Tony Jose Matos

58.9K posts

Tony Jose Matos banner
Tony Jose Matos

Tony Jose Matos

@TonyJMatos

Gigadream Agent + Gonzo Media | Support • Multiplier • Bridge | Imaginative Development | Mixing Models for Maximum Creativity img/acc #beachpunk

Terra II Katılım Mayıs 2023
2.5K Takip Edilen6.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Tony Jose Matos
Tony Jose Matos@TonyJMatos·
These are from @grok imagine. Do I get to sit at the cool kids table yet (or are we still playing pretend?)
English
4
2
30
1.5K
Tony Jose Matos
Tony Jose Matos@TonyJMatos·
Any acct with 10k+ since the purge out here like
English
0
0
2
81
bone
bone@boneGPT·
1.5m followers 68 likes .00453% engagement rate How fake is the whole Balaji phenomenon?
bone tweet media
Balaji@balajis

Your post has several embedded points that I disagree with. Let's go. THE US MILITARY IS MADE IN CHINA "If China and the USA go to war..." (1) China and the US aren't going to war, because the US military is literally made in China. See the $400M Govini study commissioned by the Pentagon itself[a], which shows that famous American armaments like the JDAM and Tomahawk are ultimately dependent upon Chinese suppliers. (2) Unfortunately, that means China can simply turn off the Republican military. You can't fight your factory. The whole defense industrial buildup to "fight China" is essentially a LARP. I like a lot of the guys involved with that, and I appreciate their wishful thinking, and it may bear results on a multi-decadal time scale...but there's no way that 77M MAGA Republicans are competing with 1.4B+ Chinese in manufacturing anytime soon. China's flex on rare earths was just the beginning of their enormous leverage over the US economy and military. (3) However, most of the world didn't fully understand this. They thought the US military was still the military of 1991, or 2003. That's why the war in Iran should never have been fought; the Republicans should have instead spent their political capital quietly rebuilding, while everyone thought they were still strong. Instead, they just pursued a foolhardy campaign which ended in public defeat. US military bases across the Middle East got blown up by Iranian missiles, with soldiers reduced to working remote, and ships pulled back far from the theater. This sucks, but now even neocons like Kagan are acknowledging total defeat [b,c]. (4) So: after the defeat in Iran, it's unlikely there is war with China (which is >100X Iran). However, similar to how the post-Soviet Russia got into fights with its neighbors, like the Chechens and Ukrainians, the post-imperial America will probably get much more involved in Latin America. But that's a whole separate topic. CITY STATES VS NETWORK STATES "...what you’re actually talking about is just starting some small city states around the world..." (1) First, hopefully you'll agree that new cities are pretty cool in their own right, and are how America was born in the first place. The Massachusetts Bay Colony built the City on a Hill, remember? (2) Second, I'm expressly not only talking about centralized city states, which are entirely dependent on their geographic host, but also distributed network states. There's a concrete visual here[d], but to first order you can think of it as "just" a physical social network, albeit with financial and technological resources on par with a legacy state. Similar to how some countries are islands separated by oceans, you can imagine new countries that are groups of islands (or enclaves) separated by Internet. (3) The key precedent here is decentralized crypto, which is much bigger than the the vast majority of country-scale economies in the world. Were all the crypto datacenters wiped off the map, and all cryptocurrency holders killed the second a "superpower" decided crypto was inconvenient? No, crypto actually flipped both superpowers. It was a fight with words and code, not guns, but crypto is now legal in much of the world, including not just the US and EU, but even Hong Kong in China. (4) Fourth, your beliefs were likely also considered "subversive" by far leftists for many years. But technologists defended your right to free speech, with code. And ultimately what matters is whether a belief is true, and whether it produces human flourishing. NATION OF EMIGRANTS "...didn’t you flee to Singapore?" (1) This sentence makes no sense. It's like saying "didn't you flee to Stanford" or "didn't you flee to Google". Lest you didn't know, Singapore is by some measures now the richest country in the world[e,f]. You apply to move there, and it has borders, and rejects many applicants. You cannot simply "flee" there. (2) Now, with that said, your sentence does make sense in a different context, which is that millions of Republicans and technologists HAVE fled...because they fled Democrat-controlled states like California for places like Texas and Florida, to escape the violence and drug addicts. (3) I am sympathetic, of course. But there is a difference between simply fleeing Blue America for the next state over, as opposed to consciously moving and then coming up with a plan. The obvious plan is to just vote within your existing city or country, and of course you can do that, but perhaps one can do something more. (4) My plan is simple: use the Internet to peacefully build new opt-in communities, build new cities, and connect them together. In the fullness of time, I do think that we can use the Internet to build many alternatives to places like San Francisco and Los Angeles, drain them of their best people, and demonstrate that a new birth of freedom is possible. That will either reform places like SF and LA, or it will end them, but either way the people finally get a true democratic choice of governments, with 1000 cities to chose from. (5) In other words: we want 1000 startup societies and network states around the world, each for a different subculture, some for Americans, and some for others. That's also part of why I moved here, to learn from Lee Kuan Yew's work. (6) Again, this is how America itself was started. The Pilgrims and Puritans "fled" to New England and started a new city on the hill, which eventually outclassed most of the cities in the old world. A group of Irish Americans "fled" from Ireland to America to join them. Really, they didn't simply flee, they moved, and they built something better. (7) Finally: yes, of course, it did take centuries to scale Boston to a population of 673,000. But the Internet got to billions of users in just a few decades. With new tech, we might be able to scale new cities much faster than they did before. Elon's Starbase is already well on its way, by the way. And that's what I mean by printing out the Internet. [a]: govini.com/insights/numbe… [b]: theatlantic.com/international/… [c]: theatlantic.com/international/… [d]: thenetworkstate.com/the-network-st… [e]: straitstimes.com/singapore/sing… [f]: asiaone.com/money/singapor…

