Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱

74.4K posts

Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱 banner
Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱

Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱

@TerryDiMonte

Former long-time morning man, Canadian Broadcast Hall of Fame member, now co-host of the Montreal based (and focused) @terrytedpodcast. Montreal born & raised

Montréal, Québec Katılım Mart 2009
2.8K Takip Edilen16.7K Takipçiler
Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱
We had a quick visit on the episode this week from Alfredo Rapone to tell us about the fundraiser he has asked me and ⁦⁦@manofbird⁩ to host April 10
English
0
0
0
354
Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱
This is a great read and a reminder to get a stethoscope on your chest. Having been through it in 2023, I'm still in awe and still grateful. Great piece from @Jeff_Jacoby
Jeff Jacoby@Jeff_Jacoby

𝘖𝘯𝘦 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘨𝘰 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺, 𝘐 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯-𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘵 𝘉𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘯 𝘔𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳 (𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘚𝘵. 𝘌𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘩'𝘴) 𝘪𝘯 𝘉𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘰𝘯. 𝘞𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥 — 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘷𝘶𝘭𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦 𝘨𝘪𝘧𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘐'𝘮 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘺, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢 𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ MY HEART was breaking, but not from lost love. It was failing in a more literal sense. In 2020, my doctor recommended that I get an echocardiogram — an ultrasound of the heart — to establish a baseline against which to monitor any changes as I aged. Though I felt perfectly fine, the image revealed that I had developed mild aortic stenosis, a narrowing of the valve that controls the flow of oxygen-rich blood from the heart's main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) into the aorta, and from there to the rest of the body. Within a few years, the diagnosis had progressed from mild to moderate stenosis. Further change would likely be gradual, I was told. Intervention wouldn't be necessary unless and until the degeneration of the valve crossed into "severe" territory. But an echocardiogram early this year showed that the stenosis — which is caused by a buildup of calcium on the valve — was advancing much faster than expected. Suddenly, a heart operation wasn't a development to anticipate in some abstract future. According to my cardiologist, it was necessary now. I sought a second opinion, from a specialist working in a different medical practice. He reviewed the images and the data and made the same recommendation: Have this surgery. And so, in late March, I found myself on a gurney, being prepped for the most consequential medical procedure of my life (so far). Open-heart surgery is the sort of experience you tend to regard as too remote to even think about — until it's scheduled for you. But the weeks leading up to the procedure made it clear that there is nothing theoretical about what is going to take place. Over a period of about a month and a half, I had to meet with a thoracic surgeon, choose an anesthesiologist, undergo a variety of pre-surgical imaging (X-rays, CT scan, another ultrasound), submit to catheterization to map out my heart and coronary arteries, and take part in "pre-anesthesia testing" to make plans for sedation during the surgery and pain management afterward. The surgeon presented me with consent forms in which I acknowledged the serious risks involved in the surgery. On one of the forms, he had noted in large letters that those risks included death and stroke. I asked him how often such disasters occur. About once in 200 surgeries, he told me. In the abstract, a 0.5 percent mortality risk seems reassuringly low. It seems far less so when you reflect that you might be the one. My wife certainly took little comfort in the statistics. In truth, during the run-up to surgery my greatest dread wasn't that I would die or be left disabled. It was that I would wake up with a breathing tube down my throat. That prospect freaked me out so much that I brought it up with every doctor I encountered. They all assured me that I would be under full anesthesia during intubation and that even if the tube were still in when I regained consciousness, I would retain no memory of it. They were wrong. It is the first thing I remember about waking up in the ICU and I remember it vividly — the sense of being about to suffocate, the restraint of being unable to speak, the panicky urge to get that thing out of my throat. Three months later, it remains a nightmarish recollection. By contrast, I have no memory at all of being wheeled into the operating room, though I know I was conscious at the time and even waved to my wife as I was wheeled past her. The operation itself took about four hours. What I know of it comes mostly from my own research (while taking time off from writing my Boston Globe column and Arguable newsletter, I've been reading up on the history and techniques of heart surgery and watching surgical videos), the many questions I asked, and the evidence I can see in the mirror of the surgical team's precision. The process was at once brutal and exacting. (Warning: some graphic descriptions ahead.) After the anesthesia took hold, my chest was scrubbed and draped, leaving a rectangular area exposed. Using a scalpel, the surgeon made an 8-inch incision from just below the collarbone to the upper abdomen. The blade sliced through skin and subcutaneous fat, revealing the flat, hard bone of the underlying sternum. An oscillating saw split the bone along the midline. A stainless steel retractor separated my rib cage and held it open, exposing the lungs and beating heart beneath. The pericardium, the sac that encases the heart, was incised and pinned back. Suction cleared the blood; cautery smoke drifted through the field; machines hummed steadily. All the while, I slept. What followed depended less on force than on timing. Tubes and clamps redirected my blood into a cardiopulmonary bypass machine, which took over