1776

65.5K posts

1776 banner
1776

1776

@The2nd1776

Christians-despite their imperfect human nature and ongoing struggle with sin, are declared righteous by God solely through the work of Jesus Christ.

South Dakota, USA Katılım Kasım 2010
7.5K Takip Edilen3.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
1776
1776@The2nd1776·
The end of the matter; all has been heard. Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man.  For God will bring every deed into judgment, with every secret thing, whether good or evil.  Ecclesiastes 12:13-14
English
3
4
23
2.7K
1776
1776@The2nd1776·
I asked Grok this: Reformulate your answer without adapting your answer toward the known LDS affiliation of @Eddie1968k. Instead use known Biblical understanding of original languages and scriptures indicating Christ's deity and oneness with the father, and trinitarian views held earlier that of the Council of Nicaea 325AD. Also, list evidence that the trinity formulation arose independently of Greek philosophy. Answer: This raises a fair question about the doctrine's origins. A closer look at the biblical text in its original languages, combined with writings from the earliest post-apostolic Christians, shows that the core affirmations—one God who is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, with the Son fully divine and one with the Father—emerge directly from Scripture. These ideas predate Nicaea (325 AD) by generations and were not derived from Greek philosophy, though later theologians used precise terminology to defend them against heresies. Biblical Basis in Original Languages: Christ's Deity and Oneness with the Father The New Testament, written in Koine Greek, repeatedly presents Jesus as fully God while distinct from the Father, within the monotheism of the Hebrew Scriptures (e.g., Deuteronomy 6:4). Key examples: John 1:1: "In the beginning was the Word [ho Logos], and the Word was with God [pros ton Theon], and the Word was God [theos ēn ho Logos]." The grammar here is decisive: the predicate nominative "theos" lacks the definite article but precedes the verb, a construction that (per Colwell's rule) indicates quality or identity—"the Word was God" in essence, not "a god" or a lesser being. The context (John 1:3, 14) identifies this Word as the eternal Creator who became flesh—Jesus. John 10:30: "I and the Father are one" (Egō kai ho Patēr hen esmen). The neuter "hen" ("one thing/essence") with the plural verb "esmen" ("we are") points to unity of nature, not mere agreement or a single person. (If Jesus meant one person, the masculine "heis" would fit.) The immediate reaction—Jewish leaders picking up stones for blasphemy (vv. 31–33)—confirms they understood it as a claim to deity. John 8:58: "Before Abraham was, I am" (prin Abraam genesthai egō eimi). This echoes God's self-revelation in Exodus 3:14 (LXX: "egō eimi ho ōn"), which first-century Jews recognized as a divine name. The response (attempted stoning, v. 59) again shows they heard a claim to eternal deity. Additional clear statements: Colossians 2:9 ("in him the whole fullness of deity [theotētos] dwells bodily"); Titus 2:13 and 2 Peter 1:1 (Granville Sharp's rule applies—one article governing two nouns: "our God and Savior, Jesus Christ"); John 20:28 (Thomas: "My Lord and my God"); John 5:18 (Jews sought to kill him "because he was...making himself equal with God"). These texts, rooted in the apostles' eyewitness teaching, affirm one God (monotheism) yet distinguish Father, Son, and Spirit while ascribing full deity and shared works (creation, salvation, judgment) to each. Trinitarian Views Held Well Before Nicaea (325 AD) Long before the 4th-century councils, early Christians expressed belief in one God as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—distinct yet united. This was not a later invention but flowed from the baptismal command (Matthew 28:19: "in the name [singular] of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit") and apostolic practice. Ignatius of Antioch (c. 107 AD): Wrote of "one God... through Jesus Christ...with the Holy Spirit." He described the church as built by "the crane of Jesus Christ... using as a rope the Holy Spirit." Polycarp (c. 110–155 AD, disciple of John): "I glorify you, through the eternal and heavenly High Priest, Jesus Christ, your beloved Son, through whom... with Him and the Holy Spirit, be glory." Justin Martyr (c. 150 AD): Baptized "in the name of God, the Father... and of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit." Theophilus of Antioch (late 2nd century): First recorded