The Fisher Tim

@SockthedogX @MusicMelan3275 Islam has been present in Britain for hundreds of years.

@MusicMelan3275 Did he though. He criticised an extreme religion that has no place in the UK. Wasn't about skin colour. Was about culture and ideology, so tell me, how did he target brown people when islam embraces all colours?

Tommy Robinson whips up hate against brown people at his racist march before going for a curry. He should be eating flavourless unseasoned boiled ham and cabbage and leaving foreign food alone. I hope the chef spat in his food.

@gervaisclips Yes but Equality Street.

Who thinks David Brent should represent the United Kingdom in Eurovision?

@Arundaar I’d suggest the organisers fancy a jaunt down under if we ever win and host.

@TimBuch18382724 Yeah it is a bit odd, I'm not bothered by it but don't quite understand why you're in there!

Our annual Eurovision scorecard (this time in paper form 😂), without political bollocks I'd be predicting Australia to win #Eurovision2026

@thehvymetal @piersmorgan If you respond with personal insults you’ve already lost.

He’s too scared.

I commissioned these 2 special pieces when Rambo announced his retirement. Just been delivered and they look fantastic. These are available at £275 each, or £500 the pair.

@LyleShelton The Australian public overwhelmingly voted to redefine marriage. It wasn’t the Liberal party.

Women suffered while the Liberals stayed silent. Now they suddenly know what a woman is? 🤔 After years of caving to radical 🏳️‍🌈 gender ideology, the Liberals are scrambling to catch up as Australians reject the madness. But can a party that redefined marriage, ignored Sall Grover’s fight, and still houses rainbow-flag activists in its ranks really be trusted to defend women and girls? Family First's latest blog pulls no punches. 🔥 IT SHOULD NOT HAVE TAKEN SALL GROVER'S SUFFERING FOR THE LIBS TO ACT By Lyle Shelton It should not have taken the suffering of girls and women, led by Sall Grover, to get the Liberal Party to move. While Angus Taylor’s announcement today that he will restore the definition of woman to the Sex Discrimination Act if elected is welcome, it’s hard to take the Liberal Party seriously on this issue. They have sat on the sidelines for years while people like Sall Grover, Kirralie Smith, Dr Jillian Spencer and others have taken the hits. The Liberals voted for Julia Gillard’s biology-defying amendment to the SDA in 2013. Then under Malcom Turnbull, they made things worse by facilitating the redefinition of marriage, something Turnbull cites as his greatest achievement as PM. Nothing has turbocharged the march of gender fluid ideology through our schools and on to the child gender clinics more than the momentum activists gained from the redefinition of marriage. Scott Morrison and Peter Dutton both squibbed fixing the SDA, Dutton ducking for cover even as the UK High Court and the US President restored common sense in those countries. Liberal Senator Andrew Bragg has previously posted on social media his support for the biological males who demand access to girls and women’s spaces. Is there a greater misogynist in the Parliament or is he just a useful idiot for the Governor General’s charity Equality Australia? Tim Wilson is an advocate for commercial surrogacy so two men can erase the mothers of children they acquire. You can’t make this stuff up but for the Liberal party, the enemy isn’t at the gates, it’s around Angus Taylor’s shadow cabinet table. Taylor leads a party full of “moderates” (a misnomer if ever there was one) who think a woman can have a penis or that a man who has his cut off can be a woman. Taylor’s statement committing to restoring the biological definition of woman and man contains the following problematic reasoning: “Every protection they (biological men who think they are women) have remains. We are not removing a single protection from anyone.” No one, including me, wants to make life difficult for any fellow Australian, including those who identify as transgender. However, the radical LGBTQA+ political lobbyists who forced Sall Grover to the Federal Court will not accept anything less than what the full bench ruled yesterday. They see yesterday’s verdict as “protection” and to return to biological definitions of male and female, as opposed to their ideological definitions, is in their eyes to remove protections. Equality Australia will fight Taylor on this. Will he be up to it? The Liberal party’s history over the last 10 years has been to fold at the flutter of the rainbow flag. Does Taylor’s pledge to keep “every protection” mean a bloke can still rock up and get a new birth certificate by saying he is female? Where does Taylor say biological men identifying as women should go to the toilet? Because there is only one place Equality Australia believes they should go to and that is the girls’. It’s good that Taylor has shown the courage to do what no Liberal leader in the past 10 years has had the courage to do. But until the false claims about equality of the LGBTQA+ political lobby are dealt with, this will not be a settled issue. It also must be observed that if Pauline Hanson, whose party is beating the Liberals in the polls, had not been out with a response repudiating yesterday’s judgement, Taylor may well have remained mute. Again, Hanson has led, the Liberals have followed. The biological definition of woman and man can’t be properly restored in law until the natural definition of marriage is restored. The Sex Discrimination Act and the Marriage Act are a package deal. Faulty definitions in either result in injustice to women, girls and children. Faulty definitions in law will always crush freedom of speech, association and religion. The Liberals’ flirtation with redefining marriage and their failure to fix the SDA despite nine years in Government mean they have a credibility gap. It’s great the Liberals have finally worked out what a woman is. But until they also commit to fixing the definition of marriage, they cannot be taken seriously.

