ThreeClerkMonte

When governments act as bad actors, one of their standard tactics is to manage opposition, especially when they are unable to fully crush it. Controlled opposition voices are typically developed to sound critical, but to steer discussion and strategy toward safer, more symbolic actions, and away from anything that might truly threaten power. They subtly downplay the most dangerous allegations, urge patience, focus on narrow reform, and reliably stay within certain lanes. Over time, the unwitting, earnest people who come with no agenda burn out believing they ‘tried everything’ while the underlying network survives, limiting its liability and denying genuine accountability.

youtube.com/live/yVq1nUxfo… Justice for Officer John O'Keefe! For Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore, Enrique Delgado Garcia, Juston Root, and *all* subjected to a justice system prone to cruelty, deception, and harm.

🚨Chris Kelly🚨 is in the Tully emails numerous times working with phone data in the Karen Read case in his capacity as Director of the Digital Evidence Laboratory for the state of MA Attorney Generals Office. Is it coincidence that his other professional affiliation (NCFI) facilitated ~$8.7+ million to Jessica Hyde's company (who had, per USASpending, previously never earned a federal contract above ~$250k) beginning in August of 2024?

Jessica Hyde has professional and/or financial ties to: •Brian Tully •Ian Whiffin •Massachusetts Attorney General's Office •Magnet Forensics (Axiom) •National Cyber Crime Conference (held every year at Four Points by Sheraton Norwood, MA) •NCFI (Secret Service digital forensics training facility) •Norfolk County District Attorneys Office •Shanon Burgess •United States Attorneys Office-Massachusetts (USA38) ❗️ •United States Secret Service

The National Computer Forensics Institute in Hoover, Alabama is a federally funded facility operated in partnership with the Alabama District Attorneys Association and the U.S. Secret Service. NCFI provides training in digital evidence/forensics to state and local prosecutors, judges, and law enforcement nationwide using tools made by Magnet Forensics, Cellebrite, and other companies. Chris Kelly serves as the Director of the Digital Evidence Laboratory at the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office. Additionally, he is a longtime (at least through 2024) developer of curriculum and legal instructor for NCFI. May 11, 2023 The recent FOIA release of Lt. Brian Tully's (who has since been disciplined, transferred, and named as a defendant in Karen Read's federal civil lawsuit) communications produced an email that states: "Chris Kelly's team at the AGO has the data and is working on it," referring to the taint team review of Karen Read's phone. The same email reveals the prosecution retained an outside digital expert not to independently evaluate Jennifer McCabe's phone data, but specifically to "support" a trooper's existing findings about the timing of the "hos long to die in cold" search. December 15, 2023 An e-mail chain between Chris Kelly, Brian Tully, Adam Lally, and Kyle Herr (AGO) indicate that Nick Guarino (MSP) will meet with Herr at 9:00am. Late May, 2024 & July 22, 2024 A key prosecution digital expert, Ian Whiffin, works for Cellebrite. During the 1st trial, Cellebrite released Inseyets Physical Analyzer V10.2.101.352, which removed the famous 2:27am timestamp from its processing of the artifact. Shortly after the 1st trial, Whiffin successfully petitioned internally to remove the LastVisited timestamp value from records sourced from Safari’s BrowserState.db (WebHistory & SearchedItems) in Cellebrite’s Physical Analyzer Standard V7.69.0.10 release. August 9th, 2024 Jessica Hyde’s company, Hexordia LLC, was awarded a DHS/USSS IDIQ federal contract to supply Magnet Forensics products (Axiom, DVR Examiner, Outrider, Griffeye Advanced) and training directly to NCFI. Hyde served as a digital forensics expert for the prosecution throughout the Karen Read case, testifying in both trials. To date, the contract has obligated 5 times for a total of $10,201,941.89. It has outlayed (paid) on 4/5 for a total of $8,765,295.14. usaspending.gov/award/CONT_IDV… January 6, 2025 Over a year later, Tully follows up with Kelly on the “taint team we had previously engaged for Comm v Read. We are exploring the possibility of asking for more databases similar to the request below for SMA database.” February 6, 2025 Tully informs Kelly that Judge Cannone “ruled from the bench that the Commonwealth can receive the requested databases pursuant to the Search Warrant directly from the AGO.” Kelly provides the link and Tully successfully downloads on the 10th. February 19, 2025 Tully requests additional files from Karen Read’s cellphone. Kelly asks if they are from the same court order and Tully replies “Yes, many of the below files were in Jessica’s affidavit but I failed to add to the original request list.” This is followed by a few lines of redacted text. April 16, 2025 Chris Kelly sends an e-mail to Attorney Little, cc’ing Attorneys Brennan & Yannetti, providing the additional data to be examined for privilege. July 21, 2025 Just over a month after Karen Read's acquittal in the 2nd trial, Hexordia lands another federal contract. This time as an expert witness ❗️ for USAO-MA ❗️

