Tommy Tube

40 posts

Tommy Tube

@TommyTubeOFF

Yo, I’m Tommy. Minecraft addict. Idea machine. Trend hunter⚡️ I turn chaos into content and fun into obsession. Follow me — let’s make your feed way entertainin

Thailand Katılım Mayıs 2026

20 Takip Edilen43 Takipçiler

Sabitlenmiş Tweet

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·3d

🚨 YouTube is silently destroying creators while still profiting from their work. Creators are being mass demonetized by broken AI systems and receiving copy-paste bot replies instead of real human reviews — while ads CONTINUE running on their videos every single day. Read that again: ❗ YouTube says creators are “inauthentic” ❗ But still pushes their videos ❗ Still recommends them ❗ Still places ads on them ❗ Still profits from them This is no longer only a creators’ problem. This becomes YOUR problem too. Because when creators can no longer afford editors, animation, production, artists, software, teams, and content pipelines — your favorite channels slowly disappear. No videos. No projects. No entertainment. No community. And all of this because of automated systems making decisions about people’s livelihoods. 🚨 We are starting a GLOBAL protest RIGHT NOW. We ask EVERYONE: ⚠️ Set the REPAIR avatar from this post as your profile picture on EVERY platform possible: • X / Twitter • YouTube • Instagram • Facebook • TikTok • Discord • Everywhere ⚠️ Spam hashtags everywhere possible ⚠️ Comment under YouTube’s official posts and videos exposing this problem using: #RepairYouTube #RemoveNealMohan ⚠️ Reply under celebrity posts, creator posts, viral tweets, shorts, reels, photos, comments — EVERYWHERE ⚠️ Repost this movement as hard as possible We are humans. Not numbers inside a broken algorithm. People are tired of AI systems deciding creators’ futures without transparency, explanations, or real human review. 🚨 Massive protest against broken YouTube systems starts NOW. @YouTube @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeLiaison @NealMohan @elonmusk @MrBeast @JeffBezos @KaiCenat @KSI @LoganPaul @DramaAlert @Dexerto @vidIQ @TubeBuddy @Instagram @TikTok_US @X #RepairYouTube #RemoveNealMohan #YouTube #Demonetization #SaveCreators #FixYouTube #YouTubeCreators #YouTubePartner #CreatorEconomy #SupportCreators #BrokenAI #FreeCreators #StopFalseDemonetization #HumanReview #YouTubeAI #ContentCreators #CreatorRights #YouTube

English

170

4.1K

Tommy Tube retweetledi

That YT Girl@CWORK226381·23h

April earnings🙏. I worked hard for a year to be able to earn this in a month, my sweat, my research all didn’t waste. I remember how I felt like I was doing something wrong still yet people here motivated me. Earn $24k dollars from just one channel kiaaa. Thank you ABBA 🙌🥹

English

192

1.4K

61.1K

Tommy Tube retweetledi

Wavears@WavearOfficial·13h

👾YouTube support in 2026: ❌ Explain the actual issue ❌ Tell creators what to fix ❌ Give transparent human reviews ✅ Copy-paste reply ✅ “Wait 90 days” ✅ Ignore small creators Meanwhile creators spend YEARS building channels just to get treated like disposable numbers. @TeamYouTube

English

587

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·8h

@vixiostwt 👋😉

QME

115

vixios@vixiostwt·8h

@TommyTubeOFF This is crazy ragebait bro, you never mentioned it was removed then said I should've known from looking at the post (Which doesn't mention it was removed)

