Stangs

That’s it. That’s how you change your life. You make a decision. You make a decision that you’re going to be the hero of you’re life No one is coming to save you. No one can do it for you. It’s up to you. You have to be the one that creates the life you’re capable of living It’s your life on the line - you should want the ball in your hands for the big shot After all, the clock is ticking down…

If you start a family, you’re gonna need some money which means you’re gonna obsess about work. And if you obsess about work, you’re gonna need to have an outlet which means you’re gonna train for something. And if you train for something, you’re gonna lose some free time which means you’re gonna disappear. And if you disappear, you’re gonna spend more time with your wife which means your family will grow. And if your family grows…

@yargward @resisfertile If you can't do 100 pushups in a day while you're being paid to do them...NGMI. I would do 500+ pushups per day easily. $1.8M in 365 days. Then you can scale back if you want to be more passive. 10Y treasuries yield $80k and can reduce your pushups per day if you want.

@resisfertile 100 pushups a day for 2.73 years to make a million. but if you factor in “cost of labor” and the amount you could make from the interest, it begins to become less reasonable imo

how someone answers this is a helpful rubric for deciding should you pay any attention to any of their views. Do they display first level, second level, or third level thinking?

@blightersort @ReubenR80027912

@ReubenR80027912 i’m hearing the initial draft of his complaint was different, apparently it read more like “give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you”

I read the story yesterday w/ no pic included and…gotta say having a pic kinda changes my whole read on this lol

FREE THIS MAN

What do you think?

@0xRarest fake story but a dumb way of trying to negotiate

A friend of mine finally got an offer after 7 months of being unemployed. $92k, decent benefits. He asked if they could do $98k because rent in the city is $3,200 and he’s got student loans. They rescinded the offer the next morning. Said he “wasn’t a culture fit.” Seven months of applications, interviews, and pretending to be excited about “team synergy”… gone because he asked for six grand more.

@Madi39 Boohoo. I couldn't care less about hockey but this keeps coming up on my timeline from losers complaining about this obvious goal.

It’s astonishing the amount of people who don’t realize the issue is that it shouldn’t of been called a goal on the ice lol

I haven't commented on this until now. "Logic" all of a sudden enters the equation as a valid means for calling goals "good", despite overwhelming history to the contrary. Some simple facts from this goal: - No official was in position to make this call on the ice, it should have been ruled no goal on the ice. That's just the facts. No ref was below the hash marks or anywhere close enough to conclusively call it in. No signal was made to this effect. Positioning failure should not result in one team being effectively penalized for that. - When such cases are ruled no goal on the ice, you need overwhelming conclusive evidence the puck completely crossed the line. Last I checked AI removals of objects and drawing circles around the puck aren't part of the situation rooms process. - If the league has a additional view that was used in this decision, that should be publicized. - It is my opinion that this puck completely crossed the line, but based on how these calls have historically gone, the process that has been used until now was tossed in the trashcan. So while the calls result is ultimately what we want from the on-ice product, the process that has been used up until now was completely thrown out the window. The league has a bit of soul-searching to do here and I believe this is a reasonable point to be perturbed with from the Oilers perspective. You can get the call right, and the process wrong, which means they need to change the process. Changing it on game 86 of the season is not the time.

This generation is cooked🤡

The Don is having a baby We have 4 beautiful healthy embryos We might end up having all 4 but which one would you choose first?

@LakeShowYo 24-9-8

Giving $50 to whoever predicts LeBron’s stat-line tonight 👀 👑 (PTS-REB-AST)

@Zachary82334684 @ZGtheGrapevine @AriWasserman @grok I think you should ask about efficiency and FGA.

@ZGtheGrapevine @AriWasserman His best individual statistics were before those six seasons. Feel free to look up his insane numbers. By the way, @grok , how many 40 point games does Michael Jordan and LeBron James have in their careers? And how many career games?

It’s been truly incredible how the entirety of Twitter finally realized nobody has ever been better at basketball than LeBron James last night.

@iky_fwjett These responses are disheartening. It’s either a gift or it’s not. No strings. I would be insulted if my parents came to me with this offer. Do you trust your husband? If yes, then you tell your parents that you will accept the gift with no strings or not at all.

At their peak, who’s actually better?

@indexnforgetit Does housing only go up? Do you have $0 transaction costs to buy and sell? Do you have $0 in repairs?

- Buy a house with 3.5% down - Live in it for 2-5 years - Sell for $100k profit - Pay no taxes on it - Use profit to fund next house - Repeat every 5 years

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 33% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 33% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

@EasternSteppe @kyria29 @LydiaMoynihan It's not saying 47% of people are on welfare. It's saying that 47% of people do not pay federal taxes. 31% of Americans are on at least one form of welfare. If you include Medicare and Social Security, it is well above 50%.

@TerminalVxlue @kyria29 @LydiaMoynihan I agree with your point about SAHM, I think they’re great. It’s that the 47% number is exaggerating the number of people on welfare. The way the economy is structured, there’s going to be a lot of net receivers…

Mitt Romney got destroyed when he explained 47% of Americans don’t work, contribute and pay into the system. He acknowledged the challenge of winning with a facially responsible message when half the country is getting free stuff they don’t want to give up. That was in 2012. The problem has only gotten worse.

@EasternSteppe @kyria29 @LydiaMoynihan Okay, they would be included I guess. The point stands. My wife is a SAHM. It's great for our family. We are net taxpayers, not receivers. He was referring to 47% of households having $0 federal tax liability. i.e., net receivers, not payers.

@TerminalVxlue @kyria29 @LydiaMoynihan They would be in the 47%. Your thinking about implement numbers