Tape
415 posts


@unseenopium Ye literally said to his team he’d pay the price of the w Super Bowl profit to them to play the music he wants and have complete creative control.
English

If you look me dead in the face and tell me Ye doesn’t deserve a Super Bowl performance after watching this i swear i’d smack the dog shi out of u
Kalshi Culture@Kalshi_Culture
JUST IN: Ye’s odds to perform at Super Bowl halftime 2x since release of 'Bully'
English

🚨 “DEEP RUNS” ARE GOING VIRAL — PEOPLE ARE BREACHING SCIENTOLOGY CHURCHES AND FILMING HOW FAR THEY CAN GET
A new trend is blowing up online… and it’s getting more intense by the day.
They call them “deep runs.”
People run full speed straight into Scientology churches with cameras rolling, testing how far they can go before they’re stopped.
And one video just pushed it further than anyone expected.
People are now saying this might be the deepest run recorded so far.
What are they so quick to shut down the moment a camera shows up?
English

@clashreport I'm from a Christian boarder village, our village is still standing and so is rest of the Christian villages.
English

@grok @jj_sutcliffe @thematrixb0t @jollarogerzuk @grok So it’s not out of the question to speculate that his daughter in law was bought from Epstein or his associates
English

No, public records, Epstein's flight logs, black book, and the Feb 2026 DOJ file releases show no direct connection between Larry Fink and Jeffrey Epstein—no meetings, emails, business dealings, or mentions.
A 2012 email chain (from the files) involves Fink's son Joshua and Epstein associate Jean-Luc Brunel over a modeling agency invoice for a woman Joshua was dating. Joshua said he had no contact with Epstein or Brunel and was just helping settle her debts; Epstein intervened indirectly via Brunel. No link to Larry Fink himself.
English

The "circle" of institutional cross-ownership stops at the end investors. BlackRock's shares are held ~84% by funds (Vanguard, State Street, etc.) that are themselves owned by clients: your 401(k), IRA, pension, or mutual fund. Vanguard is literally owned by its own fund investors—no external shareholders. Same for most peers. SEC filings show no hidden controllers; it's millions of regular savers indirectly owning slices of everything via passive indexing. Not a loop, just modern retirement finance.
English

@grok @jj_sutcliffe @thematrixb0t @jollarogerzuk @grok but if all the companies own eachother, who’s left to own the company
English

BlackRock (NYSE: BLK) is publicly traded with no single controlling owner. Per Q4 2025 SEC filings, top holders are institutions: Vanguard (~9%), BlackRock itself (~6.5% treasury/comp), State Street (~4%), Temasek (~3.3%), Bank of America (~3.3%). ~84% institutional ownership—mostly passive funds for clients like pensions/401(k)s/individuals.
Leadership: CEO Larry Fink + board/exec team handle ops under SEC rules, proxy votes, and shareholder oversight. It's standard public company structure, not a small hidden group. Data from Yahoo Finance, Motley Fool, BlackRock IR.
English

@grok @jj_sutcliffe @thematrixb0t @jollarogerzuk @grok I’m assuming a small group of people control blackrock as you need coordination with centralized leadership to ensure the firms run well. Who controls these firms like blackrock
English

Patterns of family-linked finance firms exist today—like other dynasties in private banking—but the Rothschild branches (Rothschild & Co in advisory/M&A and Edmond de Rothschild in Swiss private banking/asset mgmt) are independent entities with no shared ownership, cross-holdings, or centralized coordination since their 2015-2018 split.
Public records, regulatory filings, and CEO statements (e.g., 2024 Reuters: merger talk is "fantasy") show standard, disclosed operations. Speculation echoes 1800s rumors but lacks matching evidence of hidden global power; their scale (~$200B AUM combined) is modest vs. BlackRock/Vanguard's trillions. Data drives the view, not hindsight.
English

@grok @jj_sutcliffe @thematrixb0t @jollarogerzuk @grok Are there similar patterns today one can draw similar speculation
English

In the 1800s, contemporary sources like UK parliamentary reports (e.g., 1820s-1840s banking inquiries), French government bond records, and newspapers (The Times, Le Moniteur) openly detailed Rothschild loans to governments, railways, and wars—coordinated via family branches in London, Paris, Frankfurt, etc. Their influence was public and measurable, not hidden. No major leaks or records from the era contradict that; claims of "global control" were already circulating then as speculation, but data showed them as top bankers amid competitors like Barings or the Bank of England. The pattern holds without hindsight.
English

@grok @jj_sutcliffe @thematrixb0t @jollarogerzuk @grok if I asked the same question during the 1800s when the rothschilds were gaining global control as you mentioned, often under the table, would you have said that that were or would accepted information sources at the time lead you to say otherwise. No hindsight knowledge
English

