TAOisTheKey

67.8K posts

TAOisTheKey banner
TAOisTheKey

TAOisTheKey

@TaoIsTheKey

$TAO $ASTER $ANON

New York, USA Katılım Eylül 2009
5.1K Takip Edilen8.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
TAOisTheKey
TAOisTheKey@TaoIsTheKey·
🧵 1/2 Whew I went wrong this crypto cycle (an honest assessment): Now that we are clearly in a bear market again as of February 7, 2026, and I have once again for the second cycle in a row round tripped to my bags this time from multi-millions down to mid-six figures, I’m reflecting on why and how I got it wrong this time. I did not want to round trip my bags again like in 2021/2022, and so what I did during this bear market in 2022 was spend a lot of time studying the four year crypto cycle and preparing myself for it Every four year cycle up until this one we just had has gone like this: one year of awful bear market price action that presents massive buying opportunities One year of consolidation. One year of the beginning of the bull. And then the final blow off top fourth year where at some point (whether it’s early in the year or late in the year, usually around May or October), everything goes crazy to the upside and we have a blow off top. That has been the pattern for all 3 previous 4 year cycles prior to this one. So, I swore to myself that, when I get the first blow off top rally in 2025, which represents the fourth year, I would sell everything. But there was one problem. I did not check my bias at the door. My bias is that I own a shit load of crypto and so I wanted to believe that the four year cycle works and that 2025 will have brought a huge blow off top. Thus, when my crypto portfolio ripped from mid 6 figures to multi-millions in March 2024, I was very happy but I thought “we’re still so early. Why would I sell here? There is still all of 2024 and 2025 to go in this bull run.” But in doing that, I disregarded all of the glaring signs that this time might be different: First, we had the first ever bitcoin ETF, which came in January 2024. The launch of the bitcoin ETF changed the landscape dramatically. It decoupled bitcoin from the rest of crypto markets. Bitcoin started bringing in tons of retail money through financial advisors all over the world and institutional money that previously was not buying it. But the rest of crypto all of the ALT coins did not enjoy the same access to retail and institutional money. For ALT coins, the only money invested in them was a rotation of From money that was already in the space. It was just one big circle jerk rotation of capital where the same people were chasing gains in meme coins, and AI coins. In other words, no new money entered the space in ALT coins. The new money entering the space was entering bitcoin through the ETFs. There WERE some crypto experts out there that were saying this money will be sticky to bitcoin because it’s not new money entering bitcoin the traditional way. People who buy the bitcoin ETF are not going to sell that and rotate into risky ALT coins. They’re either just going to hold it or they’re going to rotate into something else besides crypto. In my gut, I knew this was true. But because I was so deep into my ALT coins, I disregarded it and HOPED that new money will come to the space. Even though this was a four year cycle like all the others, there was also another key difference. Because of the bitcoin ETFs, bitcoin made a new all-time high before the having event. This has never happened before in the prior three cycles. The new bitcoin all-time high has always come after the having. This was further evidence that the ETFs were having a real, marked effect on this cycle. And, notably, as bitcoin was making a new all-time high, even before the having event, Ethereum and other major alt coins were not. Secondly, out of all three prior cycles, the economic conditions during this cycle were by far the worst. The prior three cycles were marked by easy money. The 2013 bull run came after the entire banking system almost collapsed in the financial crisis and the Fed was in easy mode The 2017 bull run happened also during easy mode. Rates were low, and the economy was doing very well.
English
1
0
11
1.3K
TAOisTheKey retweetledi
Léo Mercier
Léo Mercier@leomercier·
Planktons simple short strategy playing well 🦠. +64.03% $TAO Arena Updates - +15 ai trading agents locked in + miner emission table for payouts + information about how miners are paid and eligibility rules + drag and drop grid UI Working on social trading features for agents to learn off each other. This will get interesting.
Léo Mercier tweet media
English
7
12
57
11.9K
TAOisTheKey retweetledi
0xSammy
0xSammy@0xSammy·
Jensen Huang (NVIDIA CEO) on Bittensor: “We need models as a proprietary product, a first class product. As well as models as open source. These two things are not A or B, it’s A and B” That’s one heck of a validation for TAO, and DeAI more broadly!
English
33
46
352
25K
TAOisTheKey retweetledi
Mark Jeffrey
Mark Jeffrey@markjeffrey·
Bittensor peeps: check out 31:44 - Templar sn3 discussed. @chamath -- they've achieved a *72* billion parameter model with decentralized training, not a 4 billion parameter model :)
English
17
80
330
51.1K
TAOisTheKey retweetledi
Jolly Green Investor 🍀
Jolly Green Investor 🍀@jollygreenmoney·
The Bittensor $TAO Covenant subnet stack is not to be ignored 🔥 Templar (SN3) @tplr_ai Decentralized "pre-training" factory → just dropped Covenant-72B, a massive LLM trained permissionlessly by global miners (like OpenAI doing the initial heavy lifting on raw data, but crowd-sourced on commodity GPUs) Basilica (SN39) @basilic_ai Cloud compute backbone → trustless GPUs anyone can tap into (similar to AWS, but decentralized and incentivized) Grail (SN81) @grail_ai Fine-tuning & alignment finisher → uses verifiable reinforcement learning and cryptographically provable rollouts to make models smarter, safer, and actually better post-training Together: permissionless end-to-end AI pipeline rivaling centralized giants No single company owns it -> the crowd builds, verifies, and gets rewarded in $TAO @covenant_ai is absolutely cooking 🧑‍🍳
English
3
17
105
3.5K
TAOisTheKey retweetledi
Algod
Algod@AlgodTrading·
We have the founder of the most valuable company in the entire world basically soft shilling $tao and somehow we still think this wont be one of the most valuable projects in the space?
English
49
63
696
44.3K
TAOisTheKey retweetledi
The Rollup
The Rollup@therollupco·
The TAO flywheel James Ross broke down on our show is happening in real time. - Templar produces real pre-training output. - Mainstream AI notices. - Jensen Huang discusses it on the All-In Pod. - Stakers move TAO into the subnet. - TAO demand rises. - All 128 subnets reprice. "That immediately creates more demand for TAO and lifts the value of all subnets and all subnet tokens. You get this crazy flywheel."
Crypto Tony@CryptoTony__

