TheMintRush
253 posts


@BK_McCallum @Lloydy232323 @NastyNestor69 @RyLiberty @BrokenBulletz You keep saying she hit him. I assume you are only looking at the grainy video from the house. The close up video pretty clearly shows he gets out of the way. You’re cherry-picking from the worst evidence.
English

@Lloydy232323 @NastyNestor69 @RyLiberty @BrokenBulletz She hit him with the car, she committed assault with a deadly weapon.
English

If you can step out of the way and shoot you can step out of the way and not shoot. It is hard for me to care about a crazy leftist. But they are still people.
It's the second and third shot that cant be justified at all.
If her intention was to attack an ICE agent with her car, she wouldn't have backed up at all. She could have just plowed over him. She backed up so she'd have enough room to turn right and leave.
Below is the second shot. Is he in danger for his life?

English

@josephjanecka @PercivalSweetw2 @NateSilver538 @lxeagle17 It’s all good, man. Seeing now that you’re just not really cut out for understanding how this stuff works. Best of luck!
English

@PercivalSweetw2 @TheMintRush7 @NateSilver538 @lxeagle17 In fact, 538 (Nate Silverman specifically) was the only outlet saying to watch for a Trump win in 2016 if I recall - which felt entirely unbelievable at the time.
The problem was it became a one trick pony and never sustained that approach or those insights.
English

@josephjanecka @PercivalSweetw2 @NateSilver538 @lxeagle17 This feels like a misunderstanding of good modeling. Their data was excellent when you compare predictions to outcome frequency.

English

@TheMintRush7 @PercivalSweetw2 @NateSilver538 @lxeagle17 If not, they consistently were way off base. They had great story points never supported by actual data.
English

@josephjanecka @PercivalSweetw2 @NateSilver538 @lxeagle17 What’s your issue with 538? My understanding is that their probabilistic models were well-calibrated. If not, which analyst had better political models?
English

@deep_jake_ @FischerKing64 You ever consider that maybe you’re just not that bright? Feels like the Occam’s Razor here.
English

@FischerKing64 Sam was the first "public intellectual" I listened to regularly since pretty much the beginning of his rise. I credit him a lot for my foray into debate/first principles reasoning. I've now come to believe he's either an intelligence asset or compromised by one.
English

@RealDavidRyan @blubball @minakimes @prettyboyju_ What are the odds that all the people that have studied this and know the math are on one side while you are on the other side and that YOU are right? You need an ounce of humility to consider you may be wrong here and are the one that doesn’t get it.
English

@blubball @minakimes @prettyboyju_ The best strategy is the one that can possibly make a 2 score game a 2 score game, instead of a 1 score game, that’s what they don’t get
English

If you try at the end and fail, the game is over
If you try now and fail, you know you need an onside kick to stay alive
Which are you choosing?
mike@mike_daboi
@minakimes Info is great with 3 minutes left in the game and a failed onside kick. Love having info
English

@MarchettiT @gregolsen88 Your math just assumes the conclusion ahead of time. Half the time it’s 7pts, half the time it’s 9pts. If you kick the XP then miss the 2pt, you have 0 time and game is over. Your logic is equivalent to preferring to close your eyes than knowing your odds.
English

@gregolsen88 8pts at 43% 1 score game is lightyears better in odds than 9pts which is a 0% one possession. Add in the lack of time for the extra possession and kicking XP should be a no-brainer.
English

@Owensaurus_88 @purpledrank0 @gregolsen88 It’s not binary. Down 8 is a 1.5 possession game. Down 7 is 0.97 possession game, or effectively 1. You can’t round the 1.5 down to 1. Half the time it’s not 1 score.
English

Assuming kick the EP and go down 8 (he missed earlier EP), you may still need 2 possessions (8 is not 1 score)
If you fail the 2 pt try the game is over. Bc u treated as a 1 possession game when its not
Also, my odds of a coin being heads is greater flipping it twice than once.
JJ Watt@JJWatt
@gregolsen88 Analytically, that is absolutely correct. The counterpoint would be the human element of a team’s mindset/mentality only being down one score instead of two. Right or wrong, there is some unquantifiable aspect to the belief & confidence of knowing you’re only down one score.
English

@AdamKoffler Because it’s the right decision
footballperspective.com/trailing-by-15…
English

@brandon_lighty @JohnPeric159923 @Himedanshi2199 @KibrGual @sandmansanch711 Replies have offered several notable examples at you (Austin, Tokyo, Auckland, Zurich) and your response is that you personally take issue with each study. Kinda sounds like you don’t want it to be true…
English

@serpunketh @RichardHanania They need to spend a significant amount on childcare. I looked up avg cost in PA for a rough idea of natl avg: Seeing $10-12k per kid ($20-24k for two). That’s 1/3 less than his number and only for a few years. The avg family of 4 earns ~$125k. They aren’t all poor.
English

@TheMintRush7 @RichardHanania If both parents are working , and they don’t have near by family. What do they do? How much do they pay?
English

Jesus Christ this trash article made its way into the Free Press.
Josh Kraushaar@JoshKraushaar
“Why Do Americans Feel Poor? Because They Are.” thefp.com/p/why-do-ameri…
English

@serpunketh @RichardHanania It’s a reasonable idea but does not stand up to scrutiny. He’s basically redefining the poverty line as like the 70th percentile. The average family of four is not paying $32k/yr for child care.
English


@cremieuxrecueil It’s really 15 big cities trying to tell the rest of us how to live.
English

@Neorio12321 @cremieuxrecueil “And what’s the map look like when you remove the people I don’t like?”
English

@cremieuxrecueil And what's the map look like when you remove the low income neighborhoods from major cities?
English

@calijawn @besttrousers Yes, $8k median in their transaction accounts
English

@besttrousers Not $8K "in their checking account"
#ReadingIsFundamental
English

The median household in the United States has $8,000 in their checking account, owns their home, and has a net worth of $193,000.
Dan Hill@dandinohill
A country $37 Trillion in debt, where 50% of its population cannot handle a $1,000 emergency - has NO BUSINESS giving away $100s of Billions to foreign countries!
English


@besttrousers You aren't a homeowner until your mortgage is paid off.
English