the work of oxygenating and circulating it. Then an ice-cold potassium solution, cardioplegia, was infused into the main coronary arteries. My heart slowed, relaxed, and stopped beating. Its stillness was clinical and eerie — and essential. With the heart motionless and the blood circulating elsewhere, the surgeon could proceed to remove and replace my diseased valve. Elie Wiesel, the late Nobel peace laureate, underwent invasive heart surgery in 2011 and afterward wrote a slim volume, "Open Heart," about the experience. "I didn't know, I couldn't know, just how complicated it is, with risks and dangers that defy imagination," he mused. "For the layman that I am, this surgery is not unlike a walk on the moon. ... I was overcome with a feeling of gratitude." Prior to surgery, I hadn't been experiencing any severe symptoms — nothing more than a mild breathlessness when walking uphill. But if the valve wasn't removed, I learned, it would be only a matter of time before more serious symptoms appeared. At that point, the average survival without valve replacement is only 2 to 3 years. Aortic stenosis is cruel in that way — you can be relatively asymptomatic until one day you collapse. In his compelling memoir "Fragile Lives," the trailblazing British heart surgeon Stephen Westaby quotes Henry Wadsworth Longfellow: "Nothing is too late / till the tired heart shall cease to palpitate." I had mentioned to my surgeon a couple of times that after he removed my damaged valve, I wanted to keep it as a souvenir and asked him to set it aside for me. But when I asked about it after the surgery, he told me, rather dismissively, that anything taken from the body had to be sent to the pathology lab. It annoyed me to have my simple request ignored — especially when, reading "Fragile Lives" a few weeks later, I learned that Westaby hadn't hesitated to honor a similar request from one of his patients. But considering what I owed the surgeon, I wasn't about to make a fuss over it. In the immediate aftermath of surgery, I was full of holes. There were tubes or puncture wounds in my neck, my abdomen, my chest, my hand, and my thigh. And then there were the pacing wires — thin wires attached directly to the heart and brought out through my chest, a practice invented in the 1950s by Dr. Walt Lillehei, an American pioneer of open-heart surgery. They allow doctors to pace the heartbeat externally if its rhythm falters. Mine were never needed, thankfully, and were pulled out just before my discharge. The removal was surprisingly painless, but the very idea that I had wires running from my heart to the outside world was surreal. I also worried about "pump head" — a cognitive fog that can follow surgery involving the heart-lung machine. It affects memory, concentration, language ability, and even personality. I'd read about it in Sandeep Jauhar's "Heart: A History" — it can "persist years after surgery and in many cases is probably irreversible," he wrote. My primary-care physician had also warned me that my brain might not work properly for weeks or even months after the surgery. Considering what I do for a living, that prospect alarmed me. But I was fortunate. My memory, attention, and sense of self remained intact. On the other hand, for weeks I experienced strange visual auras — the kind that usually precede a migraine but without the pain. My doctor was baffled. No one could say for sure if it was a delayed effect of anesthesia, the heart-lung machine, or simply my body's eccentric reaction to trauma. The pain, at first, was unrelenting. Not just in my chest, which I had expected, but radiating through my upper back. For weeks, I was constantly being reminded of the violence that had been done to my body in the name of healing. It was agonizing to cough; even more so to sneeze. And yet, I quickly began to recover. Within a day I had been moved out of intensive care; a day after that I was taking short walks in the hospital corridor; less than a week after entering the hospital, I was discharged. Once back home I figured out how to take a shower unassisted. I climbed a flight of stairs (slowly). I even made my way to the Starbucks around the block — though the first few times I tried it, I had to stop for periodic rests. As I have learned from my reading, a typical human heart beats three billion times over a lifetime, pushing blood through 100,000 miles of vessels — a network so vast it would circle the globe if laid end to end. That mine could literally be stopped cold and started again, and a failing valve removed and replaced with a new one, is an astonishment. We take such surgery for granted now. But when I was born, the type of surgery I just underwent was still unknown. The first time an aortic valve from a human being was successfully replaced with one from an animal was in 1965, the year I entered second grade. Jauhar writes that until the late 19th century, the heart was considered untouchable — not just medically but metaphorically. For millennia it was regarded as the seat of human emotion and feeling, and that perception lives on in our language: We "take heart," "speak from the heart," "have a change of heart," or "give our heart" to another. When Barney Clark was scheduled to receive the first permanent artificial heart in 1982, his wife anxiously asked doctors: "Will he still be able to love me?" There is something intensely human about the vulnerability of the human heart. Even in an age when more than 3,000 cardiac operations are performed every day, we still think of it as sacred territory. Perhaps it is. For me, heart surgery was more than just a medical event. It was a confrontation with mortality and a chance to marvel at what science and surgery have made possible — and what they still cannot fully explain. That I am here, writing this, with a new valve pulsing away in my chest, is a gift I do not minimize. Like Wiesel, I too am "overcome with a feeling of gratitude." Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in America. As Jauhar notes, nearly one in four Americans will die from it, despite all our progress. But we have come far. In the 1950s, open-heart surgery had a 50 percent mortality rate. Now it's often less than 1 percent. And while cardiology may be reaching the limits of what it can achieve, it still affords the precious chance to extend life — and to reflect on its value. Open-heart surgery didn't make me wiser. But it did bring home to me that the heart is not merely a pump. It is, in more ways than one, the center of our being. And mine, once broken, beats on.