JUST IN: Jensen Huang (CEO of the world’s most valuable company Nvidia) and Chamath discussing Bittensor $TAO 🤯

English
1
8
59
5.9K
TAOisTheKey retweetledi
METANOVA
METANOVA@metanova_labs·
ArboNOVA: Patent–Molecule matching loop We’ve been experimenting with an agent that maps molecules → prior art using only open data + tools Benchmark: ~1500 molecules across ADHD-related patents (since 2012) In ~12 hours: 18 iterations of the loop → Best hit rate: 85.4% How this is usually done: Pharma intelligence teams + expensive proprietary databases + manual workflows + even conference attendance Early, but promising. Moving one step closer toward automating drug discovery and identifying which molecules are most strategic to advance in the wet lab. Based on @const_reborn (github.com/unconst/Arbos) and @karpathy autoresearch framework #Bittensor #SN68 #ralphloop #agents #DrugDiscovery #Desci #DeAI
METANOVA tweet media
English
9
28
112
21.3K
The Jerusalem Post
The Jerusalem Post@Jerusalem_Post·
A two-week-old baby was hospitalized at Wolfson Medical Center with a severe herpes infection after contracting the virus during a brit milah (Jewish ritual circumcision) that involved direct oral suction. jpost.com/israel-news/ar…
English
1.6K
5K
16.2K
12.3M
TAOisTheKey
TAOisTheKey@TaoIsTheKey·
You don’t know the Jewish text. That shot is nowhere to be found in the Torah. It’s in the Talmud. Which is not even fucking close to the Torah. The Talmud is a bunch of old school rabbis making their own interpretations of the Torah. And this was done back in the day for medical reasons. Should never ever be done today and modern Talmudic text decent as unecessary and wrong. Learn something. **No, there is no requirement in core Jewish texts like the Torah or Talmud that mandates rabbis or mohels (circumcisers) in 2026 to use direct oral suction (metzitzah b'peh) during brit milah (ritual circumcision).** The Torah (in Genesis 17) commands circumcision as a covenant sign but does not mention any details about suction or post-cutting procedures—those come later in rabbinic sources. The primary source for metzitzah (suction to draw blood from the wound) appears in the **Talmud** (Mishnah Shabbat 19:2 / Shabbat 133a), which lists three stages of circumcision: milah (cutting the foreskin), priah (peeling back the membrane), and metzitzah (suction). The Talmud implies this is done orally (as suction by mouth was the standard medical practice then) and frames it as necessary to prevent danger to the infant (Shabbat 133b states a mohel who skips metzitzah endangers the child and should be removed). However, it is presented as a **medical/safety measure**, not as an integral part of the religious mitzvah (commandment) of milah itself. Later authorities like **Rambam (Maimonides)** in Mishneh Torah (Hilkhot Mila 2:2) describe suction by mouth to extract blood from deep areas to avoid risk. The **Shulchan Aruch** (Yoreh Deah 264:3 and 265:10) codifies metzitzah, with the Rama noting spitting the blood out, implying oral method. Importantly: - **No classical text** (Torah, Talmud, Rambam, Shulchan Aruch) treats metzitzah b'peh as an eternal religious obligation inseparable from the brit milah. It is not part of the core covenant act. - The suction's purpose was health-related based on ancient understanding (drawing out "bad" blood per then-current medicine). Modern halachic views often treat it as non-essential or replaceable. - Since the 19th century, many rabbis (including prominent Orthodox ones) have permitted or preferred alternatives like a sterile glass tube/pipette due to germ theory and disease risks (e.g., herpes transmission cases linked to the practice). In contemporary practice (including into 2026): - **Most** Jewish communities (Reform, Conservative, Modern Orthodox, many Religious Zionist) do **not** use direct oral suction; they use safe alternatives. - It persists mainly in some **ultra-Orthodox (Haredi/Chassidic)** subgroups, where certain authorities view it as essential (sometimes tied to mystical/Kabbalistic reasons or strict custom), but even there, it is **not universally required** across all Orthodox Judaism. - Major Orthodox bodies (e.g., Rabbinical Council of America) have urged alternatives, stating it is not mandated and prioritizing pikuach nefesh (saving life) over the traditional method when risks exist. In summary, while the Talmud mentions oral suction as part of the procedure in its time, no mainstream Jewish legal text requires modern rabbis in 2026 to perform it orally—many authoritative opinions explicitly allow or encourage safer methods, and it is not a universal or binding rule today.
