Endgegner der Kommentarspalten ✊

Kurz vor Einführung der Massenimpfung starben von 1961-1970 allein in West-Deutschland 1.158 Menschen an #Masern. Trotzdem behaupten #Impfgegner , Masern wären total harmlos. Haut ihnen diese Zahl um die Ohren. #impfenhilft #weilshilft #Globukalypse

@AnonMooseTweet @donchyme You claimed it would be obvious. If you cant deliver proof you are lying. Simple as that.

@Themios @donchyme Wait, so now I have to prove his point and I’m suddenly lying? Hahahaha

There is a trend in modern entertainment that has become impossible to ignore. Increasingly, movies and TV shows present women as the ultimate symbols of physical strength, speed, aggression, and combat dominance. The leader of the elite special forces team is a woman. The most feared hand-to-hand fighter is a woman. The lone soldier taking down entire battalions is a woman. It may make for exciting fiction, but the problem begins when fiction is presented as though it reflects reality. Real life has a stubborn way of refusing to cooperate with ideology. Take the U.S. Navy SEALs as an example. They are widely regarded as one of the toughest military units in the world. Out of a force of roughly 2,500 active-duty SEAL operators, there are currently no women who have completed the full SEAL training pipeline and earned the Trident. This is despite combat roles being opened to women over a decade ago. The standards are open to everyone, but the standards themselves remain extraordinarily demanding. Even among men, between 70% and 85% of candidates fail the selection process. This is not because women are unintelligent, incapable, or less valuable. It is because men and women are different. Whenever militaries around the world have expanded women's participation in physically demanding combat occupations, debates have frequently arisen over whether entry standards should remain identical or be adjusted to account for physiological differences. Critics argue that lowering standards risks reducing combat effectiveness, while supporters argue that standards should measure only what is genuinely required for the mission. The point is that the discussion itself exists because the physical differences between men and women are real—not imaginary. None of this diminishes women. It simply recognizes biology. The average man possesses significantly greater upper-body strength, greater muscle mass, denser bones, higher levels of testosterone, and superior explosive power than the average woman. These differences are exactly why sporting competitions are separated by sex in virtually every country on earth. No one sees that as discrimination. They see it as reality. This is why I find Hollywood's obsession with making women the face of physical dominance so strange. Strength is not the defining quality of womanhood. Women possess qualities that societies have depended upon for thousands of years—qualities that cannot be measured by how much weight someone can deadlift or how many enemies they can defeat in a fight. They nurture. They build families. They preserve communities. They often excel in communication, empathy, teaching, healthcare, intelligence gathering, logistics, administration, diplomacy, medicine, science, and countless other fields that are indispensable to any civilization, including the military. Supporting roles should never be mistaken for lesser roles. In fact, wars have often been won because of logistics, intelligence, communications, medicine, manufacturing, and leadership—not simply because of the people pulling the trigger. This is why I believe women do themselves no favors when they constantly feel they must become men to prove their worth. Even the entertainment industry is beginning to discover that audiences don't automatically embrace every attempt to replace traditionally male action heroes with female counterparts. The Supergirl movie project is a perfect example. When a story feels like it is trying to make a political statement instead of telling a believable story, audiences often respond negatively. Commercial success depends on many factors, but viewers generally reward authenticity more than messaging. History tells a similar story. People often point to the Amazons as proof that women historically dominated warfare. Yet beyond mythology and scattered historical references, there is little evidence that they established great military empires comparable to those built by the Assyrians, Romans, Mongols, Persians, or other civilizations renowned for conquest. Whether the Amazons existed exactly as legend describes remains a matter of historical debate. Perhaps we've been asking the wrong question. Instead of asking how women can become more like men, perhaps we should ask why women feel pressured to compete with men in areas where men possess natural biological advantages. Equality does not require sameness. Men and women are equal in value without being identical in design. A society that celebrates masculinity in men and femininity in women loses nothing. In fact, it gains the unique strengths of both. Women don't need to become the face of physical combat to be extraordinary. They already are extraordinary in ways that no action movie can adequately portray.