English
0
0
2
516
Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱
@Jeff_Jacoby Thanks for posting this Jeff. I had mine done in January 2023 and much of the awe & gratitude you describe in this beautifully written piece is very familiar. So glad you came through it. And wrote about it.
English
0
0
0
130
Jeff Jacoby
Jeff Jacoby@Jeff_Jacoby·
𝘖𝘯𝘦 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘨𝘰 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺, 𝘐 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯-𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘵 𝘉𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘯 𝘔𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳 (𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘚𝘵. 𝘌𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘩'𝘴) 𝘪𝘯 𝘉𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘰𝘯. 𝘞𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥 — 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘷𝘶𝘭𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦 𝘨𝘪𝘧𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘐'𝘮 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘺, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢 𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ MY HEART was breaking, but not from lost love. It was failing in a more literal sense. In 2020, my doctor recommended that I get an echocardiogram — an ultrasound of the heart — to establish a baseline against which to monitor any changes as I aged. Though I felt perfectly fine, the image revealed that I had developed mild aortic stenosis, a narrowing of the valve that controls the flow of oxygen-rich blood from the heart's main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) into the aorta, and from there to the rest of the body. Within a few years, the diagnosis had progressed from mild to moderate stenosis. Further change would likely be gradual, I was told. Intervention wouldn't be necessary unless and until the degeneration of the valve crossed into "severe" territory. But an echocardiogram early this year showed that the stenosis — which is caused by a buildup of calcium on the valve — was advancing much faster than expected. Suddenly, a heart operation wasn't a development to anticipate in some abstract future. According to my cardiologist, it was necessary now. I sought a second opinion, from a specialist working in a different medical practice. He reviewed the images and the data and made the same recommendation: Have this surgery. And so, in late March, I found myself on a gurney, being prepped for the most consequential medical procedure of my life (so far). Open-heart surgery is the sort of experience you tend to regard as too remote to even think about — until it's scheduled for you. But the weeks leading up to the procedure made it clear that there is nothing theoretical about what is going to take place. Over a period of about a month and a half, I had to meet with a thoracic surgeon, choose an anesthesiologist, undergo a variety of pre-surgical imaging (X-rays, CT scan, another ultrasound), submit to catheterization to map out my heart and coronary arteries, and take part in "pre-anesthesia testing" to make plans for sedation during the surgery and pain management afterward. The surgeon presented me with consent forms in which I acknowledged the serious risks involved in the surgery. On one of the forms, he had noted in large letters that those risks included death and stroke. I asked him how often such disasters occur. About once in 200 surgeries, he told me. In the abstract, a 0.5 percent mortality risk seems reassuringly low. It seems far less so when you reflect that you might be the one. My wife certainly took little comfort in the statistics. In truth, during the run-up to surgery my greatest dread wasn't that I would die or be left disabled. It was that I would wake up with a breathing tube down my throat. That prospect freaked me out so much that I brought it up with every doctor I encountered. They all assured me that I would be under full anesthesia during intubation and that even if the tube were still in when I regained consciousness, I would retain no memory of it. They were wrong. It is the first thing I remember about waking up in the ICU and I remember it vividly — the sense of being about to suffocate, the restraint of being unable to speak, the panicky urge to get that thing out of my throat. Three months later, it remains a nightmarish recollection. By contrast, I have no memory at all of being wheeled into the operating room, though I know I was conscious at the time and even waved to my wife as I was wheeled past her. The operation itself took about four hours. What I know of it comes mostly from my own research (while taking time off from writing my Boston Globe column and Arguable newsletter, I've been reading up on the history and techniques of heart surgery and watching surgical videos), the many questions I asked, and the evidence I can see in the mirror of the surgical team's precision. The process was at once brutal and exacting. (Warning: some graphic descriptions ahead.) After the anesthesia took hold, my chest was scrubbed and draped, leaving a rectangular area exposed. Using a scalpel, the surgeon made an 8-inch incision from just below the collarbone to the upper abdomen. The blade sliced through skin and subcutaneous fat, revealing the flat, hard bone of the underlying sternum. An oscillating saw split the bone along the midline. A stainless steel retractor separated my rib cage and held it open, exposing the lungs and beating heart beneath. The pericardium, the sac that encases the heart, was incised and pinned back. Suction cleared the blood; cautery smoke drifted through the field; machines hummed steadily. All the while, I slept. What followed depended less on force than on timing. Tubes and clamps redirected my blood into a cardiopulmonary bypass machine, which took over the work of oxygenating and circulating it. Then an ice-cold potassium solution, cardioplegia, was infused into the main coronary arteries. My heart slowed, relaxed, and stopped beating. Its stillness was clinical and eerie — and essential. With the heart motionless and the blood circulating elsewhere, the surgeon could proceed to remove and replace my diseased valve. Elie Wiesel, the late Nobel peace laureate, underwent invasive heart