English

140

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·1d

🚨 So let me get this straight, YouTube… A creator can run 8 monetized channels with nearly identical thumbnails, repetitive ideas, recycled formats, AI-generated Shorts, and even upload 2–3 hour compilation videos made from content already uploaded on his OTHER channels… …and that’s apparently completely fine? But smaller creators with original editing, animation, production, commentary, and unique workflows get flagged for “reused” or “inauthentic” content by AI systems? How does this make any sense? I recently looked at the channels of PrestonPlayz: • Nearly identical thumbnails across videos • Same facial expressions reused constantly • Highly repetitive content loops • AI-generated Shorts content • Multiple compilation channels reposting already uploaded content from his other channels Again — this is NOT hate toward the creator. This is about YouTube’s completely inconsistent enforcement. Because right now it feels like: ➡️ Big creators are protected ➡️ Smaller creators get mass demonetized automatically ➡️ AI systems punish some channels while ignoring others doing far more obvious content recycling So what exactly are the rules anymore? YouTube keeps telling creators to make “original” and “authentic” content. But when creators actually spend time making original productions, editing, animation, storytelling, and unique content pipelines — they still get flagged. Meanwhile giant repetitive content farms continue operating without problems. YouTube, are you absolutely sure your systems are working correctly? @YouTube @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeLiaison @NealMohan @DramaAlert @Dexerto @vidIQ @TubeBuddy @MrBeast @KSI @KaiCenat @LoganPaul #RepairYouTube #RemoveNealMohan #YouTube #Demonetization #FixYouTube #CreatorRights #HumanReview #YouTubeAI

English

211

35K

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·8h

Bro, why should I explain that to you? You have eyes and hands — you can look at the post yourself. And please don’t message me anymore. I can already see the type of person you are. It feels like you’re just trying to bait reactions and emotions, and that’s not appropriate here. I genuinely wish you a good day, and say hi to your mom for me. I’m glad you’re now able to support her👋😉

English

148

vixios@vixiostwt·8h

@TommyTubeOFF This is the first time youve told me its been removed, also you was posting dogshit

English

166

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·8h

I’m telling you again, my channel was REMOVED, dude. And honestly, I can already tell this conversation is pointless because you clearly sound like one of those “AI = bad” people. I never said my channel was fully created or operated by AI generation. We live in 2026. You’re literally typing this on a platform that has Grok AI integrated into it. Acting like creators shouldn’t use AI tools at all is just unrealistic. And once again: I am NOT saying fully AI-generated content with zero human involvement should automatically be monetized. I’m saying AI can be used as a TOOL to help creators make content — not replace the creator entirely. There’s a huge difference between those two things. And yes, I use AI to help structure text sometimes. We’re literally sitting on Twitter/X with Grok built into the platform. Wake up😂😂😅

English

198

vixios@vixiostwt·8h

@TommyTubeOFF i mean having an ai bio and replying to me with ai doesnt strike me with confidence, just send ur channel if ur so confident abt it

English

193

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·9h

Bro, you don’t even know what kind of content was on my channel, yet you’re already accusing me of making “AI-generated spam.” I personally appeared on my channel. My face, my personality, my presence were part of the content — and YouTube still labeled my channel as “fraud.” Does that seriously sound normal to you? Just look at what’s happening around the platform right now and you’ll understand the situation yourself. Take the rose-colored glasses off for a second.

English

751

vixios@vixiostwt·9h

@TommyTubeOFF This is NOT the same as the ai channels yall get demed for

English

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·9h

That’s exactly what I was talking about—this is a global problem, and YouTube needs to change the rules governing its broken AI before content creators find a new alternative platform!

JJ and Mikey Toons@MLeonidych63142

🚨 YouTube, explain to me how this makes any sense. I have a Minecraft channel with original videos, my own universe, recurring characters, custom 3D and 2D models, storylines, editing, voice work, and a real audience that genuinely connected with the project. The channel was earning around $8,000/month until YouTube suddenly disabled monetization for “inauthentic,” “repetitive,” or “mass-produced” content. Channel URL: youtube.com/channel/UCnLKd… But here’s the question nobody at YouTube wants to answer: Why is YouTube STILL running ads on my videos if the content supposedly violates monetization standards? I literally showed proof in my video while scrolling through my own Shorts feed - ads are still appearing on my content. And this is not only happening on Shorts. Many creators report the exact same thing happening on long-form videos too. So let me understand this correctly: My content is considered “non-authentic” for ME to earn from… …but it is still authentic enough for YouTube to continue profiting from it? If the content is truly repetitive, mass-produced, low-quality, or violates monetization policies - then why are ads still being served on it? Please answer that question directly. And another thing: Why do many larger channels with extremely similar entertainment-focused formats remain monetized without issues? I’m not talking about copying content. I’m talking about the STYLE of entertainment: • animation-based storytelling • fictional recurring characters • kid-focused entertainment • shared universes • repeatable formats • similar content structures across videos That is literally how entertainment content works on YouTube. People watch creators because they enjoy the personalities, the world, the characters, and the format. Nobody watches entertainment expecting a scientific lecture or educational documentary every upload. People watch creators like MrBeast, PrestonPlayz, Kai Cenat, KSI, Logan Paul, and countless others simply to relax, laugh, escape stress, and enjoy the content. Some creators even run multiple channels with highly repetitive structures or compilation-style formats for years without any monetization issues. So where exactly is the line? Because right now the enforcement looks completely inconsistent and impossible for creators to understand. I recently showed another monetized channel with a very similar entertainment-driven format. This is NOT hate toward that creator at all. In fact, I respect the production quality and the work behind it. But when I compare my channel to theirs, I genuinely do not understand why their channel is allowed to exist and monetize normally while mine gets removed from the Partner Program. That’s what feels unfair. Creators deserve transparent rules, real human reviews, and consistent enforcement - not automated decisions that destroy years of work overnight while ads continue running on the same videos. @YouTube @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeLiaison @NealMohan @MrBeast @Dexerto @vidIQ @TubeBuddy @TikTok_US @Instagram @X #RepairYouTube #YouTube #Demonetization #FixYouTube #CreatorRights #HumanReview #YouTubeAI #SupportCreators #SaveCreators #BrokenAI #YouTubePartner #CreatorEconomy

