lude.base.eth

924 posts

lude.base.eth banner
lude.base.eth

lude.base.eth

@The_JesusCrust

Helping teams ship and win on @base

onchain Katılım Ekim 2021
475 Takip Edilen535 Takipçiler
lude.base.eth
lude.base.eth@The_JesusCrust·
@XenBH If there is one thing I wouldnt use AI for then this def. would be trying to reduce interactions and bonding with my kids. Where the f… are we heading? This is concerning tbh
English
0
0
0
28
Xen
Xen@XenBH·
I’ve started using AI to handle my son’s bedtime stories. This used to take about an hour every night because he expects a completely original story, with a plot, recurring characters, callbacks and a frankly unreasonable amount of audience participation. So now I ask what he wants the story to be about, put that into Claude, then run the output through ElevenLabs so it reads it out in my voice. I do still need to lie there beside him while it happens (which is a bit annoying). We haven’t fully solved the robotics side yet. Still, with the content now automated, I can put on my noise cancelling headphones and use the time productively. Emails and Slack messages mainly. and a podcast I’ve been meaning to listen to about being a more present father.
English
29
1
100
5.1K
lude.base.eth retweetledi
Alex (BCP)
Alex (BCP)@BlockchainPill·
They chose #ICP over Solana & Ethereum. Here's why 👇 In this podcast I sit down with Lude (@The_JesusCrust), Head of BD at @AroNetwork, to break down: - what they're building - why they chose ICP - and how they're using Chain Fusion and Canister Smart Contracts
English
17
44
200
21.6K
lude.base.eth
lude.base.eth@The_JesusCrust·
@Austen @KellyClaudeAI Web scraping? We built a residential IP network with more than 480k IPs. Give your agents a human fingerprint and avoid modern anti bot walls.
English
0
0
0
109
rb3k
rb3k@rbthreek·
Jokes aside all I really wanna know is what this means for @base? @jessepollak time to pivot to L1 w $base as gas or ?
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

