Terry Wilcox

4.7K posts

Terry Wilcox banner
Terry Wilcox

Terry Wilcox

@Terrilox

Co-Founder @PatientsRising | Empowering patients to address America's most pressing healthcare challenges. Opinions all mine. | Better half: @wilcoxfiles

Washington, D.C. Katılım Eylül 2010
1.2K Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Terry Wilcox
Terry Wilcox@Terrilox·
Why is the world would you pay $1500 per month for health insurance that did not even cover a doctor’s visit until you met an $18,000 deductible? The one below it is $2,000 deductible but the premium is $5000 per month.!?! This is not “losing subsidies” this is losing your mind. This is not insurance. It’s a scam. #FundthePatient
Terry Wilcox tweet media
English
140
193
681
26K
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Patients Rising
Patients Rising@patientsrising·
Researchers analyzed claims data from state and local government health plans across 46 states to see how prescription drugs purchased through hospital discount programs are priced when billed to insurers. The review focused on the difference between what hospitals paid to acquire certain medicines and what those same medicines were later billed at within public employee health plans. What emerged was a clearer picture of how pricing moves through the system once those drugs leave the hospital purchasing channel and enter the insurance claims process.
Patients Rising tweet media
English
0
2
3
90
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA
I’m honored to testify before the @HouseCommerce Health Subcommittee on March 18 as Congress examines the background, scale, and consequences of rising health care costs. Health care affordability is one of the defining policy failures of our time.
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA tweet media
English
30
36
206
7.8K
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Elisabeth Potter MD
Elisabeth Potter MD@EPotterMD·
This is happening more than people realize. A woman fighting breast cancer showed up for surgery today…fresh off of chemo, port in place, nothing to eat or drink, mentally preparing for the thing no one can ever truly be ready for. And then we canceled. Not because she didn’t need surgery. Not because it wasn’t medically necessary. But because the hospital said they won’t get paid without prior authorization. This is the system we’ve learned to work inside, one that denies and delays care for administrative reasons. A system where responsibility is spread everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Where having insurance doesn’t guarantee you’ll get the care you need. Where paperwork can matter more than a patient sitting in a hospital bed. Prior authorization reform may be announced, but on the front lines, it’s not what we’re seeing. Today, a cancer surgery was canceled because the system is designed to protect payment…not people.
English
224
2.2K
6.1K
323.4K
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Terry Wilcox
Terry Wilcox@Terrilox·
As a Virginia patient advocate, I strongly oppose the substitute to #SB271 that would impose federal IRA drug price controls statewide. No guaranteed lower out-of-pocket costs, risks to medicine access & supply, plus serious legal questions on preemption & constitutionality. patientsrising.org/advocacy-updat… @KarrieKDelaney @SenCreighDeeds @RodneyWillett @VAHouse @VASenate @GovernorVA Prioritize real patient relief for all Virginians. This is not your answer.
English
0
0
1
57
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Patients Rising
Patients Rising@patientsrising·
Across the country, families facing serious illness are also facing financial collapse. Patients Rising is reviewing federal bankruptcy filings and a troubling pattern keeps appearing. Hospitals that participate in the federal 340B drug discount program, a program meant to support vulnerable patients, are showing up as major creditors in medical bankruptcy cases. When the institutions receiving federal drug discounts are also driving patients into bankruptcy court, it raises a serious question about where those savings are actually going. Our investigation into Medical Bankruptcy in America is just getting started. Learn more here: hubs.ly/Q045ZPMw0
Patients Rising tweet media
English
0
1
4
114
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA@DrDiGiorgio·
California is trying to pass "Guaranteed Health Care for All" again. It's been introduced as AB 1900 and it's worth taking a look at this legislation. It creates CalCare, which isn't "universal coverage" as much as it's "single payer." The difference is crucial. CalCare and AB 1900 make private health insurance illegal. In the bill’s language: once CalCare is operative, a carrier can’t offer benefits or cover services when CalCare offers coverage for those same services. That means if CalCare covers primary care, hip replacements, and psychiatric treatments, you're not allowed to have private insurance that covers them. This will eliminate all private insurance in the state. You like your Kaiser Permanente plan? Too bad. “But doctors can opt out!” Yes. The bill explicitly contemplates providers who do not sign a participation agreement and allows private contracting under a structured framework. But opting out is only scalable where patients can pay cash. That means primary care / concierge / DPC, plus a handful of elective specialties. It does not scale for complex inpatient care. That creates a two-tiered system where the wealthy can get primary care through cash-pay DPC/concierge services and everyone else needs to wait in line. Single payer advocates promise “no rationing.” But that's economically illiterate. If you set prices below market-clearing rates and expand demand by removing cost sharing, the rationing mechanism becomes wait time + access restrictions. Meanwhile, specialty care will be decimated. If CalCare drops rates from private insurance, which it will need to lest the program bankrupt the state, you'll see a massive exodus of specialists: early retirement, relocation, moves into industry. And AB 1900 is not just a state policy. It requires federal cooperation. To do what proponents advertise, California needs massive Medicare/Medicaid waiver and funding alignment — i.e., permission from DC. That creates regime risk: a waiver can be renegotiated, narrowed, litigated, or reversed when administrations change. So you can end up with a state program that has promised the world… and then loses part of the federal money stream it was built on. Also under-discussed: when you ban comprehensive private insurance, you don’t “simplify the system.” You create a gray-market ecosystem with “supplemental” products, indemnity-ish cash products and memberships that insist “this isn’t insurance." This leads to state regulatory actions, lawsuits, counter suits, and private transactions held up in courts for years. Another consequence: capacity becomes political. Payment rates, covered services, utilization rules are all decided by a board and the legislature. That turns every specialty into a lobbying fight over slices of a fixed budget. If you want universal coverage, fine but lets be honest about AB 1900. It's a ban on duplicative private coverage + single payer price setting + predictable two-tier access. And don’t pretend the shortages and queues are a surprise.
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA tweet media
English
11
16
49
6K
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Dutch Rojas
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas·
$1.2 billion. That is how much more Kaiser Permanente receives in tax breaks than it gives back in charity care. The largest fair share deficit of any nonprofit health system in the country. Kaiser pioneered the vertically integrated model that the Five Families later copied. Insurer, hospital, and physician group under one corporate umbrella. The efficiency argument writes itself. The accountability argument does not. When the entity that denies your claim also employs your physician and owns the facility, the word “integrated” stops meaning efficient and starts meaning inescapable.
English
5
85
228
5.3K
Terry Wilcox
Terry Wilcox@Terrilox·
Minnesota just pulled back the curtain on the 340B program. Hospitals reported $1.34 BILLION in net 340B revenue in one year. 25 hospital systems generated 90% of it. But the biggest question still isn’t answered: How much actually reaches patients? New analysis ⬇️ patientsrising.org/advocacy-updat…
English
0
0
0
102
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Patients Rising
Patients Rising@patientsrising·
Medicare drug price negotiations are happening now, and patient experience evidence is required by law. Your participation, your voice and your experience matter! Sign up here: hubs.ly/Q0455t-w0
Patients Rising tweet media
English
0
1
1
61
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Dutch Rojas
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas·
@AndreaBee00722 I understand. I also understand M&A. And there is no rule or law that says you have to aquire to gain efficiencies. There are other ways to get there.
English
2
1
4
3.3K
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Fund The Patient
Fund The Patient@FundThePatient·
Patients know what is best for their health care. Advisor @Terrilox speaks to this and more in her op-ed in The Hill: “The most important relationship in health care is between patients and their doctors. Bureaucrats disrupt that relationship.”
Fund The Patient tweet media
English
0
1
2
63
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Fund The Patient
Fund The Patient@FundThePatient·
ICYMI: In their op-ed in The Hill, Advisors @DrDiGiorgio and @Terrilox hit the nail on the head. The key to fixing health care isn’t more bureaucracy, but restoring the vital bond between patients and doctors.
English
1
1
1
68
Terry Wilcox retweetledi
Patients Rising
Patients Rising@patientsrising·
Patients Rising is hosting TWO workshops to educate patients, advocates and caregivers on how the CMS Negotiation process works and how YOU can play a role in the future of drug pricing. You deserve to have a voice in this. Click the link in the bio and select "CMS Drug Price Negotiations" to sign up and learn more.
Patients Rising tweet media
English
0
1
1
87
Terry Wilcox
Terry Wilcox@Terrilox·
This is unreal. 🔥🔥🔥🔥 This is just the procedure grift … the entire healthcare grift looks like a vine map of Hawkins.
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas

