TapiX retweetledi
TapiX
3.9K posts
TapiX retweetledi
ZachXBT Accuses LAB Founder of Market Manipulation, Offers $10,000 Bounty
ZachXBT has accused LAB token founder Vova Sadkov of allegedly manipulating the market via CEXs while posting philosophical content on X, harming retail investors. ZachXBT previously reached out to the team via direct message but received no response.
He subsequently announced a $10,000 bounty for evidence of LAB-related market manipulation, including insider information from LAB’s market-making activities on Bitget spot, Bybit perps, Binance perps, and OKX perps—such as contracts, chat records, and other documents—as well as identity clues of founder vsadkovv, including passport or ID. x.com/zachxbt/status…
English
TapiX retweetledi
$LAB CREATED BY BINANCE?🟩 why Binance is scamming with innocent people
At some point, almost every manipulated token had some kind of connection with Binance. This is serious, guys.
Binance can’t easily manipulate spot trading on regular listed tokens because investigators can track everything. But on Alpha, it’s different there’s barely any transparency, and almost nobody can properly verify the manipulation happening there.
Day by day, Binance is becoming a terrible exchange. My suggestion: stay careful, avoid depositing extra funds on Binance, and it’s better to use a cold wallet to protect your assets.
English
I give $10 add-on
ZachXBT@zachxbt
$10K bounty is now live on @vsadkovv passport/ID or insider details of the market maker (contracts, chat logs, etc) used for LAB on Bitget spot, Bybit perps Binance perps, or OKX perps. These grifters are further hurting the industry reputation and it must not go unpunished. War time mode.
English
TapiX retweetledi
Another week, another manufactured pump.
This time it’s $LAB by @LABtrade_, while Bitget once again plays the familiar CEX middleman role.
The concerning part? Wallets allegedly linked to the LAB team and @vsadkovv still appear to control massive portions of the supply:
• 0x7Cfd8d2d8626B287bEA569b5e65AB5CBb75E9265
• 0x78a79D0fa0Eaf58741f5Bde7E05b5CC8F33D24d3
• 0x36FC85Ec486C254c9564d66de8c4210a1A20C291
• 0xf79ff8a5052E969a6d13E18c4E439fE5202B02Fa
• 0xB4b74D63F30076870d54aB9E8E6a7D18293273c3
• 0xe03722dedBf090Ad7A1C8F82ceB86637053E21dd
On April 8, wallet 0xe037 alone moved 40M LAB (~$13.6M) to Bitget:
0x77156a0a621d2Ac7A075C0AC3172707C2e4aa191
Then came the May 1 price explosion.
But one week before the pump, wallets tied to the same cluster quietly deposited 96M LAB worth nearly $63M to Bitget:
• 0xDd77BFbDc11Cd37fD255AE35A4ac39Df1F9d570a
• 0x6593aa6c31C88397c37f71259625EC92Fe4EE0bF
Even more suspicious: gas funding activity (0.14 BNB) was distributed beforehand — a pattern commonly seen in coordinated wallet preparation:
• 0x50f2760fd5E6d546EE7dcEB617F33497A3C38593
• 0x0559694BbB47dbA8Bc3B7ac93004EF401F2da16d
Meanwhile, this wallet has been aggressively accumulating $LAB on-chain before routing tokens to Gate and Bitget:
0x11fc12b988933966688d33B70651B5f2f450963C
The same wallet was also active in $SkyAI before its 1000% run over the past month.
Weeks ago, @GracyBitget publicly promised an investigation. Since then? Silence.
If exchanges cannot detect coordinated market behavior, disclose findings, or explain who benefits from these repeated cycles, trust in market integrity continues to erode.
English
TapiX retweetledi
Remember Rave:
Step 1: @zachxbt Post, $27 to $13
Step 2: Bitget Transfer, $13 to $0.50
$LAB
Step 1 ✅
Step 2 ⏳
Love you @GracyBitget
Your turn.
English
Everyone should stop supporting any CEX doing this crime, especially @GracyBitget
Specter@SpecterAnalyst
Price manipulation now happens almost every week, with $LAB by @LABtrade_ becoming the latest pump-and-dump token while Bitget continues playing the usual CEX role. The LAB team, @vsadkovv, appears to control a significant portion of the supply. Wallets linked to the team still hold large allocations: 0x7Cfd8d2d8626B287bEA569b5e65AB5CBb75E9265 0x78a79D0fa0Eaf58741f5Bde7E05b5CC8F33D24d3 0x36FC85Ec486C254c9564d66de8c4210a1A20C291 0xf79ff8a5052E969a6d13E18c4E439fE5202B02Fa 0xB4b74D63F30076870d54aB9E8E6a7D18293273c3 0xe03722dedBf090Ad7A1C8F82ceB86637053E21dd On April 8, a wallet linked to the team (0xe037) deposited 40M LAB worth $13.6M to Bitget: 0x77156a0a621d2Ac7A075C0AC3172707C2e4aa191 The LAB price started pumping on May 1, but a week earlier wallets linked to the team deposited 96M LAB worth around $63M to Bitget: 0xDd77BFbDc11Cd37fD255AE35A4ac39Df1F9d570a 0x6593aa6c31C88397c37f71259625EC92Fe4EE0bF This looks coordinated. Gas fees (0.14 BNB) were distributed a week earlier 0x50f2760fd5E6d546EE7dcEB617F33497A3C38593 0x0559694BbB47dbA8Bc3B7ac93004EF401F2da16d The wallet below has also been aggressively buying $LAB on-chain and depositing to Gate and Bitget, including tokens like $SkyAI, which surged 1000% in the last 30 days: 0x11fc12b988933966688d33B70651B5f2f450963C It has been weeks since @GracyBitget promised an investigation, yet there has been no public update. If platforms cannot conduct internal investigations, identify coordinated manipulation, or provide transparency on who is behind these activities, confidence in market integrity keeps declining. ZachXBT still has a reward open for credible intel that lead to identifying the actors behind this operation. Stay smart.
