Tom
393 posts


GPT-5.6 Sol and Luna are ahead of Terra at every point on the Intelligence vs Cost per Task chart. GPT-5.6 Luna stands out as a particularly cost efficient model
Charting the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index shows the trade-off between intelligence and Cost per Intelligence Index Task. Across reasoning efforts, each GPT-5.6 model pushes past GPT-5.5 on the Pareto frontier (excluding non-reasoning).
However, Luna and Sol are always ahead of Terra. This means for any Terra effort level, there is a Luna or Sol effort level that is more intelligent at no extra cost, or as intelligent at lower cost.

English

@ArtificialAnlys Could we also see the average time per task at all the reasoning levels
English

Introducing a limited preview of GPT-5.6 Sol, our next generation frontier model, as well as GPT-5.6 Terra, a balanced model for efficient, everyday work, and GPT-5.6 Luna, a fast and affordable model for high-volume work.
openai.com/index/previewi…
English

My talk at the recent Claude for developers Brisbane event. youtube.com/watch?v=ppCbbe…

YouTube
English

@ThomasCsere @theo This is frist post theo has ever been wrong about
English

Hermes Agent comes with a truly absurd number of skills pre-enabled. Over 100 of them. This is roughly half.
I get what they're going for - they want an agent that comes "ready out of the box".
I just don't get why every user has to have a polymarket skill, 3 baoyu art skills (? never heard of this), a headless Pokemon skill, and Minecraft modpack server skills, all available the first time they run it.
I guess Hermes Agent just isn't for me.

Teknium 🪽@Teknium
@theo They're nonsense for you maybe. We didn't make hermes just for you. If you want an empty soulless experience, not ready ootb for anyone, try openclaw
English

@DrJohnVervaeke Congrats, you found agnosticism through first principles
English

In the theism-atheism debate (which may be one of the core engines of the current culture wars) there are two variables you become aware of…
One is:
Do you think you can capture ultimate reality with your concepts? Can you give a sufficient description, something that you think is complete or close to completion?
The other is:
How mature do you think you are in relationship to ultimate reality?
And then what Zen-Neoplatonism (plus coordinating arguments) says is, well, think about this:
We've been maybe spiritual for 40,000 years.
First of all, think about that...40,000 years.
And then think about all the legacy religions that are about maybe 2,000-3,000 years old.
What?
That's such a small fraction of that 40,000.
And then if you go back even more, because you see chimps doing weird things like they'll pass a certain tree and they'll put rocks in front of it...so maybe now we're talking about millions of years.
Now also think about 40,000 years into the future...100,000 years into the future, 4 million years into the future:
Do you think we really got it right now?
No...so we have to take a stance of a beginner's mind.
And this is what you say to the atheist:
So you think science is mature?
But what do you think of all of the theories up until the last 40 years in science?
They turned out to be largely false.
So what should you think about your science right now?
That it is also still immature in a radical way.
We may turn a corner and we may have an Einsteinian revolution…
So you gain a radical openness and reject two things at the same time.
You reject the atheist weak notion of transcendence (“there's not much transcendence available to us“) and you say:
No, no, we need to mature, so we have to encourage as many transcendent experiences as we can.
Not the claims made from them…but the developmental process, because these are the most transformative experiences people can go through.
But we also have to reject the theist claim that they've got a good complete operating manual…a thick description.
So you reject simultaneously the theist thick description and the atheist thin transcendence…and you get a thin description of a strong transcendence.
And that's non-theism:
It's different from both theism and atheism.
It orients us in a profound epistemic humility in a way in which we don't have to have fundamental conclusions…but we can encourage each other in the cultivation of whatever spiritual growth we are individually and collectively capable of.
And that's a significant difference.
English

Ahhh yes, back in November 2026.
Fix your copy @antigravity
share.google/3AA8sygSkFwsg1…
English






