan years ago long before they rose to power. It looks as if they were carefully hand-picked and groomed from a young age to lead Britain in a very specific direction. This has all the hallmarks of long-term, well-funded planning the quiet Muslim Brotherhood-style takeover of Britain from within. And now, with both in senior positions, Britain is paying the price. Jewish citizens live in fear. Ordinary Brits are afraid to speak their minds. Parents are scared to let their daughters walk alone at night. This wasn’t an accident. What do you think, was this planned?
中文
小白 retweetledi
@augama 從華府帶回一句話，是他模擬川普對台灣盟友的口氣：「那有那麼難嗎？那把你賣掉算了。」
這句話的脈絡是國民黨那筆 3800 億 + N 國防預算。在川普眼裡，這份預算就像一份 term sheet 簽好了卻不匯錢。Jason 擔心的是這個訊號傳到華府後，台灣已經被貼上「不上道盟友」的標籤。Jason 是前立委，現在是華府哈德遜研究所的資深研究員，今年 3 月剛受邀到美中經濟與安全審查委員會作證。塞掐 SideChat 的這集訪談裡，他把川普第二任怎麼看盟友、怎麼看台灣，分層攤開。
川普個人風格只是表象，下一任總統也不會把這套打掉。民主黨自己也看到效果，回不去了。
如果你想知道：
- 川普篩選盟友的兩個冷酷標準是什麼
- 為什麼 3800 億 + N 在華府眼裡像一張沒打款的合約
- Jason 在華府兵推聽過的最危險劇本，72 小時怎麼把台灣推上談判桌
- 台積電在華府只有 5 個人，三星有 150 個人專做政府關係
✅ 完整訪談請看 YouTube
youtu.be/8qHTU6c2hCQ
#塞掐SideChat #許毓仁 #川普 #台灣國防 #華府智庫
YouTube
中文
小白 retweetledi
『全球對 VPN 的打壓正在加速——而歐盟正走在最前面。
完全就是我昨天警告的那件事：
布魯塞爾的數位封鎖
歐盟執委會已經向各會員國明確表示：到2026年底，必須全面建立線上年齡驗證制度。
所有對「敏感」內容的存取都必須可以被驗證。當被問到要如何防止透過 VPN 繞過時，副主席 Henna Virkkunen 冷冷地回答：「那是下一步的重要一環。」
這遠遠不只是技術上的附註，而是對「數位利維坦」的哲學性投降。
作為匿名自我決定最後堡壘的 VPN，正在被系統性拆解。這不只是摧毀個人隱私，更是在摧毀自由意見形成、個人自主以及啟蒙公民的存在基礎。
歐盟以保護兒童這個經典理由，建立一套「完全透明」的基礎設施。兒童保護成為特洛伊木馬，導入一套監控架構，在這個架構中，公民不再是主體，而只是被國家監視的對象。
這種邏輯遵循著一個古老的模式。國家原本被視為自由的保障者（霍布斯筆下作為保護力量的利維坦），如今卻轉變為無所不在的監視者，把任何「不可見性」都視為威脅。
啟蒙運動——康德所說的「人類從自我加諸的不成熟中解放」——在這裡被徹底反轉。
成熟的公民被要求再次變得不成熟——這次不再是教會或君主，而是演算法與歐盟命令。
我們必須要求重新奪回數位主權。』
Dr. Thilo Scholpp@Wilehalm
The worldwide crackdown on VPNs is accelerating — and the EU is leading the way. Exactly what I warned about yesterday: Brussels’ Digital Lockdown The EU Commission has made it crystal clear to member states: By the end of 2026, comprehensive online age verification must be in place across the board. Every access to “sensitive” content must be verifiable. When asked how VPN circumventions should be prevented, Vice-President Henna Virkkunen replied with cold precision: “That is an important part of the next steps.” 🤮 This is far more than a technical footnote. It is the philosophical surrender to the digital Leviathan. The last bastion of anonymous self-determination — the VPN — is being systematically dismantled. It doesn’t just destroy individual privacy. It destroys the ontological foundation of free opinion-forming, individual autonomy, and enlightened citizenship. The EU uses the classic pretext of child protection to build an infrastructure of total transparency. Child protection becomes the Trojan horse for a control architecture in which the citizen is no longer a subject, but an object of state visibility. This logic follows an old pattern. The state, once conceived as a guarantor of freedom (Hobbes’ Leviathan as a protective power), mutates into an omnipresent overseer that defines any form of invisibility as a threat. The Enlightenment, which Kant understood as “man’s emergence from his self-imposed immaturity,” is here reversed. The mature citizen is to be made immature again — this time not by church or prince, but by algorithms and Commission decrees. We must demand the reconquest of digital sovereignty. #FreiheitStattZwang
中文
小白 retweetledi
『大家都被告知，塑膠污染是個「全球性」問題……
但數據呈現的卻是完全不同的樣貌。
大約有90%到95%的海洋塑膠，來自少數幾條河流……而且大多集中在亞洲與非洲。像是長江、恆河、湄公河、尼羅河、尼日河。
不是你在科羅拉多州用的塑膠購物袋。
也不是你在華盛頓特區用的吸管。
真正造成絕大多數污染的，是少數幾個廢棄物管理不善的系統。
聯合國並沒有把這件事當成一個可以解決的工程問題來處理……而是把它設計成一個可以長期運作的全球性資金來源。
因為如果用直接而快速的方式解決……
那就不需要幾十年的委員會、資金機制，還有各種「框架」了。』
Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki@MatthewWielicki
Everyone’s told plastic pollution is a “global” problem… But the data say something very different. Roughly 90–95% of ocean plastic comes from a handful of rivers... mostly in Asia and Africa. The Yangtze. Ganges. Mekong. Nile. Niger. Not your grocery bag in Colorado. Not your straw in D.C. A small number of poorly managed waste systems are doing the overwhelming majority of the damage. The UN isn’t structuring this like a solvable engineering problem... it’s structuring it like a permanent global revenue stream. Because if you solve it quickly and directly… there’s no need for decades of committees, funding mechanisms, and “frameworks.”
