Sacud

A small sponsor card shows while Claude or Codex is working! You keep 60% of the ad revenue. No tracking, open-source, install from the VS Code marketplace. sponsoredai.dev

GPT‑5.6 Sol became the builder behind my VPS: it turns production signals into small, tested PRs while respecting strict safety guardrails. Capable and genuinely useful on long-running work..

@a_c_i_e @JonBuildsHQ How do you handle two people vibecoding the same file at once, does it fall back to normal merge conflicts?

@JonBuildsHQ Yooo ever heard of multiplayer vibecodin g? x.com/a_c_i_e/status… sharingu.ryuklabs.io

If you’re building in public with under 1k followers: drop your product. Let’s find the underrated builders.

@currentbitsNET @JonBuildsHQ Auto-resolving contradictions is where I'd get nervous. When two agents disagree something silently picks a winner, and if it picks wrong that's way harder to catch than just having it flag the conflict for me.

Building a few tools an agentic dev tool for personal use a native macOS app for running & coordinating multiple terminal AI coding agents (Claude, Codex) that share one brain Just shipped self-learning memory: agents record decisions, contradictions auto-resolve, useful conventions earn their spot & stale ones get demoted. And notelace.app a full featured markdown editor with support for local ai, linked notes, shared notes, databases basically all the features without endless setup and cala a daily planner

@talhaahsan_sh I'd swap Replit for Claude Code, it's the one I actually keep open all day.

I'm thinking about investing in AI coding agents to speed up development. Current plan: • Replit Core ($20/mo) • Codex ($20/mo) Before I pull the trigger—what would you recommend? If you had a ~$40/month budget, would you: Keep Replit + Codex? Swap one for Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, or something else? Go all-in on a single tool? Would love to hear what you're actually using in production. #BuildInPublic #AI #Coding #IndieHackers

AI coding agents created a weird new wait state. You are not away from the keyboard. You are not watching a build. You are watching an agent think. I am testing whether that moment can fund AI credits without uploading prompts, code, logs, paths, or terminal output.

A small sponsor card shows while Claude or Codex is working! You keep 60% of the ad revenue. No tracking, open-source, install from the VS Code marketplace. sponsoredai.dev

@Noderunner_Hex Past ~5 parallel agents I spend more time reviewing diffs and untangling merge conflicts than I save time

ONE GUY, 30 AI AGENTS, $1M IN REVENUE Claude Code, Codex, and other CLI agents working simultaneously. The desktop behind them holds hundreds of project files. He is not coding. He is dispatching. Each terminal is an autonomous worker building, testing, or shipping a piece of software while he reviews outputs. The bottleneck of software used to be how fast one person could type. Now the bottleneck is how many agents one person can supervise without losing track of context. 30 agents at roughly $200/month in API costs is $6K. If the output produces $1M, the margin per agent is around $32k net. No salaries. No equity. No HR. This is what replaces the 20-person dev team. Not a better IDE. A human running a swarm from a kitchen desk, accepting that 80% of the code will be discarded because the 20% that survives still ships faster than a hired engineer. The interesting part is not the money. It is that the desktop is a mess and nobody cares. Output is the only metric left. The next wave of solo operators will not look organized. They will look unhinged and print cash.

@vikktorrrre curious how the design system actually shows up in claude code in practice. does it pull your tokens/components into context so generated UI matches, or is it more of a linting/check step after the fact? and has the merged usage limit changed which model you reach for by default?

after weeks of waiting for the integration of claude design into the desktop app it's finally here, and 10x better - token and usage limit are now merged with your paid claude account(s) - choose between different models - the design system is now available in claude code via the terminal already tested it myself and will be dropping a guide on it today you can test it out: claude.ai/design

Before SAI talks about sponsor AI credits, the privacy boundary should be inspectable. The part I do want judged is the contract: - prompts stay local. - source code stays local. - terminal output and logs stay local. - full file paths, repo URLs, screenshots, window contents, clipboard, and window titles stay local. SAI measures wait-state metadata, not developer work. What else would you want to inspect before trusting a tool like this?

Same split here, roughly. Codex when the change is well-scoped and I just want it executed cleanly across the repo, Claude Code when I'm still arguing with myself about the approach. The annoying part is the handoff.. do you ever have one plan the change and the other do it, or does that just add friction?

Yes. I switch based on the task, not because I think one always wins. Codex is usually my go-to for implementation, refactoring, and repo-level execution. Claude Code is useful when I need more context, architecture thinking, or product-level reasoning. For important tasks, I sometimes use both.

Codex is farrr better (for now) than Claude Code. Who all agrees?

My bet is that SAI matters most where USD model bills bite hardest. But that's a guess.. While your coding agent is waiting, one sponsor card can earn you AI credits. No prompts, code, logs, paths, or terminal output leave your machine. It measures the wait, not the work. ~50 installs, one funded campaign running, so right now most wait states earn almost nothing. If you pay for Codex or Claude Code in dollars and that bill stings against what you earn locally, would credits like this actually change anything, or is it noise?

Advertise your brand with sponsoredai.dev/v

New version out! Go check it out, better performance and minor fixes.

@akaasten today it’s frequency, kill switch, and uninstall. category preferences are planned, but I wanted to get the trust boundary and payout mechanics right first.

@TheSacud Is there a way for users to choose sponsor categories, or is the main control just install vs uninstall?

Anyone having issues with @Hetzner_Online ?!

@thebuz__ fair. the fix is we don’t reward raw traffic. only qualified placements count: funded sponsor, visible 5s, attended session, non-duplicate. after settlement it can be used as credits or cashed out via Stripe Connect.

@TheSacud tbf i never got a payout from kickbacks.ai , how did you solve spammers and payouts?

@thebuz__ But better and you earn more

@TheSacud kickbacks.ai

@ionleu sponsoredai.dev/v=x2

drop ur startup link

Working on some new features! Out soon

@Rukksssst The project is open you can verify it.

@TheSacud Sounds like a monetization idea in theory, but execution will always raise questions around trust, privacy, and value exchange 💯

Your AI agent makes you wait. SAI pays you for it. One quiet sponsor line in Claude Code or Codex while it thinks. Keep 60%, as credits or cash. Everything stays local. npm i -g @sponsoredai/cli