
The Free Agent
122 posts



Messias é rejeitado pelo Senado para o STF, e Lula sofre derrota histórica www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2026/04/…


In the M&A-Law world, I am facing a major challenge: Clients, buyers, sellers, and even opposing counsel are taking advice from AI Systems. Last week, a client sent an LOI that was exceedingly standard and a very favorable offer for the seller. The seller ran it through ChatGPT, and it told the seller that it was a bad deal, including that the seller should not agree to a non-compete (very standard). The seller sent an email with all of the ChatGPT-flagged issues list and terminated discussions. It is not just sellers, but my clients are sending me AI-generated lists, and I have to try to convince them that AI is off-base (or lacking nuance) and that my opinion is right. I find myself defending myself from their AI tools. AI (in its current form) is like a person you meet at a dinner party who talks loudly and confidently, but upon scrutiny lacks nuance or strategic understanding. This results in bad outcomes for many people, including the seller who rejected a great LOI offer. AI can be a great tool for people who already know a lot about a topic, but very damaging to people who use it for something they do not know about. It is also eating up a lot of legal time to run through issues lists, which are quickly written by low-cost AI.


@BuySellBA Roughly the same as Shake Shack for a smash burger, fries, and a drink.


Je considère que la libre circulation dans l'espace Schengen devrait être réservée aux seuls ressortissants des pays européens. Obtenir un titre de séjour en Espagne, par exemple, ne doit pas permettre de circuler librement dans tous les pays de l'Union européenne.


i mean yeah, it's not just killing/robbery. People don't know about the institutional theft and corruption that rivals any african country, the dismal state of infrastructure, that 60% of the pop has no acecss to sewage system, & the zero trust culture of the general public













fuera.




I think 80% of families looking for a European base will end up in Cyprus. Here's why. 15% corporate tax. A 17-year non-dom regime that eliminates tax on foreign dividends and interest with just 60 days of presence. English everywhere. British common law. No wealth tax. No inheritance tax. 340 days of sunshine. EU citizenship after 7 years of residency. Direct flights to London, Dubai, and most of Europe. Healthcare is affordable and high quality. International schools in every major city. And with €300K in real estate, you qualify for permanent residency if you prefer the investment route. No other country gives you this combination at this price point. Some people find it boring. As Portugal cools down, 80% of globally mobile families will most likely end up choosing Cyprus. What's your take: how's life in Cyprus? Is it really as boring? Please share your honest pros and cons.









It’s insane seeing how big São Paulo 🇧🇷 really is Got here last night and the city just went on and on and on Very excited about exploring it





Not really, the difference can be quite steep on things that matter a lot like safety, education and healthcare. Plenty of proofs of this out there. Doesn't mean you can't get good quality at lower prices, but you need to look carefully and gain as much awareness as possible about the tradeoffs you're doing. Some pointers on safety compromises in Italy: x.com/nic_amadio/sta… And healthcare compromises in Italy/Poland: linkedin.com/posts/nicola-a… And these are fairly well-off European nations. I'm not convinced at all that LATAM reliably offers high standards on several aspects that matter a lot especially after having kids. What do you think @JakeNomada? I once remember seeing someone complain about healthcare for their kids somewhere in LATAM not sure if it was you or someone else.