@CascadiaWinters @Giocane89 @AtronachSign @esjesjesj Because you only put them out if you need to row.

@Giocane89 @Themios @AtronachSign @esjesjesj Maybe they add them for the movie, CGI maybe. But on none of the pictures they have shown there have been any oars.

So these guys are just like legit idiots who don’t know anything

@CascadiaWinters @AtronachSign @esjesjesj Wtf are you talking about. They have real oars, they are just pulled in. You can even see them row in the trailers.

@Themios @AtronachSign @esjesjesj Sure maybe they CGI the oars for the actual movie, we will see.

@CalebChanc925 @DebicaJani59202 You mean the 2004 Troy which got nearly everything wrong? lol

@DebicaJani59202 Yeah 1956 one and 2004 one are way better then 2026 shit

Because Hollywood are the most retarded Woke Losers that disrespect the European culture its based on.

@AnonMooseTweet @donchyme I am referring to the screenshot in my tweet. And why cant you name the shows if its obvious, lying idiot?

@Themios @donchyme “Why can’t you name the shows” is not, in fact, citing. Hahaha

@CascadiaWinters @AtronachSign @esjesjesj Thats the same for Viking longboats. The oars on a greek pentekonter could be fully pulled in and secured inside the ship. Again: whats your point?

@Themios @AtronachSign @esjesjesj My point is the oars of the Greek ship are essential, the way of the wings of butterfly are. And more importantly the crew oaring is essential part of the original plot, having losses to them being akin to losing a mast or engine failure.

@AnonMooseTweet @donchyme Its called citing. Thanks for coming to my TED talk.

@Themios @donchyme You did the meme of looking for a source for incredibly obvious things.

@HyperHawkMedia @Gazz_54 You are a very special kind of stupid. Did your parents try to suffocate you? Filming tax breaks are given for production of a movie in the country. Which happened. Its an incentive for creating jobs and spending money in the local economy.

@Gazz_54 Nolaaaaaaaaan STOLE 6.5 million euros of 🇬🇷 Greek Taxpayer money and used it to Vandalize and SPIT on their culture and history. Complete Disrespect of an entire race.

Christopher Nolan took 6.5 million euros in Greek taxpayer money to film The Odyssey in Greece for 15 days. They gave him the subsidy without telling the Greek people what the movie was actually going to be. No Greek actors. Heavy distortion of one of our most important stories. Now the world tour is skipping Greece completely. He knows exactly what he did. He disrespected our history, took our money, and now he won’t even show his face here. This is what happens when Hollywood gets comfortable pissing on other people’s culture.

@Gazz_54 @Jokerwarr10r_ Thats your rebuttal of the fact that you have no clue what filming tax breaks are and that your whole claim is utter nonsense?

@Jokerwarr10r_ Every single fucking time... you are just another mentally ill anti-Greek racist

@towereyer @UnamunoAgain Are you kidding me? Its a similar ship design. The only major difference is, that the pentekonter doesnt have its oars pulled in on the picture. And for the other points of your rambling: no one, not even Nolan, has ever claimed that its a historical accurate movie.

@Themios @UnamunoAgain Eso no se parece en nada a un drakkar, solo en los remos. Y que ocurre con los cascos, vestuario y el caballo en impresión 3D? Eso si es de la época de Troya?

Nolan ha puesto un drakkar vikingo del siglo IX A estas alturas mi teoría es que Nolan ha basado toda su película en un ragebait constante y quiere que veamos la película por puro morbo y hateo La única semejanza entre el trirreme griego y el dakkar eses que ambos flotan

@CascadiaWinters @AtronachSign @esjesjesj So you are agreeing with me that viking longboats and pentekonters are similar ship designs. Or what is your point?

@Themios @AtronachSign @esjesjesj You know the 50 oars the name of the ship type comes from. Leaving the oars out of ancient ships we classified on their oars is like leaving out the wings of a butterfly.

@123_vermin @beergnome1st @AtronachSign @esjesjesj I tried to explain to the asshat that the real historical ships were even more similar to a viking longboat. Given his newest reply he is an idiot who is ignoring any evidence and the assessments of real experts (i took the picture from an academic book about ancient ships).