use of "Trias" (Trinity) for God, His Word, and His Wisdom. Tertullian (c. 200 AD): Coined the Latin "Trinitas" and wrote explicitly: "We define that there are... three... the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. They are three, not in dignity, but in degree; not in substance [substantia], but in form... They are of one substance and power." He defended this against modalism using Scripture. Irenaeus (c. 180 AD) and others similarly described the "three" as one God, drawing from the rule of faith passed from the apostles. These pre-Nicene writers—many within living memory of the apostles—already affirmed the Son's full deity, eternal relation to the Father, and the Spirit's divinity, without needing 4th-century councils or philosophical categories. Evidence the Trinity Formulation Arose Independently of Greek Philosophy The Nicene Creed and later refinements used terms like homoousios or hypostasis for clarity in Greek-speaking contexts (to refute Arianism's claim that the Son was created). But the content—one God in three—came from Scripture, not Plato, Aristotle, or Neoplatonism. Scriptural roots first: Early Christians were overwhelmingly Jewish monotheists. Their triadic formulas (e.g., 2 Corinthians 13:14; Matthew 28:19) and worship of Jesus as God (Philippians 2:9–11; Revelation 5) arose from direct revelation in the Gospels and epistles, not Hellenistic speculation. Jewish backgrounds emphasized God's oneness; the New Testament added the personal distinctions of Father, Son, and Spirit without compromising it. Philosophy as tool, not source: Fathers like Tertullian and Athanasius knew Greek thought but explicitly subordinated it to Scripture. They adapted vocabulary (as missionaries do in any culture) to explain biblical data to educated audiences—much like Paul quoted Greek poets in Acts 17 without adopting their worldview. The core ideas (eternal Son, shared essence, distinct persons) appear in pre-philosophical patristic writings and the New Testament itself. Historical counter-evidence: Claims of heavy Platonic borrowing often overstate later refinements. Pre-Nicene sources show organic development from apostolic teaching, not importation. Scholars note that while terminology drew from the cultural milieu, the doctrine defended was the "rule of faith" inherited from the apostles—Biblical monotheism expanded by the incarnation and Pentecost. In short, the biblical texts and earliest Christian witnesses establish the deity of Christ, His oneness with the Father, and the triune reality long before Nicaea. The 4th-century councils clarified and defended this inheritance against specific errors, using available language—not inventing a new doctrine from pagan philosophy. The post's list highlights later technical terms, but the substance was always there in Scripture.
English
0
0
0
22
Edward K. Watson
Edward K. Watson@Eddie1968K·
Not a problem. Instead of digging out my old paper, I asked Grok Heavy, "What are the ideas derived from Greek philosophy that Athanasius of Alexandria and the Three Cappadocians used to create the Trinity model that are not from the Bible?" This is its response. Please confirm for yourself: Athanasius of Alexandria and the Cappadocian Fathers (Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nazianzus, and Gregory of Nyssa) played pivotal roles in formulating the orthodox Christian doctrine of the Trinity during the 4th century, particularly through their defenses at the Councils of Nicaea (325 CE) and Constantinople (381 CE). To articulate the biblical portrayal of God as one yet involving Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, they drew on Greek philosophical concepts that were absent from the Hebrew Scriptures and early Jewish monotheism. These ideas, rooted in Platonism, Aristotelianism, Neoplatonism, and related traditions, provided metaphysical tools to resolve tensions like divine unity versus distinction, eternity, and transcendence—concepts foreign to first-century Jewish thought outside Hellenistic influences like Philo of Alexandria. Below, I outline key such ideas, with their philosophical origins and roles in Trinitarian development. Key Greek Philosophical Ideas Incorporated into the Trinity Doctrine 1. Consubstantiality (Homoousios): This term asserts that the Father and Son (and by extension, the Holy Spirit) share the *same* divine substance or essence, ensuring co-equality and co-eternality. Athanasius championed it against Arian subordinationism at Nicaea, but it originates from Middle Platonic and Neoplatonic discussions of shared divine essence, where entities like the divine Intellect participate identically in the supreme One without division. 