English

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·10h

Bro, if I wanted only “educational” or supposedly “original” content, I would just open Wikipedia instead of YouTube. People go to YouTube to relax, have fun, follow creators they like, watch someone’s life, enjoy a creator’s series, gameplay, reactions, stories, or simply escape from everyday stress for a while. YouTube was built around entertainment and personalities. That’s literally why most people use the platform. And by your logic, think about this for a second: If someone has enough time and resources to run EIGHT channels at the same time, doesn’t that already suggest the content is probably very easy, repetitive, and template-based to produce? Because truly complex and high-effort content usually doesn’t allow one person to manage that many channels consistently. No offense, bro, but there are contradictions in your arguments too. Creators get demonetized for “repetitive thumbnails” and “reused patterns,” yet we clearly see channels where 30–40% of thumbnails look almost identical. And according to your logic, every video now supposedly needs to be “educational” or highly unique under YouTube’s new standards. But these channels are pure entertainment content. Logically, entertainment content will naturally repeat formats, ideas, faces, and structures sometimes. But the AI doesn’t care whether content is educational or entertaining. It only sees patterns, repetition, similarities — and then triggers moderation. And okay, let’s assume for a moment that this creator has a massive production team helping manage all eight channels. Then how exactly is an average person supposed to start a YouTube career today without huge financial resources, a production team, editors, designers, managers, and a full studio behind them? Where’s the logic in that? I’m not trying to offend you, bro. I’m just pointing out how absurd this entire situation has become, because the platform rules themselves are absurdly vague. That’s the real problem. There’s no actual logic anymore when the rules are written so broadly that almost any type of content or channel could technically fall under them. And until creators finally receive real specifics instead of generalized policies that apply to literally everything, these situations will keep happening.

Mario Joos@MarioJoos

Let’s do a comprehensive breakdown of a typical post about this “inauthentic” content “issue" on YouTube. Yesterday, I found this post complaining and not really understanding the difference between scaling practices and crossing the line in terms of what counts as inauthentic content. The OP (original poster) complains that people like Preston, who has over 30 million subscribers, are allowed to have thumbnails that look alike, ideas that are alike, and compilation videos that group multiple of his own videos together. In the meantime, the same OP says that smaller creators with original editing, animations, production, and unique workflows are getting flagged for inauthentic content. Here’s what’s actually going on. OP is completely unaware, as per usual, of the actual problem here. What Preston is doing is using HIS OWN IP and repurposing this IP to cater to different audience needs. A compilation is better for when you just want to put something on in the background while cooking, repurposed shorts are better for quick consumption, and about the “similar ideas,” well, he’s pointing at Preston reusing similar expressions in his thumbnails. What most of these “small creators” are doing isn’t repurposing their own IP. They’re simply taking another person’s footage (such as IShowSpeed, television shows, etc.), recutting it and adding some subtitles to it. Sometimes they’ll add non-transformative voiceovers, thinking that this suddenly puts their content under fair use. Here’s a lesson. Fair use doesn’t just look at the effort you put into something. Minimal edits, content that acts as a replacement for the original, and straight reposts do not fall under this legal framework. What matters is the amount of footage you use and the substantiality of it. The question that these “creators” need to ask is the following: would people watch your version instead of the original? Would your work damage potential licensing opportunities for the original creator? But let’s not stop there, because I’m tired of these people tagging YouTube, other creators, and simply wasting time that should go toward genuine mistakes on YouTube’s end. In OP’s post, he complains about YouTube’s inconsistent enforcement, claiming that big creators are protected and smaller creators aren’t. That’s straight-up selection bias. You’re looking at a subgroup of small creators while there are plenty of 1M+ subscriber channels getting hit by the same rules. So what are the rules? (As the OP doesn’t seem too sure about them anymore.) Simple, create your own IP that doesn’t rely heavily on the IP of others who spend time, money, and effort creating their content. If YouTube were to continue rewarding unoriginal work, it wouldn’t just be demotivating for genuine creators to keep creating content, it would genuinely hurt their ability to do so, as other people would be generating money at the expense of their own effort. P.S. Stop tagging me with your channels. I’m not YouTube support, and I’m very much on the side of YouTube on this one, with a few exceptions where the demonetization was an actual mistake.