中文
小白 retweetledi
『這一週很難熬。我和幾位來自歐洲國家的聰明朋友一起吃晚餐，他們有些人一半的人生都在聯合國體系中工作。我們本來聊得很開心，直到話題轉到唐納·川普和伊朗。所有人，沒有例外，都在批評川普：說他給大家帶來麻煩，說戰爭很可怕，說這是違法的，等等。
我保持沉默。直到大家終於安靜下來時，我只問了一個問題：那超過400公斤的鈾，究竟要由誰來收集並移除？
我的法國朋友說：川普和那個政權沒什麼差別。而且，他發動了一場非法戰爭。再說，很多國家都有核電廠，為什麼伊朗不可以有？
我內心幾乎炸開，但一開始我還是保持沉默。當我終於開口時，我說：那在第二次世界大戰期間，美國幫助法國，難道也是非法的嗎？那是不必要的嗎？
然後又是一片沉默。
我一直在想該怎麼表達內心的感受；該怎麼向一個歐洲人解釋這個政權——一個被左派意識形態包圍、處在各種間接審查之中，總是隨時準備說「戰爭很可怕」，卻又在我說很多伊朗人其實希望這場戰爭時感到驚訝的人。
你要怎麼向那些生活在安全環境中的人解釋：當所有內部的道路都被封死時，有些國家會把外部壓力視為唯一剩下的出路？你要怎麼解釋，他們不是在談地緣政治，而只是站在道德上的舒適位置做判斷，而有些人談的是生存？
那些歐洲人，即使擁有民主與自由網路，仍然不知道1月8日至9日在伊朗發生了什麼。那些歐洲人，相信每一場衝突都可以用同一套道德模板來理解。那些歐洲人，在理論上譴責一切暴力，卻從未生活在一個暴力已經成為日常一部分的伊斯蘭體制之下。
而我坐在那裡，感覺我們之間的距離，比我們圍坐的這張桌子還要遙遠……』
Bahar Akhavan@AkhavanBahar
This week was tough. I had dinner with my intelligent friends from European countries, people who have spent half their lives working within the United Nations. We were having a good time until the conversation turned to Donald Trump and Iran. Everyone, without exception, spoke badly of Trump: that he causes problems for everyone, that war is terrible, that it is illegal, and so on. I stayed silent. When everyone finally became quiet, I asked only one question: who is actually going to collect and remove those more than 400 kilograms of uranium? My French friend said: Trump is no better than the regime. On top of that, he has started an illegal war, and many countries have nuclear power plants why shouldn’t Iran have them too? I exploded inside, but I remained silent at first. When I finally broke my silence, I said: was it illegal when the United States helped the French during the Second World War? Was it unnecessary? Then silence returned. I kept thinking about how to express everything happening inside me; how to explain the regime to a European-someone surrounded by left-wing ideology, enclosed within indirect forms of censorship, and always ready to say that war is terrible, yet surprised when I say many Iranians wanted it. How do you explain to people who live in safety that some nations sometimes see outside pressure as the only remaining path when every internal path has been closed? How do you explain that they do not even speak in geopolitical terms, but judge only from a position of moral comfort, while others are speaking about survival? Europeans who, despite democracy and free internet, still do not know what happened in Iran on January 8–9. Europeans who believe every conflict can be understood through the same moral template. Europeans who condemn all violence in theory, but have never had to live under a Islamic system where violence is part of everyday life. And I sat there with the feeling that the distance between our realities was greater than the table around which we were sitting…
中文
小白 retweetledi
『三名非法移民被判定犯下在布萊頓海灘對一名英國女子進行輪姦的罪行。
他們在施暴過程中一邊拍攝，一邊辱罵她為「骯髒的婊子」。
其中一人曾抓住她的臉，強行撬開她的嘴並向裡吐口水，還鼓動其他人照做。
受害者表示：「我一直哀求他們停下來，但他們沒有。每當我閉上眼睛，就會看到他們在嘲笑我。他們覺得很好笑。我一想到他們做的事就全身發毛。他們很邪惡，毀了我的人生。」
她可能永遠無法從這段創傷中恢復。
這就是英國政府對這個國家的女性所造成的結果。
這件事必須有人負責。』
𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎@NiohBerg