@OzraeliAvi Fly to France and catch a dinghy. You’ll be welcomed with open arms.

I never wanted to be in London more than I do today. Keir Starmer and Tommy Robinson might as well be co-organisers at this point… because every desperate move by Starmer has turned this into an even bigger event. Nothing boosts a rally quite like the Prime Minister trying to silence it.

@LyleShelton If they are “mainstream views” why does no one ever vote for you?

Next Wednesday I'm back in the Queensland Supreme Court after the drag queens filed fresh legal action trying to shut down my judicial review before arguments are even heard. This case has never been about me. It’s about whether ordinary Australians can question radical gender ideology without being dragged through years of legal warfare. The punishment is the process. That’s why I'm taking this fight from the courtroom to Parliament. 👇 I’m running for the NSW Parliament because Australia’s free speech crisis must end By Lyle Shelton Next Wednesday, May 20, I will again be back in the Queensland Supreme Court after the drag queens suing me filed a Section 14 application attempting to strike out my judicial review case before I can even make any arguments. After more than six years of legal proceedings over my criticism of “Drag Queen Story Time” events for children, the case has become a stark lesson in how anti-vilification laws are being weaponised against Australians who express mainstream views on gender ideology and the protection of children. That is one of the key reasons I am running for the New South Wales Legislative Council at the next state election. While I was sued in Queensland when I lived there in 2020, similar anti-free speech laws exist here in NSW. Indeed, these laws have been extended in recent years in response to antisemitism in a way that will clamp down on legitimate speech even more. If elected, I intend to fight for reforms that protect Australians from being dragged through years of costly legal warfare simply because someone claims to have been offended or hurt by political commentary. I am deeply grateful for the outstanding work of my legal team at the Human Rights Law Alliance. Without them, defending myself against this relentless litigation would have been impossible. But the truth is this problem cannot ultimately be solved by good lawyers alone. The real solution is for parliaments to repeal or radically reform laws that allow activist complainants to weaponise subjective hurt feelings in order to punish political opponents. Australians are increasingly discovering that the punishment is the process itself. Even when people eventually win, they can still lose years of their lives, enormous financial resources and emotional energy defending basic freedoms that previous generations simply took for granted. The original 2023 QCAT ruling found my comments did not amount to unlawful vilification. The drag queens appealed to another member of QCAT and re-ran their case in 2024. Then in late 2025, the QCAT Appeal Tribunal overturned key parts of that decision deciding that my speech was capable of inciting hatred, serious contempt or severe ridicule of the drag queens. Reading the decision, I saw that the Tribunal set a very low bar for what constitutes hate speech that will have serious implications for all Australians. This prompted my judicial review application to the Supreme Court. My judicial review application argues the Appeal Tribunal adopted the wrong legal test and expanded Queensland’s anti-vilification laws beyond what Parliament intended in a way that is fundamentally out of step with precedents set in other courts and in other States. This should concern every Australian, regardless of where they stand politically. If criticising drag queens as being unsafe to perform for children in public libraries can trigger six years of litigation, then nobody engaged in public debate is truly safe. The drag queens are also asking the Court to require me to pay their costs of participating in the appeal because Supreme Court proceedings operate within a normal court costs jurisdiction. This despite the fact that the Drag Queen’s lawyers are government funded and I have had to crowdfund over many years to defend this case. That underlines how serious this case has become. But their fears of paying costs could be allayed tomorrow if they dropped their legal action against me. Instead of dragging me through the courts, we could hire a hall and have a civil debate about the merits of exposing children to sexualised and gender fluid role models. What began as a blog about children and gender ideology has evolved into a major test case about freedom of communication about important societal issues within Australia. Australians should be free to peacefully express views on contested moral and political issues without fearing years of legal harassment. That is why I am taking this fight from the courtroom into the political arena. If we want to restore genuine freedom of speech in Australia, we need more than legal defences after the damage is done. We need lawmakers with the courage to repeal the bad laws that make these cases possible in the first place. media@familyfirstparty.au