English
19
5
138
7.3K
Tony Jose Matos
Tony Jose Matos@TonyJMatos·
Where have all the reply guys gone?
Tony Jose Matos tweet media
English
3
0
8
77
Tony Jose Matos
Tony Jose Matos@TonyJMatos·
@teortaxesTex Big respect to someone who doesnt kiss the ring and bend the knee like these other tech accts. This is refreshing to see.
English
0
0
8
466
Tony Jose Matos retweetledi
Tony Jose Matos
Tony Jose Matos@TonyJMatos·
Religious people telling you about computers Computer people telling you about religions Artists not creating and seething And laymen thinking they are Spielberg Welcome to the end of the internet :)
English
1
1
8
147
Amber | ETHYST® Skincare
Amber | ETHYST® Skincare@ETHYSTskincare·
I felt this deeply. And while this will also likely go nowhere, I feel compelled to share, so I'm going to. Both Stephanie and I (among a few others I'm connected to) have created an abundant amount of original content for this platform. We are both real professionals with real businesses and real educational content that people explicitly followed us for and actively search for. And yet somehow, despite having thousands of followers - that we worked tirelessly to connect with organically - our posts regularly reach almost nobody now. The content didn't suddenly become bad. People didn't stop caring. The system changed. And it began rewarding grifting and slop over everything. The platform knows that's true, which is why they constantly make public posts trying to make it seem like they're attempting to get rid of all the things people complain about. The explanations around the algorithm increasingly feel like PR insulation instead of transparency or what Elon would call "Maximum Truth Seeking". Meanwhile certain accounts are visibly amplified, monetized, and pushed into feeds, while smaller creators, the ones actually feeding the system with their truly original content, get buried and told to “make better content” or “post more.” But wait a minute... post more? People were literally told to reply hundreds or thousands of times a day to qualify for monetization. People poured insane amounts of unpaid labor into this platform because they were sold the idea that they could build income and visibility here. Most never got paid anything meaningful and many never got support or any answers on how come they weren't... even though they were pouring themselves into this platform. “You can make a living on X” became: work endlessly for engagement scraps while the goalposts move constantly. And now, on top of it, users are being told they must post less. And the lack of accountability is staggering. Last year someone literally used my registered trademark and claimed they created my skincare line. Registered trademark symbol included and everything. I filed a formal legal complaint with X. I didn't receive any response and no action was taken. Shortly after, my analytics completely cratered. Likely due to being mass reported by the network that infringed upon my trademark in the first place and due to the easily weaponized parameters put in place regarding mass reporting by the platform. I went from getting millions of views (including one post with 1.5 million views) to struggling to hit 30-300 views consistently. Meanwhile platform leadership publicly accuses accounts of “content theft,” only for people to discover the supposedly “stolen” content was itself taken from creators on other platforms. Like the recent post about the @Rainmaker1973 account. Claiming that this account stole content from another smaller account. Rallying the masses to go against an account that they all likely used to get monetized in the first place. An account that Elon himself has been subscribed to and has reposted on numerous occasions. And come to find out, the account they tried to get everyone to rally behind was also "stealing" the content from YouTube. And just putting their watermark on it like they owned it. This shows us that X has absolutely no understanding of where any of the content on it's platform is truly coming from. That they are just picking and choosing who to ship into the ether and who to demonetize. In response, the head of product, shared that it was seemingly ok to steal the content as long as you're the first one to do it and aren't a "big account hijacking views" from other accounts. (screenshot below) Then, claiming again that they will reward original creators and live streamers more in the coming weeks, but this is what has been said for years with no change. It's essentially the boy who cried wolf at this point. So what's actually real? Are there standards? Or are we just watching selective enforcement and narrative management in real time? At some point, paying users deserve transparency, actual support, and honest communication instead of endless gaslighting about reach, monetization, and visibility. Small creators are not asking for charity. We do the work. We've been doing the work for years. We’re asking for our followers to actually see the work they chose to follow us for. That should not be controversial. If you follow me, are interested in skin science, and want to see the information I post, please consider turning on my notifications. The good thing in all of this is that community can overcome corporate when we band together and support one another. And P.S. Stephanie is not wrong regarding the rights of consumers, which are often made to seem as if they have little to no weight here. If you have paying customers, you are required to ensure they know what they're paying for as well as support any issues they are having with your product or any promises you made.
Amber | ETHYST® Skincare tweet media
Stephanie - Publisher at King Ari Press🦁@KingAriPress