surgery in 2011 and afterward wrote a slim volume, "Open Heart," about the experience. "I didn't know, I couldn't know, just how complicated it is, with risks and dangers that defy imagination," he mused. "For the layman that I am, this surgery is not unlike a walk on the moon. ... I was overcome with a feeling of gratitude." Prior to surgery, I hadn't been experiencing any severe symptoms — nothing more than a mild breathlessness when walking uphill. But if the valve wasn't removed, I learned, it would be only a matter of time before more serious symptoms appeared. At that point, the average survival without valve replacement is only 2 to 3 years. Aortic stenosis is cruel in that way — you can be relatively asymptomatic until one day you collapse. In his compelling memoir "Fragile Lives," the trailblazing British heart surgeon Stephen Westaby quotes Henry Wadsworth Longfellow: "Nothing is too late / till the tired heart shall cease to palpitate." I had mentioned to my surgeon a couple of times that after he removed my damaged valve, I wanted to keep it as a souvenir and asked him to set it aside for me. But when I asked about it after the surgery, he told me, rather dismissively, that anything taken from the body had to be sent to the pathology lab. It annoyed me to have my simple request ignored — especially when, reading "Fragile Lives" a few weeks later, I learned that Westaby hadn't hesitated to honor a similar request from one of his patients. But considering what I owed the surgeon, I wasn't about to make a fuss over it. In the immediate aftermath of surgery, I was full of holes. There were tubes or puncture wounds in my neck, my abdomen, my chest, my hand, and my thigh. And then there were the pacing wires — thin wires attached directly to the heart and brought out through my chest, a practice invented in the 1950s by Dr. Walt Lillehei, an American pioneer of open-heart surgery. They allow doctors to pace the heartbeat externally if its rhythm falters. Mine were never needed, thankfully, and were pulled out just before my discharge. The removal was surprisingly painless, but the very idea that I had wires running from my heart to the outside world was surreal. I also worried about "pump head" — a cognitive fog that can follow surgery involving the heart-lung machine. It affects memory, concentration, language ability, and even personality. I'd read about it in Sandeep Jauhar's "Heart: A History" — it can "persist years after surgery and in many cases is probably irreversible," he wrote. My primary-care physician had also warned me that my brain might not work properly for weeks or even months after the surgery. Considering what I do for a living, that prospect alarmed me. But I was fortunate. My memory, attention, and sense of self remained intact. On the other hand, for weeks I experienced strange visual auras — the kind that usually precede a migraine but without the pain. My doctor was baffled. No one could say for sure if it was a delayed effect of anesthesia, the heart-lung machine, or simply my body's eccentric reaction to trauma. The pain, at first, was unrelenting. Not just in my chest, which I had expected, but radiating through my upper back. For weeks, I was constantly being reminded of the violence that had been done to my body in the name of healing. It was agonizing to cough; even more so to sneeze. And yet, I quickly began to recover. Within a day I had been moved out of intensive care; a day after that I was taking short walks in the hospital corridor; less than a week after entering the hospital, I was discharged. Once back home I figured out how to take a shower unassisted. I climbed a flight of stairs (slowly). I even made my way to the Starbucks around the block — though the first few times I tried it, I had to stop for periodic rests. As I have learned from my reading, a typical human heart beats three billion times over a lifetime, pushing blood through 100,000 miles of vessels — a network so vast it would circle the globe if laid end to end. That mine could literally be stopped cold and started again, and a failing valve removed and replaced with a new one, is an astonishment. We take such surgery for granted now. But when I was born, the type of surgery I just underwent was still unknown. The first time an aortic valve from a human being was successfully replaced with one from an animal was in 1965, the year I entered second grade. Jauhar writes that until the late 19th century, the heart was considered untouchable — not just medically but metaphorically. For millennia it was regarded as the seat of human emotion and feeling, and that perception lives on in our language: We "take heart," "speak from the heart," "have a change of heart," or "give our heart" to another. When Barney Clark was scheduled to receive the first permanent artificial heart in 1982, his wife anxiously asked doctors: "Will he still be able to love me?" There is something intensely human about the vulnerability of the human heart. Even in an age when more than 3,000 cardiac operations are performed every day, we still think of it as sacred territory. Perhaps it is. For me, heart surgery was more than just a medical event. It was a confrontation with mortality and a chance to marvel at what science and surgery have made possible — and what they still cannot fully explain. That I am here, writing this, with a new valve pulsing away in my chest, is a gift I do not minimize. Like Wiesel, I too am "overcome with a feeling of gratitude." Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in America. As Jauhar notes, nearly one in four Americans will die from it, despite all our progress. But we have come far. In the 1950s, open-heart surgery had a 50 percent mortality rate. Now it's often less than 1 percent. And while cardiology may be reaching the limits of what it can achieve, it still affords the precious chance to extend life — and to reflect on its value. Open-heart surgery didn't make me wiser. But it did bring home to me that the heart is not merely a pump. It is, in more ways than one, the center of our being. And mine, once broken, beats on.
Jeff Jacoby tweet media
English
2
1
12
1.8K
Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱
"remain treasured friends". Why do corporate communications people insist on including this drivel/bullshit? Who do you think you're fooling? 🤢🤢
Brian Stelter@brianstelter