Epstein was wearing a United States Secret Service shirt in recently released files

@EstatePlan @GlammaSooz Instead of clarifying it, they inverted it.

@GlammaSooz I believe that by default google maintains search histories for 18 months. The 2:27 search was brought up in a court filing within 15 months of the search, so there still could have been time to get info directly from google, if the DA's "investigators" had actually been trying.

227 will follow her for the rest of her life. Jen McCabe is not as good of a liar as she thinks. She is not believable. Her story changes every time video evidence proves her wrong. I wonder how she will handle depositions with Karen’s team of lawyers having so much more discovery and evidence at their disposal.

The AG is literally representing the Speaker & Senate President in the SJC against my office & 72% of voters — but still claims she’s only defending them in court against the audit because she really does support the audit. 👀 For. the. love… Can’t make it up. #gaslighting

@ThreeClerkMonte I can't. 😭

Dirty Diller just fucked up big time. Let’s talk about the very first line of this O’Keefe v. Read filing. They open the motion with a quote: “I’m dead. I’m f****** dead. Do you have any clue what’s on the phone that they took?” Dramatic, right? There’s just one problem. That’s not what she said. On the actual recording, Karen says: ✨️ “Again? A-fucking-gain?” ✨️ Those are not interchangeable statements. “I’m dead” suggests consciousness of guilt. “Again?” suggests frustration over yet another seizure of her phone. Completely different context. Completely different tone. Attorneys are usually obsessive about quoting recordings accurately. They know better than to paraphrase when they’re asking a court for emergency relief.. especially when the quote is positioned as the emotional hook of the entire motion. And here’s what makes it more interesting: the filing cites Exhibit J as proof of that quote. When you click Exhibit J, it leads to an error page. Every other exhibit link works. The one supporting the opening quote does not. This motion hit the docket Friday. By Sunday, the exhibit backing the headline quote is inaccessible. Was it pulled? Was it corrected? Hard to say. But an attorney typically doesn’t file a motion citing an exhibit that then leads to a broken link. Which brings us to the obvious question… where did that wording come from? At best, this could be a scrivener’s error. Maybe someone relied on caption software. But when you actually listen to the audio, it is clear as day: “Again. A-fucking-gain.” 🙄 If you’re asking a judge to restrain someone’s property and you start with a shock quote (especially placing it right at the head of the filing) accuracy isn’t optional. Even with prior pleadings, I’d like to give the benefit of the doubt and call it a scrivener’s error. But when your argument depends on framing someone as panicked about what’s “on the phone,” that distinction is important. Desperate times call for desperate measures, I suppose....

This is an important & underdiscussed point! There are several simple explanations in play that would reasonably explain the Touhy dump + Farwell arrest, followed by a pause/reversal of course. For instance: •DOJ realized continuing forth in good faith would implicate too many of their own •The network of corruption was strong enough to go over the head of good faith USAO-MA efforts •Deals were made behind the scenes, many parties benefit while the public is sold out

@Dan_Donovan_17 But it’s not. It’s more of a once in a lifetime example of an AUSA doing what they’re supposed to do. And that’s the part nobody knows the answer to, yet. I believe it’s because the MA DOJ didn’t have the balls to indict Morrissey, but did recognize KR was being framed.

The FBI had the texts. They had ALL of the info, there was nothing showing anyone other than Karen Read being responsible. Do you think that they were going to FAIL TO POINT OUT this in the 3000 pages of touhy documents that were released. You pushed a lie and attacked children.