English
13
1
61
16.7K
lude.base.eth
lude.base.eth@The_JesusCrust·
@ibuprod Not bad. Congrats on the progress. But no way thats 7%. Should be more around 14%. Don't put too much weight on those scans. They are worthless and misleading .
English
0
0
0
30
ibu
ibu@ibuprod·
7% body fat are you kidding me bro ☠️
ibu tweet mediaibu tweet media
English
4
0
11
1.7K
lude.base.eth
lude.base.eth@The_JesusCrust·
@binji_x @amanonthechain It's not about how often you hit the gym. It's about what you do when you are in the gym. I know people working out multiple times per week for years without actually adding muscle or changing their look. Intensity is key. Volume is secondary.
English
0
0
0
18
binji
binji@binji_x·
@amanonthechain been gyming 4x/week, running is just a final boss I need to conquer
English
2
0
0
888
binji
binji@binji_x·
i want to get as fit as possible in 2026, what detailed advice do you have (exercises, lifestyle, diet)?
English
108
3
145
30.1K
PredictBase
PredictBase@PredictBase·
We’re excited to announce that PredictBase has secured a strategic investment from Virtuals Ventures @virtuals_vc , reflecting their strong support and long-term commitment to our vision for prediction markets and AI agents. This partnership includes a strategic $PREDI token acquisition, reinforcing long-term alignment with PredictBase. With our rapidly growing volume and demand, this investment will accelerate our ability to scale liquidity, strengthen our infrastructure, and expand our user base and revenue.
PredictBase tweet media
English
60
45
287
36K
lude.base.eth
lude.base.eth@The_JesusCrust·
Not sure where you got this from but someone seems to be salty. I am here since day 1, helping multiple projects succeed on Base. AI, DePIN, DeFi, Gaming, you name it. Those teams that made Base the amazing eco and infra it is today. Thats what made institutions choose base. They couldnt care less about content coins.
English
0
0
0
17
meowphasaurus
meowphasaurus@meowphasaurus·
How can I put this simply... -supported meme communities -dramatic increase in users + chain success -internally decides memecoins can be replaced by creator tokens -mostly ignores memecoin community for a year and relationships with communities and builders seemingly stop mattering -simultaneous with over-pushing creator tokens and the creator economy -chain suffers, culture fractures, toxicity spews -returns a few times to say "we support you guys still...but help us scale creator tokens which we believe will help you prosper" areuserious? -indicates non-belief in memes or memecoin communities and think creator tokens are the next evolution and will replace them (with no evidence or data to support this, and clear rejection from the market and culture) -repeats and repeats it's the same problem every time guys... you are not comprehending you are unwilling to change either you don't care or really do not understand no one wants to help build the creator economy after this past year. no one believes you when you say you think it will grow the pie for everyone. you have to build something better that everyone organically and naturally can believe in and get behind and the current creator economy / token is not that. you ask for help scaling it but when help arrives to BUILD A BETTER SYSTEM you reject all help and believe you know what's best despite the market clearly telling you, you don't. be authentic in your support for everyone else and repair relationships without requesting they do something for you (e.g. support creator tokens) and when it comes to fixing the creator token and creator token economy, quietly spend the next 6 months listening to the community and iterating while you support everyone else that was ignored in 2025. maybe some will decide to help after they stop having it leveraged and shoved down their throats for a few months. otherwise i do not see how you get to a place where you've repaired the culture and have a world where the creator economy thrives (and for the record, i think it can, it just needs to be executed differently). Ego will continue to prevent this meta from ever taking off. Kill the ego, maybe there is a chance.
English
16
22
118
7.6K
lude.base.eth
lude.base.eth@The_JesusCrust·
@meowphasaurus @mirror_web3 If @base keeps pushing in this direction it soon will be known as creator chain. Many brilliant teams building real tech and infra solutions will think twice if base is the right place for them.
English
3
0
6
140
meowphasaurus
meowphasaurus@meowphasaurus·
and to add, I’m not saying creator economy should be unsupported or eliminated. it can work, but not how it’s being executed today or for the past year. but that shouldn’t be first priority for base. First priority should be ensuring the users you actually have, stay. because so many have left due to being unhappy and sick of this shit
English
1
1
17
3K
lude.base.eth
lude.base.eth@The_JesusCrust·
Some true words here. I also believe going basically all in on socialFi with @baseapp wasnt the right way to go. It just doesnt feel organic to me and at this point it feels very forced. I feel @baseapp would have been way better off focusing on traders and builders. Miniapps is an amazing concept cause it provides builders with a quick and easy way to showcase their products and normies with an easy enough UI/UX to explore them. Thats what drives discovery and distribution and is connecting builders with their target users. So much buried value here... PS: is this still @baseposting ?
chiron@chironchain

.@brian_armstrong the fact that you are asking this now as if people haven't been answering this question all year makes me doubt that you've been paying attention to the overall sentiment from traders on @Base The thesis for buying @Zora has always been that you guys are too stubborn to pivot to something that people genuinely believe in; very few of us traders who provide liquidity to "creators" actually give a damn about the normie, superficial culture espoused by the founders of Zora Trying to bring Instagram onchain has always seemed viscerally unappealing because it is somewhat antithetical to the energy that made crypto great in the first place Support traders on Base by promoting great tech-oriented projects and increasing the amount of opportunities available on your chain That will give you the result you're looking for, but I'm not sure if you're open to taking that route over going all-in on the niche sector of SocialFi

English
0
0
1
254
Base Posting
Base Posting@baseposting·
reply to this if i forgot to follow you
English
658
54
771
21.4K
Base Posting
Base Posting@baseposting·
like this post if you want a job in crypto
English
134
19
495
9K
aneri
aneri@0xAneri·
Team had a fun small break during the @baseapp surge. Ft. Based drinks and ugly sweaters
aneri tweet media
English
32
7
125
4.2K
lude.base.eth retweetledi
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
fusaka
Indonesia
1.4K
1.3K
10.9K
713.2K