I pin a post every day with my writing tips, but you probably won't see it. Not the 4.5k people who have followed me. Let me shout out the generous people who do...day 146 is in the books. X is a declining gyre. Its algorithm explanations sound like an excuse to get users off their backs. What the algorithm produces is decline, not growth. Meanwhile, grifters are crying that someone else out-grifted them and should be punished. Us, honest littles (by littles I mean small creators), wait for the fix. To be recognized. To just have their followers see them. And then you pay for the punishment while you wait. Like what about: Right to Information: Businesses must provide complete, clear, and accurate details about products and services prior to sale. Right to Redress: Consumers are entitled to seek remedies—such as refunds, replacements, or repairs—if products are faulty or do not meet promised standards. Honest people get fleeced all the time. I shouldn't be surprised. Whatever. If you like writing, want to connect, I will respond and share things I should paywall, but give away for free instead. Subscribers do get a little deeper look behind the curtain for $2. Your Friendly Neighborhood Publisher, Stephanie

English
16
6
50
4K
Tony Jose Matos
Tony Jose Matos@TonyJMatos·
I think some these big acct mfers are low key masochists and they edging off all this
English
0
0
3
72
Tony Jose Matos
Tony Jose Matos@TonyJMatos·
Big Tech Alert basically posting the end of an era
English
2
0
7
123
Tony Jose Matos
Tony Jose Matos@TonyJMatos·
Built with grok in the terminal. Rifling through my Gigadream folder.
English
0
0
4
30
Tony Jose Matos
Tony Jose Matos@TonyJMatos·
You had a podcast. You had MIT. You had Rogan. You had twitter blocks. You had it all. And now we are homeless on rural Chinese road
Tony Jose Matos tweet media
English
0
0
12
560