Different Rothschild branches did collaborate in the 1800s (e.g., coordinated loans to governments via family networks in London, Paris, Vienna). Today, post-2000s restructurings, they are separate: Rothschild & Co (publicly listed advisory firm) and Edmond de Rothschild (Swiss private bank) operate independently under distinct ownership and regulations. No public records or verified leaks show secret "under the table" global power coordination—modern dealings are disclosed in filings, like the Ukraine advisory or Epstein's 2013-2019 contract with the Swiss arm. Influence exists via finance, but it's not centralized control; top asset managers dwarf them in scale.
English

@grok @jj_sutcliffe @thematrixb0t @jollarogerzuk @grok I see different entities. And there’s no history of different Rothschild entities working together sometimes under the table to grow global baking and power networks, right? That would never happen.
English

Rothschild & Co (the Paris-based advisory firm, distinct from other family branches) advised Ukraine's finance ministry on its 2024 sovereign debt restructuring—standard corporate finance work. They helped negotiate $20.5B in Eurobonds with creditors (BlackRock, Amundi, etc.), leading to a deal exchanging old bonds for new ones, cutting Ukraine's debt by ~$9B principal and saving ~$11B over time. Completed Sept 2024. No ownership, loans, or control involved.
Separately, Feb 2026 DOJ Epstein file releases show Jeffrey Epstein had a 2013-2019 business/personal relationship with Ariane de Rothschild (CEO of Edmond de Rothschild Group, the Swiss private banking arm). Epstein advised on strategy, mediated family disputes, and signed a $25M contract via his firm for risk analysis/algorithms/introductions. The bank described it as professional dealings; no Ukraine overlap.
These are different Rothschild entities—advisory vs. private bank. Family wealth remains ~$20B across heirs per Forbes/Sunday Times trackers, not centralized.
English

@grok @jj_sutcliffe @thematrixb0t @jollarogerzuk @grok Can you explain a bit more about Rothschild ukraine alongside Epstein
English

Rothschild & Co (the advisory firm) served as Ukraine's financial advisor for its 2024 debt restructuring, helping negotiate over $20B in Eurobonds with creditors. They facilitated meetings in Paris, leading to a deal that saved Ukraine ~$11.4B over three years (97% bondholder approval). It's corporate finance advisory, like other banks do—no ownership or control.
Wealth estimate: Recent Forbes-linked reports put the collective net worth of the family's ~67 living heirs at ~$22B (dispersed across branches, investments in banking, wine, real estate, etc.). The $20B figure tracks with that and conservative analyses (e.g., Sunday Times, financial trackers). Higher claims lack verifiable sources beyond speculation.
English

@grok @jj_sutcliffe @thematrixb0t @jollarogerzuk @grok what about Rothschilds involvement in Ukraine? No way they’re only worth 20b. Whats your source
English

No single group "owns it all." The video shows real cross-ownership among top asset managers (Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, Fidelity) in S&P 500 firms. These hold ~80% of US public equities per SEC data, mostly as passive index funds for clients: pensions, mutual funds, 401(k)s, and individuals globally.
Vanguard is client-owned. BlackRock is public (top holders: its own clients). Rothschild family wealth (~$20B) is minor compared to these ($10T+ AUM each). No evidence of ethnic or family control—it's modern finance structure, not conspiracy.
English

@opieaccount4 @ObviousUniverse @real_lord_miles What? My dad used to keep £10,000 in the glove box “just in case” plus a few grand in his coat pocket, plus several tens of thousands in his safe in the office and there was stacks of cash in various drawers around the house. Scrap metal and exports tends to be dealt in cash.
English

I’ll tell you guys a life hack if you’re single.
Carry a $1,000 in cash in your wallet. Everyone typically has $1,000 in their bank, it’s not impressive, but in cash? WHOA! brain goes wow!
Pull it out in front of a cashier, pull off a money clip (this is one of mine) and ask if they take cash. If not, they saw the cash.
Because I travel a lot. I always carry $1,000, £500 and €500 in cash wherever I go at the very least, it solves a lot of problems

English

@elonmusk @MarioNawfal So there isn't that much $2 trillion? Or is it far more than $2 trillion?
English

SpaceX boosted its IPO target valuation above $2 trillion.
Under Elon’s bold leadership, the company is now aiming for one of the largest public offerings in history.
This new target reflects the extraordinary progress Elon has driven across rockets, Starlink, and AI, positioning SpaceX as one of the most valuable companies on Earth as it prepares to go public.
Source: Bloomberg, SeekingAlpha
Video: @stevenmarkryan
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
SpaceX has confidentially filed for an IPO, setting up what could be the largest listing in history. The company could target a valuation above $1.75 trillion, putting it at the very top of global markets. Backed by Elon’s expansion into AI with xAI, the move signals massive confidence in future growth. Source: Bloomberg, @elonmusk
English

@Ricburton i think a human prolly would have slowed down before it went into the smoke blindly…
English

@chasedownleads @NathanJRobinson Guess who owns the quarter mint?
English

I realize the title of "worst billionaire in America" is highly competitive, but I wrote about why I think Silicon Valley "war king" @PalmerLuckey deserves the prize:
currentaffairs.org/news/palmer-lu…

English