English
TapiX retweetledi
Hello Gracy.
The community has not received any update about the investigation of RAVE.
While now LAB is running yet another market manipulation scheme via Bitget spot.
Every new token running similar scams only hurts the credibility of the industry further.
Yes CEXs want fees generated by volume however is destroying retail traders the best way to drive it?
(Also Binance/OKX/Bybit perps seems to be a potential source)
Specter@SpecterAnalyst
Price manipulation now happens almost every week, with $LAB by @LABtrade_ becoming the latest pump-and-dump token while Bitget continues playing the usual CEX role. The LAB team, @vsadkovv, appears to control a significant portion of the supply. Wallets linked to the team still hold large allocations: 0x7Cfd8d2d8626B287bEA569b5e65AB5CBb75E9265 0x78a79D0fa0Eaf58741f5Bde7E05b5CC8F33D24d3 0x36FC85Ec486C254c9564d66de8c4210a1A20C291 0xf79ff8a5052E969a6d13E18c4E439fE5202B02Fa 0xB4b74D63F30076870d54aB9E8E6a7D18293273c3 0xe03722dedBf090Ad7A1C8F82ceB86637053E21dd On April 8, a wallet linked to the team (0xe037) deposited 40M LAB worth $13.6M to Bitget: 0x77156a0a621d2Ac7A075C0AC3172707C2e4aa191 The LAB price started pumping on May 1, but a week earlier wallets linked to the team deposited 96M LAB worth around $63M to Bitget: 0xDd77BFbDc11Cd37fD255AE35A4ac39Df1F9d570a 0x6593aa6c31C88397c37f71259625EC92Fe4EE0bF This looks coordinated. Gas fees (0.14 BNB) were distributed a week earlier 0x50f2760fd5E6d546EE7dcEB617F33497A3C38593 0x0559694BbB47dbA8Bc3B7ac93004EF401F2da16d The wallet below has also been aggressively buying $LAB on-chain and depositing to Gate and Bitget, including tokens like $SkyAI, which surged 1000% in the last 30 days: 0x11fc12b988933966688d33B70651B5f2f450963C It has been weeks since @GracyBitget promised an investigation, yet there has been no public update. If platforms cannot conduct internal investigations, identify coordinated manipulation, or provide transparency on who is behind these activities, confidence in market integrity keeps declining. ZachXBT still has a reward open for credible intel that lead to identifying the actors behind this operation. Stay smart.
English
TapiX retweetledi
$RAVE peaked at $28B FDV
$RIVER peaked at $9B FDV
$MYX peaked at $19B FDV
$PIPPIN peaked at $900M FDV
Meanwhile,
$LAB currently sitting at ~$4B FDV
Don't predict the top cuz for this kind of crime coin, you're nothing but a gambler. Trade wisely!
Evening Trader Group@Eveningtraders
$LAB Doesn't Want To Be Forgotten $LAB is up +600% since the initial flag. The mechanics behind the move are worth understanding before the next phase begins. [A notable supply control & low float concept] 24h volume sits at roughly 1/5 of market cap. In typical pump-dump cycles, volume approaches or exceeds market cap. The discrepancy here points to something specific, effective circulating float is far smaller than headline supply suggests. Strip out supply that isn't actually tradable, and the real float is likely under 30M $LAB, around $90M. At that float size, the volume ratio normalizes and the price movement makes complete sense. When real float is this thin, price doesn't need significant capital to move dramatically in either direction. Headline valuation looks large. The actual tradeable market is tiny. From a team and investor perspective, the playbook follows logically: shake out weak hands at lower levels, push price to elevated levels, build thick liquidity in preparation for the major team and investor unlock arriving in June. Distribution into thin float at inflated prices is significantly more profitable than distributing into a weak market near lows. Until new supply from the June unlock actually hits circulation, the same dynamics remain in place. Inflated valuation, controlled float, manipulated price action
English
Why @HyperliquidX so successful? Because @binance and CEXs love or tend to support scam projects, like $LAB $RAVE and more
Richard Teng@_RichardTeng
300M → 3B. The next phase of Binance is here. Join @heyibinance and I for an exclusive fireside chat. What questions do you want me to answer? Drop them below 👇
English
@_RichardTeng @heyibinance Why $HYPE @HyperliquidX so successful? Because @binance and CEXs love or tend to support scam projects, like $LAB $RAVE and more
English
300M → 3B. The next phase of Binance is here.
