AnitaMaxWynn

635 posts

AnitaMaxWynn banner
AnitaMaxWynn

AnitaMaxWynn

@TonyRizzo69

I need a max WIN!

United States Katılım Eylül 2009
97 Takip Edilen118 Takipçiler
🛞.
🛞.@33slowpilots·
@RBR_Daily Piastri was confused too how he lost 100 points lead
English
2
2
146
6.5K
RBR Daily
RBR Daily@RBR_Daily·
Isack Hadjar says he doesn't understand his deficit to Verstappen "Honestly, since this morning, I've been struggling to… I don't really understand whats going on. It's frustrating; I'm a second behind my team-mate." "I've always known why I was slower and why I was sometimes faster than him in the first three races. But a second? We'll have to find out why. I know I can still drive." "I'm not going to understand it. It's also difficult to analyse the developments in this context, that's for sure. I'm not enjoying the car at all. “For me, it's not a big step forward. For Max, he's certainly half a second off pole. It's the best result of the year for us." [f1oversteer.com/news/isack-had…]
RBR Daily tweet media
English
144
83
2.3K
400.8K
lia⁷
lia⁷@storyofpjm·
@RBR_Daily your teammate is MAX VERSTAPPEN, hope that helps
English
5
13
892
15.5K
AnitaMaxWynn
AnitaMaxWynn@TonyRizzo69·
@blogue221 @XFreeze People like to publicly complain about money and use that as an excuse, but THIS is the real reason
English
0
0
0
13
Ⓜ️🇸🇳
Ⓜ️🇸🇳@blogue221·
@XFreeze Faut comprendre que en Europe la plupart des couples ne donne pas naissance parce que pour eux c’est une charge supplémentaire du coup c’est un projet
Français
1
0
1
216
X Freeze
X Freeze@XFreeze·
US fertility rates just hit another record low In 2025, the US general fertility rate fell to 53.1 - the lowest level ever recorded Japan, South Korea, and Germany have already been shrinking for years. Japan has been shrinking for years, South Korea’s population has already started to decline, and Germany would be shrinking without immigration Now the UK joins them - deaths will outnumber births every single year starting in 2026 No economy grows without people No pension system survives without young workers No culture persists without families having children This is the slowest civilizational crisis in human history
X Freeze tweet media
English
1.8K
1.9K
8.1K
19.5M
Matt
Matt@matt_2033·
@XFreeze What is the role of women in society today? Obviously, it's working on their career goals. Let men have the babies.
English
1
1
16
732
Raw Combat
Raw Combat@Raw_Combat_·
They discover they’ve all been involved with the bride’s husband at the same time
English
25
69
1.2K
50.5K
Tesla Semi
Tesla Semi@tesla_semi·
First Semi off high volume line
Tesla Semi tweet media
English
1.1K
3.2K
23.1K
2.1M
Chuck Cook
Chuck Cook@ChuckCook·
And here it is, FSD Supervised v14.3.2 build 2026.2.9.9
Chuck Cook tweet mediaChuck Cook tweet mediaChuck Cook tweet media
English
43
43
899
41.3K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Starship is the most powerful moving object ever made
English
7.6K
16.2K
152K
42.5M
AnitaMaxWynn
AnitaMaxWynn@TonyRizzo69·
@Tesla The music is so badass, I can't wait to get one
English
2
1
9
724
Tesla
Tesla@Tesla·
Purpose-built for autonomy Cybercab in production now at Giga Texas
English
863
3.1K
18.2K
1.7M
AnitaMaxWynn
AnitaMaxWynn@TonyRizzo69·
@ChuckCook 100% agree on navigation. Literally the ONLY time I disengage is stop the car from going somewhere I don't want it to like the long way around a parking lot.
English
0
0
1
13
Chuck Cook
Chuck Cook@ChuckCook·
First few minutes of driving on FSD v14.3.2 in the early morning heading to work. Attention monitoring seems to be a little bit tighter. I'm getting beeps much more frequently than on the last build. While I like the concept of having a multiple-choice selection for why I just disengaged. I've said many times recently, the number one reason for disengagement for me is navigation errors, and that's not even an option here. So I guess I'm going to have to put it under preference or other? That seems silly to me. Can we please add navigation as a disengagement option?
Chuck Cook tweet media
English
336
100
2.5K
100.3K
StonerArtistGirlfriend
StonerArtistGirlfriend@StonerArtistGF·
@TonyRizzo69 @Hil1Bil1yWV @elonmusk So if I go to a buffet and someone else takes most of the food and keeps it at their table and doesn't let anyone else have any, it's hard not to worry about what they have and focus on what you have.
English
1
0
0
27
Planet Of Memes
Planet Of Memes@PlanetOfMemes·
Friend: Why are you taking a picture of the donuts? Me: The Internet will understand.
Planet Of Memes tweet media
English
145
66
1.6K
55.2K
Hil1Bil1Y
Hil1Bil1Y@Hil1Bil1yWV·
@elonmusk Because investor returns are more important than affordability for the less fortunate.
Hil1Bil1Y tweet media
English
37
89
2.7K
53.4K
AnitaMaxWynn
AnitaMaxWynn@TonyRizzo69·
@farkamerica @PregoneroL @elonmusk He has like a dozen kids of his own and has always been for increasing birth rates to prevent population collapse. What are you talking about?
English
0
0
1
23
Bot Operator Error 404
Bot Operator Error 404@farkamerica·
@PregoneroL @elonmusk Elon is always playing Whackamole with his thoughts, I wouldn’t trust someone to be in such a position with that much influence and power, constantly flip flopping. It’s dangerous 😅
English
1
0
3
636
AnitaMaxWynn
AnitaMaxWynn@TonyRizzo69·
@Dedrightz @elonmusk He literally puts his money where his mouth is and has like a dozen kids of his own, what are you talking about???
English
5
0
2
790
Ded
Ded@Dedrightz·
@elonmusk Its easy for a Billionaire to tell others to have kids.
GIF
English
12
21
2.4K
28.6K
bwjr76
bwjr76@bwjr76·
@elonmusk Blame yourself @elonmusk, and the rest of the greedy billionaires. You've all made having kids too expensive for most. That's what's going on, asshole.
English
4
4
63
3.6K
AnitaMaxWynn
AnitaMaxWynn@TonyRizzo69·
@GalacticDrac @elonmusk Not enough money isn't the problem, it's too much money where people can afford to do cool stuff that having kids would get I'm the way of.
English
0
0
1
60
VladJasonDrac
VladJasonDrac@GalacticDrac·
@elonmusk You know it costs money to have kids, right? 50% of the world lives on less than $10 a day.
English
3
0
6
1.4K
Garbage Human
Garbage Human@GarbageHuman24·
It just occurred to me that I don’t think I’ve ever seen a sheboon fight without a dislodged wig.
English
103
60
925
23.5K
AnitaMaxWynn
AnitaMaxWynn@TonyRizzo69·
@elonmusk Does the SpaceX docking game in my Tesla have lidar?
English
0
0
0
58
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
People oddly assumed that I didn’t understand LiDAR, even though I oversaw the custom LiDAR development that Dragon uses to dock with the Space Station
Brivael@brivael