Three illegal immigrants have been found guilty of gang raping a British woman on a beach in Brighton. They brutally raped her while filming and calling her a "Dirty b****". At one point, one of the rapists grabbed hold of her face, forced open her mouth and spat in it while encouraging his friends to do the same. The victim said: "I was begging them to stop and they wouldn't. Every time I close my eyes I can see them laughing at me. They thought it was funny. My skin crawls because of what they did. They're evil and they've ruined my life." She may never recover from this trauma. This is what the British government has done to the women of this country. There needs to be a reckoning.
中文
小白 retweetledi
『Kash Patel：「金錢不會說謊，寶貝……那個號稱在對抗三K黨的慈善機構，實際上卻資助了三K黨。那個號稱在對抗新納粹的慈善機構，實際上卻資助了新納粹。
南方貧困法律中心（SPLC）運作了一套有系統、精心計算的計畫，詐騙其捐款人數百萬美元，並利用不正當的銀行結構體系，在我們的社會中散播分裂與仇恨。」
種族歧視已經不再以他們想要的方式存在，因此他們必須在財務上「製造」它。
在美國，種族歧視已經罕見到，南方貧困法律中心甚至必須付錢給白人，讓他們假裝成種族歧視者。』
（白左團體自導自演，打壓異己奪權）
MJTruthUltra@MJTruthUltra
Kash Patel: “Money doesn’t lie baby… The charity that supposedly fought the KKK actually funded the KKK. The charity that supposedly fought Neo-Nazis actually funded Neo-Nazis. The Southern Poverty Law Center ran a methodical, calculated scheme to defraud their donor base for millions and used an illicit banking structure system to sow discord and hate into our society.” Racism doesn’t exist how they want it to anymore, so they have to financially fabricate it. Racism is so rare in the U.S. that the Southern Poverty Law Center had to pay white people to pretend to be racist. rumble.com/v78vow4-kash-p…
中文
小白 retweetledi
整個世界應該反省！
在伊朗光榮加入專門關注女性權利的聯合國“方案與協調委員會”之後；
在英國、法國、加拿大、澳大利亞、德國、西班牙、挪威、荷蘭、瑞士、奧地利、芬蘭，這些傳統的“人權捍衛國”以全場行注目禮的方式，歡迎新朋友來到委員會共同討論如何關注女性權利之時，伊朗官方宣布；
將對8名女性實施絞刑處決；
對此，全世界除了美國；
所有的國家、
所有的NGO、
所有的人權組織、
所有的非營利組織和聯合國都未發出一絲聲音，靜悄悄地等待著這8名女性被處決。
只有美國，只有川普總統發文，要求伊朗不要這麼做。
現在伊朗回應了---4人無罪釋放，4人判一個月監禁。
當日曆來到了2025年之後，全世界被獨裁邪惡政府壓迫的草根民眾的基本權利，只有美國政府，美國總統是在關心之中。
6名中港官員因為鎮壓港人及海外迫害，被美國制裁；
泰國的一位副總理，因為將40名維吾爾人“送中”，而被美國制裁；
伊朗人民反抗暴政，川普總統發文表示支持，並且已經履行了承諾，消滅了至少3層伊朗政府官員；
雖然川普團隊僅僅執政15個月，卻祭出了上屆美國政府從未有過的對人權惡棍的制裁措施；
儘管今天支持伊朗的傳統“人權捍衛國”仍然壟斷著“保護人權”的所有語言，佔據著“捍衛人權”的道德至高點，但所有捍衛人權的行動，都來自今天的美國政府，來自川普總統。
作為一個社會草根， 你如何理解上述事實？
中文
小白 retweetledi
『他們因為看電影，就被活活燒死。
1978年8月19日傍晚，伊朗阿巴丹的雷克斯電影院，四名男子走進戲院。
他們帶著汽油罐，把燃料潑灑在地板上，而觀眾還坐在裡面看電影。
接著，他們從外面把門鎖上……然後點火。
至少有400人被活活燒死。就在一棟被鎖住的建築裡。只因為他們在看電影。
不是因為電影有什麼危險，而是因為電影院本身被視為對伊斯蘭的冒犯，是西方墮落的象徵。
一個讓男女在黑暗中坐在一起、被娛樂的場所——這樣就足夠了。
自1978年初以來，伊斯蘭極端分子已經在伊朗縱火燒毀了另外29間電影院，但那些都是空的。雷克斯電影院不是。
接著，謊言出現了。
魯霍拉·何梅尼——曾稱電影院是「賣淫與腐化青年的中心」——立刻將這場大屠殺歸咎於國王及其秘密警察SAVAK。
數百萬伊朗人相信了他。
隨之而來的憤怒，加速了革命。
那些活活燒死400人的人，竟把自己受害者的遺體，當成他們攀上政治權力的燃料。
真相花了23年才浮出水面。
其中一名加害者最終承認犯行——不是出於悔意，而是因為他再也無法忍受別人奪走他認為是「為伊斯蘭作出終極犧牲」的功勞。
而那些幕後的人？其中幾人後來還成為伊朗國會議員。
負責審理此案的法官，與涉嫌涉案的神職人員有關聯。這場審判成了一場戲。受害者被遺忘，他們的名字從官方紀念日中消失，沒有任何周年紀念。
伊斯蘭共和國就這樣繼續往前走。
這就是我們正在面對的對象。
一種會因為看電影而活活燒死人、把罪責推給受害者、將大規模殺戮變成政治工具，甚至讓加害者進入國會的意識形態。
而這也是歐洲數十年來小心翼翼對待、安撫、保護免於批評，甚至將點名它稱為種族歧視的那種意識形態。
伊朗人知道判斷錯誤的代價。
他們已經付出了47年的代價……而且還在持續。
而我們還在假裝自己有時間慢慢思考。
感謝上帝有美國與以色列。』
Krisztina Maria@KrisztinaMaria
