TheNaturalCube

Sloth follow distance + Hurry speed cap = best of both worlds @elonmusk

@DgtlNumismatist @galgitron I’m heavily slanted toward crypto too. When the time comes to relax and cash-out (and hopefully that’s sooner than later), I want options for parking USD or stables without having banks dictate the terms. Whatever form the bill takes, I hope it’s good for both of us.

@TheNaturalCube @galgitron I totally see your point, I’m more of a crypto guy than stables. I have zero stablecoins now, so it doesn’t matter to me. I just want the market to go up.

This is not a compromise. Banks win again. x.com/LuckyStar589/s…

@scottmelker TLDR: The banks have successfully bribed American representatives to implement a ban on stablecoin yield.

BREAKING: 🚨 SENATORS AND WHITE HOUSE REACH AGREEMENT IN PRINCIPLE ON STABLECOIN YIELD FOR CLARITY ACT CRYPTO BILL

Iran is losing so bad they shot 2 F35s, depleted US defenses in 2 weeks, have dozens of nations trying to negotiate with them on the side, are dictating who does or doesn’t pass the strait of Hormuz, are holding the global oil trade hostage, and the US eased sanctions on them.

@DgtlNumismatist @galgitron 5%+ is better than < 1%. Rolling over for the banks is a forfeit of our power as market participants and value holders. You’re advocating for allowing the banks to rig crypto in the same way they rigged TradFi.

@TheNaturalCube @galgitron We’re earning yield now. How’s the market treating you? I think it fucking sucks. I’m here to get rich, not earn a measly 4-5%. Open the markets to crypto and we all get rich!

@guyontheearth @galgitron Agreed.

@galgitron Total fucking bullshit. Entire industry captured.

@Real_JackJ @galgitron This battle is the front line.

@galgitron They were always going to win the battle. Let’s focus on the war.

@DgtlNumismatist @galgitron It’s a big deal because we should be able to earn yield on passive holdings. Why the fuck would you rather “gamify” it if there’s no need to do that?

@galgitron What is so complicated about this? We cannot earn yield on “ Passive holding” of stablecoins. But we can gamify it. We can be part of a “subscription” model. We can earn something other than “yield”. This is no big deal, we just have to be creative.

@sven141 Zionists have tricked Christians into thinking Muslims are their enemy so we invade bomb & fight them while Zionists sit back & watch our mutual destruction.

@LuckyStar589 @BSCNews Communism for the banks. Zero yield for everyone else.

@BSCNews Yes, the agreement is, we get zero yield

🚨 BREAKING: U.S. SENATORS REACH BIPARTISAN DEAL WITH WHITE HOUSE ON STABLECOIN YIELD DISPUTE The CLARITY Act just cleared its biggest hurdle. Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Senator Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) confirmed Friday they have an agreement in principle with the White House on stablecoin yield language that stalled crypto market structure legislation for months. "Sen. Tillis and I do have an agreement in principle," Alsobrooks said. "It will allow us to protect innovation, but also gives us the opportunity to prevent widespread deposit flight." Tillis added: "In working with the White House, I think we have an agreement. Now we have to vet it with industry, because they are a party to an ultimate deal." The bill could now move to a Senate vote within weeks. If passed, it would end regulation by enforcement and bring clearer rules on token classification, intermediary standards, RWA tokenization, and small transaction tax clarity. The House passed the CLARITY Act in July 2025. The Senate version has been stuck in Banking Committee over the stablecoin yield fight between banks and crypto firms. That fight may now be over.

@galgitron Yup.

@grok @vbkotecha @politico Sounds awful.

The deal: Sens. Tillis (R-NC) & Alsobrooks (D-MD) reached an agreement in principle with the White House to bar yield/rewards payments on passive stablecoin balances. Aims to stop deposit flight from traditional banks while protecting crypto innovation. Could unlock the stalled CLARITY Act for broader digital asset rules. Still needs industry vetting—details fuzzy for now.

Senators, White House strike ‘agreement in principle’ to resolve bank-crypto clash dlvr.it/TRcFBS

Credit to @SenThomTillis and @Sen_Alsobrooks for bridging the partisan divide to tackle a difficult issue. More work to be done to close out this and other outstanding issues, but this is a major milestone toward passing the CLARITY Act.

@tryarchpublic @TEXASOL61 What kind of private-health-insurance system are they going to design for stablecoin yields, I wonder.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Senators reach deal with White House to resolve crypto stablecoin yield dispute with banks.

A commentary I’ve heard within the XRP community this month is some version of “why is XRP price dislodged from adoption metrics?” Here’s my quick take: XRP is not yet a liquidity bridge at scale. The version of XRP that we believe could drive sustained utility demand is when banks and businesses leverage it as working capital. We see signals that institutional use is growing. Just not as fast as the traffic from everyday people. This is not investment advice or a price prediction. But I know which set of data we focus on at @EvernorthXRP. Learn more: evernorth.xyz/press-release-…

LATEST: ⚡ Ripple-backed XRP treasury firm Evernorth has filed a Form S-4 registration statement with the SEC, the final major regulatory step before it can list its shares on the Nasdaq.

@jacksonhinklle The flags look a bit too identical, too.

🚨🇮🇱 Wait, Netanyahu might actually be dead...

JUST IN: Evernorth set to go public in Nasdaq listing with a billion-dollar XRP treasury.

We’ve come too far to go back to regulatory uncertainty. Digital assets are the future, and it’s time America gives them the environment they need to thrive.