Algernon

@readswithravi Our imagination creates a future we might live. Our egos justify why it has not to come to pass.

I need your help. I often say that this record level evidence is far more conclusive than any research papers can be. The papers are anonymous and use statistical inferences. These records prove fraud and prove vax death in only a sampling. Please tell me if I am overstretching my statements. Lastly, not one politician or HHS person has ever replied to these types of emails of evidence. Only one HHS person has ever contacted me. I provided information. He was shocked and appreciative and said no one else ever gave him such information and that he had called many popular names before me.

@Charles04702910 @AaronSiriSG @MedMAPS @picphysicians @AAPSonline @Honest_Medicine That, is an illusion. X is still a fully manipulated space.

@AaronSiriSG @MedMAPS @picphysicians @AAPSonline @Honest_Medicine In a false system any single outlier breaks the messaging. Like X broke the fascist censorship regime.

Huge news! As of today, these are the 4 new liaison members to CDC's vaccine committee, ACIP! @MedMAPS @picphysicians @AAPSonline @Honest_Medicine These 4 groups understand the need to simultaneously protect against: (1) infectious disease, (2) vaccine injury, and (3) violations of informed consent. Despite being only 4 of the 33 liaison members to ACIP (the other 29 are rabid vaccine zealots that promote vaccinating children like cattle), the legacy media will no doubt cry that somehow adding a little balance is unfair. Ther reality is that their concern, consciously or unconsciously, stems from the fact these 4 groups will present facts and evidence that do not fit the legacy media's beliefs. That is what really scares them... Updated VICP Charter: cdc.gov/acip/downloads…

@DanielMiessler I think people cannot quite believe or understand the scope. It's unimaginable -- and perhaps therefore judged impossible. But here we are.

We’re missing a much bigger point on Mythos. It wasn’t even trained specifically for cybersecurity. It’s just that much better at doing work in general. It’s that good at cyber because it’s that good at everything. What do you think this is going to do to knowledge work? Mythos can chain multiple low and medium vulns together to create a high or critical. This is a task that far less than 1% of cybersecurity experts have ever done. Hell, probably less than 1% of all pentesters. So if it can do that, how do you think it’ll do at sending emails, doing analysis, writing reports, and the other 99% of everyday knowledge work? Do you really still think that Chris from Idaho has any chance competing against AI for a knowledge work job? In six months or a year, there will be very inexpensive models that can do knowledge work almost as good as Mythos. So companies have the choice of paying Chris $84,000 plus a whole bunch of benefits for 40 hours of mediocre work, or they can pay probably $100-$1000 for an AI that can do 10-1000 times the work per hour and that works 24/7. This Mythos announcement is getting attention because of cyber, but the real story is work in general.

@AnthropicAI Thank you for putting resources towards something that is so clearly needed.,🙏

Introducing Project Glasswing: an urgent initiative to help secure the world’s most critical software. It’s powered by our newest frontier model, Claude Mythos Preview, which can find software vulnerabilities better than all but the most skilled humans. anthropic.com/glasswing

@BrivaelFr The framing of more regulation or less regulation becomes moot when incentives are misaligned. If regulators regularly get rewarded by the regulated, it's because they helped out and are being rewarded. That is the norm in US systems.