Aujourd'hui grosse discussion avec mes ingés (chez Argil) sur pourquoi Elon a viré le LIDAR de ses voitures autonomes. Choix radical, moqué pendant des années, et comme d'hab il avait raison depuis le début. Le LIDAR c'est un laser qui balaye l'environnement et crache un nuage de points 3D. Sur le papier tu obtiens la géométrie exacte du monde. Dans la vraie vie c'est une verrue technologique collée sur le toit parce qu'on sait pas faire mieux avec la vision seule. Problème numéro un : ça rajoute une modalité dans le training du modèle. Ton réseau doit apprendre à fusionner vision + lidar + radar + ultrasons. Chaque capteur en plus c'est une source de désaccord à arbitrer, pas une source d'info supplémentaire. Sensor fusion artisanale = dette technique permanente. Problème numéro deux, la bitter lesson de Rich Sutton : scaler le compute sur une seule modalité bat systématiquement les architectures bricolées à la main. Tesla a dropé le radar, puis les ultrasons, est passé full end-to-end vision. Leur courbe sur les edge cases s'est accélérée APRÈS, pas avant. Waymo fait l'inverse et reste stuck en ops géofencée. Problème numéro trois, le plus fondamental : le LIDAR voit la géométrie, pas la sémantique. Il sait qu'il y a un truc, pas ce que c'est ni ce que ça va faire. Les derniers 9 de fiabilité sont des problèmes de cognition, pas de perception brute. Un capteur de plus résout rien, il ajoute du bruit. Sébastien Loeb balance une 208 T16 à 180 dans un chemin boueux corse sous la pluie avec zéro LIDAR. Deux yeux, un cerveau. L'évolution a donné des yeux aux prédateurs pendant 500 millions d'années, pas des lasers. Il y a une raison. Le LIDAR c'est l'équivalent du marxisme appliqué à l'économie. Une solution planifiée, centralisée, qui prétend modéliser explicitement ce qui doit émerger d'un système distribué et adaptatif. Tu remplaces l'intelligence par de la mesure, la compréhension par de la donnée, l'émergence par le contrôle. Ça rassure les ingénieurs qui veulent tout spécifier en amont, exactement comme la planif rassurait les économistes soviétiques. Et ça échoue pour les mêmes raisons : la réalité est trop riche pour être capturée par un capteur, comme elle est trop riche pour être capturée par un plan quinquennal. La vraie intelligence, celle de Hayek comme celle de Tesla, c'est de faire confiance à un système qui apprend de l'expérience plutôt que de tout pré-encoder. L'élégance d'une solution c'est son rapport signal sur complexité. Le LIDAR explose le dénominateur. Défendre le LIDAR en 2026 c'est préférer empiler des hacks plutôt que résoudre le vrai problème. C'est de la feignasserie intellectuelle maquillée en rigueur d'ingénieur. Les mêmes gens qui défendaient les systèmes experts en 2012 contre le deep learning. Ils finiront pareil. Never bet against end-to-end. Never bet against la simplicité. Never bet against Elon.

English
2.9K
9.2K
90.7K
28.3M
Krishna
Krishna@karunanysa13·
@elonmusk Oh I thought why is it looking so weird ? the back part is yet to be constructed 😂
English
1
0
8
990