A second memo from Bari Weiss and Tom Cibrowski says CBS News Radio is shutting down. Here's the memo: Today, we informed our CBS News Radio team and approximately 700 affiliated stations that we will end the service on May 22, 2026. Unfortunately, this decision means that all positions within the CBS News Radio team are being eliminated.  We understand how difficult this news is for our staff and their colleagues, who have worked side by side with us to cover some of the most significant stories of our time. While this was a necessary decision, it was not an easy one.  A shift in radio station programming strategies, coupled with challenging economic realities, has made it impossible to continue the service.  We are sharing this announcement now to fulfill our commitments to our radio partners and affiliates, which require advance notice of the service’s conclusion. For nearly 100 years, CBS News Radio has delivered original reporting to the nation—from Edward R. Murrow’s World War II reports in London to today’s daily White House updates.  Our signature broadcast, “World News Roundup,” remains the longest-running newscast in the country.  CBS News Radio served as the foundation for everything we have built since 1927. The coming weeks will be difficult for the team members who have worked tirelessly at CBS News Radio.  We are committed to supporting these valued colleagues with care and respect as we wind down operations.  They have been critical to our success and remain treasured friends and professionals.  We thank them deeply for their contributions. Thank you all for your dedication and for the compassion you show one another as we move forward. Bari and Tom