THEY BURNED THEM ALIVE FOR WATCHING A FILM. On the evening of August 19, 1978, four men walked into Cinema Rex in Abadan, Iran. They carried cans of fuel. They spread it across the floor while the audience sat watching a movie. Then they locked the doors from the outside…and set it on fire. At least 400 people burned to death. Alive. Inside a locked building. Because they were watching a film. Not because the film was dangerous. But because the cinema itself was considered an insult to Islam. A symbol of Western decadence. A place where men and women sat together in the dark and were entertained. That was enough. Since the beginning of 1978, Islamic extremists had already burned down 29 other cinemas across Iran. But those were empty. Cinema Rex was not. And then came the lie. Ayatollah Khomeini - who himself had called cinemas “centres for prostitution and the corruption of youth” - immediately blamed the Shah and his secret police SAVAK for the massacre. Millions of Iranians believed him. The outrage that followed accelerated the revolution. The very men who burned 400 people alive used the bodies of their own victims as fuel for their political rise to power. It took 23 years for the truth to come out. One of the perpetrators eventually confessed - not out of remorse, but because he could no longer stand watching others receive credit for what he considered the ultimate act of sacrifice for Islam. And the men behind the attack? Several of them went on to become members of the Iranian parliament. The judge appointed to the case had ties to the very clerics suspected of involvement. The trial was a theatre. The victims were forgotten. Their names were erased from official calendars. No anniversaries were observed. The Islamic Republic simply moved on. This is who we are dealing with. An ideology that burns people alive for watching a film. That blames its victims for its own crimes. That turns mass murder into a political weapon. That rewards its perpetrators with parliamentary seats. And this is the ideology that Europe has spent decades tiptoeing around. Appeasing. Protecting from criticism. Calling it racism to name it out loud. The Iranians know what it costs to get it wrong. They paid with 47 years…and counting. We are still pretending we have time to think about it. Thank God for USA and Israel.❤️🔥🪽✝️ @realDonaldTrump @netanyahu
中文
小白 retweetledi
『試想一個情境：中國入侵台灣，而當美國試圖做出反應時——
— 擁有核武、飛彈林立的伊朗關閉荷姆茲海峽
— 掌控巴拿馬運河的中國企業將其關閉
— 印度洋上唯一的美軍基地迪亞哥加西亞，因為英國的關係而失去
— 委內瑞拉與古巴啟動潛伏細胞、販毒集團，並切斷「美國灣」的航運
— 我們在格陵蘭的基地，因為歐洲官僚體系的遲緩而受到影響
除此之外，中共還利用我們港口與電網的關鍵漏洞讓整個系統癱瘓，同時切斷我們的藥品供應，以及任何他們可能採取的其他手段。
這樣聽起來，美國會贏得台灣戰爭嗎？』
（這個想像是建立在沒有川普執政的世界線）
China Uncensored@ChinaUncensored
Imagine a scenario where China invades Taiwan, and while the US attempts to react -a nuclear armed Iran bristling with missiles shuts down the Strait of Hormuz -Chinese companies in control of the Panama Canal shut it down -Diego Garcia, the only US base in the Indian Ocean, is gone thanks to the UK -Venezuela and Cuba activate sleeper cells, the cartels, and cut off shipping in the Gulf of America -our bases in Greenland are compromised by molasses slow European bureaucracy And this is all on top of the CCP using critical vulnerabilities in our ports and power grids to shut it all down and cutting off our supply of medicine on top of anything else they may try. Doesn’t sound like the US would win the Taiwan War, does it?