@Katy_Faust @LyleShelton It didn’t and it’s not going anywhere. Gay marriage is God’s will.

Gay marriage did this.

@consv_genz @Katy_Faust So you’re suggesting surrogate babies would prefer not to have been born.

@Katy_Faust While I agree part is true, I also don't agree that a person should be stripped off his rights to marry whoever he wants.

@Fx1Jonny @frances07424235 Certainly not raped innocent women and children.

Nobody ever asked the pertinent question. What were the Palestinians supposed to after 75 years of excruciating suffering, murder, displacement and starvation at the hands of israel with zero recourse for justice??? What would you have done??!!

@jaquix173 @zimby1970 Still going on about the failed divisive voice. Australians didn’t want it. Move on.

Senator Jacinta Price emotional perfornance in the senate today as a result of death of Kamajayi Baby Girl. Maybe her tears cover her guilt over her solid campaigning against a Voice to Parliament that indigenous people caljed for? Otherwise it's pure hypocrisy. 😡

@DaRamblingMan @markmcadamtv After Arsenal

@markmcadamtv Southampton becoming the club the whole country fucking hates.

Southampton centre-back Taylor Harwood-Bellis is alleged to have made a discriminatory comment to Middlesbrough's Luke Ayling during tonight's game. Ayling is believed to have reported the comment to the ref Andrew Madley. Game was paused while he spoke to both managers.

@SteveWoosnam @PaulineHansonOz @RightDownUnder Laughing at your own jokes. Sad.

@PaulineHansonOz @RightDownUnder As close as you'll ever get to delivering a budget 🤣🤣🤣

In Canberra for the Budget being handed down tonight. Getting ready for more broken Labor promises.

@jwilla14 @PaulineHansonOz Cry harder.

@PaulineHansonOz and make sure you introduce yourself to your peers, as you haven't been there very often. You Hypocrite.

@JonesHowDareYou @zimby1970 Where is Naarm? It comes up as a spelling error.

Just saw this on insta. Police brutality in Naarm yesterday at a peaceful 'No cuts to NDIS' rally. "Vulnerable people with disability, young people and the elderly were pushed to the ground, shoved, punched and injured. Police pushed people in front of a moving tram." #springst

@thebeatles Your mother should know.

Time to show that song some love

@goodfoodgal I love anti-vaxxers.

It’s that time of year again when we ask people to let their immune system do its job. 😜

@BenHamilton1776 @DanQCarruthers @cmclymer That’s the point. He’s appalling.

@DanQCarruthers @cmclymer Yeah exactly, this isn’t a normal politician. This is a special politician. A once in a century politician.

Yesterday, Trump pointed at Rachel Scott of ABC News and said "she's a bitch" after Ms. Scott asked him about rising gas prices. It will be old news by close of business today. Once again: Trump is held to a different standard by legacy media.