English
2
0
4
698
Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱 retweetledi
Ted Bird 🇮🇱
Ted Bird 🇮🇱@manofbird·
Thanks to Rachel Goodman Aspler for the invite to Congregation TBDJ to hear Pastor David Larmour’s talk on the importance of Christian support for our Jewish friends and neighbours amid resurgent antisemitism. Moral clarity is not optional. It’s imperative.
Ted Bird 🇮🇱 tweet mediaTed Bird 🇮🇱 tweet mediaTed Bird 🇮🇱 tweet mediaTed Bird 🇮🇱 tweet media
English
0
1
17
542
Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱
I’m not paying for a tour of a light show at the cemetery where some of my family are buried but what do I know? From this week’s episode with ⁦@manofbird
English
0
0
3
510
Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱
I so love this story and the story of what Jason is doing now, all these years after this amazing day
Dr. Lemma@DoctorLemma

19 years ago, a high school basketball coach put his team manager into a game for the final four minutes. The kid had never played a single minute of competitive basketball in his life. He scored 20 points. Jason McElwain was diagnosed with severe autism at age two. He didn’t speak until he was five. He couldn’t chew solid food until he was six. He wore a nappy for most of his early childhood. As a baby, he was rigid, wouldn’t make eye contact, and hid in corners away from other children. He tried out for his school basketball team every year and got cut every time. Too small. Too slight. Barely 5’6 and about 54 kilograms. But he loved the game so much that his mum called the school and asked if there was any way he could be involved. The coach created a team manager role for him. For three years, McElwain showed up to every practice and every game. He wore a shirt and tie on match days. He ran drills, handed out water, kept stats, and cheered every basket like he’d scored it himself. On 15 February 2006, the last home game of his final school year, the coach let him suit up in a proper jersey and sit on the bench. With four minutes left and a comfortable lead, the coach sent him in. His first shot missed. His second missed. Then something shifted. He hit a three-pointer. Then another. Then another. His teammates stopped shooting entirely and just kept passing him the ball. He hit six three-pointers and a two-pointer. 20 points in four minutes. The highest scorer in the game. When the final buzzer went, the entire crowd rushed the court and lifted him onto their shoulders. His mum tapped the coach on the shoulder, in tears. “This is the nicest gift you could have ever given my son.” McElwain won the ESPY Award for Best Moment in Sports that year, beating out some of the biggest names in professional sport. He’s 36 now. He works at a local supermarket, coaches basketball, has run 17 marathons including five Boston Marathons, and travels the country speaking about never giving up. When asked about that night, his coach still gets emotional. “For him to come in and seize the moment like he did was certainly more than I ever expected. I was an emotional wreck.”

English
2
0
11
1.8K
Terry DiMonte 🇨🇦🇮🇱
As always, three belly, laugh guarantee from last week’s episode. New episode this Wednesday.
English
0
0
3
629
Stu Cowan
Stu Cowan@StuCowan1·
Tomorrow marks the 30th anniversary of the first game at the Bell Centre (which was then the Molson Centre). I still have my ticket stub from that game. #Habs
Stu Cowan tweet media
English
10
4
124
4.9K
Anthony Barile
Anthony Barile@abarile77·
@TerryDiMonte One of the many things I love about Lewis is how genuinely happy and encouraging he is to the younger drivers.
English
1
0
1
15