The Bionic Man

88.5K posts

The Bionic Man banner
The Bionic Man

The Bionic Man

@TheRealMasud

I won’t stop dancing, until the curtain falls, by then my story will be a compelling movie.

Katılım Mayıs 2010
4.6K Takip Edilen3K Takipçiler
The Bionic Man
The Bionic Man@TheRealMasud·
@Zlatandiary It’s the most important are on a field Plus the only wing they really lack is CF, they are good accross board and close to perfect in midfield
English
0
0
0
3
The Bionic Man retweetledi
Gift Ojeabulu
Gift Ojeabulu@GiftOjeabulu_·
😂😂 I won't be shock if twitter decide to make likes public next and make it private only for paid users. Even this feature of seeing your followers tweet. I won't be shocked if overtime it becomes only available for paid users.
English
0
1
2
308
The Bionic Man
The Bionic Man@TheRealMasud·
Is there a data science newbie that can explain what just happened on twitter Small price dey
English
8
1
3
2.1K
The Bionic Man
The Bionic Man@TheRealMasud·
@aykhalid_1 Since you are the one that addressed the issue topic, even if you didn’t address the issue , so send your account in my dm
English
1
0
0
39
🇦 🇾 🇰 🇭 🇦 🇱 🇮 🇩
@TheRealMasud Thanks for the detailed explanation. I wish I could explain it better than I did. I will be glad if you can get more of this coming once in a while. You won't believe my sleep disappeared doing research just to get the right answer.
English
1
0
1
17
The Bionic Man
The Bionic Man@TheRealMasud·
You are the only one that touched it Twitter wasn’t initially created for vitality, like TikTok, Elon switching to “for you” feed like TikTok means he banked a lot on all major forms of recommendation in one, but weight of allocation was distorted and your followers content was relegated to the background, that’s the actual design of a “for you” page Technically they shouldn’t have changed it , if you want your followers go to “following” but since user experience is almost dead they had to yield to our calls
English
1
0
0
11
The Bionic Man
The Bionic Man@TheRealMasud·
@aykhalid_1 Not exactly that, this is a continuation of my initial response . What’s described in the video is kinda like graph network analysis , kinda like estimating span of influence , LinkedIn show it more with the level of connection 1st, 2nd , 3rd ish x.com/TheRealMasud/s…
The Bionic Man@TheRealMasud

So twitter isn’t a platform with detail profile and metadata beyond location, so they focus more on collaborative filtering really Now the actual issue is, twitter feed used to be like LinkedIn, what you see is based on what the people you follow do, no recommendation engine was used Then Elon switch that , start two feeds “For You” and “Following” for you is exploratory , you are getting recommendations based on interaction , not based on who you follow , they combine content filtering and collaborative filtering , so metadata is key (this is what made the feed disruptive ) So even if you’re not following me , if you interact with me, you’ll see more of my tweets, not just that, you’ll see people like me or that tweet like me, or If you like my tweet, you’ll see tweets that others who like my tweet, also like And the metadata filter brings in search relating content filtering All combined made it a mad feed. They would have made it better by applying a reasonable scale for the feed , say 50 percent from your followers, 20 for content based collaborative filtering , 20 content based collaborative or 10 content based filtering Instead they placed priority on the recommendations, eliminating your followers posts (this is the actual problem and what I was looking for, the explanation was just to differentiate it from what you explained) They’ve now decided to prioritise your followers content over the random ones brought from recommendation Now remember recommendations isn’t saying you’ll definitely like what’s recommended, it’s saying you probably will (mostly around 10-20percent chance you’ll like it) Imagine flooding your feed with something that you have 10-20 percent chance of liking, it’s huge amount of unbearable noise Lasting solution is , weighted distribution of feed based on the example above, and also allowing users to give explicit feedback (like and unlike) and also taking implicit feedback from users (if you give me content from a user like thrice and I don’t interact, it mean I don’t like it, don’t give me anymore)

English
1
0
0
14
The Bionic Man
The Bionic Man@TheRealMasud·
So twitter isn’t a platform with detail profile and metadata beyond location, so they focus more on collaborative filtering really Now the actual issue is, twitter feed used to be like LinkedIn, what you see is based on what the people you follow do, no recommendation engine was used Then Elon switch that , start two feeds “For You” and “Following” for you is exploratory , you are getting recommendations based on interaction , not based on who you follow , they combine content filtering and collaborative filtering , so metadata is key (this is what made the feed disruptive ) So even if you’re not following me , if you interact with me, you’ll see more of my tweets, not just that, you’ll see people like me or that tweet like me, or If you like my tweet, you’ll see tweets that others who like my tweet, also like And the metadata filter brings in search relating content filtering All combined made it a mad feed. They would have made it better by applying a reasonable scale for the feed , say 50 percent from your followers, 20 for content based collaborative filtering , 20 content based collaborative or 10 content based filtering Instead they placed priority on the recommendations, eliminating your followers posts (this is the actual problem and what I was looking for, the explanation was just to differentiate it from what you explained) They’ve now decided to prioritise your followers content over the random ones brought from recommendation Now remember recommendations isn’t saying you’ll definitely like what’s recommended, it’s saying you probably will (mostly around 10-20percent chance you’ll like it) Imagine flooding your feed with something that you have 10-20 percent chance of liking, it’s huge amount of unbearable noise Lasting solution is , weighted distribution of feed based on the example above, and also allowing users to give explicit feedback (like and unlike) and also taking implicit feedback from users (if you give me content from a user like thrice and I don’t interact, it mean I don’t like it, don’t give me anymore)
English
0
0
0
29
The Bionic Man
The Bionic Man@TheRealMasud·
Collaborative filtering can either be Content based or User based Content based collaborative filtering is “people who like this, also like that” , so since everyone that like A also like B, so if you like A , you are expected to like B User based collaborative filtering is if Person A likes item U V W X Y Z, and person be likes U V W X , it’s expected that they’ll like Y Z too Content filtering is using item and user metadata to predict what a person will like, it doesn’t rely on interaction data like the other one Content filtering is to use your profile and preference to recommend, user based collaborative filtering is for exploration or preference , item based collaborative is to widen your need
English
3
0
1
37
The Bionic Man
The Bionic Man@TheRealMasud·
@aykhalid_1 Not correct, but first person that is addressing a tiny bit of the issue It’s related to recommendations, but not what you explained
English
1
0
0
63
🇦 🇾 🇰 🇭 🇦 🇱 🇮 🇩
@TheRealMasud Should I say it is a type of recommendation system. Specifically hybrid recommendation system, which is a combination of content based filtering and collaborative filtering. Unlike what it used to be where context was prioritized.
English
1
0
0
74
Dr. Ahmad
Dr. Ahmad@Bt_ahmadi·
@TheRealMasud Both Kounde and Digne were already average, they then decided to raise the bar even lower tonight
English
1
0
0
36
The Bionic Man
The Bionic Man@TheRealMasud·
We all know France’s weakness is their fullback, and Spain exploited it big time
English
1
0
0
209
The Bionic Man
The Bionic Man@TheRealMasud·
@SirJarus Even France didn’t seem like they respected Spain enough Same way Spain won euros , they look basic on paper , but very good
English
0
0
0
180