English

140

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·11h

Bro, then tell me right now what exactly I — and all other creators — should change in our content, and we’ll gladly follow those rules. Your comment honestly sounds ridiculous, because if you’re far from YouTube, then that explains it. But if you actually understand the platform, then you know YouTube’s rules are extremely vague right now. When you get demonetized or receive a strike, you usually don’t even get a clear explanation of what exact video or action caused it. The rules are written so broadly that almost every channel could technically fall under them: MrBeast, T-Series, PewDiePie, news channels, sports channels, gaming channels, vlog channels, reaction channels, history channels — literally everyone. So if you really think you fully understand the system, then okay — explain exactly what rules are being violated and what creators should change. And if your explanation actually makes sense, I’ll publicly apologize to you. 🤷‍♂️

OMMT AI Picture Studios@OpenKultur1

@TommyTubeOFF wo ist der Sinn Youtube ändern zu wollen? ist doch viel logischer zu alternaiven zu gehen! Youtube wird ihr langfristiges Ziel nicht aufgeben und des ist nun mal "KIwood"

English

396

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·13h

Yeah bro, you’re completely right. This is usually called an AdSense/IP association ban or linked-channel ban. According to YouTube’s rules, if you have one blocked or demonetized channel connected to your device, AdSense, IP, or account ecosystem, the system can affect all your other channels too — even personal channels that were only used for watching YouTube as a viewer and not as a creator. But in this case, we are clearly seeing the opposite happen. 🤷‍♂️

English

1.3K

Supergirl & Superman (AI Art)@supergirlmaid·13h

@TommyTubeOFF @TommyTubeOFF I heard someone today say that if 1 channel is punished (demonetized, for example) and another is used, both are deactivated and the account banned for good (for circumventing the punishment)...

English

1.4K

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·13h

🚨 YouTube, explain how this is fair. Channels from smaller creators get demonetized even for words like “death” in titles, while massive channels continue operating with thumbnails containing blood, violence themes, suggestive imagery, and shocking content — without any problems. Let’s talk about Aphmau. Her channel continues being fully monetized even though many thumbnails and video formats would instantly get smaller creators flagged for “inauthentic content” or policy-related issues. And the most important part: There are MANY repetitive videos, repetitive thumbnail styles, and repeated content formulas across the channel that AI moderation systems would normally consider “reused” or “inauthentic” for smaller creators. Yet somehow the moderation systems seem to completely ignore it. Again — this is NOT hate toward the creator. This is about inconsistent enforcement and double standards. Because right now creators are seeing: ➡️ Smaller channels punished instantly ➡️ Bigger creators protected ➡️ AI moderation aggressively targeting some creators while seemingly ignoring others with highly repetitive content structures At this point, many creators are starting to wonder: Do large creators have some kind of protection label that prevents AI systems from applying the same moderation rules to them? Because from the outside, this no longer looks fair. How can YouTube claim fairness when the rules clearly do not apply equally to everyone? Many creators I personally know were demonetized simply for using certain words in titles. But here we see: • Violence references directly in thumbnails • Words related to death in titles • Suggestive/shocking imagery • Highly repetitive thumbnails and content structures • Recycled video formulas repeated over and over again YouTube, is this really what you consider a fair system? Or do large creators simply get different treatment? 🚨 And to everyone supporting this movement: Join our protest. Set the protest avatar as your profile picture across all social media platforms. We are together. We are a team. And together we can force attention onto this broken system. @YouTube @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeLiaison @NealMohan @DramaAlert @Dexerto @vidIQ @TubeBuddy @MrBeast @KSI @KaiCenat @LoganPaul #RepairYouTube #RemoveNealMohan #YouTube #FixYouTube #Demonetization #CreatorRights #HumanReview #YouTubeAI #SupportCreator