Join @heyibinance and I for an exclusive fireside chat.
What questions do you want me to answer? Drop them below 👇
Binance@binance
Exclusive fireside chat at Binance Online with Co-CEOs @heyibinance & @_RichardTeng They’ll discuss the journey from 300M → 3B users. Plus the infrastructure, products, and the sauce making that scale possible. Save your seat now → binance.com/en/square/audi…
English
10 wallets hold 98% total $LAB, another pump and dump scam incoming. @binance destroy customer trust again
Irene Zhao@Irenezhao_
好消息：五天不到 2.5M 变 5M啦！ 坏消息：
English
Why $HYPE @HyperliquidX so successful? Because @binance and CEXs love or tend to support scam projects, like $LAB $RAVE and more
Richard Teng@_RichardTeng
Scan, pay, and grow your business with @Binance Pay. Since 2021, Binance Pay has processed over US$280B and is expanding QR payments to 10+ countries by Q3 2026.
English
TapiX retweetledi
TapiX retweetledi
Telegram becoming TON’s largest validator strengthens decentralization.
It lets other major players join the validator pool without centralizing the network — with Telegram as the counterbalance.
📈 More and more TON gets locked in validation as everyone competes for 20%+ APR.
English
TapiX retweetledi
Not 1–2 years. It only took 3 weeks. My short-sightedness is truly tragic.
$ton $redo $not $utya
Layergg@layerggofficial
💎$TON Ecosystem(이라고 제목을 쓰며, X Chat 출시와 $TON을 보며 드는 생각) 0) 트레이딩 아이디어는 아니고, 나중에 1~2년 뒤에는 인용할 일이 있지 않을까하면서 참고하려고 미리 만들어봄. 1) 텔레그램은 2025년 말 기준 MAU 10억명, 전세계 1/8쓰는 세계로 3~4번째로 큰 메신저임. 2) 근데 저번 4월 9일 Pavel durov가 Make Ton Great Again을 부르짖으면서 활동을 다시함. x.com/durov/status/2… 3) 주장하는 바에 따르면 블록속도는 6배 빨라지고, 트랜잭션은 1초 미만 처리 된다고 함. 4) 앞으로 7단계의 MTONGA 중에 첫번째 일 뿐이고, 두번째는 체인 수수료를 1/6로 줄이겠다고 함. 5) 텔레그램을 주목해야할 이유는 따로 있음. 프라이버시임. 6) 4월 10일 FBI가 용의자의 iPhone에서 알림 저장소를 통해 삭제된 Signal 메시지를 성공적으로 추출했음. x.com/IntCyberDigest… 7) IOS 알림 저장소의 모든 알림이 최대 한 달 동안 저장되는 걸 이용해서 역추적 한거임. 8) IOS의 구조적인 한계 때문에 시그널도 완벽한 프라이버시 메신저는 아니었던 것. 9) 파벨 두로브는 이를 인용해서 왓츠앱의 "암호화" 또한 불안정(사기라는 워딩을 쓰긴함)할 수 있으며 텔레그램은 안전하다고 함. x.com/durov/status/2… 10) 일론머스크도 오는 17일 End-to-End 완벽한 프라이버시를 표방하는 메신저인 X Chat(@chat)을 출시할 예정임. 11) 일론머스크의 방향성을 의심할 사람은 없을 것. 12) 결국 메신저는 프라이버시가 중요하다는 것이고(카톡보면 답도 없다), 프라이버시는 검열 저항이라는 블록체인의 정신과도 맞닿아 있음. 13) 재밌는건 텔레그램은 러시아에서 밴됐는데, 러시아 사람들은 또 전부 텔레그램 씀. 모두가 VPN 써서 씀. 14) 검열 저항에 대한 스트레스 테스트는 확실하게 한거임. 15) 여기에 더해 4월 11일엔 Telegram 자체 반검열 프로토콜도 한번 더 업데이트했음. x.com/durov/status/2… 16) 이런 면에서 Telegram은 분명 X Chat이 따라잡아야할 주체임. 17) 결론: 글써보니까 $TON Ecosystem하고는 아무런 관련이 없는 것 같음. 18) $TON도 프라이버시를 지원하기도하고, 텔레그램에 대한 베팅할 수 있는 자산이라 조사한 것일 뿐. 19) 아무튼 솔직히 차트는 괜찮아 보이는데 시총도 $3.5B로 높고, $TON이나 에코시스템 뭐 살 생각은 안함. 그냥 밈코나 한두개 뭐 사볼까.. 좀 오르긴하겠지.. 이런 생각뿐임. 20) 이미 좀 오른 밈코도 있음. Shout out to @0xjumpman 21) 다만 전쟁 지나고 하락장 지나고 나면, $TON과 텔레그램은 그 접근성과 특징으로 인해 분명 어떤 뱅어들이 나올 만한 환경인 건 맞을 듯.
English