Milton Friedman (prix nobel d'économie) a dit un truc il y a 50 ans qui est encore plus vrai aujourd'hui. Et quasiment personne ne le comprend. 🧵 On lui pose la question : "Sans régulation sur les médicaments, des gens pourraient mourir en prenant des produits dangereux. Vous ne trouvez pas ça grave ?" Sa réponse est un des retournements logiques les plus brillants de l'histoire de l'économie. Oui, dit Friedman. Un médicament non régulé peut tuer des gens. C'est visible. C'est dans les journaux. C'est un scandale. Tout le monde le voit. Mais ce que personne ne voit, c'est les gens qui meurent parce qu'un médicament qui aurait pu les sauver a été bloqué pendant 10 ans par le processus de régulation. Ce mort là, personne ne le compte. Personne ne fait sa une. Personne ne connaît son nom. Parce qu'il est mort de l'absence de quelque chose qui n'a jamais existé. C'est l'asymétrie fondamentale de la régulation. Le régulateur a deux types d'erreurs possibles. Erreur 1 : approuver un médicament dangereux. Résultat : scandale public, procès, le régulateur perd son poste. Erreur 2 : bloquer un médicament qui aurait sauvé des vies. Résultat : rien. Personne ne sait. Personne ne proteste. Les morts silencieux n'ont pas de porte-parole. Du coup, le régulateur rationnel optimise pour éviter l'erreur 1. Toujours. Il rajoute des études. Des phases. Des comités. Des délais. Chaque couche de "sécurité" supplémentaire le protège, lui, au détriment des patients qui attendent. Friedman estimait que la FDA avait probablement tué plus de gens en retardant des bons médicaments qu'elle n'en avait sauvé en bloquant des mauvais. C'est impossible à prouver précisément. Mais la logique est imparable. Un exemple concret. Le bêta-bloquant Propranolol était disponible en Europe des années avant d'être approuvé aux États-Unis. Pendant ces années, des Américains mouraient de crises cardiaques qui auraient pu être évitées. Combien ? On ne le saura jamais. Parce qu'on ne compte pas les morts de l'inaction. C'est le même principe partout. Pas que dans la médecine. En France, les taxis autonomes sont bloqués par la régulation. Chaque année de retard, ce sont des accidents de la route qui auraient pu être évités. Mais personne ne compte ces morts là. On compte uniquement le premier accident d'un taxi autonome, qui fera la une de tous les journaux. L'IA dans la médecine est ralentie par des processus d'approbation qui prennent des années. Des diagnostics qui pourraient être faits en secondes par un algorithme attendent des validations pendant que des patients attendent des mois pour un rendez-vous. Le nucléaire a été bloqué pendant des décennies par la peur. Combien de gens sont morts de la pollution des centrales à charbon qui ont tourné à la place ? Personne ne les compte. Le pattern est toujours le même. On voit le risque de l'action. On ne voit jamais le risque de l'inaction. Et comme le risque de l'inaction est invisible, le régulateur choisit toujours l'inaction. Parce que l'inaction ne produit pas de scandale. Friedman résumait ça en une phrase : "Les gens qui ont été sauvés par la FDA sont visibles. Les gens qui sont morts à cause des retards de la FDA sont invisibles. Et dans une démocratie, le visible gagne toujours contre l'invisible." La prochaine fois que quelqu'un vous dit "il faut plus de régulation pour protéger les gens", posez une seule question : combien de gens meurent en attendant que la régulation les autorise à vivre ? La réponse est toujours plus grande que ce qu'on imagine. Mais personne ne la calcule. Parce que les morts de l'inaction n'ont pas de visage.

@elonmusk Can't wait to see the high resolution photos of the landing sites from 57 years ago. 🤔

NASA Artemis passing close to the Moon

@rickbest1 @DrMcFillin Can we step back a level? We, the public, are generally seeking meds when we go to the doctor. Nearly every medication has a list of awful possible outcomes. We take them anyhow. It's a problem, but it isn't because we don't know about the side effects. We ignore the info.

@DrMcFillin drs dont have time anymore they see you for 10-20min. then boot you out

If doctors actually provided genuine informed consent, they'd be comparing these medications to a game of pharmaceutical Russian roulette: "Here's a pill that might help your sadness, might do absolutely nothing, or might give you sexual dysfunction, emotional numbness, weight gain, sleep disturbances, or in some cases—especially if you're a teenager—make you more likely to consider ending your life. Five chambers are empty, one has a bullet. Care to spin the cylinder?" But that kind of honesty doesn't move product, does it?

@jeffreytucker @gail_gailmd It would be a great way to amplify divides. Like showing a tweet asking crowds to go home from Jan 6 or pretending like the tweet didn't exist.

@gail_gailmd That's interesting if true.

I had to check if this is real. It is. Easter morning.