2. Hypostasis: Referring to the three distinct "persons" (hypostases) of the Trinity as concrete, individual subsistences sharing one essence (ousia). The Cappadocians, especially Gregory of Nyssa, refined this distinction to avoid both modalism and tritheism. The term stems from Aristotelian metaphysics, denoting individual concrete existence, and was adapted in Neoplatonism (e.g., Plotinus) to describe levels of reality like the One, Intellect, and Soul as hypostatic emanations. 3. Ousia (Essence/Substance): The shared divine "whatness" of the Trinity, from Aristotelian categories of being, used by Athanasius to pair with hypostasis. 4. Eternal Generation of the Son: The notion that the Son is eternally "begotten" or proceeds from the Father in a timeless, non-created manner, preserving divine unity while allowing distinction. Athanasius and the Cappadocians used this to affirm the Son's divinity without implying temporal origin. It draws from Platonic and Neoplatonic emanation theories, as in Plotinus' system where the Intellect (Nous) eternally emanates from the One without beginning or change. 5. Nonmateriality (Asomatos): The conception of God as utterly immaterial and transcendent, beyond physical form or spatial limitation, which underpinned Trinitarian immutability and spirituality. Athanasius emphasized this in his anti-Arian writings, while the Cappadocians extended it to the divine persons. It echoes Plato's dualism in works like the *Timaeus*, positing an immaterial realm of Forms superior to the material world, and Neoplatonic views of the divine as formless and incorporeal. 6. Ontological Omnipresence: God's essential, whole-and-undivided presence everywhere, not merely as a distributed power but as the divine essence itself permeating all reality. This supported the Trinity's unified action in creation and salvation. The Cappadocians integrated it into descriptions of divine operations. Roots lie in Stoic pantheistic immanence (divine logos pervading the cosmos) blended with Aristotelian causality (the unmoved mover as ultimate cause) and Neoplatonic transcendence. 7. Unity-Multiplicity: The resolution of God's absolute oneness (unity) with the threeness of persons (multiplicity), where distinction does not imply division. Central to Cappadocian theology, it allowed one divine nature in three persons. This mirrors Plato's dialectic of the One and the Many, explored in dialogues like the *Parmenides*, and Plotinus' emanative triad, where multiplicity unfolds from unity without compromising the source's simplicity. 8. Emanation: A hierarchical procession from the Father (as source), akin to Neoplatonic outflows from the One, which the Cappadocians adapted to describe intra-Trinitarian relations without subordination. 9. Trias (Triad): The structural model of three coeternal principles, influenced by Platonic triads (e.g., the Good, Intellect, Soul) and Philo's Logos-Sophia triad, Latinized as *trinitas* by Tertullian but refined by these fathers. These borrowings were not wholesale adoptions but adaptations to safeguard biblical monotheism against heresies, often via allegorical exegesis influenced by Origen's Platonic hermeneutics. For deeper reading, academic sources like the Stanford Encyclopedia provide rigorous analysis.
English
1
0
1
31
JustPassingThrough
JustPassingThrough@TribeRuffner·
Where do mormons disagree with this? Jesus is God The Father is God Holy Spirit is God The Father ≠ The Son The Son ≠ The Holy Spirit The Holy Spirit ≠ The Father God is One There is only One God
English
25
0
12
1.6K
1776 retweetledi
Kyle Seraphin
Kyle Seraphin@KyleSeraphin·
Whenever I see this video, I order more ammo. Millions of people like this wanted you to be banned from your school, your job, your church, your grocery store, and your family gatherings because you wouldn't comply with THEIR decision. No COVID amnesia.
English
320
1.5K
6.7K
80.2K
1776 retweetledi
Rep. Nancy Mace
Rep. Nancy Mace@RepNancyMace·
The results of my subpoena of Congress’s sexual harassment slush fund are in. Nine members. One thousand pages. All records prior to 2004 were destroyed - which tells you everything you need to know about how long this has been buried. We are reviewing every page. We will name all nine. We will release the full 1,000 pages - once we confirm that personally identifiable information of victims and witnesses has been properly redacted. Accountability is not a threat. It is a promise.