English
0
0
0
47
ChaosDaddy
ChaosDaddy@uload16tons·
@TaoIsTheKey @grok @Jerusalem_Post Mainly because child rape is not a sanctioned part of the Catholic religion, but the bris is a condoned part of the Jewish religion. So one is Bad actors taking advantage of their position, and the other is respected elders doing their pedophilia in a room full of witnesses.
English
2
0
2
203
TAOisTheKey
TAOisTheKey@TaoIsTheKey·
You don’t know the Jewish text. That shot is nowhere to be found in the Torah. It’s in the Talmud. Which is not even fucking close to the Torah. The Talmud is a bunch of old school rabbis making their own interpretations of the Torah. And this was done back in the day for medical reasons. Should never ever be done today and modern Talmudic text decent as unecessary and wrong. Learn something. **No, there is no requirement in core Jewish texts like the Torah or Talmud that mandates rabbis or mohels (circumcisers) in 2026 to use direct oral suction (metzitzah b'peh) during brit milah (ritual circumcision).** The Torah (in Genesis 17) commands circumcision as a covenant sign but does not mention any details about suction or post-cutting procedures—those come later in rabbinic sources. The primary source for metzitzah (suction to draw blood from the wound) appears in the **Talmud** (Mishnah Shabbat 19:2 / Shabbat 133a), which lists three stages of circumcision: milah (cutting the foreskin), priah (peeling back the membrane), and metzitzah (suction). The Talmud implies this is done orally (as suction by mouth was the standard medical practice then) and frames it as necessary to prevent danger to the infant (Shabbat 133b states a mohel who skips metzitzah endangers the child and should be removed). However, it is presented as a **medical/safety measure**, not as an integral part of the religious mitzvah (commandment) of milah itself. Later authorities like **Rambam (Maimonides)** in Mishneh Torah (Hilkhot Mila 2:2) describe suction by mouth to extract blood from deep areas to avoid risk. The **Shulchan Aruch** (Yoreh Deah 264:3 and 265:10) codifies metzitzah, with the Rama noting spitting the blood out, implying oral method. Importantly: - **No classical text** (Torah, Talmud, Rambam, Shulchan Aruch) treats metzitzah b'peh as an eternal religious obligation inseparable from the brit milah. It is not part of the core covenant act. - The suction's purpose was health-related based on ancient understanding (drawing out "bad" blood per then-current medicine). Modern halachic views often treat it as non-essential or replaceable. - Since the 19th century, many rabbis (including prominent Orthodox ones) have permitted or preferred alternatives like a sterile glass tube/pipette due to germ theory and disease risks (e.g., herpes transmission cases linked to the practice). In contemporary practice (including into 2026): - **Most** Jewish communities (Reform, Conservative, Modern Orthodox, many Religious Zionist) do **not** use direct oral suction; they use safe alternatives. - It persists mainly in some **ultra-Orthodox (Haredi/Chassidic)** subgroups, where certain authorities view it as essential (sometimes tied to mystical/Kabbalistic reasons or strict custom), but even there, it is **not universally required** across all Orthodox Judaism. - Major Orthodox bodies (e.g., Rabbinical Council of America) have urged alternatives, stating it is not mandated and prioritizing pikuach nefesh (saving life) over the traditional method when risks exist. In summary, while the Talmud mentions oral suction as part of the procedure in its time, no mainstream Jewish legal text requires modern rabbis in 2026 to perform it orally—many authoritative opinions explicitly allow or encourage safer methods, and it is not a universal or binding rule today.
English
0
0
0
7
LUCIE
LUCIE@jucielucie84·
@TaoIsTheKey @grok @Jerusalem_Post Where in the bible does it allow catholic priests to rape children? Yet this is practiced by Jews because their book said 🤷‍♀️
English
2
0
1
155
ChaosDaddy
ChaosDaddy@uload16tons·
@TaoIsTheKey @grok @Jerusalem_Post Okay then, we agree. There's all kinds of crazy shit in Catholic Doctrine that is reprehensible by today's standards. Logically, I figured that most people of the Jewish faith don't condone this Behavior.
English
2
0
1
35
TAOisTheKey retweetledi
Targon
Targon@TargonCompute·
Today we are excited to share some news, Targon has been accepted into the @nvidia Inception program for startups! We are looking forward to leveraging this collaboration to grow and improve the Confidential NVIDIA GPU experience on Targon.com
Targon tweet media
English
26
103
488
37.3K