@jeffreytucker This is not a valid way for us to operate as a civilization.

@jrphelpsphd @Fynnderella1 No future employer is going to expect you to do the work yourself. 🤔

@Fynnderella1 As a college professor if you can’t complete the exam in the allotted time period then you clearly shouldn’t be in my class or degree program. No future employer is going to give you extra time…

Kids with “accommodations” out-test everyone! They give special dispensations for everything from test -anxiety, to ADHD, dyslexia, dysgraphia, Tourette’s, spectrum, etc. I was wondering why both my kids complain that everyone in their classes gets 30+ mins extra for every test as well as standardized test extra time. What are your thoughts on this? Should they give extra time for everyone?

@JohnBeaudoinSr I agree with your point, but I want to raise the issue of anosmia. The cells in my olfactory system were damaged/or blocked and I had no sense of smell. I consider this a possible viral to brain path. (No idea if this is relevant to the study mentioned.)

Any article or paper mentioning long Covid without mention of Covid vaccine as a cause is disingenuous and incomplete. Yes, long Covid from Covid per se is real and does cause brain injury. I fully admit that does occur. The incidence rate is very low and likely rivals pre-Covid era brain-effect viruses. This was not unheard of before Covid. However, the probability has to do with the airborne virus making its way into your lung, replicating in cells, and breaching the mucosal barrier, aka, the alveolar-capillary barrier (also called the blood-air barrier, air-blood barrier, or respiratory membrane). In order to get into your body, the virus would have to breach that barrier, which is rare. And then make it to your brain or make it to your marrow where the blood will get dysregulated into producing weird cells that affect the brain or other endothelial cells will begin to make amyloid that will gunk up your brain a bit or some endothelial cells in your brain capillaries will be scored and begin to leak. The reason for the "or"s is because they don't know for sure, but there are good theories out there. NOW ... let's take a look at the Covid vaccine in context. You do NOT breathe it it. You inject it AROUND the lung's mucosal barrier and into the body via the arm (deltoid muscle, or thigh or butt in babies). The "vaccine" then distributes all over the body including the heart, lungs, brain, other organs, and reproductive organs. The blood goes everywhere in the body. The chances of the faux vaccine breaching the mucosal barrier is 100%. The chances of the faux vaccine distributing all over the body is in the 90s%. The chances of the faux vaccine transfecting cells to produce spike protein is dependent on the environmental temperature and light to which it was exposed in the chain of custody from factory pour to delivery in-body. The faux vaccine gets your cells to produce the intended spike protein AND other off-target proteins they don't even know are being produced. The chances that these cause the same thing as Covid per se brain fog is near 100%. So, why would any honest scientist write a paper or article about Covid per se brain fog without mention of the far more likely and far more common Covid vaccine brain damage and brain fog? No honest or competent scientist would make such a glaring omission. The intent is malicious -- it is to protect the faux vaccine and to make the public scared of Covid, while pretending that the faux vaccine prevents Covid, which it does not. If you are tired of these lying scientists and doctors promoting the very thing that killed hundreds of thousands of Americans, and pretending that Covid per se is far worse than it actually is, then please follow me and read my books, articles, and watch my podcasts to stay informed.

@DisaffectedPod @Rach4Patriarchy Is holding oneself responsible for one's own choices a masculine trait? Is blaming feminine? (In people's minds?)

@Rach4Patriarchy They call "holding women responsible for what they do" "blaming women."

“Rachel, you blame women for everything!” False. I blame feminism for ruining women, which ruined everything.

@drdrew @naomirwolf So, there is no downside to institutions censoring on behalf of the government. Five years to adjudicate. No punishment to individuals. It will happen again and again.