中文
小白 retweetledi
『這到底有多他媽的奇怪啊……
好幾個星期以來，整個歐盟和那個沒骨氣的英國一直在對我們大吼大叫，要求我們跟黎巴嫩停火，就在真主黨開始對我們發射飛彈，而我們反擊之後。歐洲領袖一個接一個，簡直就是在重複同一套無聊的劇本，一遍又一遍又一遍又一遍又一遍又一遍又一遍又一遍。
現在我們有停火談判。在華盛頓。國務卿魯比奧也參與其中。
你猜怎麼著？？？
真主黨又開始對我們發射飛彈和無人機了。沒錯。就他媽的在停火談判中間。
為什麼？
因為真主黨和伊朗不想要我們跟黎巴嫩和平相處。他們想要我們死掉，把黎巴嫩變成一個伊斯蘭奴隸國家。
但這還不是最奇怪又好笑的部分。聽聽這個……
那些同樣的歐洲領袖，之前瘋狂發飆、跺腳發脾氣，一遍又一遍又一遍又一遍又一遍又一遍又一遍又一遍……現在卻鴉雀無聲。是的，沒錯，他們沉默了。沒有一句關於真主黨發射飛彈的話。沒有譴責。沒有嚴厲的信件。什麼都沒有。
瘋狂吧？
你幾乎會以為歐洲是站在恐怖分子那邊的，只想要猶太國家滅亡。
哦等等……這正是他們想要的。
所以當你聽到以色列叫歐洲滾蛋，然後再滾遠一點的時候，現在你知道原因了。』
Mor Edge Insight@MorEdge_Insight
So how fucking weird is this right… For weeks the entire EU and spineless Britain have been shouting at us for a ceasefire with Lebanon after Hezbollah started firing missiles at us and we fought back. European leader after European leader literally parroting the same boring script over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. Now we have ceasefire talks. In Washington. With Secretary of State Rubio involved. And guess what??? Hezbollah started firing missiles and drones at us again. That’s right. In the middle of fucking ceasefire talks. And why? Because Hezbollah and Iran don’t want us to have peace with Lebanon. They want us dead and Lebanon as an Islamic slave state. But that’s not the weird and funny part. Listen to this… Those same European leaders who screamed and stamped their feet in wild tantrums over and over and over and over and over and over and over again… are silent. Yes that’s right, they are silent. Not a single word about Hezbollah firing missiles. No condemnation. No stern letter. No anything. Crazy right? You’d almost think that Europe was on the side of the terrorists and just wants the Jewish state dead. Oh wait… that’s exactly what they want. So when you hear Israel telling Europe to go fuck themselves, and then to fuck themselves some more, now you know why.