The largest 212 nonprofit hospitals are a danger to the United States of America. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid assign them higher reimbursements for the same procedures and treatments performed in a non-hospital setting. You might say, well they have to take everyone. I’d agree. And then I’d teach you a lesson on how they receive 80% of the $275 billion in taxpayer-funded, government-assigned subsidies. And then I might talk about executive compensation that makes Wall Street blush, jets, trips, and more extravagance, all paid for by taxpayers. Of these 212 hospital systems, only 2 contribute more in community benefit than they receive in tax benefits. These same nonprofits pay no property tax, no state income tax, and no federal taxes. They use those advantages to acquire risk-taking, tax-paying, for-profit businesses and convert them into nonprofits too. The deal was simple: take care of the community and receive tax abatements. Instead, they broke the deal. And lawmakers, along with a large army of lobbyists, started gaslighting the public. The nonprofits use the higher reimbursements not to help their communities, but to acquire more independent practices. And every time that happens, Medicare pays more for the same. You won’t hear anything from the 7,000 employees or administrators, so don’t expect it.

English
0
0
1
76
Terry Wilcox
Terry Wilcox@Terrilox·
@DrDiGiorgio We did not think so and left in 2015— but now we live in … Virginia. The tax rate is not that high …yet. 😬
English
0
0
1
51
Terry Wilcox retweetledi