Dr. Kheriaty just secured a landmark legal victory in the historic Missouri v. Biden lawsuit (formerly Murthy v. Missouri). Thanks to Dr. Kheriaty's victory, a federal court consent decree now permanently bars government agencies—including the CDC, Surgeon General, and CISA—from threatening social media platforms to censor constitutionally protected speech. Dr. Aaron Kheriaty is a physician specializing in psychiatry and author of five books, including most recently, Making the Cut: How to Heal Modern Medicine (2025). He is a Fellow and Director of the Program in Bioethics, Technology, and Human Flourishing at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He graduated from the University of Notre Dame, earned his MD from Georgetown University, and completed residency in psychiatry at the University of California Irvine. Follow @AaronKheriatyMD

@SwipeWright The Daily Mail UK regularly posts badly framed things on social media to inflame US passions. The best move is to block the daily mail and move on with your life.

All the large accounts that present themselves as truth-seeking journalists or commentators, then quote posts like this and act utterly baffled—“What the hell!?” “WTF!?” “What’s going on here???”—are frauds. It took me less than a minute to see what the court documents actually said and understand what they meant. They do not show that the bullet was not fired from the gun. They show only that the bullet was too fragmented to confidently link it to ANY gun. This is not uncommon, and DOES NOT mean the bullet didn’t come from Robinson’s gun. Of course the defense attorneys are going to spin this as evidence that Robinson is innocent. That is what defense attorneys do. They scrape together every possible fragment of doubt and present it as if it were fully exculpatory. It’s not. Defense lawyers are paid to downplay or ignore evidence pointing to guilt, exploit people’s cognitive biases, and make fallacious arguments sound persuasive. This information about the bullet doesn’t erode the case for Robinson’s guilt in any way. It is totally neutral on that front. And it in no way invalidate the mountain of positive and mutually corroborating lines of evidence we do have for Robinson’s guilt. You should expect more from the commentators you follow, and hold them accountable by refusing to give them your attention in the future. If they could not be bothered to spend even one minute checking the facts before spreading confusion to you and millions of others on X, they do not deserve your attention. They are nothing more than grifting engagement farmers.

@ianmiles @naomirwolf April fools?

This is incredible. Something is going on in the UK. The Home Office just changed its policy of arresting people for speech crimes, and not only that, it is directly addressing the grooming gang scandal in regards to ethnicity, religion, and cultural backgrounds. Why now? They’ve been denying that they did anything wrong for the longest period of time.

"This war conflicts with campaign promises and is tanking the Trump administration in the polls." "Doesn't matter. We must do what's right." "Then let's go harder against pharma, end the liability shield, embrace medical freedom, and curb the vaccine schedule and mandates that parents despise." "No, our polls show that will harm us in the midterms."

@DanielleM877 @JeffereyJaxen 100%

@JeffereyJaxen Yet, Kennedy nor anyone in this current admin has stopped the emergency extension. All are complicit in this massive fraud and crime.

Follow me here: 1. Biden's final act before exiting office was to extend the PREP Act until 2029 2. The PREP Act extends the COVID emergency, funnels C-19 vax injured into 'black hole' CICP, and gives legal immunity to pharmacists to give shots 3. NY is now trying to pass a law for pharmacists to give COVID shots to kids as young as 2-years-old FULL STORY: news10.com/capitol/legisl…

Oxford University researchers have discovered the densest element yet known to science... The new element, Governmentium (symbol=Gv), has one neutron, 25 assistant neutrons, 88 deputy neutrons and 198 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312. These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called pillocks. Since Governmentium has no electrons, it is inert. However, it can be detected because it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact. A tiny amount of Governmentium can cause a reaction that would normally take less than a second, to take from 4 days to 4 years to complete. Governmentium has a normal half-life of 2 to 6 years. It does not decay, but instead undergoes a reorganisation in which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places. In fact, Governmentium's mass will actually increase over time, since each reorganisation will cause more morons to become neutrons, forming isodopes. This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to believe that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a critical concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as a critical morass. When catalysed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium (symbol=Ad), an element that radiates just as much energy as Governmentium, since it has half as many pillocks but twice as many morons.

@InsideLucysHead And you might mention the Ngodium (Ng) particles which gather the money radiating from the Administratium which eventually returns to the Governmentium, completing it's natural cycle of self replication and growth.

Beautifully put. I hope they are able to hear what you wrote. 🙏