中文
小白 retweetledi
『轉自 馬丁・艾爾斯（再分享）：
在美國住了將近兩年後，我意識到一件事。
美國與其他西方世界，已經不再站在同一條線上。
我們總是會嘲笑、調侃美國人說「自由！」，因為我們真的以為自己跟他們一樣自由。
錯了。我們不是。差得遠了。在法律、思維方式和行為上，這一點完全不同。
最重要的是，政府本身就完全不一樣。美國對核心自由的信念，是我們沒有的那種規模。
同時，唐納・川普 贏得了普選票、選舉人團、眾議院和參議院……這樣一個人在其他西方國家，往往是被公開嘲笑，甚至鄙視的。
基於這些以及其他原因，我們其實不一樣。
然而，整個西方，包括澳洲，卻完全指望在生存上依賴美國。
如果世界局勢惡化（這是遲早的問題），那麼沒有美國的整個西方世界，都會完蛋。
所以你可能會問——既然我們在意識形態上沒有那麼一致，那我們在軍事上總該有些貢獻吧？
其實沒有……我們的軍事價值並沒有那麼重要。
美國海軍大約有470艘艦艇，包括11艘航空母艦、69艘潛艦、75艘驅逐艦……還有110艘新艦正在建造中。
澳洲大約有30艘，包括3艘驅逐艦、7艘巡防艦和7艘老舊潛艦。英國稍微好一點，大約有60艘。
同時，美國擁有超過14,000架軍用飛機，數量驚人。
澳洲有252架軍用飛機，英國有556架。
美國軍隊接近100萬名現役軍人。澳洲大約4萬5千人。
美國將GDP的3.4%（9680億美元）用於國防，澳洲是2%（364億美元）。美國的軍費支出，等於全球接下來15個最大軍費國家的總和（包括中國）。
美國有一種「戰鬥文化」。男性會射擊（很多）也會打獵，退伍軍人在很多事情上受到優待，從停車位到登機順序都是。穿軍服的年輕人在街上，一天會被道謝好幾次。
「喔，美國人和他們的槍！」我們總是用一種自以為高明的態度這樣說。是的，他們有一種戰士文化。我們沒有。我們也不需要，因為我們寄生在他們之上。
有多少英國年輕男性願意為國家作戰？再問問美國年輕男性。差距幾乎大到極致。
在軍事上，我們幾乎沒有什麼貢獻。
同時，看看澳洲如何一邊依賴美國，一邊又親近中國、甚至損害美國利益。中國讓我們變得富有，我們就維持關係。那是一個具有擴張意圖的馬克思主義政權。
再說一次，你真的要在美國待一段時間，才會理解彼此在中國議題上的巨大鴻溝。
歐洲也是。他們讓中國在從德國到格陵蘭的各種地方發揮影響力，同時又引進伊斯蘭，還把自己的人送上法庭，只因為說了讓人不舒服的話。
不知怎麼地，我們跟美國達成了一個「天上掉下來」的協議——意思是：「當壞人來的時候，你們會來救我們，對吧？」因為我們自己救不了自己。
我們活在和平中。但我們持續侵蝕自由，持續讓中國坐大，對軍事也變得鬆散、漠不關心，因為有「山姆大叔」在撐著。
而且，老實說，美國人在全球其實常被瞧不起。更諷刺的是，我們對自己的保護者也沒有多尊重。
所以，美國現在終於說「夠了」。我人在這裡，可以告訴你現在的氛圍就是如此。唐納・川普 正在做人民想要的事，他們已經受夠了。
而我們卻一副震驚、委屈的樣子，表現得好像完全沒有自知之明。
是的，全球聯盟體系現在已經一團亂。但從美國的角度來看，這其實是早該發生的。
我必須說，雖然我是個以澳洲為榮的人，我也不得不同意——有些事情，真的該改變了。』
Tom Kratman@TKratman
From Martin Iles, reposted: Having lived in the USA for nearly two years, I've realised something. The USA and the remainder of the Western world are no longer aligned. We all laugh and mock when the Americans say, "Freedom!" because we truly think we're as free as they are. Wrong. We're not. Not even close. The laws, the mindset, and the behaviour, is totally different in this regard. Most of all, the governments are totally different. The USA's convictions around core freedoms are on a scale we do not share. Meanwhile, Donald Trump wins the popular vote, the electoral college, the House, and the Senate... a man who, in every other Western country, is held in open derision, if not contempt. For these and other reasons, we are not the same. Yet the West, including Australia, fully expect to rely on the USA for our very survival. If the world turns bad (which will happen - only a question of time), then the whole West, without America, is toast. So, you may ask - if we're not very aligned ideologically, then it must be that we bring something to the party militarily? Well, no... actually... we don't matter that much militarily. The USA has about 470 ships in its navy, including 11 aircraft carriers, 69 submarines, 75 destroyers... plus 110 new ships in the pipeline. Australia has about 30, including 3 destroyers, 7 frigates and 7 outdated submarines. The UK does a little better, with about 60. Meanwhile, the US has over 14,000 military aircraft. A staggering number. Australia has 252 military aircraft. The UK has 556. The US army has just shy of 1,000,000 uniformed personnel in its military. Australia has about 45,000. The USA spends 3.4% ($968 billion) of its GDP on defence. Australia spends 2% ($36.4 billion). The US spends as much as the next 15 largest military-spending countries (including China) combined. The USA has a fighting culture. The men shoot things (a lot) and hunt things, the veterans get favoured in everything from parking spots to boarding planes. A uniformed young man is thanked in the street a dozen times a day. "Oh, the Americans and their guns!" we say, in our smug way. Yes, they have a warrior culture. We do not. We don't have to, because we're a leech on theirs. How many young British men are willing to fight for their country? Now ask the same regarding young American men. The difference is about as wide as it could be. Militarily, we don't offer squat. Meanwhile, look at the way Australia works against America's interests by loving on China. China made us rich and we stay close. This is a Marxist regime with expansionist aims. Again, you have to spend time in the USA to realise just how vast a gulf there is between us on China. Europe, too. They let China have their way everywhere from Germany to Greenland, all the while importing Islam and sending their own people to court for saying hurty words. Somehow, we have landed the deal of a lifetime with the USA that says, "when the baddies come, you'll save us ok?" Because we can't save ourselves. And we live in peace. But we keep gnawing away at freedoms, keep enabling China, and get flabby and disinterested about our military because Uncle Sam's got it. And, let's be honest, Americans are widely looked down on. To add insult to injury, we don't think that highly of our protectors. So, the USA is finally saying "enough." I am here, I can tell you what the vibe is, and that's it. Trump is doing what people want in this regard. They're over it. And we come across all shocked and hard done by. We behave like people with no self-insight at all. Yes, the global alliance system is all over the place now. From America's perspective, it's about time. And I must say, though I be a proud Australian, I am forced to agree. Something has to change.
