@Antonio__1992@Disperze_ Generally if you get that error on any tx then it's related to the fee/gas. To make sure it goes through, choose the high fee option and click "Set Gas" then set it to 400,000
@TheJunonaut@Disperze_ I'm not able to deposit because of code 160221: out of gas. Which is not correct, there should be gas enough to make the transaction. Anyone else facing the same problem?
4. You should now see your account name with the imported addresses under it.
Through the navigation bar on the left, scroll and click the chain of your choice.
3. Enter your account name, then choose the chain(s) you want to import address(es) for, then click "Next", then click "Save"
⚠️ Do not import addresses for chains colored in red if you do not have a ledger.
@OluwseunT If the proposal is approved or rejected but not vetoed, each deposit will be automatically refunded to its respective depositor.
Source: docs.cosmos.network/master/modules…
Proposals can be deposited by multiple accounts and their deposits get refunded unless the prop is vetoed.
@Gelotto2 Yes, governance can change it. There is nothing wrong with changing the MinDeposit parameter again in the future. This is not a permanent change.
@TheJunonaut Even $1250 is a decent amount of money. We shouldn't change the amount due to market conditions, what happens if Juno goes to the moon in the next few weeks? Will we change it again?
@nonfungiblejawn@petranto $5,000-$22,500 equivalent of minimum deposit was already the case during January till May where price was $10 or higher.
Anyone can deposit into a proposal and it does not have to be the proposer themselves.
A prop can enter voting using multiple deposits from diff accounts.
@TheJunonaut I am against it. "Community-driven" may mean little if the average pleb cannot afford to make a proposal. It would make more sense to me to have a counterproposal to punish the spammers. It will sail through.
@TheJunonaut Nah. Current deposit is ok, given that we are in bear market. Current required $JUNO amount could be far higher in dollar terms in the future.
It's a double edged sword. Raise requirement too high and it risks gov by eliminating others. Make it too low and spams show up.