English

688

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·1d

ZXX

2.3K

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·1d

ZXX

2.5K

Tommy Tube retweetledi

EXPERT@expertqq·23 Nis

YouTube is breaking insane revenue records for 2025 - $60 billion.. But instead of making creators lives easier or rolling out useful updates, they're leaving the platform to a broken AI moderation system, turning our lives into a nightmare. This "Inauthentic Content" wave must stop.

English

5.2K

Tommy Tube retweetledi

Mineology@MineologyYT·1d

Day 1 of YouTube under Neal Mohan’s leadership doing nothing to stop the mass takedowns and demonetizations of honest creators' channels. Sign the Petition! c.org/MhGyKbrThJ #RepairYouTube @TeamYouTube

Neal Mohan@nealmohan

Over the last month, our @youtube team shipped these products and features for our viewers and @youtubecreators: 🪟Fully custom multiview on @YouTubeTV ⏳Countdown stickers for mobile live streamers 🖼️Picture-in-Picture for non-music content globally 🔍Ask YouTube, a new way for Premium subscribers to search on YouTube 🛍️Expanded shopping auto-tagging across APAC 🔊Voice Boost for amplifying vocals and reducing background sounds 👑Experience Points (XP) for watch time and Super Chat replies during vertical live streams 👨‍👩‍👧 Expanded parental controls, including an industry-first Shorts timer 🎁Gifts on horizontal livestreams on mobile 🤗Gifts in 🇨🇦🇰🇷🇮🇩🇹🇭🇦🇺🇳🇿 🕹️Select games (Playables) on mobile vertical livestreams 🎶The entire Shorts Audio library in our YouTube Create app 🤝Streaming in both vertical and horizontal formats at the same time ✋Automatic ad holdbacks when live chat engagement is at its peak 🌏Premium Lite in 15 new countries around the world 🕵️Automated likeness detection technology for the entertainment industry 📺Ask on TV 🔃Reimagine (a new remixing capability) and Add Object in Shorts

English

221

Tommy Tube@TommyTubeOFF·1d

@nealmohan @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeTV #RepairYouTube

QME

140

Neal Mohan@nealmohan·1d

English

212

355

385.6K

Tommy Tube retweetledi

Anime Versus@AnimeVersus_X·2d

YOUTUBE'S NEW WEAPON JUST DELETED ANOTHER BIG CHANNEL 💀 @spunkyinsaan20 LOST 465K subs overnight, BECAUSE someone gave him FAKE copyright strikes 🥀 NO review, NO warning, INSTANT termination! So, THIS IS the END of Small Creators?! Real talk: Is it time to LEAVE YouTube?

English

118

175

591

21.3K

Tommy Tube retweetledi

Critical Analytical Shiv@CriticsAnalysis·7 Ara

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) (INDIA) about one-sided mass account termination by YouTube. #YouTubeAIWrongedCreators forms.gle/Ny1Xe1DyvuXorR…

English

1.7K

Tommy Tube retweetledi

Continuity Channels@CChannels17873·19 Nis

Today marks the day that my channel has been wrongly terminated for 6 months. My voice has been ignored for months now. I have been building my channel and had over 1,000 subscribers before I got wrongly terminated on October 18, 2025. The reason was that YouTube claimed that I had "violated" their circumvention policy despite the fact that I never had another channel before which shows that couldn't have violated their policy. This was my only channel and it got wrongly terminated. I just need help getting my message out. Please YouTube, I kindly ask for you to look into my wrongful termination.

English

7.2K

Keşfet

@TeamYouTube @vixiostwt @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeLiaison @NealMohan @DramaAlert @Dexerto