中文
小白 retweetledi
『有一種螞蟻，會靠近另一個蟻群的邊緣，先殺死一隻工蟻，然後讓自己帶上那隻死去螞蟻的氣味。
對螞蟻來說，氣味就是一切。帶著這種氣味，入侵者可以毫無阻礙地進入蟻群。其他工蟻會從牠身邊經過，毫不起疑。
入侵者會一路往內移動，接近蟻后，然後向蟻后噴灑另一種氣味，使工蟻轉而攻擊牠。接著牠們會包圍蟻后並將其殺死。
入侵者不需要與任何人戰鬥。整個蟻群會替牠完成這件事。
一旦蟻后消失，入侵者便開始繁殖。真正的入侵者不再是入侵者，而成為未來。
這就是意識形態接管的運作方式。
一種具有破壞性的外來意識形態，會披上熟悉觀念的外衣，彷彿理所當然地進入社會。
它使用本土的語言——正義、平等、同情、權利、進步——並利用這些詞彙，悄悄改變它們所指涉的意義。
接著，它開始向內滲透。
它改變人們對基礎價值的理解：責任被描繪成殘酷，法律被描繪成壓迫，邊界被描繪成仇恨，傳統被描繪成危險，歷史被描繪成罪惡。
到了這個階段，文明開始對自己動手。
法院、大學、教會、媒體與官僚體系，開始把自身的基礎視為威脅。他們以為自己是在保護體制。
他們在執行那些如今「聞起來合理」的東西。他們看不見入侵者，因為它說話的方式與他們完全一樣。
當創立的原則最終被移除、抹黑、拆解、消除之後，這種外來意識形態不需要征服任何東西，它只是繼承剩下的一切。
蟻后已死，蟻群已不再是原來的自己。
最有效的征服，是讓一個社會相信自己的根基才是敵人，並把摧毀它們視為一種美德。』
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy
There is a species of ant that approaches the edge of another colony, kills a single worker, and then takes on the dead ant’s scent. For ants, scent is everything. Wearing that scent, the intruder walks in with no resistance. The workers pass by without concern. The intruder moves inward, toward the queen, then It sprays the queen with a different scent that makes the workers turn on her. Then they surround her and kill her. The intruder does not need to fight anyone. The colony does the work itself. Once the queen is gone, the intruder reproduces. The true invader is no longer an intruder. It is the future. This is how ideological takeover works. A destructive foreign ideology takes the scent of familiar ideas and walks in as if it belongs. It speaks the native vocabulary, justice, equality, compassion, rights, progress. It uses these words and quietly changes what they point to. Then it moves inward. It alters how foundations are perceived. Responsibility is made to smell like cruelty, law like oppression, borders like hatred, tradition like danger, history like guilt. At that point, the civilization turns on itself. Its courts, universities, churches, media, and bureaucracies begin treating their own foundations as threats. They believe they are defending the system. They are enforcing what now smells legitimate. They do not see the intruder because it sounds exactly like them. And when the founding principles are finally removed, discredited, dismantled, erased, the foreign ideology does not need to conquer anything. It inherits what is left. The queen is gone. The colony is no longer itself. The most effective conquest is the one that convinces a society that its own foundations are the enemy, and that killing them is an act of virtue.
