Skinx

Veeeery excited to release testnet after months of work This is barely the beginning, expect a lot more cool things coming in the next few weeks. g∩eura

@ushouldcashout terrible take. Valid for some businesses but for others (crime) they definetly will rely on it

Sorry to break it to you X402 and agents won’t fcking matter to your business. Agents do not need payments infra and no one genuinely cares about this. Other than the bloodsucking VCs

@robert_lauko Good to see them ranked according to their domain, was curious to know if there would be biases according to domains

Chat GPT Pro: (thought for 52m 19s): Yeah bro fr that’s crazy. Anyways here’s a slop ppt with schizo formatting. Please don’t ask me to do this again. Claude after 10 min: Here you go. Everything is correct. The narrative cooks. Formatting rocks. I fucked your gf last night btw

No bro you must be an expert to trade macro. I’ve been trading oil for 20 years and called every move this past week wrong. You can’t just vibe trade off headlines and price action you don’t even know the history of 1973 Kurdish revolution and what oil did that day

For the record. Jamie Dimon says he wants a “level playing field” for stablecoins. What he really wants is to make sure nobody can offer you a better deal on your own money than tradtional banks can. The president is right to call the banks out on this. We’ve seen this before. In the 1970s, money market funds started paying real yields while banks were locked under deposit caps. Banks cried “unfair” and “unsafe,” lobbied furiously, and lost. Policymakers chose competition over protection; savers got paid, and banks had to adapt instead of suffocating the threat. Today’s script is the same, just with better technology. Stablecoin issuers now operate under licensing, 1:1 high‑quality reserves, liquidity and risk rules, audits and strict AML standards. This is not the Wild West. Yet Dimon still talks as if they exist with “no reserves, no compliance, no oversight.” He’s not describing reality; he’s describing a story that justifies shutting down a rival funding system. The Clarity Act is the real battlefield. On paper, it’s about integrating crypto into U.S. market structure. In practice, the big banks are fighting to ensure that anything that looks like a deposit with yield must either become a bank product or be regulated into irrelevance. “Level playing field” in their vocabulary means: everyone wears the bank straitjacket, or no one plays. Why? Because yield‑bearing stablecoins blow up the quiet cartel behind record profits. Banks live on deposits that pay close to nothing even when risk‑free rates are high. They earn a clean spread and interest on balances parked at the Fed, while passing little of it through. Savers get crumbs; banks get the margin; inertia does the rest. A credible, regulated stablecoin that passes through money‑market yields detonates that racket: with a few clicks, your cash can leave the cartel. The president’s critique goes straight at this arrangement: Americans should “earn more money on their money,” and banks should not be allowed to undermine laws designed to make that possible or to stall a market‑structure bill so the whole “powerful Crypto Agenda” decamps overseas. He’s not attacking banking; he’s attacking a model that treats low‑yield deposits as an entitlement and regulation as a weapon. Crypto‑native firms, for all their flaws, behave like they live in a real market: they build new instruments, disclose, and pay up to attract capital. The banks build talking points and hire lobbyists. Stablecoins don’t just threaten their funding; they threaten their chokehold on payment rails and transaction data. Call this debate what it is: not a fight over “safety,” but a fight over whether a protected deposit cartel gets veto power over technologies that finally let savers earn something closer to the risk‑free rate. In the 1970s, policymakers chose competition. In the 1970s, banks were forced to stop hiding behind regulation and compete. If Jamie Dimon wants a level playing field, he should stop complaining and start doing the same.

Who is John Galt? governance.aave.com/t/aci-is-leavi…

How to survive? "Yeah I'll keep up with AI and I'll be fine" No buddy this is not fine

Yet another discussion with an IT "architect" who is "into AI" (uses ChatGPT) and thinks he has 5 more years in front of him So cooked

@barneytheboi Only 300 more matches to get right

holy shit its coming home

@ArrakisFinance Great work team

We analyzed 125 token launches and spoke with 25+ founders to learn why 85% of tokens launched in 2025 ended the year negative. Only 9.4% of tokens that declined in their first week ever recovered. What drove Week 1 relied on decisions founders often overlooked. The guide covers the decisions that actually mattered, how to model them, and a framework for keeping your token out of the 85%. 👉 Read the Practical Guide to TGE: arrakis.finance/tge-guide

@rootshe11 Except Halborn audited this one iirc

Just audit your code. Pay for it, it's worth it.

Literally a new crypto kidnapping attempt in France every 2nd day 0 measures taken by the authorities Tax workers selling information to criminals, this country is a joke

Crypto's 2025 trade of the year belongs to @cobie, who's services were priced at $152m by Coinbase (~86% of their $176m Echo purchase price)

@DarkWebInformer @whalecalls Damn they worthless anyway

‼️🇺🇸 A threat actor is selling an alleged critical severity OpenSea 0-day exploit chain for $100,000 USD (BTC/XMR). The threat actor claims the exploit affects OpenSea's Seaport order validation logic on Ethereum Main Net, Polygon, and Blast, enabling forced transfer of high-value NFTs at 0 ETH, bypassing listing approvals, and working on both active and inactive listings. The seller claims the vulnerability is unpatched and undisclosed.

Introducing Exa Instant: the first sub-200ms search engine. Faster than Google, it's custom built to power realtime AI products like chat and voice.

@omgcorn @AgentChud Gud tech

Ya 12% is really high for stables yield. If you don't know BOLD, it's a permissionless, completely hands-off stable. It operates on it's own, without human intervention, forever. It's very unique in DeFi today because it's a true primitive in the sense that Uniswap is a primitive too. Thoughtful design, high yield, it's only a matter of time before BOLD use takes off.

@swisscryptocat Opus pro?

Si quelqu'un connait un logiciel ou app de montage video automatisé genre "capcut" mais ideal pour faire des pti shorts insta /tiktok sans se prendre la tete je suis preneur ! un truc ou tu balance des videos en vrac et ca te fait un montage auto

You eventually start to realize, no job is safe.