ThatOneEyedSnowman

@BasicGage @charlescwcooke Trump is showing respect for the office. Mueller did not.

@charlescwcooke Yup. If not for human decency, have some respet for the office. This is a gear he does not have.

The president should not do this. There are no exceptions to that rule.

@charlescwcooke You're entitled to your opinion. There are no exceptions to that rule. President Trump's entitled to his opinion also.

@Anne_de_Cologne @BruvverEccles @damasus01 I like your drift.

@BruvverEccles @damasus01 There is no archbishop of Canterbury. And there won't be until a Catholic bishop will retake the Cathedral.

Yes, Pope Gregory and St Augustine didn't imagine this absurdity.

@cassand07959039 @BruvverEccles Misogyny schmisogeny. It's about the divinely instituted apostolic succession.

@BruvverEccles Sectarian point scoring again. And rampant misogyny

@BruvverEccles end this atrocity I would add

@RealJamesWoods @SherryT2020 Try this in Khameini's Iran and you'd lose the hand.

Leave them there. I’m not kidding.

@Robbie_Reasons no chance.

If Argentina invaded the Falklands islands today do you think Britain could, or Starmer would defend them?

@sourpatchlyds @BenGrahamUK @CadburyUK Cadbury, don't hide your light under a basket.

@BenGrahamUK "From Cadbury this season"? WHAT SEASON IS THAT, @CadburyUK

Britain has been a Christian nation for over 1,400 years. Through wars, plagues, and countless kings, Easter has always been celebrated. Yet now, Cadbury won’t even use the word ‘Easter’ on their eggs. When did celebrating British traditions become controversial?

@sourpatchlyds @BenGrahamUK @CadburyUK it's the season that we're not supposed to speak about

@BenGrahamUK Sad. Time to change brands.

@strayahome @car_oline2001 I'm sure Sec'y Rubio uses English when the context requires it. These were just pleasantries. It's nice to have a bilingual president. ¿No hablas?

@car_oline2001 I will not be comfortable with my representative using a language other than English when representing our country

He is so Good

@thetakencareof @car_oline2001 That's not what I call half naked, also, you failed to read the room, the context, etc. Try harder.

@car_oline2001 why is he half naked meeting Marco Rubio with his family

Exactly. My wife is Japanese. Born and raised in Tokyo. She agrees with this completely. It's time for Japan's 80 year contrition to end.

@baseballcrank I'll take my chances with Trump. His political instincts have been challenged many times but he's been shown to be correct in the long run.

Trump can't help himself. This isn't just classless & petty, it is counterproductive for Trump politically.

@sarah_delore @tonywendice1954 My royal knowledge is extremely sparse and I appreciate any enlightenment.

@tonywendice1954 The press are not allowed to follow the Wales family to private church services because of the children. Only the King is photographed on Sundays because he records his church attendance as work in the Court Circular. You might want to brush up on your royal knowledge.

Going to church on Sunday is not "performative." It's part of any committed Christian's faith.

@sarah_delore @RoyaNikkhah @thetimes I misunderstood the gist of your comment. I agree with the underline sentiment.

@ThatOneEyedSnow @RoyaNikkhah @thetimes He attends church, he just doesn't call the paparazzi to record it.

EXCLUSIVE - Prince William confirms his “quiet faith” and new “commitment to the Church of England”. After years of doubt, William “draws a line in the sand” on religion, while redefining his future role as Supreme Governor. My @thetimes exclusive scoop👇🏼 thetimes.com/uk/royal-famil…

@sarah_delore @RoyaNikkhah @thetimes There's that horrid word again—performative. One attends church or doesn't. Leave it at that.

@RoyaNikkhah @thetimes I’m glad to see Prince William addressing the lie that he’s not a Christian because he doesn’t performatively attend church every Sunday. He and Princess Catherine are clearly led by faith and higher values - they show this through their actions and lifestyle.

@urso_bruto @JuliusMasteroso Sad when a ballroom dance venue closes and reopens as a standup-comedy club.

Lo que parece subyacer en buena parte del pensamiento contemporáneo, de matriz posmoderna, es la afirmación de que nada puede ser juzgado como objetivamente mejor que otra cosa. Bajo este supuesto, incluso una crítica ponderada de la civilización y de la cultura modernas, especialmente cuando se las compara con nuestra propia sociedad de hace cincuenta o ciento veinte años, queda descalificada. La razón de esta actitud no es difícil de discernir. Una vez admitida la posibilidad de establecer comparaciones significativas dentro de una misma cultura a lo largo del tiempo, el paso siguiente resulta inevitable: la comparación entre culturas distintas. Sin embargo, la mente moderna suele retraerse ante esta consecuencia. Para evitarla, adopta una posición según la cual todas las culturas deben ser consideradas, como mínimo, equivalentes, con independencia de las diferencias, patentes tanto en sus resultados como en sus estructuras y en sus marcos morales. A esta disposición intelectual se añade, además, una tendencia característica: la progresiva eliminación de la belleza de la vida ordinaria. Aquello que en otro tiempo se concebía con un sentido de forma y de armonía, a saber, los objetos domésticos, los utensilios cotidianos, la arquitectura, el arte público, e incluso los juguetes, es sustituido cada vez más por artefactos de un utilitarismo desnudo, a menudo marcados por una fealdad deliberada. La razón última de este fenómeno no es meramente práctica, sino filosófica. La belleza es uno de los trascendentales, junto con el bien y la verdad, y en cuanto tal participa de la manifestación de lo divino. Despojar al mundo de belleza equivale, en cierto modo, a oscurecer esa manifestación. Y así, en la medida en que la belleza se retira de la experiencia cotidiana, se debilita también la aprehensión natural, casi espontánea, del orden que remite a la realidad divina. El resultado es una suerte de parálisis intelectual, una negativa a seguir el razonamiento hasta sus últimas consecuencias. No se trata tanto de una conclusión sólidamente argumentada cuanto de una forma de ceguera cultivada, sostenida precisamente para eludir la necesidad de establecer distinciones que son, en realidad, tanto posibles como necesarias.

Vivimos en las ruinas de una civilización superior

@Free_ByTheSea so-called Archbishop

I’ll be washing my hair.