中文
@cnn_co_jp トランプは独裁者だと言っている人は、皆これを見るべきだ
x.com/i/status/20374…
Aimen Dean@AimenDean
“The Iranian regime poses no threat to the world.” Honestly, every time I hear that sentence - usually from a politician or a very comfortable diplomat - I mentally put a big red X on their ability to understand geopolitics. Not disagreement. Disqualification. Let’s walk through this slowly, for the well-meaning but dangerously naive. In what world is it normal for a state to recruit 700,000 fighters from across Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan, and Pakistan… arm them, train them, and deploy them as transnational militias outside the authority of their own countries? In what world is it normal to effectively hijack the political, economic, and military decision-making of a neighboring state like Iraq, while simultaneously fueling civil wars in Syria and Yemen that have left millions dead and tens of millions displaced? In what world is it normal that half of a country’s armed forces - namely the IRGC - is designated as a terrorist organization by dozens of countries… and yet continues to operate, fund, arm, and expand? And here’s my favorite. In what world is it normal for a regime to transfer ballistic missiles (multi-warhead systems with ranges exceeding 2,500 km) to a terrorist non-state actors like the Houthis? Let me simplify that. Sovereign-level strategic weapons… handed to narco terror militias. Militias that traffic in narcotics, humans and chaos. And somehow, we’re told this is… not a threat? Even NATO countries like Germany or Italy don’t field that kind of range in their arsenals. But a militia in Yemen does? Perfectly normal. Nothing to see here. And all of this is happening in a region that holds roughly 60% of global oil and gas reserves, and controls the world’s most critical maritime choke points - Strait of Hormuz, Bab el-Mandeb, and the Suez Canal. So let me ask the obvious question. If this is not a threat… what exactly qualifies? Explain it to me like am a 5 year old!! Do we wait until global energy flows collapse? Until maritime trade is strangled? Until missiles start landing beyond the region? At what point do we graduate from “not a threat” to “perhaps mildly concerning”? Because from where I’m sitting, the regime isn’t preparing to become a threat. It already is one. Oh, I forgot .. All of the above is happening while the same terror sponsoring regime is seeking nuclear weapons and in actual control of 460 kg of highly enriched uranium enough for 11 nuclear bombs!!🤦🏻♂️
日本語
トランプ氏、ホルムズ海峡を「トランプ海峡」と呼ぶ 海峡再開を改めて要求
cnn.co.jp/usa/35245620.h…
日本語
小白 retweetledi
當年要上台北唸高中，一起打籃球的初中同學說，「你一定可以打校隊，你那些同學都是書呆子」。開玩笑，不要講什麼校隊了，連班隊都打不到。這就是一般人對常態分佈的認知不足，所造成的幻想。常態分佈的人口，你隨機取出來的樣本，還是常態分佈。社會上三教九流的人群，有的善良，有的壞。你把他們依考試選出了一個樣本，裡面還是一樣有的善良，有的壞。這是統計學告訴我們，為什麼不要對人有刻板印象，不要以偏概全的原因，你永遠不知道面對你的人，是在鐘形曲線的那一邊。
在台灣，中配裡面，有好人，也有壞人，不要以偏概全。而有些中配，被反中的極端派歧視，就說綠營都歧視中配，那也是以偏概全。在美國，面對移民的問題也是這樣，移民裡有認真生活、認同美國價值的，也有討厭美國、專領福利的，土生土長的美國人不應該以偏概全，而土生土長的美國人裡面，有仇視移民的，也有尊重移民的，甚至有希望移民來更新美國努力精神的，所以我們也不要看到戴著MAGA帽子就說是紅脖子。
但這裡就要講到一個重要的觀念區別，我們要尊重個體差異，但在制定政策時，不能用全部曲線制定，我們要看均值。舉個例子，如果你比速度，比肌肉大小，你可以輕鬆地說，有些女生比男生跑得還快，肌肉還大，但這兩個群體的均值差太多，所以你不可以把男女生放在同場競技。同樣的，如果穆斯林的移民群體，總是不願意融入美國社會，當了移民，還不願意接受美國文化，甚且要強迫別人容忍他們，那這個「融入美國社會」的均值太差，會造成美國社會的問題，美國因而拒絕接納穆斯林的大量移民，那是可以，而且必需進行的公共政策。而在外籍配偶裡，如果中配「親中反台」的均值遠高過其它外籍配偶，那為了台灣的安全，還有社會的安定，台灣制定嚴苛的中配入籍規定，那是可以，也必需進行的公共政策。這不是個人歧視，這是國家該有的政策，因為中國的國策就是武力犯台，台灣當然要有限制中配的國策。聽懂了嗎？李貞秀、上官亂？
中文
小白 retweetledi
／
「メモリアルアートブック2」が当たる🎁
#ダブルアニバ 後夜祭リポストキャンペーン
＼
①@pokemas_gameをフォロー
②この投稿をリポスト
【3/19(木)13:59】まで
詳細はスレッドを参照👇
▼マリィ・ビートを仲間にして一緒に冒険しよう！
go.dena.my/ZCp2voZ
#ポケマスEX #ポケモン30周年 #ポケマス6・5周年 #Pokemon30
日本語