@lj1054 @kelly_steffee usatoday.com/story/news/nat… From text message exhibits displayed and read aloud during Jen McCabe’s cross-examination on May 2, 2025 (day 8 of the retrial).

@ThreeClerkMonte @kelly_steffee Hi. Where is this from? I’m not familiar with that text.

I needed a break from thinking about my own life for a bit. So I have been going thru trial motions, evidence, and call logs. Nothing better then throwing yourself back in the flames that brought you pure literal hell for last 8 mths of your life instead right? IYKYK. This has been something that has drove me crazy from the beginning. Jen McCabe's Jan 29, 2022 call log is wild. Dozens of short/fragmented calls (seconds-long, unanswered/rejected/missed) to family & friends (Coco, Kerry Roberts, Tom Beatty, Uncle Brian, Ashley's Bella's mom, husband Matt). Forensic extraction shows some calls deleted. Yes. After finding a friend dead in the snow? Most people make a handful of urgent calls (911, close family, cops) not bombard a dozen contacts with rapid-fire dials. Feels off to me still #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #justiceforjohnokeefe

@mezmerelda007 @DataDecoder11 ❌️ 🪄

Stay tuned.. the lovely @DataDecoder11 is gonna show us how she recreates this smear pattern - that also defies foreground snow! MAGIC 🪄

@mezmerelda007 Unpopular Opinion: If the feds wanted justice for OJOK, they could easily "do something" through the (many) coverups, some of which are readily shown. This tampering is a great example, well done! (imo) time to loudly petition the entire government and their (many) enablers!

Really Coleen?? You couldn't edit the reflection as well?

Today is March 1st, 2026 → it has been 6 YEARS. Still no justice. Still no accountability. @MassAGO #JustonRoot was EXECUTED—shot 31 times while unarmed, lying on the ground with nothing in his hands. Former Norfolk DA detective #MichaelProctor LIED. He told my stepmother Juston shot a valet & refused to drop a weapon. The truth can’t stay buried. #TruthMatters #JusticeForJustonRoot secure.everyaction.com/zFEo4Q28ZUmfXS…

@bruinsnut1737 @NorthKoreanPuss @GrantSmithEllis A pattern emerges, rules for thee but not for me! Dr. L shrugged it off like a boss. 2022 MA civil ruling where Judson Blair Welcher was entirely excluded from testifying: William D. Kavey and Carole J. Kavey v. Christopher G. Simonds, JEC Service Company, Inc., et al.

@NorthKoreanPuss @ThreeClerkMonte @GrantSmithEllis Station Nightclub wasn’t a Massachusetts case.

A month before Karen Read's retrial, Jessica Hyde was prohibited from testifying in a case in Maryland. She had performed testing on her own phone, which is a different model, on a different operating system, with different settings. The judge's order cited Commonwealth vs Arrington, a 2023-2024 Massachusetts case & appeal where (arguing for the CW's position) Hyde filed an amicus brief.  So did Steven Verronneau and Ian Whiffin. law.justia.com/cases/massachu…

@suspiciousauce (imo) the precedents set in how digital evidence was treated in Karen's case/trials (and elsewhere in MA) are so alarming that (in a just society) they should discredit entire industries.

@ThreeClerkMonte I recently re-read a Green affidavit, while listening to Whiffins testimony... and ooph, do I have so many questions for Mr Whiffin... (and Jessica Hyde)...

2/10/2026: Ricciuti stepped in to the Kelsey Fitzsimmons case, denying as moot the defense motion to recuse Judge Kathleen McCarthy-Neyman. He ruled: “The judge is scheduled to sit in another session during the period of the remaining pre-trial and trial of this case, and was not specially assigned to this matter, as the motion inaccurately assumes.” He did not address the merits of the bias claims. x.com/i/status/20173…

Here is the key issue I think many may have missed today: "As a result, Karp said he would ask Ricciuti to assign him to hear all matters on the case, which would put him on firmer ground to amend the conditions of release."

Imagine being so arrogant that you file in court “on behalf of” the Speaker & Senate President against the Auditor, then get to go on TV & say you’re trying to help the Audit. This is why I don’t have cable. I hear enough of this bullsh*t at the state house. Corruption. #mapoli