@Themios @beergnome1st @AtronachSign @esjesjesj I’m not disagreeing with you? I’m completely against the asshat saying it looks like a completely different ship that what the Greeks used

@DrunkAt12 @catedempsey It isnt even far off from a pentekonter which was used at that time. Its just another fake outrage take.

@catedempsey It is, however, a myth, so accuracy has never been a factor in any versions of it made so far. It is about the story, not the details. And, when it costs $250M to make, you want it to appeal widely. Cooler boat sells more tickets (the boat is real, that is why they used it...)

The Odyssey continues to vex me. Christopher Nolan thought "all boats are the same, right? RIGHT?" so instead of using any Greek boat, he's using a VIKING LONGBOAT in that movie. I can't watch it. I can't! He forgets the Greek Gods come colour-coded and with a LOT of description

@catedempsey @DragonShadows4 Pentekonters have the same basic dsign structure (longboat, no deck, one row of oars, one sail, similar length) as a viking longboat.

@DragonShadows4 It won't look like a Viking Longship at all. Nobody mentioned Triremes and clearly they are Attic, but then by all means pick a fight with the person who reads Attic Greek, that usually works out well.

@Dilophomasnaur1 @esjesjesj Which was modified to resemble a pentekonter. The ship design is very similar (longboat, one row of oars, no deck, one sail, similar length). These clowns are always referring to triremes, which didnt even exist in the Mycenaean period.

@esjesjesj No, it's literally a Viking ship. Specifically, its the Draken Harald Harfagre, a Norwegian built replica longship. loopnorth.com/news/viking022…

@Lim38878197 @airbagged2077 @LiftyLefty @esjesjesj "It doesnt look similar at all" Do you need glasses? It looks much more like a pentekonter than the merchant round ship you linked in another tweet. Do you even understand the difference between a longboat and a round ship?

@airbagged2077 @LiftyLefty @esjesjesj It doesn't look similar at all lol, its literally a Viking ship. We have a very, very good idea of ancient Greek ships from a wide period of time because they kept on sinking in the Black sea and getting incredibly well preserved there, in addition to lots of artwork.

Good thing this is the correct ship

@Lim38878197 @airbagged2077 @LiftyLefty @esjesjesj You must be kidding. Thats a merchant round (!) ship built around 800 years after the Mycenaean period ended. The Mycenaeans used pentekonters as warships, which were longboats similar to viking longboats. You clowns have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.

@airbagged2077 @LiftyLefty @esjesjesj If you are interested, here's an article on a very well preserved ship found in the Black Sea so you can get a sense of what they were like, the article even has pottery art showing a famous scene from the Odyssey!: bbc.com/news/world-eur…

@Lim38878197 @battlehateharm @AtronachSign @esjesjesj Its realistic. Its a longboat with similar design and size to a pentekonter. No deck, one row of oars, one sail. Thats the point. Realistic doesnt mean accurate. You want a ship design in the movie that didnt exist until centuries later and would neither be realistic or accurate.

@battlehateharm @AtronachSign @esjesjesj Its pretty simple for me, Nolan puts a lot of stock on a sense of "realism" or least tangibility, he does things like have minimal CGI or have no modern instruments in the soundtrack, even this whole ship thing got kicked off by discussion about his committment to realism where

@NoahCur88319363 @battlehateharm @Lim38878197 @AtronachSign @esjesjesj They have a ship type that didnt exist at the Mycenaean period. You are all missing the point: viking longboats have a similar design to pentekonters: longboat, no deck, one row of oars... There is a reason why pentekonters are always compared to viking longboats.

@battlehateharm @Lim38878197 @AtronachSign @esjesjesj The greek navy has some

@beergnome1st @123_vermin @AtronachSign @esjesjesj His picture doesnt show a ship type that was used during the Mycenaean age. They used pentekonters, which were very similar to viking longboats.

@123_vermin @AtronachSign @esjesjesj Not even REMOTELY the same design other than the vague shape of it, like fucking come on dude