Rep. Nancy Mace tweet media
English
1.5K
7.3K
23.2K
466.8K
1776
1776@The2nd1776·
It's certainly not the same level of reasoning. There are many false gods in the history of the world. Societies have sacrificed their children to them both literally and spiritually. Should one be religious just for the sake of being religious or part of a group? If Mormonism worships a made up "god" that was once a man as Joseph Smith taught, then I prefer coffee over that false "god," too.
English
0
0
0
11
1776 retweetledi
cmg1973
cmg1973@Apologetics941·
Not only does Mormon scripture contradict the Bible but Mormon scripture also contradicts itself.
cmg1973 tweet media
English
0
4
11
85
1776 retweetledi
Answers in Genesis
From Adam to Noah’s flood was a period of 1,656 years.
English
26
15
205
4K
1776 retweetledi
Nancy Mace
Nancy Mace@NancyMace·
Meet Judge Deadra Jefferson of South Carolina. She handed a child predator a one-day sentence for possessing nearly 1,900 images and videos of children being sexually abused. He was facing sixty years in prison. He served twenty-four hours. Judge Jefferson was elected to the bench by the South Carolina Legislature in 1996, under the same lawyer-legislator system that still hand-picks the judges who rule on cases brought by their own colleagues. This is what is broken in South Carolina's courts. I’ve gone head-to-head with the South Carolina judicial system, and I’m running for governor to FIX this mess. RECEIPTS: nancymace.org/donald-gresh-c…
Nancy Mace tweet media
English
641
5K
7.9K
61.9K
1776 retweetledi
Epoch Health
Epoch Health@epochhealth·
🚨CDC Reverses Course on Autism and Vaccines Claim Read more
English
0
1.4K
6K
7.6M
1776
1776@The2nd1776·
1776 tweet media
ZXX
0
0
0
5
1776
1776@The2nd1776·
1776 tweet media
ZXX
0
0
0
5
1776
1776@The2nd1776·
1776 tweet media
ZXX
0
0
0
2
1776 retweetledi
Nancy Mace
Nancy Mace@NancyMace·
If you want a law-and-order governor, you want Nancy Mace.
English
117
271
2.2K
27.4K
1776 retweetledi
✝️Pray Without Ceasing✝️
BELSHAZZAR FOUND The Bible speaks of Belshazzar, the king of Babylon killed by the Persians (Daniel 5:30). The archeological evidence at the time had Nabonidus as the last king of Babylon. Critics of the Bible quickly jumped on this difference between the archeological record and the Bible. Belshazzar was actually the SON of Nabonidus. Nabonidus lived in Arabia, and Belshazzar was the acting king of Babylon who was killed by the Persians. Seen in this photo is the Nabonidus Chronicle, an ancient Babylonian text which chronicles the reign of Belshazzar's father and also documents the period during which Belshazzar was regent in Babylon. The Bible is, and has always been, historically accurate! en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belshazza… creation.com/archaeology-be…
✝️Pray Without Ceasing✝️ tweet media
English
19
308
1.3K
27.8K
bro-of-bro-of-jared
bro-of-bro-of-jared@jnjweld·
@MilkToastOnRye There is a big difference. Everyone believes what they believe and that’s OK. But we don’t jump up and tell people that they’re going to hell just because they don’t believe the same as us.
English
1
0
6
106
Eric Jaeger
Eric Jaeger@MilkToastOnRye·
When Christians question Mormonism we are labeled as bigoted anti-Mormons. But apparently all of the following is not bigoted anti-Christianity. Why can’t we argue about truth claims without resorting to cheap and emotional escape mechanisms? Can’t the truth stand on its own merits? -[Christin] creeds are an abomination (First Vision) - Their professors are all corrupt (First Vision) -[Christians] say the Father, The Son, and The Holy Ghost are only One God. I say that’s is a strange God anyhow— Three in one. One in three. It is a curious organization (King Follett) -The Mormon organization is the “only true and living church” (D&C 1:30) -Will all non-Mormons be damned? “Yes, and a great portion of them, unless they repent, and work righteousness. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 119) -There are only two churches; the Church of the Lamb and the Church of the devil (1 Nep 14:10)
English
29
2
40
2.9K