Modox Jew

Just voted @SenFettermanPA for President and @Mike_Pence for Vice. Proud to be a write-in voter in this year of terrible candidates.

The rules are simple: 1) Convert to Catholicism a week ago. 2) Declare that Jews drink Christian blood on Passover (or defend someone who says it). 3) Receive criticism. 4) Claim you're being attacked just for being Catholic. Just follow this simple template and soon you'll be bathing in the spotlight and raking in the dough!

Over the past several weeks, Carrie Prejean Boller has complained that she was removed from the Presidential Commission on Religious Liberty because of her Catholic beliefs, and she has called out myself and other Catholic members of the commission for not defending her. This is absurd. Mrs. Prejean Boller was not dismissed for her religious convictions but rather for her behavior at a gathering of the Commission last month: browbeating witnesses, aggressively asserting her point of view, hijacking the meeting for her own political purposes. The Catholic position on matters of “Zionism,” to which I fully subscribe, is as follows: all forms of antisemitism are to be unequivocally condemned; the state of Israel has a right to exist; but the modern nation of Israel does not represent the fulfillment of Biblical prophecies and hence does not stand beyond criticism. If Mrs. Prejean Boller were dismissed for holding these beliefs, it is difficult to understand why I am still a member of the Commission. To paint herself as a victim of anti-Catholic prejudice or to claim that her religious liberty has been denied is simply preposterous.

The notion that Charlie Kirk was an anti-war, anti-Zionist, independent voice for truth has got to be one of the most hilarious beliefs of the current crop of conspiracy retards.

@TheModerateCase Please don't.

I combat antisemitism daily. Thanks for speaking on behalf of all Jews, even though many Jews would say you don’t speak for them, to tell me I should shut up and let them take care of their own issues. I guess I should stop speaking out against Jew hatred…

@RealAlexJones Have some babies

There only one developed country that is not heading into a demographic crisis and is above replacement birth rates. That same ethnostate lobbies other western nations to open their borders to Third World invasion..

🚨To every Black person tempted by the antisemitic wave sweeping right now:🚨 Back when white mobs lynched us in the streets... When we had no money, no power, and literally no movement... Who stood with us? Who risked everything? The Jews. They weren't just allies—they were family in the fight. - Jewish leaders co-founded the NAACP in 1909 and funded/led it for generations when no one else would. - When Dr. King and our people were arrested, beaten, jailed—Jewish lawyers defended us for free, and Jewish money paid bail bonds and court fees while others turned away. - In Freedom Summer '64, half the white volunteers risking death to register Black voters? Jewish. - Rabbi Heschel marched arm-in-arm with MLK in Selma—our struggles linked forever. Without their blood, treasure, solidarity, and courage—there is no Civil Rights Movement as we know it. No Voting Rights Act. No dream realized. That's why I stand with the Jews. They were our only true friends when this country hated us—when doors slammed shut and ropes hung high. They showed up, bled, and built with us. So to my people joining this demonic, divisive hate today: Pause. Remember. Honor the alliance that freed us. Our histories are bound. Our freedoms were won together. Betray that, and you betray the very martyrs who died for our rights. Black-Jewish unity forged the dream. Don't let hate destroy it. I stand with my Jewish brothers and sisters—always. ✊🏾🤝✡️🇮🇱 Repost if truth > trends. If gratitude > division. If history matters. #BlackJewishAlliance #RememberOurAllies #StandTogether #CivilRightsTruth #NoToAntisemitism

Joe Kent on Tucker Carlson when?

Tucker

@ValidScience @christopherrufo She did? nutso

I don't understand what she is. She claimed that we nuked Nagasaki in order to take out a Catholic school. The idea was that Jews were in charge of our nuclear targeting in 1945 and they were motivated to vaporize stray Catholics, even in Japan... (Nagasaki was the secondary target that day, only hit because of weather at the primary. But her whole thesis is insane.)

I listened to an hour of Candace Owens and if you can’t figure out that she’s pushing unadulterated insanity, that’s a “you” problem. The Frankist spellcasters did not murder Charlie Kirk to set up his Manchurian candidate wife to become president. Caveat emptor.

@MattWalshBlog Yet you are appearing with @RealCandaceO on a prayer panel. Why?

This is a good example of how defamation works in the modern age, and why it’s not as simple as “just sue them.” The person in this recording is absolutely not Erika. It couldn’t even be Erika because she was like 16 at the time of this recording. And yet this account, amplified by bigger accounts like Ian Carroll, has made this claim recklessly and with malicious disregard for the truth. Can Erika sue over it? Does she have any recourse at all? Sure, she can sue. I hope she does. But in order to win a lawsuit she’d have to prove that this person posted this nonsense knowing it wasn’t true, and then she’d probably have to prove damages, and then she’d have to hope that the broke assholes who posted and amplified it actually have the funds to pay, which they don’t. And all of this will take a long time, years potentially, to sort itself out in court. Even if she wins, it won’t make a difference to the people who’ve already decided that she’s some kind of cartoon villain. They’ll just use the fact of the lawsuit as proof that Erika “has something to hide.” Meanwhile she will have only further highlighted and called attention to the very lies she’s trying to rectify in court. So in other words, it’s the ultimate lose-lose scenario. I’ve experienced much smaller versions of this. People who engage in outright open defamation, slandering my character with totally manufactured lies, and yet I don’t sue for all the reasons above. It’s total bullshit. The upshot is that the slanderers and defamers basically have carte blanche to lie about you and destroy your reputation. Your only recourse is costly, takes a long time, and may damage your reputation even more.

Secretly communicating with an enemy of the United States during an active war conflict makes you a traitor in my book. Full stop.

😂😂😂👇

Ben Shapiro has never argued for legally penalizing anyone for criticizing Israel. This only proves Ben’s point: these people like Tucker invent these bizarre claims, attribute them to people who never made them, and then claim THEY are the ones being persecuted. It’s ridiculous.

@megynkelly @GoldsteinBrooke

Megyn Kelly and Candace Owens are so disgustingly evil and demonic, they’re actually making me take the side of Ben Shapiro. And that’s saying something.

Tucker should do an episode about Israel

Ma’am, you claim to defend Charlie’s legacy while his own widow has publicly asked you to stop. You are exploiting Charlie’s death under the guise of being his protector. You were fired from Daily Wire and turned a personal grudge into a content empire built on a dead man’s name and debunked conspiracy theories. Your “Bride of Charlie” series harassed his widow. You call Ben a “maggot rotting on a corpse” while you’re the one who won’t stop picking at the grave. If “everyone in politics” knows the truth, why does the one person who knew Charlie best, Erika, want you to shut up? You tell Ben to “have some shame.” When will you have shame? You got 9 million views of your colleague’s murder. You don’t care about Charlie Kirk.